What's new in 6.0rc10 (2013-Feb-15 10:47):

HotSpot server requires "address-list" configured to work properly

*) ppp - added bridge-path-cost & bridge-port-priority to ppp profiles;
*) ppp - made RSTP work over ppp links as well;
*) ppp - added last-logged-out to ppp secrets;
*) ppp - made MRRU work propererly on CCR;
*) hotspot, ppp - support multiple address-lists;
*) fixed problem - could not format disks larger than 2Gb on CCR;
*) fixed problem - repartitioning flash second time made system unbootable;
*) fixed problem - partition fall back settings got corrupted;
*) fixed problem - package made for other architectures could be installed,
making whole system non functioning;
*) sstp, ipsec - respect CRLs;
*) certificates - for certificates marked as trusted=yes,
CRL will be automaticly updated once in hour from http sources;
*) fixed ppp family interfaces - show it's status (bug introduced in rc8);
*) fixed p2p, connection-bytes firewall matcher;
*) fixed ip firewall nat action=same;

Upgrade includes several stability improvements for Cloud Core Routers.

http://www.mikrotik.com/download

congratulations for the people of mikrotik.
You guys always bring improvements to routeros, a sign that you mean it with us
Thank you for your efforts, I appreciate that

*) hotspot, ppp - support multiple address-lists;

wow! AFAIR, I was talking about this on some EU MUM in '10 or '11 - it's time to pack up my back pack for Zagreb and generate new ideas

how should RADIUS send several address-lists to the router? as separate value pairs of the same name?

RB433UAH (power 24V 2A)

RouterOS + MetaROUTER (opendchub,web server) > uptime 3h KO!,destroy,broken,died, no work proxy, >> reboot OK

warning on download page: Hotspot not working

Is it a bug in RC10 or hotspot is not implemented in v.6 RC at all? I've started to upgrade routers from 5.x to 6rc9 except those with hotspot function. I had a plan to upgrade them with 6rc10, but now I see that will not work.

warning on download page: Hotspot not working

Is it a bug in RC10 or hotspot is not implemented in v.6 RC at all? I've started to upgrade routers from 5.x to 6rc9 except those with hotspot function. I had a plan to upgrade them with 6rc10, but now I see that will not work.

I thing it is bug in rc10. In rc9 hotspot works

*) hotspot, ppp - support multiple address-lists;

*) fixed p2p, connection-bytes firewall matcher;

What is the option of multiple address-lists in hotspot and ppp? How can it be used?

I thought that the p2p matcher was somehow abandoned since the complicated nature of nowadays p2p clients.
What has been improved in here? (I doubt encrypted p2p connections are matched)

This is what I get after performing upgrade on my RB493G:
I cannot connect to the services that are marked invalid.

now pre-relased ??

it was "relased" a fer hours ago.

mikrotik ?

I need help, I need the quues tree functions, global out, and in global, and global total, however do not have the RC9?, in version 5.22 has my works normal full cache without them without full cache.

but where is the 6rc10 files in the download page?

but where is the 6rc10 files in the download page?

There is only main package (.npk) now, marked as "pre-release". It seems like RC10 was canceled because of some issues, so we should wait.

I've upgraded my RB493G without any problems, maybe I'm lucky one

but where is the 6rc10 files in the download page?

http://www.mikrotik.com/download - bottom of page

to MT:

Just wondering ... how many rc versions can we expect before final 6.0 comes out? 10? 20? 30? ... is there any timeline by when final version should be released or will this rcXX go on and on and on and on and on and on and on ....

yes, I could be described as impatient but anyway... keep up the good work adding new features (EIGRP please) and removing the bugs from ROS 5 and 6.

Got a link for that boot file again? Haven't put it on yet. Ta.

*) sstp, ipsec - respect CRLs;
*) certificates - for certificates marked as trusted=yes,
CRL will be automaticly updated once in hour from http sources;

Great, checking CRL was a must that many of us were waiting for.

