What's new in 5.11 (2011-Dec-12 11:05):

*) hotspot - fixed https login (broken in v5.9);
*) eoip: swap tunnel id bytes to be compatible with previous versions;
*) eoip,gre: fix setting config

What's new in 5.10 (2011-Dec-09 11:49):

*) snmp - provide extended interface statistics when availabe;
*) dhcpv6 client - use link-scoped multicast address;
*) dhcp client - renew dhcp lease on ethernet link up event;
*) ipv6 gre tunnel added (/interface gre6) supports ip and ipv6 encapsulation;
*) ip gre tunnel supports ipv6 encapsulation;
*) allow setting bigger trafflow cache;
*) improved RB1200 stability when using ether9,ether10;
*) fixed RB1200 stability issues when using crypto hardware acceleration;

http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros-mipsbe-5.11.npk
http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros-mipsle-5.11.npk
http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros-powerpc-5.11.npk
http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros-x86-5.11.npk

why is the torrent not workig

why is the torrent not workig

what is not working exactly? a lot of others are downloading it with no issues, we can see the many transfers in our tracker.

I still have problem useing eoip tunnel between 4.17 and 5.11

RB433 from 5.9 to 5.11 successfully upgraded.

Hi Normis, 2 x86 Core PC/RouterOS with 5.10 are rebooting frequently...
Downgraded to 5.8 and problem solved...

v5.11 do something with that?

Thanks and Regards!

I still have problem useing eoip tunnel between 4.17 and 5.11

What boards you have on both ends?
Could you make a support output file from both of them and send to support@mikrotik.com

2 updates in the last week and no fix for the metarouter interface enumeration problem?

I still have problem useing eoip tunnel between 4.17 and 5.11

What boards you have on both ends?
Could you make a support output file from both of them and send to support@mikrotik.com

I will send it to support team eoip tunnel is very important to me.

2 updates in the last week and no fix for the metarouter interface enumeration problem?

Are you sure? Did you test, or are you just commenting the changelog?

I did an upgrade from 4.13 to 5.11, and manually installed the user-manager, reboot, then CPU load is 100% and user-manager not working. I see in the profiler, user-manger taking more than 90% cpu usage. So I've disabled it, and now all wireless/hotspot client can't connect.

Any suggestions?

MrKimbo

I did an upgrade from 4.13 to 5.11, and manually installed the user-manager, reboot, then CPU load is 100% and user-manager not working. I see in the profiler, user-manger taking more than 90% cpu usage. So I've disabled it, and now all wireless/hotspot client can't connect.
Any suggestions?

Answer depends on package you had before upgrade,
- v4.x usermanager-test, there should not be any problems with upgrade from v4.x to v5.x;
- v4.x usermanager, in some cases there could be problems, and it is easier to start new configuration, if you want to avoid manual reconfiguration of profiles and users.

Please make new post in User Manager section for questions about User Manager!

Since the user-manager is not installed by default, so I installed it manually using the file "user-manager-4.13-mipsbe.npk" which is extracted from "all_packages-mipsbe-4.13.zip". So, what should I do? Is there any better solution than resetting the ROS to default and reconfigure all again?

When user-manager from 5.11 installed, it's hard to do anything, cpu load is 100% and winbox become very slow respond. Tried to clear the user-manager database also doesn't works, it said timed-out or something.

I did an upgrade from 4.13 to 5.11, and manually installed the user-manager, reboot, then CPU load is 100% and user-manager not working. I see in the profiler, user-manger taking more than 90% cpu usage. So I've disabled it, and now all wireless/hotspot client can't connect.

Any suggestions?

Did you wait long enough? It takes a while for the database to convert/rebuilt. In the meantime the cpu load will be high. I had trouble upgrading from 5.8 to 5.9. I havn't tried 5.11 yet. Maybe you shuld try 5.8?

Before upgrading - make sure there are no special characters("-+%€öäå" etc) in profile names, router names etc. and the upgrade will be smother

RGDS

Hello,

Did you wait long enough? It takes a while for the database to convert/rebuilt. In the meantime the cpu load will be high.

Yes, i thought it so. Have been waiting for more than half an hour but still no different.

Before upgrading - make sure there are no special characters("-+%€öäå" etc) in profile names, router names etc. and the upgrade will be smother

I already make sure, there's no non-alphabets char.

Hello,

Did you wait long enough? It takes a while for the database to convert/rebuilt. In the meantime the cpu load will be high.

Yes, i thought it so. Have been waiting for more than half an hour but still no different.

Before upgrading - make sure there are no special characters("-+%€öäå" etc) in profile names, router names etc. and the upgrade will be smother

I already make sure, there's no non-alphabets char.

Just some ideas:

1. If you see both "flash" and "userman" in profile with high % - the chance is its still trying to convert. Maybe using an other RB or x86 with more memory will
do it better...

2. What about trying 4.17 with userman test-package. Run, rebuild and then update to ROS 5....

I've upgraded RB751 from 5.10 to 5.11 and it was strange then - rebooting immediately after connecting any cable (from empty switch too) to any of switched ports 2-5. Counter "Total Sector Writes" was erased. I saved config and supout file, then tried to reset configuration using jumper - it was all right then, after loading configuration as well.

I've upgraded RB751 from 5.10 to 5.11 and it was strange then - rebooting immediately after connecting any cable (from empty switch too) to any of switched ports 2-5. Counter "Total Sector Writes" was erased. I saved config and supout file, then tried to reset configuration using jumper - it was all right then, after loading configuration as well.

what did you see in the log file after the the reboot?any auto support output file generated?

what did you see in the log file after the the reboot?any auto support output file generated?

There was something about not proper shutdown in the log file, but I didn't see any supout file. I have supout before crash - I saved it (using ether1 - only port without problems), then connected cable to other port, router crashed immediately and was not able to boot until cable was removed. I can send the supout if it could help to avoid similar behaviour in the future.

Hi Normis, 2 x86 Core PC/RouterOS with 5.10 are rebooting frequently...
Downgraded to 5.8 and problem solved...

v5.11 do something with that?

Thanks and Regards!

+1
Upgrade X86 Core router from 5.7 to 5.11 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.9 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.8 - problem solved

nothing was changed in this area, so I can't see why X86 would reboot on v5.11 and not on v5.8

nothing was changed in this area, so I can't see why X86 would reboot on v5.11 and not on v5.8

Hi Normis!

I have a simular issue - see Ticket#2011113066000083

RGDS
Jörgen

2 updates in the last week and no fix for the metarouter interface enumeration problem?

metarouter interface naming will be fixed in 5.12.

Issue since v5.9 on Routerboard 750.

