Your temp is OK. If you can't see the fans, doesn't mean they are not there. They are inside the wind tunnel. If you open the case, you will see the tunnel. Don't they make any noise? Maybe try to load it, when CPU load increases, fans should get louder.CCR seems to have no rear fans? Is this normal
Normis did you have any eta for this ?RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
It is hard to say, but I think in February it will be available.Normis did you have any eta for this ?RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
Thanks to everyone at Mikrotik for working so hard on RouterOS 6.It is hard to say, but I think in February it will be available.Normis did you have any eta for this ?RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
Hi Normismoving configuration via backup files is not recommended, please use the new "/export compact file=name" function to reliably move config. I suggest you try that. Backup file is meant to be restored on the same device only.
Please send us a supout.rif file from your deviceThe first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
Sent to support.Please send us a supout.rif file from your deviceThe first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
Oleg, hello! Please tell me how you use your CCR? What services are using (NAT, firewall, BGP), and how much traffic passes through it?The first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
Hello. So far, the use as NAT, firewall, and queues. On average it from 200 to 300 users. Loading of 10%. Traffic is about 150 MB / s. But do not let some of the features which are stated above. On x86 i5 4 core RouteOS version 5 steeply from 400 to 500. The license will not allow it. CPU load of about 20%. Loading volume about 250-300 MB / s.Oleg, hello! Please tell me how you use your CCR? What services are using (NAT, firewall, BGP), and how much traffic passes through it?The first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
Олег, здравствуйте! Скажите пожалуйста, как вы используете Ваш CCR ? Какие сервисы используете(нат, файрвол, бгп) и какой объем трафика проходит через него?
Спасибо!
TodayWhen will RC8 testing begin?
where download RC8 ? thanksThe first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... 6.0rc8.npkwhere download RC8 ? thanksThe first thing he noticed when loading 100%. RC8.
install RC8 from the link above, and check again, if the problem persists, make a supout.rif file when the disconnections happen, and email it to support. we will check what happens, and if it's a pppoe problem or a CCR problem.hi normis
We bought a CCR 1016-12G, it have a few problems. It always restart twice a day and drops many pppoe connections during the day. we use v6.0 rc7 .do you know how can we fix these problems? thanks for help
and sorry for bad english:)
Hi!Does it means that CCR not suppurted jumbo frames?(
Summary aggregated traffic is 1 - 1.2 Gbit/sHi!Does it means that CCR not suppurted jumbo frames?(
How much traffic goes through CCR?
check for newer build, it is already resolved there. At least on linux witn wine-winbox it shows '%' sign correctly.I haven't put RC8 on the on our CCR yet, but I did put it on of my test routers and noticed that the percentage sign is gone from the CPU at the top of Winbox. I'm not even sure how I noticed it.
Are you using IP or MAC address in the Winbox ? Use IP.Hello,
I have CCR1036-12G-4S and I am testing it 3 weeks, installed RC6, RC7 and RC8 on it but one problem already exist. When I reboot, after a few hours I am trying to log in via winbox, I am in but there is no interfaces loaded. After reboot everything is back to normal, but after some hours when i log in again there is no interfaces. In IP-> Addresses it says addresses are on Unknown interface.
I have about 400 clients which are connected via PPPOE. I have 2 WAN's and I am doing load balancing with routing marks.
Other problem is related to clients with PPPOE connection. At random time there is clients dropping, random clients, random time. I noticed that there is pppoe client which status is Dynamic but NOT running and is connected. When i disconnect him, the next client which connect has the same status and hasn't internet connection 0 packets/bytes.
Last time when I tried to do supout file it failed.
Please help.
Thanks.
+1!Yes, I am using radius server. But previously I had an x86 machine with ROS 5.22 and it worked fine.
I have lurked far and long to acquire this for you. Treasure it with all you have:Hello !
Here there we has this sweet router of great imbaness CCR1036-12G-4S running 6.0rc7 in this nice production environment of ours. For our needs we see it as a good fit, ceiling cat is pleased. We can has this problem now - CCR stops responding to winbox, telnet or ssh after some while, thus we ordered them gnomes to reboot the device in the nite time when sun has went to sleepa and sane people too. Of course, while gnomes reboot it quietly and almost noone notices, I find no honor in such a reboot.
Anyone else experiencing such a thing ? I reads here about this 6.0rc8, maybe any goodie fix there ? Where can I acquire this rc8 ?
as far as I know RouterOS does not support MSDP. However if you configure your multicast network as IGMPv3 you can have IGMPv3 group joins for specific source. Maybe you could find this satisfactory.Does cloud core support MSDP? I don't find MSDP in cloud core v6.0rc7 :/
IGMPv3 isn't suitable for my soluton :/ Thank you for information.as far as I know RouterOS does not support MSDP. However if you configure your multicast network as IGMPv3 you can have IGMPv3 group joins for specific source. Maybe you could find this satisfactory.Does cloud core support MSDP? I don't find MSDP in cloud core v6.0rc7 :/
I might add that not only interfaces disappear in winbox, but in the terminals (telnet and ssh). This issue was raised long ago, and I even put out screenshots. But why is it still is not solved. Just stop working SNMP.+1!Yes, I am using radius server. But previously I had an x86 machine with ROS 5.22 and it worked fine.