What is the option of multiple address-lists in hotspot and ppp? How can it be used?

for example, you set some general traffic limit for all clients, but few of them are allowed/disallowed to use some resources - and you set it via one more address list

I need help, I need the quues tree functions, global out, and in global, and global total, however do not have the RC9?, in version 5.22 has my works normal full cache without them without full cache.

in v6, there's only 'global' parent, use it (they said, it was 'global-total' in v5, but, as far as I remember, there were some corrections later, so probably now it's what was 'global-out' previously)

help check

@rafaeltdk
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Packet_Fl ... outerOS_v6

HTH,

sorry, and very complex for me, I could not understand, and I need help before it was too simple, it was so choose now to do everything, and unfeasible for me, personal mikrotik any idea when we'll V6 in the Global out and in and total?

In RouterOS ver. 6.x 'global-in' and 'global-out' were replaced by 'global', hence link to packet flow diagram.
Just compare differences between ROS 5.x and 6.x.

HTH,

ok great so grateful, however I am not an expert on mikrotik someone could help me? give access to mikrotik.

nevermind fixed it.

complicated, nobody's ruling mikrotik, I see that the forum not only help each other, I bought this CCR to update my network however I have to leave it in a corner and thrown back to x86 due to lack of this function can not use the full cache my network, mikrotik need of parent: global in global and out, or something to do the same, if possible post a rule, thanks.
friend only global not working for me.

try to use simple queue it will work ...

Where is PPP package?

Where is PPP package?

I do have it there (but not using).

The previous version was 6.0rc9 updated by pressing the button "Check for Updates"
What am I doing wrong?

And now as to add additional package PPP?

The previous version was 6.0rc9 updated by pressing the button "Check for Updates"

Me too - everything was ok on RB493G and a pair of SXT 5HPnD.

What am I doing wrong?

Nothing - you did it right, but there was probably something wrong in RoS update system. Or maybe - what about "Free HDD space"? You use some extra packages and maybe there was not enough free space... Hmmm, your system says it has 512 MiB HDD? I don't have RB433AH, but I thought all of RB433xx have 64 MiB (as my RB433).

Try to delete unnecessary files, download main package (http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... .0rc10.npk) manually, then press System -> Packages -> Downgrade.

hello,

since release .10, openvpn server @ rb2011 isnt working anymore.

ive already cleaned my certificates, renewed them and so on..

my mac client ( /w tunnelblick ) always says:


TCP connection established with [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef]
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,WAIT,,,
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,AUTH,,,
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TLS: Initial packet from [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194, sid=3448459d 8f8f6847
2013-02-16 17:36:25 *Tunnelblick: Disconnecting; 'disconnect' button pressed
2013-02-16 17:36:25 *Tunnelblick: Disconnecting using 'killall'
2013-02-16 17:36:25 event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
2013-02-16 17:36:25 SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,EXITING,SIGTERM,,

no one has pressed the disconnect button

my next step will be downgrading to rc .9

any ideas ?

cheers

rafaeltdk, just use 'global' instead of 'global-out'

Overall tried, however the simple quues not let pass the speed quue tree, would be a bug?

After 2 days of uptime I get many TX DROPS on all ports.. what it means? on 1036

When I reboot router.. TX drops are 0

I get this always after 2-3 days on all RC versions. When drops starts.. Its about 20-30 tx drops / s

This is what I get after performing upgrade on my RB493G:

Code: Select all

[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> print
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid
 #   NAME                                      PORT ADDRESS                                                                         CERTIFICATE
 0   telnet                                      23
 1   ftp                                         21
 2 X www                                         80
 3 I ssh                                         22
 4 X www-ssl                                    443                                                                                 none
 5 X api                                       8728
 6 I winbox                                    8291
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> enable www
error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> enable winbox
error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)

I cannot connect to the services that are marked invalid.

Same problem for me. I got a supout just haven't had time to send it. I switched back to my rc9 partition.

This is what I get after performing upgrade on my RB493G:

Code: Select all

[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> print
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid
 #   NAME                                      PORT ADDRESS                                                                         CERTIFICATE
 0   telnet                                      23
 1   ftp                                         21
 2 X www                                         80
 3 I ssh                                         22
 4 X www-ssl                                    443                                                                                 none
 5 X api                                       8728
 6 I winbox                                    8291
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> enable www
error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)
[admin@MikroTik] /ip service> enable winbox
error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)

I cannot connect to the services that are marked invalid.