Packets not being recorded for masquerading on a out PPPOE interface.

what did you see in the log file after the the reboot?any auto support output file generated?

There was something about not proper shutdown in the log file, but I didn't see any supout file. I have supout before crash - I saved it (using ether1 - only port without problems), then connected cable to other port, router crashed immediately and was not able to boot until cable was removed. I can send the supout if it could help to avoid similar behaviour in the future.

Unfortunately, router crashed again now - I was using it today since morning lightly, then I started to transfer some data at full speed and router rebooted and cannot boot now when the cable is connected There is no automatic support output file, I've created one and I am going to send it to support.

what did you see in the log file after the the reboot?any auto support output file generated?

There was something about not proper shutdown in the log file, but I didn't see any supout file. I have supout before crash - I saved it (using ether1 - only port without problems), then connected cable to other port, router crashed immediately and was not able to boot until cable was removed. I can send the supout if it could help to avoid similar behaviour in the future.

Unfortunately, router crashed again now - I was using it today since morning lightly, then I started to transfer some data at full speed and router rebooted and cannot boot now when the cable is connected There is no automatic support output file, I've created one and I am going to send it to support.

what power supply you are using, the same that came with the box?
Do you have some usb device connected?
Do you have different power supply to test out?

what power supply you are using, the same that came with the box?

yes

Do you have some usb device connected?

no, but I have external antenna connected
EDIT: I've tried to remove it now, but it is still restarting when the cable is connected

Do you have different power supply to test out?

yes, I will try on Friday.. I have two RB751, I may try to load the same configuration to it, too

I asked for this 2 years ago, and support basically told me too bad, they said it would be a useless feature and was not needed.

nothing was changed in this area, so I can't see why X86 would reboot on v5.11 and not on v5.8

If you do not know, you expect from us? but in my experience 5.8 is the most stable x86 version...

In many others PowerPC Core Router and Core Switches the 5.11 is wonderful.

Best regards,

Upgraded a RB1200 running ospf, vlans , pppoe and a few eoip tunnels no known issues at this time traffic usually under 20 Mbps will report back if needed. Previous version was 5.7

Hey All,
Reporting having to downgrade to v5.9 - main towers are connected but stop passing traffic after 4-8 hours.
Rod

Hey All,
Reporting having to downgrade to v5.9 - main towers are connected but stop passing traffic after 4-8 hours.
Rod

Hi rodneal, can you explain more your question? type, rb, cards, protocols, voltage, etc...

I have testing at 2 days and not having problems in PtP links with v5.11, NV2, RB4xx and RB333, XR5 and R52Hn in MIMO.

Thx and regards!

Update from 4.17 to 5.11 went fine.

User-Manager is still working, old account still here but with a default configuration so I'll have to import some more datas by myself. Not a problem.
Just had a look to the new userman webpage, because I'm using my own application to generate voucher and manage my hotspots.
So you changed the credit part to something called profile, with limitation and profile-limitation to bind them all. Too bad we can't assign to a unique user a specific download limitation without generating a new profile.

Anyway, and because I'm using my own application to generate voucher and manage my hotspots, I need to understand how the new User-Manager is working...
I can't understand how you link Users to Profiles.

tl;dr:
How to bind a user to a profile using console/api in the last UserManager.


Cordialy,

daita.

Is possible the transfer speed can bites the microwave ASAP?

Hello

I trying to ugrade RouterOS from 5.8 to 5.11 on my RB12000 with no succes . When I copy RouterOS-powerpc-5.11.npk file to file folder of RB1200 then suddenly at size of 31,4Kb transfered file , transfer fail , and Router disconect from port . RB1200 is brand new with 2.37 FW .

Is there anything wrong with this release ?

try FTP

mikrotik could not achieve maximum bandwidth throughput by accessing Rb450G from LAN if using windows machine (7 pro sp1 64bit) (30KBps to 1Mps range only, mostly below 1MBps).

funny thing, after tested from ubuntu machine (11.10 desktop x86) the thoughput went through 6MBps!

the router eth0 is Gigabit, so is the client (windows and ubuntu). is there known limitation/compatibility for mikrotik and windows bandwidth throughput?

mikrotik could not achieve maximum bandwidth throughput by accessing Rb450G from LAN if using windows machine (7 pro sp1 64bit) (30KBps to 1Mps range only, mostly below 1MBps).

funny thing, after tested from ubuntu machine (11.10 desktop x86) the thoughput went through 6MBps!

the router eth0 is Gigabit, so is the client (windows and ubuntu). is there known limitation/compatibility for mikrotik and windows bandwidth throughput?

how did you test? what data was transferred, how, and from where to where?

Hi! I upgrade from 5.6 my RB450G (mrtg) and RB750 to 5.11 And now I Cant configure ip address and gateway through setup command. (
Sorry for bad eng.

zzipper, thank you very much for the report! We will try to fix the problem.

Glad to help! When approximately will fix?

zzipper, wait for the upcoming versions (most likely 5.12). Now you need to use /ip address as alternative solution.

Hi Normis, 2 x86 Core PC/RouterOS with 5.10 are rebooting frequently...
Downgraded to 5.8 and problem solved...

v5.11 do something with that?

Thanks and Regards!

+1
Upgrade X86 Core router from 5.7 to 5.11 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.9 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.8 - problem solved

+1 ........ (Ticket#2011121666000143)

X86 with 5.11 (on Vmware) will crash frequently with nothing on the log......
downgrading to 5.8 solves the problem...

mikrotik could not achieve maximum bandwidth throughput by accessing Rb450G from LAN if using windows machine (7 pro sp1 64bit) (30KBps to 1Mps range only, mostly below 1MBps).

funny thing, after tested from ubuntu machine (11.10 desktop x86) the thoughput went through 6MBps!

the router eth0 is Gigabit, so is the client (windows and ubuntu). is there known limitation/compatibility for mikrotik and windows bandwidth throughput?

how did you test? what data was transferred, how, and from where to where?