At first i try to use CCR as NAS server and have the same problem... But i use PPTP connections in my network.
As soon as the number of VPN became more than 200-300 pc`s and traffic exceeded 200 Mbit/s the strange things began to happen...
In "Interfaces" is empty or shows only 10-15 tunnels of 200-300...
At random time there is clients dropping, random clients, random time too...
I use IP address in the Winbox...
Also tested web interface, same problem exist in webfix.I might add that not only interfaces disappear in winbox, but in the terminals (telnet and ssh). This issue was raised long ago, and I even put out screenshots. But why is it still is not solved. Just stop working SNMP.+1!Yes, I am using radius server. But previously I had an x86 machine with ROS 5.22 and it worked fine.
At first i try to use CCR as NAS server and have the same problem... But i use PPTP connections in my network.
As soon as the number of VPN became more than 200-300 pc`s and traffic exceeded 200 Mbit/s the strange things began to happen...
In "Interfaces" is empty or shows only 10-15 tunnels of 200-300...
At random time there is clients dropping, random clients, random time too...
I use IP address in the Winbox...
Our CCR1036-12G-4S also experiences random restarts...Hi all,
I have a strange issue with the CCR1036-12G-4S CloudCore ....
It just randomly restarts .... 9 times today. RouterOS v6.0rc7 And the logs does not say anything ... Any ideas how to debug that issue ? Can it be related to the traffic because there was no traffic Saturday and Sunday and it was OK, but today it started again.
If it gets the date correct in the log, it is probably one of the phantom reboot log messages. The router probably did not actually reboot. Unless, do the CCRs have an actual real time clock? That would be nice. I'm not lucky enough to have hands on with a CCR yet.jan/28 02:39:14 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shutdown
It's no effect:HTB "global" (similar to v5.x "global-in" and "global-out") doesn't know anything about Ethernet header, so it is not calculated into limit. You can use interface HTB - they know Ethernet header and takes in into account. Each packet +18 bytes (at least)
Done.Asket, please email support@mikrotik.com about Queue Tree problem with attached supout.rif file.
CCR does not have internal memory to save clock information, you have to configure NTP client on the router.Also, time and date is reset every time I reboot / upgrade router.
We eventually figured out the freezing side had not taken the RC8 upgrade (corrupt file upload) so we fixed that. The other side running RC8 has been fine since install, aside from the odd latency issue mentioned aboveHello savagedavid,
One side is now freezing up constantly.And what is with the other CCR? Is it running fine or there are also problems?This morning one of the CCR's is frozen.
Okay now my head just hurts!!I really think that we all should change the former thinking in my opinion,
because today we have 36 cpu cores and not only one or two cores! Am I right with this?
If the CPU load from the CCR is under 36% of total CPU load it will be shown as 0-1% of each core > 36% : 36 cores = 0%.
And now backwards please, if then all CPU cores are running perhaps on 5% of usage should that mean then, we have
5% x 36 cores = 180% and are the 80% then the benefit from this device, or have I done now a thinking false?
Because in normal terms and conditions you will only and even talk about 0% - 100% right?
No I get that. Maybe we give MikroTik a hard time too quickly! We always want the very latest features as soon as possible completely bug free. I guess you can choose any 2 of those options, but not all 3!Hello again savagedavid,
this is more related to the new hardware platform type from Tilera, but if they get it false free runningjust require a less buggy ROS release to take full advantage.
and other well known bugs and issues are also fixed, it must be a really cool device, i personally think.
Actually its freezing even in a DC environment with 20C ambient temp. The CPU temp never exceeded 54C (average over 4 days was 53.3C) and it still freezes. Even with the yesterday's version of RC8 it only lasted 16h and then died again. Temperature may be a factor, but not the main cause.I think I have tracked the problem down. Seems like the CCR's are much more sensitive to heat. The CPU temp was exceeding 75 degrees in the location it was installed (the RB1100AH did not seem to have a problem in the same location). Back in the DC it does not freeze at all. I am going to look at additional cooling, but perhaps MikroTik can modify the ROS software to have more aggressive fan activation/cooling for these units.
In case of overheating your CCR will reboot itself and have 1000Mhz, if still overheating another reboot and - 800Mhz, and so on until it reaches 200Mhz. I tried it to check how board is behaving when fan dies. As soon as you reboot it manually it goes back to 1200MhzI think I have tracked the problem down. Seems like the CCR's are much more sensitive to heat. The CPU temp was exceeding 75 degrees in the location it was installed (the RB1100AH did not seem to have a problem in the same location). Back in the DC it does not freeze at all. I am going to look at additional cooling, but perhaps MikroTik can modify the ROS software to have more aggressive fan activation/cooling for these units.
i wander how can you do this with ccr1036, could you please tell us? thanksDear Mikrotik employees,
if there is need I can give you read access to my CCR1036-12G-4S router. As I mentioned before it is working with about 6k users so you can see how does it handle that load. If you think that access to my router can help you to improve RouterOS you are more than welcome to contact me.