Same problem for me. I got a supout just haven't had time to send it. I switched back to my rc9 partition.

I have this /ip service enable www procedure does not have any problems

The procedure itself isn't the problem. It is something wrong with the services. As you also see SSH is invalid.

It seems queues now work as intended. IE, bandwidth is correct.

How can i download All packages of RC10?

RB433UAH (power 24V 2A)

RouterOS + MetaROUTER (opendchub,web server) > uptime 3h KO!,destroy,broken,died, no work proxy, >> reboot OK

can you fgive any more details about configuration apart form what you have written (metarouter dies after 3 hour uptime)?

Hello.
First of all I want to thanks all of Mikrotik's staff - it is great work. Thanks!
I'm newbee in Microtik and RouterBOARD. Need your help.
I ve bought RB751G-2HnD - configure - all works - update up to v6rc10 - but have some troubles with http proxy from v5 until v6rc10.
All works - but when router has big loading (2-3 users with a lot of http queries) it goes into reboot. In logs I see only:
jan/02/1970 03:01:16 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shutdown by watchdog timer
Thats all. If want some more logs or switch on loglevel - please give link where I can read how to make it - I will attach all data to find the issue and make RouterOS better.

RB433UAH (power 24V 2A)

RouterOS + MetaROUTER (opendchub,web server) > uptime 3h KO!,destroy,broken,died, no work proxy, >> reboot OK

can you fgive any more details about configuration apart form what you have written (metarouter dies after 3 hour uptime)?

I already wrote here a few times

RouterOS + enable MetaROUTER >> random KO RouterOS routerboard,frost services RouterOS (MetaROUTER still functional) = unusable
RouterOS + down inactive MetaROUTER >> quite reliable, problems are not

I already wrote here a few times

RouterOS + enable MetaROUTER >> random KO RouterOS routerboard,frost services RouterOS (MetaROUTER still functional) = unusable
RouterOS + down inactive MetaROUTER >> quite reliable, problems are not

ok, on what router is this? i have tried on MIPS and PPC router and have no issues running it. Can you give any details on what exactly you are attempting to do. (Also what guest you are running, have you tried to run RouterOS)?

[quote="janisk"][quote="napismizpravu"]


????? it is written
opendchub,web server (no PHP,no MySQL) Lighttpd (currently trunk "openwrt-mr-mips-rootfs-31411-basic.tar.gz" http://openwrt.wk.cz/)

Overall tried, however the simple quues not let pass the speed quue tree, would be a bug?

sorry, I don't understand you. but as far as I remember, in v6 simple queues and queue tree are processed separately, so you cannot catch traffic in queue tree by simple queue

On RC10 I am having issues with hotspots not allowing users to authenticate. Seems to claim radius server problem even though I am not using an external radius server. I am also having issues with PPPoE server handing out IPv6. It does not seem to bind the correct /64 to the PPPoE session out of the /48 IPv6 pool I am using.

Just upgraded my RB333 to rc10: Both Ethernet ports 1 & 2 DISAPPEARED after "reset configuration", and aren't listed on interface list anymore

On RC10 I am having issues with hotspots not allowing users to authenticate. Seems to claim radius server problem even though I am not using an external radius server. I am also having issues with PPPoE server handing out IPv6. It does not seem to bind the correct /64 to the PPPoE session out of the /48 IPv6 pool I am using.

I think this is a known issue

from the downloads page: (hotspot not working) on all rc10 pre release downloads

Regards
Alexander

fixed p2p, connection-bytes firewall matcher (!)

Still doesnt work on CR10 CCR....

Have you got any ideas about my situation that I described some posts ago?
Thank you!

fixed p2p, connection-bytes firewall matcher (!)

Still doesnt work on CR10 CCR....

please write to support@mikrotik.com with support output file so we could check your configuration

Just upgraded my RB333 to rc10: Both Ethernet ports 1 & 2 DISAPPEARED after "reset configuration", and aren't listed on interface list anymore

did you make a support output file and sent it to support@mikrotik.com?

fixed p2p, connection-bytes firewall matcher (!)