Mikrotik RB450G on 4.17 or 5.11 eth0 >> 192.168.1.1
Mikrotik RB450G on 4.17 or 5.11 eth1 >> 10.125.1.1

Ubuntu 11.10 Server 64Bit >> 192.168.1.2
Client Windows 7 Pro SP1 64Bit >> 192.168.1.3
Client Ubuntu 11.10 Desktop 32Bit >> 192.168.1.4

i NAT the public address to port 80 on private address and download a file from web server on LAN using the NAT public address with Firefox. Firefox on Windows only put 1MBps on average, rarely burst to 3MBps. Firefox on Ubuntu put 6MBps on average, sometimes burst over 7MBps.

in torch, there are two connections, 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.1, and 192.168.1.3/192.168.1.4 to 10.125.1.1 with both produced almost the same throughput in transfer and receive respectively. the data being downloaded was AMD Catalyst driver 11.12 (104MB).

i tried to FTP to the router uploaded and downloaded the routeros upgrade npk and it only puts 150KBps max.

if i bypassed and downloaded directly from 192.168.1.2, both browser downloaded 26-60MBps. only if the client is set with public DNS who translated the domain into its public ip address than the throughput went down badly like it was being limited by mikrotik and i see the mikrotik cpu usage went up to 100%.

to avoid this kind of situation, i added a static DNS on mikrotik to translate the domain into its own private address in LAN. but if someone is using public DNS (OpenDNS, or GoogleDNS) inside the LAN, than their browsing experience is compromised by bandwidth limitation.

i've tried to turn off all mangle, filter, and queue, except NAT, still the problem exists. i haven't had the time to try on other routerboard though. i guess i have another rb450 (the older brother), will test on it and let you know later next week or two.

Hi Normis, 2 x86 Core PC/RouterOS with 5.10 are rebooting frequently...
Downgraded to 5.8 and problem solved...

v5.11 do something with that?

Thanks and Regards!

+1
Upgrade X86 Core router from 5.7 to 5.11 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.9 - rebooting frequently...
Downgaded to 5.8 - problem solved

+1 ........ (Ticket#2011121666000143)

X86 with 5.11 (on Vmware) will crash frequently with nothing on the log......
downgrading to 5.8 solves the problem...

+1 here for X86, too. It does not reboot, it just hangs. Needs hard reset. Didn't test 5.9 and 5.10, jumped from 5.8 to 5.11

sigxcpu, MichelePietravalle, nik247, Alessio

looks like there is something in common between all your routers. none of our test devices has crashed, we even have some running in our live network.

it's possible you all four use the same feature or function. can you all describe your configured settings in a few words? what did you all configure? do you have queues, tunnels, some specific feature?

You have the supout for my configuration, that is:
- 13 EoIP tunnel to centralize hotspot system
- 5 bridges collecting 5 groups of eoip tunnel
- 5 hotspot servers listening on the 5 bridges
- PPTP + OVPN server with 5-6 active connections
- mangle based on addess lists
- quee tree with pcq queue for hotspot users
- radius client for hotspot auth
- OSPF with only 1 neighbour
- dude server (4.0beta3) used as agent for another dude server

thanks,

Michele Pietravalle

perfect! can the others with crashing x86 post a list like that please?

x86 reboot when use multi CPU (V5.9 y V5.10) (server hp proliant dl360 g3)

700 user simple queue
1x LAN (dhcp)
1XWAN 256 public IP (50M upload / 50M download)
QoS using Queue Tree

Hey Normis,

after tweaking and testing around, it seems on my windows machine, the ipv6 is enabled, while on ubuntu the ipv6 is disabled on purpose.

i can confirm that login to winbox and torch to see the throughput really hurts own machine LAN performance to the the Mikrotik.

by exiting winbox and do the test again on windows, finally i am able to achieve 400KB-600KBps, and 1.14MBps (9Mbps! woohoo!) by using downthemall plugin

just my two cents,


chrone

Hi Normis, i have reboots in 2 IBM Servers with Intel Xeon and Core 2 Duo and 4Gb RAM each...

1) Core Router balancing manually by subnetting and routing 8 WANs in 1 Trunk Ethernet by VLANs generated by a RB1100 like Core switch, with around 120Mb of Internet.
_Simple Mangle rules and QoS in Queue Tree
_Little firewall protection doing forward limits of Netbios traffic, TCP connections, AntiSPAM, etc

2) Similar PC with similar configuration by in the other side, at 120km with the same Switch doing the VLANs and controlling around 3000 users with pppoe.

Regards!

Mt 5.11 anyone have problem with high ping 5-20mls on RB1200 on eth9 and eth10

mikrotik could not achieve maximum bandwidth throughput by accessing Rb450G from LAN if using windows machine (7 pro sp1 64bit) (30KBps to 1Mps range only, mostly below 1MBps).

funny thing, after tested from ubuntu machine (11.10 desktop x86) the thoughput went through 6MBps!

the router eth0 is Gigabit, so is the client (windows and ubuntu). is there known limitation/compatibility for mikrotik and windows bandwidth throughput?

how did you test? what data was transferred, how, and from where to where?

forget what i said earlier, i know the culprit is the cpu was somehow set to 100mhz after upgrading from 4.17 to 5.10 and then 5.11. that's why it took down throughput when running winbox.

i just tested download a file from a private server through a nat public ip on rb450g, the download speeded up to 10MBps ~ 100Mbps. now that's a huge bump! woohoo!

I have 2 Routerboard 1100AH upgrade to v.5.11 and every day crash

x86 reboot when use multi CPU (V5.9 )
Intel Core 2 duo 2,6GHz
2x Intel 82576 Gigabit Network Connection
1x Intel 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
1x Marvell 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller
1x RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller
Chipset 82801I (ICH9 Family)
Hard drive SATA 80GB WD

500 user simple queue
2x LAN, one use DHCP
3x WAN, 512 public IP 2x WAN using BGP
logging traffic on port 80

sigxcpu, MichelePietravalle, nik247, Alessio

looks like there is something in common between all your routers. none of our test devices has crashed, we even have some running in our live network.

it's possible you all four use the same feature or function. can you all describe your configured settings in a few words? what did you all configure? do you have queues, tunnels, some specific feature?

- queue trees (8 in queues, 8 out queues)
- 2 BGP sessions (same AS number "internet" and "national" traffic)
- 2 VLANs
- 1 IPIP Tunnel (that seldom has traffic)
- DNS forwarding active
- DHCP server
- 2 X Marvell Gigabit (skge driver) - was RTL8169, same behaviour
- Core2Duo E6300 downclocked to 1.4GHz, 1GB RAM


I cannot provide a supout for the crash because it just hangs.

*) dhcp client - renew dhcp lease on ethernet link up event;

What does this mean? The dhcp-client request new IP etc. after ethernet link up event?
Or dhcp-server reset "Expires After" time of client?

Either way, if you have an issue with the Ethernet port (port flap! Either virtual or real...) the dhcp-client is re-requesting or the dhcp-server is resetting timer every time again?
I don't know if I am so happy with that, and I don't know if the router is happy with all that extra work....... can I switch this off?

I have 2 Routerboard 1100AH upgrade to v.5.11 and every day crash

And i found new feature!

