Hi there

Are there any plans to include PVST+ (or MSTP) as an option for Bridges?
While it is an option to create a separate bridge for each VLAN and enable RSTP,
this pretty much sucks when you have to bridge more then a couple of VLANs.

Then again... I don't see how a Bridge would know about all the VLANs contained in the stuff that is being bridged.
So, there would need to be an option to give a list of VLAN IDs for which a STP instance should be created for

Well, that is just a shot in the wild blue since there is a dedicated SwOS line of devices and even these dont have PVST+ as far as I know...

Any comments on that?

Multiple Spanning Tree is a better solution IMO.

Well, actually i dont care at all which one of those techniques is implemented
As long as there is any possibility for multiple STP instances on one bridge, I am happy.

I think you'll need a hardware switch to do this. Router OS is a good router, but the switch part is quite poor compared to entry level managed switches.


MSTP is more a switch function. With a hardware switch, you will get wire speed for level 2 functions. (even for bonding, meshing). Router OS is not able to do hardware Meshing or Bonding. This is a serious handicap for serious switching...

On a hardware switch you will get as well 802.1x, Provider Backbone Bridge or other level 2 functions you will not have with Linux based distributions like Router OS before a couple years at best.


Use each product for what he has been designed, or you will be disapointed.

Hi!

Several years later, still I'm wondering wether PVST+ is supported in RouterOS.
Can anyone clarify?

Hello,

MSTP would be nice and easy to use and should provide even better position on the market.

-NetworkPro

Wondering about this myself with some issues I am having between catalyst and ROS RSTP.

Honestly an SDN Layer that abstracts this crap would be preferably nowadays.

Vendor 1 supports 1 thing and didn't really document it, vendor 2 supports another - I do not want to waste time with shitty configurations of shitty implementations of shitty standards.

I have a packet flow from few servers to few firewalls that I want 100% connectivity with instant fail-over and instant fail-back. And I want to configure this in a nice HTML5 Web GUI by dragging with the mouse.

Not CLI and Not WinBox and definitely not getting a PHD or CCNP in STP RSTP MSTP loop protection vendor 1 loop protection vendor 2 native vlans, trunks, etc etc. why waste my time ?



Make an SDN controller that works with other vendors gear by doing a bit of reverse engineering and a lot of testing and put Web interface on it. Forget CLI and forget CCNP.

In case people haven't noticed yet, changes are afoot as of 6.40rc29 to bring MSTP to RouterOS. I noticed it in the release candidate channel firmware at 6.41rc11 (cli-only mode currently).

See the link below for the only reference to it on the Wiki:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... _Filtering