Still doesnt work on CR10 CCR....

please write to support@mikrotik.com with support output file so we could check your configuration

And i stiil having troubles with NTP.
Ticket#2013021966000297

Thank you

I can't assign more LEDs to show signal level on SXT, RoS v6RC10: Is it a bug? This command is working on RC9 - but I don't know if the LEDs are really on. I'm sure it was working in ROS 5.x.

I can't assign more LEDs to show signal level on SXT, RoS v6RC10:

Code: Select all

/system leds add interface=wlan type=wireless-signal-strength leds=led1,led2,led3,led4,led5
failure: Maximum led group size reached, only one led per action available!

Is it a bug? This command is working on RC9 - but I don't know if the LEDs are really on. I'm sure it was working in ROS 5.x.

It is a bug, will be fixed in v6.0rc11.

hello,

since release .10, openvpn server @ rb2011 isnt working anymore.

ive already cleaned my certificates, renewed them and so on..

my mac client ( /w tunnelblick ) always says:


TCP connection established with [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef]
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,WAIT,,,
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,AUTH,,,
2013-02-16 17:36:25 TLS: Initial packet from [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:1194, sid=3448459d 8f8f6847
2013-02-16 17:36:25 *Tunnelblick: Disconnecting; 'disconnect' button pressed
2013-02-16 17:36:25 *Tunnelblick: Disconnecting using 'killall'
2013-02-16 17:36:25 event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
2013-02-16 17:36:25 SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
2013-02-16 17:36:25 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1361032585,EXITING,SIGTERM,,

no one has pressed the disconnect button

my next step will be downgrading to rc .9

any ideas ?

cheers

I can confirm openvpn does not work on rc10.

I believe this change was a major mistake:
everything related to cache server stopped and I've done everything without any hope only go back to OS 5.

neandero can you shed some details on what you have configured now and what exactly is the problem.

Ok, i show you my code, you make this work on os 6 and i will be ready to test it.
But please make sure you provide a working code not just to test, as you know i must stop all services to first upgrade the system and then implement your code. and if it didn't work i then must downgrade and recode it back..... you know all this is time related for every subscriber. !!!

thank you,

please bring back global in, and global out, etc., please, because I have the same problem related to that friend stopped my cache.

and if it didn't work i then must downgrade and recode it back..... you know all this is time related for every subscriber. !!!

use Backup functionality

do you use simple queues for limiting your customers? seems that it's the actual problem, not the 'global' itself: AFAIR, now Simple Queues and Queue Tree are separated and cannot affect each other. you need to create Simple queue for Cache traffic

p.s. describe your problems, do not make others to just guess it...

I have a RB751U-2HnD running NAT to a PPPoE Connection on v6rc10

After a while (say 5-6 Hours) the web server gets slow and starts to kick me out of the web interface all the time.
Then after a day or so the web server is not available at all. There is no excess memory usage. nothing in logs.

Winbox and ssh access work fine.

When I was running V5 on the router there was no problems at all and the web interface worked all the time.

There is the big problem after upgrading RouterOS rc9 to rc10.

All information (screenshots and support files) in the attached zip.

On rc10 after reboot some settings dissapeared.

Brige interface dissapeares, pridge ports dissapears, dhcp on bridge "LANs" settings stop working, ip on bridge "LANs" stops working AFTER REBOOT !!!

and if it didn't work i then must downgrade and recode it back..... you know all this is time related for every subscriber. !!!

use Backup functionality

do you use simple queues for limiting your customers? seems that it's the actual problem, not the 'global' itself: AFAIR, now Simple Queues and Queue Tree are separated and cannot affect each other. you need to create Simple queue for Cache traffic

p.s. describe your problems, do not make others to just guess it...

you are correct, I do use simple queues but using PCQ as its type! if global in and global out was eliminated should simple queue be unuseful at all?

p.s. describe your problems, do not make others to just guess it...

I just wish to follow every upgrade you guys make, but at this particular situation I am not able anymore!
either you guys have to do a rework, or i have to find a different route. either way a word must be said to make it noteable.

thanks,

"global-out" and "global-in" was merged into "global" for performance reasons.
Simple queue was moved to separate independent place just after "global" - this way eliminating century old problem of remembering that simple queues shared "global-in" and "global-out" with queue tree queues placed there, also adding back some of the functionality that might be lost because of "global-in" and "global-out" merger.