After kernel panic reboot has the RB decided to change CPUs frequency from 680MHz to 100MHz ........... very nice
It takes 6mins to reboot it to correct 680MHz frequency

Hello!
Faced with the device RB450G that after you upgrade from version 4.17 to any version 5.8-5.11 is the performance drop by 2-3 times (at the 4.17 rate was about 200 megabits, but now more than 50 does not rise, due to the 100% CPU usage)
It is also sometimes result in an error of the kernel.
What can follow any responses to advise, if I had to re-create all the rules, after resetting all settings.

-----------------

Здравствуйте!
Столкнулся с проблемой в устройстве RB450G что после обновления с версии 4.17 на любую из версий 5.9-5.11 происходит падение производительности в 2-3 раза (на 4.17 скорость была около 200 мегабит, теперь же выше 50 не поднимается, в связи со 100% загрузкой процессора).
Так же иногда появляются ошибки ядра.
Что можите посоветовать, если я уже заново создавал все правила, после сброса всех настроек.

Hello!
Faced with the device RB450G that after you upgrade from version 4.17 to any version 5.9-5.11 is the performance drop by 2-3 times (at the 4.17 rate was about 200 megabits, but now more than 50 does not rise, due to the 100% CPU usage)
It is also sometimes result in an error of the kernel.
What can follow any responses to advise, if I had to re-create all the rules, after resetting all settings.

i guess you are experiencing the same symptom with me. take a look at system resource, check the cpu frequency, i hope it's not 100Mhz.

you could set the frequency back to its normal value via command line if it happens to be set 100Mhz after the upgrade. or through the gui in winbox on the routeros 5.x version. don't forget to upgrade your firmware too.

I have 2 Routerboard 1100AH upgrade to v.5.11 and every day crash

The same thing, x86 platform - router was rebooted without proper shutdown, at least two times in 24h. It was working perfectly until ver. 5.8. After upgrade to 5.9 - 5.10 - 5.11, rebooting continue constantly... Supout.rif file sent to the support.

nothing was changed in this area, so I can't see why X86 would reboot on v5.11 and not on v5.8

Problem with my x86 - After 4 days of the upgrade to v5.11 my HP Proliant ML110 G6 core server is stopped and frozen as well as with earlier version v5.7. Just press on the reset has helped to start server again..

crash on x86 platform

hardware:
GIGABYTE GA-H61M-S2V-B3
Core i5 2500 @ 3.3Ghz
Transcend JetFlash 500 2GB
Intel® PRO/1000 CT Gigabit Desktop Adapter * 3ps
int. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller

4 Ethernet adapters
4 EoIP
4 IPIP
19 VLAN
350 online pptp whith RADIUS
DNS (32 statics, allow remote requests, 131072 cache)
Firewall (filter, src-nat and masq, mangle, 8 adress-list)
OSPF (4 area)
Queues Tree (2 tree global-out 0f 20 records (pcq))

happy give more information

i guess you are experiencing the same symptom with me. take a look at system resource, check the cpu frequency, i hope it's not 100Mhz.

you could set the frequency back to its normal value via command line if it happens to be set 100Mhz after the upgrade. or through the gui in winbox on the routeros 5.x version. don't forget to upgrade your firmware too.

No, like the frequency has not changed.

i guess you are experiencing the same symptom with me. take a look at system resource, check the cpu frequency, i hope it's not 100Mhz.

you could set the frequency back to its normal value via command line if it happens to be set 100Mhz after the upgrade. or through the gui in winbox on the routeros 5.x version. don't forget to upgrade your firmware too.

No, like the frequency has not changed.

oh okay, so the cpu frequency has nothing to do with your lower throughput. ever tried to disable all firewall rules and test it out temporarily?

oh okay, so the cpu frequency has nothing to do with your lower throughput. ever tried to disable all firewall rules and test it out temporarily?

Yes, tried on the number of rules does not.
Load is increased if a NAT is ~ 4900 packets per second.
Or activated via IPTV IGMP Proxy (flow rate of ~ 3,7-7Mbit / sec).

After Upgrade From 4.11 To 5.11
Route Reboot Every 1 Hours, Or Stop Working
Installed X86 Version On PC With Dual Core CPU

clear the configuration and recreate it step by step. after all that is mayor version upgrade that is not done to initial version of major release.

sigxcpu, MichelePietravalle, nik247, Alessio

looks like there is something in common between all your routers. none of our test devices has crashed, we even have some running in our live network.

it's possible you all four use the same feature or function. can you all describe your configured settings in a few words? what did you all configure? do you have queues, tunnels, some specific feature?

Hi Normis.

1) No BGP
2) PPtP server + 8 PPPoE servers
3) online up to 580 users (pptp and pppoe)
4) Only simple queues - no QueueTree
5) No bridge
6) 59 VLANs

HW - Dell 1950 (2CPU*2CORE=4CORE) + LAN Pci-E Intel 82576 (2 ports)

Upgrade to 5.11 was in 2:00 of night and server worked about 10 hours without reboots, but when load was increase (pptp and pppoe active) server start to reboot every 20-30 minutes. One core CORE was 100%|100%.
This left on disconnected winbox.
#sys resource cpu print interval=1
CPU LOAD IRQ DISK
0 100% 100% 0%
1 3% 3% 0%
2 3% 3% 0%
3 5% 5% 0%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

After downgrade from 5.11 to 5.8 uptime now - 5d 22h (no any reboot)
I think it's problem with ppp and multi-core.

Thanks.
Nikolay.

clear the configuration and recreate it step by step. after all that is mayor version upgrade that is not done to initial version of major release.

an export and a new import can be good or i really need to recreate the conf????

sorry Janisk, but a reconfiguration of the routre after an upgrad is crazy in a real enviroment!

I have same problem with reboot and stop working...
ros 5.11 x86, mpls, pptp server, dhcp server, ospf, vlans, wireless
system- Asus p5gc, dual core 2,7ghz, 512ram, cf1gb>sata
problem started at version 5.9
My other system have problem too ... ros 5.11 on vmware esxi, 1cpu pptp server... v5.8 working well

sigxcpu, MichelePietravalle, nik247, Alessio

looks like there is something in common between all your routers. none of our test devices has crashed, we even have some running in our live network.

it's possible you all four use the same feature or function. can you all describe your configured settings in a few words? what did you all configure? do you have queues, tunnels, some specific feature?

it seems the problem is related to vlans . right ?

i have not vlan!

hi,
i have problem with RB600 and latest fw (5.9, 5.11)
after RB600 update winbox shows all available routerboards (clients) with same IP as RB600 (dhcp server)
ohh not all, clients connected thru lan ports shows with correct ip,
but clients connected thru wifi shows same ip as RB600 server. (and these clients have probs with connection then)
when downgraded RB600 to 5.8 all ok..
do i have some wrong setting which are not sensible in fw 5.8 and eralier ?
thanxx brad

I updated two RB 411A:
First: 4.17 to 5.11
Second: 5.4 to 5.11
All two RBs never started after update ((

X86 on vmware with 5.11 hangs only on our multicore machine (3 cpu). Works for about 8 hours then just hangs. I reset it in vmware, and i am good to go for 8 hours. Downgraded to 5.8 to see if it will help.

On two others with 1 core and 2 core it works fine.

I used hotspot on 750G with ros 5.11 in a workshop for a ISP engineers, I assigned Router IP(v4) address in walled garden and walled garden IP as (allow), but when openning the userman page the '411 page not found error' was appeared, by disabling Hotspot the userman page opened successfully. downgrade to 5.10 fixed this issue.

My RB750 upgraded successfully,It works well till now.
But I found a warnning message in the system logs.
"System rebooted because of kernel failure"
Every time I start or reboot the router,It's always in the first line of the logs.
Is this a prompt bug or a serious proplem?

Are you sure the routerOS will up in first try?
isn't there any auto reboot when you turn the router on?

My RB750 upgraded successfully,It works well till now.
But I found a warnning message in the system logs.
"System rebooted because of kernel failure"
Every time I start or reboot the router,It's always in the first line of the logs.
Is this a prompt bug or a serious proplem?

My RB750. ROS version 5.11. firmware 2.37.

NO issue. all works very well.

Check your 'System/Logging' settings.
For critical error like 'System rebooted because of kernel failure' two actions are defined: 'memory' and 'echo'.
By default 'echo' action has 'Save' option turned on, so even old critical errors are displayed after every reboot.

HTH,

Hi,
i have a 2 ogmaconnect router now running on 5.8, both have x86 multicore (quad and dual).
is th 5.11 now multicore compatible?

I just have the live-system and can not risk longer outages..

thanks for info.

br Daniel

the main question: what's not working in 5.8 for you?..

good question!
I am quite happy with the 5.8 but nevertheless there are a few bugfixes especially for eoip an ppp, which are important topics to me.

br

5.9, 5.10 rebooting frequently...or sometimes its get's hang
shifted back to 5.8 :/

8core processor with 4gb ram x86

pppoe
firewall
DNS
queues
radius
UM
graphing

5 packages installed
advanced-tools
ppp
security
system
user-manager

I have two PC Intel 4 core with V5.11 and same configuration:
firewall
DNS
queues
OSPF
BGP
API
and 60Mb Wan
Periodically reboot

If I disable queues, all OK

If install V5.8 with queues enable, all OK

Had 5.11 lock up on an esxi VM after about 2 days. A reset brought it back up, and its been up for just over 6 days. ONLY change made was for all logs to go to disk instead of memory or console, so I could catch what was in the logs before the next lock up.

Config:

2 vCPU's (xeon e5420)
1GB vRAM
80GB vDisk thin provisioned
2 legacy network interfaces (e1000) for WAN and LAN
Fairly basic firewall rules (approx 50)
Blacklist chain added that inspects against an address-list with approximately 400 ip's/address spaces - dynamically updated nightly
Packet mangling (approx 30)
Queue tree with approx 10 branches
3 continuous SSTP connections to 3 remote RB750gl's (have issue with SSTP stop passing traffic, which I'll post in another topic - a net watch script works around this)
No dhcp client or server
Combination of dstnat/srcnat and simple routing of 1 private space and 2 public spaces on LAN
SNMP enabled and monitored using a Mikrotik template through a Cacti server every 5 minutes

Other than the SSTP issue, everything has been stable.

i have upgrade my X86 from 5.7 to 5.11 but the problem that its keep hang up and stop running untill i reboot it , i have downgrade it to 5.7 and its back stable ,, please be noted to fix it in 5.12


Thanks

Also downgraded back to 5.9 on a RB-800 as the PPPoE server and client options in the interface disappeared. (firmware 2.24 - did not try with 2.30)

On the other RB-400s and RB-600s 5.11 is fine.

Hi,

After upgrade the v4.16 to 5.11 one of our router get hanged two times within 3days.

Which is used for only queueing in bridge mode with 150Mb bandwidth & having near 100 no queue.

Router is 2282 Model.

Could you give me stable version 5.X(npk file) so I coul downgrade...

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:BED4005315D9DFB36D4D7CDC267F5CE90DACCDCD&dn=routeros-5.8&tr=http%3a//tracker.mikrotik.com/
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:79B0BE7AABBDA58CF23A2455C558391C4CDE8E5D&dn=routeros-5.9&tr=http%3a//tracker.mikrotik.com/

L2tp VPN inbound on multiple ISPs issue exist still in v5.11 ?
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Same reboot problem on two different systems for 5.11:

Quad AMD vs Intel I7 2600
Both have same set of features:
Most important: VRRP, BGP, QoS, VLANS, Queue Management, Firewall, Bridging, Bonding, Multi-CPU on.

I7 is primary, AMD is backup so it is not used as much. I7 was rebooting every 2 minutes, AMD rebooted twice in 24h.

Also, on AMD when upgraded from 5.8 to 5.11 one of the VLANS switched the attached interface to another disabled interface which had nothing to do with the original interface the VLAN was attached to.

Also, as a side note, will there be any support for more than 2GB of RAM in the system and more than 200 networks available in /routing bgp network ? These two features I belive are very important, as we're currently running 12 BGP full table peers and are planning on a lot more for multi-cpu systems.

Thanks,

I've run into an issue tonight where I couldn't log in to my x86 v5.11 router with my configured username and password. I had deleted the "admin" user at initial setup but the router sometime in the last 24 hours decided to remove my username from the users list and reactivate the default admin user. This had the unfortunate side effect of letting someone unknown to me log in to my router early this morning via SSH which was configured to allow logins from anywhere, unlike every other service which is locked down. Fortunately, this person didn't appear to have changed anything. After setting things back (with a new password just in case my password was compromised) the system returned back to only having the default admin user in it within minutes of me changing the config several times. Also, looking at the license of the router shows no license. /sys lic print literally just prints a couple returns and back to a prompt. The loaded license was a level 5.

Motherboard: SuperMicro X9SCL
CPU: Intel Xeon E1220 quad-core no hyperthreading
Memory: 8 GB
onboard NIC 1: Intel 82579LM (not supported yet by ROS)
onboard NIC 2: Intel 82574L
PCI-E NIC 1: Intel 82574L
Boot disk: USB flash drive - 8GB

Just FYI.