So if you had some complex queuing going - you should adjust to these changes.


In case of web-proxy - if you like to avoid limiting proxy traffic or place a separate limitation to it - just use mangle to capture that traffic and place a simple queue for that mark before your regular simple queues. in v6.x simple queues is still working in order, so if packet is captured by first queue it will not go to other queues.

In general QoS in v6.x is much more easy than it was in previous versions. especially when you have to explain it from zero.

Hello guys,

If the option change-mss is enabled on PPPoE profile the dynamic simple queue doesn't work properly.
The lab:

PPPoE-Server(Mikrotik x86) -> PPPoE-Client (Ubuntu Linux)
No radius, no usermanager.

We first established five connections with 10 Mbps each one (50 Mbps). Ok queue works great, so we put more five connections and the queue still working properly (100 Mbps), more five (150 Mbps)... still working... but after more five connections (200 Mbps), the traffic on the server was at 500+ Mbps.

Could you please check this?
Thank you very much!

Hello.

In 6rc10 is possible to add more than one Address List in ppp profile, but when i send same parameter from radius, string addresslist1,addresslist2 received as single word, that lead to adding one new address list with name "addresslist1,addresslist2"

There is debug log:

09:02:58 radius,debug,packet MT-Address-List = "addresslist1,addresslist2"

There is config print

5303 D addresslist1,addresslist2 10.0.130.97

Seems this is a bug?

Not happy - I purchased over 50 MT routers in the last 24 months and have been very happy. I sent a guy from the office to MUM in New Orleans and he was wowed by the new Cloud Core Routers. I purchased two of them for a large scale VPN solution and also 60 MT750GL routers. The CC-1036 came with RC6 and had tons of OVPN and certificate issues. The latest release still has the same problems - opens OPVN session for 20 seconds then drops. What am I to do? I've depended on and been happy with Mikrotik's until now - I'm stuck holding the bag for all of these devices until I can get it working?

With lack of UDP on OVPN and the money I have tied up right now I want to know when I can expect a functional CC and OVPN solution. I've even ordered a few Ubiquiti EdgeMax LITE routers just to see what else is out there.

Not happy - I purchased over 50 MT routers in the last 24 months and have been very happy. I sent a guy from the office to MUM in New Orleans and he was wowed by the new Cloud Core Routers. I purchased two of them for a large scale VPN solution and also 60 MT750GL routers. The CC-1036 came with RC6 and had tons of OVPN and certificate issues. The latest release still has the same problems - opens OPVN session for 20 seconds then drops. What am I to do? I've depended on and been happy with Mikrotik's until now - I'm stuck holding the bag for all of these devices until I can get it working?

With lack of UDP on OVPN and the money I have tied up right now I want to know when I can expect a functional CC and OVPN solution. I've even ordered a few Ubiquiti EdgeMax LITE routers just to see what else is out there.

You cant blame MT for using prereleased software.

Its sad that there is no stable RC version for 1036 ;(

Not happy - I purchased over 50 MT routers in the last 24 months and have been very happy. I sent a guy from the office to MUM in New Orleans and he was wowed by the new Cloud Core Routers. I purchased two of them for a large scale VPN solution and also 60 MT750GL routers. The CC-1036 came with RC6 and had tons of OVPN and certificate issues. The latest release still has the same problems - opens OPVN session for 20 seconds then drops. What am I to do? I've depended on and been happy with Mikrotik's until now - I'm stuck holding the bag for all of these devices until I can get it working?

With lack of UDP on OVPN and the money I have tied up right now I want to know when I can expect a functional CC and OVPN solution. I've even ordered a few Ubiquiti EdgeMax LITE routers just to see what else is out there.

You cant blame MT for using prereleased software.

I can blame them for releasing hardware that won't work WITH ANY OF THEIR SOFTWARE though. Thanks.