Ryan Wilkins

@rwilkins
This really sounds like someone hacked into the system and installed a backdoor.
After all ROS on x86(and all other plattforms) is Linux based and so exploits might work like on any other Linux based system.

Un-stable version 5-11.

We are facing issue with Mikrotik with PPTP tunnels. We have core-2-duo machine but they could not handle more than 800 pptp tunnels, even we replaced xeon machine 8 core processor. finally We requested MT support to help us. As per their recomendedation we upgrade 5-11 to core-2-duo machine. After upgrading machine cpu was very high...

What About Userman ...

Its Still Have Problems ..

5-11 reboot after 12 hours, See the performance difference between 4.17 with 5.11

I'm sorry mikrotik support, I wrote "internal server error" for my android. but with browser opera version 11.50 build ADR-1111101157 work fine anytime . by the way in usermanager "userman - show overall totals, show user totals if user has more than one entry" like changelog 5.7 did'nt work;
that's just info, thx

I'm sorry mikrotik support, I wrote "internal server error" for my android. but with browser opera version 11.50 build ADR-1111101157 work fine anytime . by the way in usermanager "userman - show overall totals, show user totals if user has more than one entry" like changelog 5.7 did'nt work;
that's just info, thx

ok
ok

I have 2 Routerboard 1100AH upgrade to v.5.11 and every day crash

I am seeing a similar problem and error messages ("system rebooted because of kernel failure"). I have a new RB450G which came with 5.2 installed. I upgraded to 5.11 and entered my configuration which is relatively simple. It has rebooted twice in the four days that I have had it. I also have a new RB493G with 5.11, albeit with a different configuration which has been fine so far. It appeared to generate a supout file so I'll send that to Mikrotik support.

Other observations:
1) Using winbox, my CPU frequency was showing as 100MHz although it didn't seem like the router was running slowly (I reset to 680MHz).
2) Using winbox, it listed nothing for current firmware, and 2.38 for upgrade firmware (I had already upgraded to 2.38). If I printed the firmware versions using CLI, the current firmware version correctly displayed.

It seems like others have been seeing similar symptoms on various RB versions. Any feedback yet from Mikrotik?

I've run into an issue tonight where I couldn't log in to my x86 v5.11 router with my configured username and password. I had deleted the "admin" user at initial setup but the router sometime in the last 24 hours decided to remove my username from the users list and reactivate the default admin user. This had the unfortunate side effect of letting someone unknown to me log in to my router early this morning via SSH which was configured to allow logins from anywhere, unlike every other service which is locked down. Fortunately, this person didn't appear to have changed anything. After setting things back (with a new password just in case my password was compromised) the system returned back to only having the default admin user in it within minutes of me changing the config several times. Also, looking at the license of the router shows no license. /sys lic print literally just prints a couple returns and back to a prompt. The loaded license was a level 5.

it looks like RouterOS looses HDD (in my case, it's USB Flash, 8G too ) - either now, or a bit later you will find out that Files window is empty, and Terminal window hangs after opening. the only thing that will fix it is reboot; and the only problem - it should be hardware reboot, because on rebooting remotely (via WinBox) router will just hang

Is it so diffilcult for Microtik to write down release notes. For example that it is necesarry to update x86 pc's firmware before using new 5.x versions.
As support informed hdd of usb loses is due to old x86 pc's firmware.

it looks like RouterOS looses HDD (in my case, it's USB Flash, 8G too ) - either now, or a bit later you will find out that Files window is empty, and Terminal window hangs after opening. the only thing that will fix it is reboot; and the only problem - it should be hardware reboot, because on rebooting remotely (via WinBox) router will just hang

But why should accounts(/etc/passwd?) revert to old values? I would expect that all accounts would be rendered unusable in that case.

Is it so diffilcult for Microtik to write down release notes. For example that it is necesarry to update x86 pc's firmware before using new 5.x versions.
As support informed hdd of usb loses is due to old x86 pc's firmware.

why would it be in the release notes? this is a specific suggestion, just for your situation.

Please check "Re: v5.11 released" there are a lot of complains about misteriuos x86 craches and hangs. I had the same problem with three x86 routers - old firmware.

It would be a great help for admins to see release notes, because you can spot problems much faster then us.
Your operating router system is great, but using it becomes tricky because of unknown problems. And nobody comunicates it.

You can't blame MikroTik for buggy x86 BIOS and Firmware implementations!
And yes there are a lot of them.

aries, you are basically asking us to add information about problems in x86 system BIOS releases? Shouldn't you be looking at the BIOS release notes instead?

The problem is not in bios, problem is that you don't know what to expect installing new ros version. And it is called "stable".
Problems that affected me last lew months was problems with eoip, ssh, snmp, and x86 router hangings because of bios. The strange thing is that it was working well in previos versions like 4.17. Hangings started from 5.7 version or so.

And maybe there are over issuses that I don't know. Another problem is that after some bug fix you install new version, and it has new bugs, that don't have to do anything that is stated in change log like last eoip problem.

Best regards.

hi normis, when this problem crashes on x86 will be fixed?, im still waiting. maybe next 5.12?

I belive that the reboot problem lies in the support for multi-core/multi-cpu. We have downgraded from 5.11 to 5.8 and we always got "system,info,critical CRIT_: Disabled multi-cpu setting, new value will take effect after the reboot." messages in the console after the downgrade. Even days after the downgrade. Indeed, as someone else suggested in a previous reply, the system could not be rebooted remotely as it hanged.

What we did was we disabled multi-cpu, re-enabled it immediately after, we got "system,info,critical CRIT_: Enabled multi-cpu setting, new value will take effect after the reboot." in the logs, and then rebooted. That mysteriously fixed the problem and the after hangs.

I'm also having x86 latching up problems but on 5.7 (the device still works, but no interface is accessible until reboot). Actually I've got two systems, one running 5.7 and the other running 5.8 that will not update to 5.11 - perhaps I am doing something wrong or missed reading something somewhere.

my RouterOS x86 had 2 kernel panic crash this morning after upgraded to v5.11
so i decided to downgrade to v5.8

I want to upgrade from 5.7 to new version but it has serious crash/reset problems .

When a new stable version for x86 will be released ?

Hi,

After upgrading our 2 RB800 routerboards to v5.11,they started to reboot occasionally with error message System rebooted because of kernel failure,or they just hanged,so we needed to reboot them manually from power switch.

After downgrading the ROS to v5.9,the problem is solved 1d 14h. uptime with no errors.

*We never had other problems with these 2 RBs,untill now,the issue is probablly connected with the ROS.

so i'm not alone on this

anyway, before i upgraded to v5.11 on the main router, i had it tested on an unused RB750. suprisingly it doesn't crash at all, i keep it running for 24 hours. it has no any firewall rules added, it is on a clean default setting.

Quick update that we've had our x86 5.11 VM running flawlessly except for an SSTP problem for almost 2 weeks now.
The ONLY change made was to have ALL logs go to disk instead if memory. Could memory-based logging or overall memory allocation be the source of the problem?

so i'm not alone on this

anyway, before i upgraded to v5.11 on the main router, i had it tested on an unused RB750. suprisingly it doesn't crash at all, i keep it running for 24 hours. it has no any firewall rules added, it is on a clean default setting.

that's right. i forgot to mention,we are also running v5.11 on RB433AH with two R52Hn cards - no problems at all.

This problem is probablly common on powerpc models.

I have problem with 5.11 on x86 router with one CPU. router hung up 4 time. (CPU worked on 100% - VM statistic)
solution to the problems was:
disable "multi CPU"

I would like to mention the second router with 5.11 and two CPU works perfectly with enable "multi CPU"

reg.

Hi , can you explain more your question? type, rb, cards, protocols, voltage, etc...

I have testing at 2 days and not having problems in PtP links with v5.11, NV2, RB4xx and RB333, XR5 and R52Hn in MIMO.

Thx and regards!
http://updatesdaddy.com

I'm experiencing some issue with ssh/ssl traffic via SNAT/MASQ on my x86 5.11.
Cannot connect via ssh and all ssl pages opened with huge delay ...
Traffic which has no nat goes as it is expected.
Have anyone the same issue?

I'm disabling IpV6 package. Is that safety or that's not recommended?
Cheers.

mangust,

Mikrotik is having serious problems in the routing table.
If you use only to control the MikroTik PPPoE connections have no problems.
If you use the MikroTik with DNAT / SNAT - Firewall - ARP will have various problems of freezing or rebooting the system.

RB1000 use to control the PPPoE clients without problems.

I use Intel x86 PC to control the PPPoE clients without problems.

I use to control RB1200 routed customers have a lot of freezing and rebooting problems.

The team is aware of these problems with MikroTik routing but failed to solve.

Maybe the new kernel with version 6 ?

I use to control RB1200 routed customers have a lot of freezing and rebooting problems.

this may be unrelated to routing at all. RB1200 used to have some problems that were fixed in RouterBOOT and RouterOS upgrades. So, please upgrade RouterOS to v5.11 and then issue command :"/system routerboard upgrade" and reboot. After this, your problems will be gone.

this may be unrelated to routing at all.

Well, Is it safety to use 5.8 instead of 5.11 or it should not be any problem in NAT/Routing (BGP) in 5.11?

there are no known routing issues like that in v5.11
RB1200 issues are only fixed in v5.11 (+ latest bootloader) so you must upgrade anyway.

I can personally confirm that the latest RB1200 firmware included with 5.11 (2.37) resolved the rebooting issue.

Thank you,

I'd rather wait for a solution for all platforms

x86 routed still presents problems of freezing and rebooting

My equipment - RB1000 - RB1200 - RB600 - RB333 - RB433AH and several MikroTik x86 we are using version 5.7

When everything is right on all platforms exchanged for the most current version

Thanks again.

there is zero benefit in waiting for all platforms to be the same version. upgrade the ones where problems are fixed, or better yet - simply upgrade them all.

can you please update http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/RouterBOOT_changelog
for example RB433 now has RouterBoot v2.39 and on the web page there is still 2.37 as the last one described.
Thank you in advance!!

can you please update http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/RouterBOOT_changelog
for example RB433 now has RouterBoot v2.39 and on the web page there is still 2.37 as the last one described.
Thank you in advance!!

there are no public changes. added support for unannounced products.

can you please update http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/RouterBOOT_changelog
for example RB433 now has RouterBoot v2.39 and on the web page there is still 2.37 as the last one described.
Thank you in advance!!

there are no public changes. added support for unannounced products.

...

"No public changes" means "changes"... useless changes for actual users but still potentially dangerous changes by definition.
So why release it in the first place?

I can't understand MT release policy at all.

added support for unannounced products.

whats unclear about this sentence? you wanted us to publish the names of future products in a changelog?

x86, ROS5.11.
Am I only the one who cant use packet sniffer?
I mean packet sniffer shows nothing for me than i am tring to start it

added support for unannounced products.

whats unclear about this sentence? you wanted us to publish the names of future products in a changelog?

I think, he wanted to say "Why do you release firmware for unreleased hardware?"

When using RB751U-2HnD with software 5.11 are frequent hangs and reboot the device for downloading torrents at speeds above 40 Mbps.
I use two uplink pppoe (5 Mbps) and pptp (100 Mbps), masquerading, load balancing using PCC.
At version 5.8, this configuration is stable.

there are no public changes. added support for unannounced products.

Thank you normis on your fast reply!!
May I ask, why then, for example, for RB4XX last version is 2.39 and for RB7XX last one is 2.38 and both are mipsbe?

If anyone is experiencing crashes with X86 systems, please email us a photo of the crash (on the monitor) and the supout.rif file. This applies especially to those of you who said that downgrade helps!

i wish i had taken a photo of it, but i didn't. i can't help you at this moment too, as my clients are gonna kill me if i have another crash again. i had too much crashes + electrical problem + wireless signal interference + cable replacements on BTS + firmware upgrading / downgrading, and all these happened on this january . they had too much problem from me

When we last had our x86 box crash, it was responding to pings but not forwarding any traffic. Console was completely black. Pressing any keys didn't change that, so can't help with a screenshot.

Been up just fine for over 2 weeks now.

Have problems with X86 crashing on VMware 4.1 I have several of these running on exactly the same hareware platform the ones running 5.8 or earlier have no problems 5.11 is crashing at random I did not have any problem for 2 weeks then I added some mangle rules and pcq queing and a few days later it starts crashing at random intervals.

Experiencing random reboots on x86 with 5.11. We have several PPPoE B-RAS`es based on MT... Planning to downgrade to 5.10 maybe earlier.

Does the Mikrotik support team localize the problem in 5.11 yet?

added support for unannounced products.

whats unclear about this sentence? you wanted us to publish the names of future products in a changelog?

I think, he wanted to say "Why do you release firmware for unreleased hardware?"

Exactly.

same CPU family, same firmware. maybe you haven't noticed, but firmware is not divided by model, but by CPU

Sorry for bothering... But does support have any update on problem with 5.11 running x86 system?