Not happy - I purchased over 50 MT routers in the last 24 months and have been very happy. I sent a guy from the office to MUM in New Orleans and he was wowed by the new Cloud Core Routers. I purchased two of them for a large scale VPN solution and also 60 MT750GL routers. The CC-1036 came with RC6 and had tons of OVPN and certificate issues. The latest release still has the same problems - opens OPVN session for 20 seconds then drops. What am I to do? I've depended on and been happy with Mikrotik's until now - I'm stuck holding the bag for all of these devices until I can get it working?

With lack of UDP on OVPN and the money I have tied up right now I want to know when I can expect a functional CC and OVPN solution. I've even ordered a few Ubiquiti EdgeMax LITE routers just to see what else is out there.

You cant blame MT for using prereleased software.

I can blame them for releasing hardware that won't work WITH ANY OF THEIR SOFTWARE though. Thanks.

Before I purchased our CCR1036 I knew very well that these were not for production environments and that the software was not release quality yet, having said that I too would like to see UDP in ovpn and more stability under heavy load on the CCR, this is by far the most powerful router MikroTik have made on a brand new hardware platform, it was never going to work perfectly 'out the box'. We need to support MikroTik while they work out all the bugs and increase stability and performance, so far I'm impressed with what I see. (except Ticket#2013012466000127 still no solution!).

Have you provided config, supout files and verbose logs (both ends) of the issue to MikroTik when the ovpn session drops?

Before I purchased our CCR1036 I knew very well that these were not for production environments and that the software was not release quality yet, having said that I too would like to see UDP in ovpn and more stability under heavy load on the CCR, this is by far the most powerful router MikroTik have made on a brand new hardware platform, it was never going to work perfectly 'out the box'. We need to support MikroTik while they work out all the bugs and increase stability and performance, so far I'm impressed with what I see. (except Ticket#2013012466000127 still no solution!).

Have you provided config, supout files and verbose logs (both ends) of the issue to MikroTik when the ovpn session drops?

I have done what I have been asked to do - saying we should "support them" doesn't mean I should pay and be their guinea pig on beta code for released hardware with my money. What would Juniper and Cisco do - sell hardware to the masses and then work on software afterwards??

How did you know the product wasn't for production environments? Did something in the product description tell you it wasn't ready for prime time?

Before I purchased our CCR1036 I knew very well that these were not for production environments and that the software was not release quality yet, having said that I too would like to see UDP in ovpn and more stability under heavy load on the CCR, this is by far the most powerful router MikroTik have made on a brand new hardware platform, it was never going to work perfectly 'out the box'. We need to support MikroTik while they work out all the bugs and increase stability and performance, so far I'm impressed with what I see. (except Ticket#2013012466000127 still no solution!).

Have you provided config, supout files and verbose logs (both ends) of the issue to MikroTik when the ovpn session drops?

I have done what I have been asked to do - saying we should "support them" doesn't mean I should pay and be their guinea pig on beta code for released hardware with my money. What would Juniper and Cisco do - sell hardware to the masses and then work on software afterwards??

How did you know the product wasn't for production environments? Did something in the product description tell you it wasn't ready for prime time?

It's written on the distributors website where I bought our CCR: "Please note that the CCRs run RouterOS 6 which is not fully released yet. It is not recommended to use the CCRs in production until it is fully released." I also read this forum so I was aware of many issues.

I have 5.24 in CCR

I have 5.24 in CCR

haha, how? =)

I moved the 60 second timer on the OVPN server config after upgrading to RC10 and now the sessions stay up past the 20 second timeout I was seeing earlier - clearly this is come sort of counter bug.

I hope they get this worked out - I really don't want to purchase some vendors "industrial PC" MT box and hope for the best. Later!

PUT UDP SUPPORT INTO ROUTEROS NOW NOW NOW!!!!

How did you know the product wasn't for production environments? Did something in the product description tell you it wasn't ready for prime time?

It's written on the distributors website where I bought our CCR: "Please note that the CCRs run RouterOS 6 which is not fully released yet. It is not recommended to use the CCRs in production until it is fully released." I also read this forum so I was aware of many issues.

The same is also on our own web site. And other distributors tell you the same too. The initially available batch (all units currently out there) are sold as "pre production testing batch"

I have 5.24 in CCR

Tell us how ?

not possible