Sorry for bothering... But does support have any update on problem with 5.11 running x86 system?

we have no reports in support. only complaints in forum. please make photo of crash, and send to support with supout.rif file. also tell us last version where it worked fine.

come on, to be honest, the mikrotik staff cannot reproduce the problem of crash v.5.11 on x86? i had reported and then send suppout file, from v.5.9, v.5.10, and then last 5.11. still have the same problem, back to the v.5.8 and run flawlessly.
please check my ticket. Ticket#2011120766000133. Dec 7, 2011 17:42

siprox in your ticket you don't give us any information. we need at least photo of the crash output on the monitor

siprox in your ticket you don't give us any information. we need at least photo of the crash output on the monitor

We have only remote devices, no monitors or anything... But we have console connections to our mikrotik B-RASes. On consoles we have nothing. Like common reboot... How to get any debug output, kernel oops...or anything? Maybe some kind of netconsole?

i didn't photo on that condition, just see black screen, keyboard not working.

i can tell you that mine is not just black screen. there's a lot of error message on the screen, and somewhat i clearly remember that the last words are "kernel panic".

After upgrading RB1100AH from 5.8 to 5.11 I have large latency spikes 5-20 ms across bridged VLAN's on port 11/12, previously latency was 0-1 ms.

I am using the RouterBoard as a transparent firewall at my network edge, bridging 4 VLAN's through 4 bridges on port 11/12.

Attached is an screenshot of the latency spikes before and after the upgrade from our network monitoring.

i can tell you that mine is not just black screen. there's a lot of error message on the screen, and somewhat i clearly remember that the last words are "kernel panic".

Dear friends!

Kernel panics or black screens... No matter. All that things are very bad. Double trouble is that developers do nothing for now and we have no any debug output or anything. I think that photos of the monitor output is not a professional way.

We need some patch or something like patch to troubleshoot the problem.

Hello Guys... Im new here...I started to work in a School and they have Mikrotik 4.11....

So i want to upgrade.. but when I do it??? It will reset all the configuration??


Thank you Any help will be aprreciated

This release may be still got some bug.

After I upgrade from 5.7, my company found the network delay change to so big.

The traffic show very big.

This release may be still got some bug.

After I upgrade from 5.7, my company found the network delay change to so big.

The traffic show very big.

error.jpg

On wire or radio? And do you facing reboots?

After upgrading RB1100AH from 5.8 to 5.11 I have large latency spikes 5-20 ms across bridged VLAN's on port 11/12, previously latency was 0-1 ms.

I am using the RouterBoard as a transparent firewall at my network edge, bridging 4 VLAN's through 4 bridges on port 11/12.

Attached is an screenshot of the latency spikes before and after the upgrade from our network monitoring.

Wow! Weird... Do you have strange reboots or hangs?

Hello Guys... Im new here...I started to work in a School and they have Mikrotik 4.11....

So i want to upgrade.. but when I do it??? It will reset all the configuration??


Thank you Any help will be aprreciated

If it works, do not upgrade. If zou reallz want to upgrade go to 4.17. If zoy really need something in 5.xx upgrade to 5.4, but only if you really must.

Upgrade will usually keep configuration intact but in newere versions there is increased probability that config will be messed up, so beackup both binary and command mode before upgrade.

Hello Guys... Im new here...I started to work in a School and they have Mikrotik 4.11....

So i want to upgrade.. but when I do it??? It will reset all the configuration??


Thank you Any help will be aprreciated

If it works, do not upgrade. If zou reallz want to upgrade go to 4.17. If zoy really need something in 5.xx upgrade to 5.4, but only if you really must.

Upgrade will usually keep configuration intact but in newere versions there is increased probability that config will be messed up, so beackup both binary and command mode before upgrade.

Thanks for the info. But we have big troubles with bras`es on x86 with 5.11 software. Spontaneous reboots. Nothing helps... I wonder, does this problem exists on 5.10 or 5.9?

来自中国ros001 我现在用3.30 挺稳定的，满足了日常运用 不过考虑升级 不知道 升了之后还稳定吗 ？

Hello Guys... Im new here...I started to work in a School and they have Mikrotik 4.11....

So i want to upgrade.. but when I do it??? It will reset all the configuration??


Thank you Any help will be aprreciated

If it works, do not upgrade. If zou reallz want to upgrade go to 4.17. If zoy really need something in 5.xx upgrade to 5.4, but only if you really must.

Upgrade will usually keep configuration intact but in newere versions there is increased probability that config will be messed up, so beackup both binary and command mode before upgrade.

Thanks for the info. But we have big troubles with bras`es on x86 with 5.11 software. Spontaneous reboots. Nothing helps... I wonder, does this problem exists on 5.10 or 5.9?

i had experiencing randomly reboots on version 5.9, 5.10, 5.11 to. all that same. back to 5.8 and then normal again.

I have sent 2 e-mail's with the supout.rif and no reply there is nothing to screen shot the console is black

Are you using PPP or PCQ on those problematic routers ?

we have made a pre-release version with a potential fix for x86 reboots. email support to gėt it.

after 5 hours form the update seems to be ok! but i will wait 24h before enjoy me

we have made a pre-release version with a potential fix for x86 reboots. email support to gėt it.

So whats up with the latency issue, and why havent you pulled the release, as clearly it is not stable?

we have made a pre-release version with a potential fix for x86 reboots. email support to gėt it.

So whats up with the latency issue, and why havent you pulled the release, as clearly it is not stable?

what latency issue? the x86 issue that I mentioned, affects only specific configurations. we only have received 3-4 complaints to support, and maybe 5-6 in the forums (clearly 2-3 people have no interest in reporting the issue to support)

we have made a pre-release version with a potential fix for x86 reboots. email support to gėt it.

So whats up with the latency issue, and why havent you pulled the release, as clearly it is not stable?

what latency issue? the x86 issue that I mentioned, affects only specific configurations. we only have received 3-4 complaints to support, and maybe 5-6 in the forums (clearly 2-3 people have no interest in reporting the issue to support)

This one http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 22#p299214

(Also there are about two other posts in this thread talking about high latency after upgrading).

What info do you want me to send to support?

problem description, supout.rif file, screenshot of issue

I have a few RB1200 with 5.7 after I update to 5.11 I have strange lost packet, ping for this machine is not stable and sometimes RB is freeze,
on this machines I use pppoe (client) and very simple quee tree with quee type = pfifo

hola, heactualizado una SXT 5HnD a la version 5.12 y despues de reiniciar no puedo acceder por winbox de ninguna manera no me aparece la mac

anyone tested v5.12? on x86?

Guys,
Anybody found his x86 v5.xx crashes fixed?