I was talking about the CCR1036, but im quite sure the 1016 has also two power sockets. But he would see it as soon as he opens the case.@beamerHi, is it possible to connect CCR1016-12G to 220V and PoE at the same time to achieve power redundancy in case the internal power supply dies? (Similar question was asked in this thread but not answered.)
Perhaps interesting for you? http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69422
Ok he was not telling around about witch CCR model he is talking about as I see it, but otherwise good to know, or?
Yes, simply set up a bridge and add the wanted ports.Hello, for everyone. I want know does CCR1036-12G-4S routerboard support interface grouping? If i want 4 ports work as switch ports. Thank You for answer.
We have your ticket, and are looking into this issue.Hi all,
We bought two CCR1036, both at about the same load and use the same function, but one of them has 21 days uptime (ros 6.0rc7), and another 3-4 times a day at random freezes(6.0rc7-8-9). at the time of freezing, we can not get access to the device through ssh \ telnet \ winbox, routing through the device works, but not consistently, and with a noticeable delay. the only thing we can do at this point, reboot it remotely through snmp. We mail a lot of supout files, but still have not received an answer to the question, what is the reason our problem, what we need to turn off the function to solve the problem temporarily.
We have [Ticket#2013020666001015]
with best regards
It depends on what configuration you have. Some features do use memory.Speaking of memory.
I've got a CCR running and the memory status has gone from 3734MiB to 2990.7 MiB in a matter of 3 days. Is this expected? Normal?
We have not specifically made ECC support, so I can't say. It might work, but it will certainly not use the ECC featuresHaha, super thanks for this hint normis!you can also use higher frequency for the DDR3 module, it it backwards compatible. So DDR3 DIMM with 1800MHz will also work,
But do they accept ECC/REG modules would it better to go with the normal S0DIMM?
For sure it is the first series and I would expect to much at first, but good to know which modules are
working "not" is also very welcome.
hi simpl3x,Hi all,
We bought two CCR1036, both at about the same load and use the same function, but one of them has 21 days uptime (ros 6.0rc7), and another 3-4 times a day at random freezes(6.0rc7-8-9). at the time of freezing, we can not get access to the device through ssh \ telnet \ winbox, routing through the device works, but not consistently, and with a noticeable delay. the only thing we can do at this point, reboot it remotely through snmp. We mail a lot of supout files, but still have not received an answer to the question, what is the reason our problem, what we need to turn off the function to solve the problem temporarily.
We have [Ticket#2013020666001015]
with best regards
Same problem. Router accessible only via mac-address (no ip). Problem starting with multiple ip addresses on one interface.Hello !
After upgrade to RC9, problem with Winbox still remains - after some time CCR stops responding to Winbox/telnet/SSH. There is extra info on this behavior: while all management access to router is gone, there are some interfaces and MAC adresses which DO respond to Winbox. Also, after few days of uptime, somehow router becomes accessible *again* with winbox/telnet/ssh thru any IP address it has.
Stop panic, guys... this issue IMHO not only RC9, ROSv6 and even CCR.Same problem. Router accessible only via mac-address (no ip). Problem starting with multiple ip addresses on one interface.After upgrade to RC9, problem with Winbox still remains - after some time CCR stops responding to Winbox/telnet/SSH. There is extra info on this behavior: while all management access to router is gone, there are some interfaces and MAC adresses which DO respond to Winbox. Also, after few days of uptime, somehow router becomes accessible *again* with winbox/telnet/ssh thru any IP address it has.
Before upgrade memory in CCR --> you can make memory test in any X86 machine.When is the RouterBOOT memory tester going to be implemented on the CCR-series ?
If we are going to upgrade the memory, we would like to be reasonably certain that the memory is 100% functional in the CCR before deploying it in a remote datacentre.
Ticket#2013021366000842Ansy, Bakula, Jetrider, please write to support with information how we could connect to your router with Winbox and test this.
replied. looks like issue is fixed in rc10Ticket#2013021366000842Ansy, Bakula, Jetrider, please write to support with information how we could connect to your router with Winbox and test this.
video + supout.rif + access to demo router
this problem Ticket#2013020666001015 fixed in rc10?replied. looks like issue is fixed in rc10Ticket#2013021366000842Ansy, Bakula, Jetrider, please write to support with information how we could connect to your router with Winbox and test this.
video + supout.rif + access to demo router
this problem Ticket#2013020666001015 fixed in rc10?[/quote]replied. looks like issue is fixed in rc10
thank you Normis, we already installed it 10 minutes ago(Feb/15/2013 10:47:45), your debug packet was deleted before it. we mail supout files if problem continueswe did find some significant issue and fixed it, please try todays build:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc10.npk
could you please write to a support@miktotik.com or if you already have done that write the ticket number so we could check?nothing has changed in rc10. 5-4 routing freezes and not available ssh\winbox services a day. maximum 11 hour uptime.
RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
Please contact support@mikrotik.com to get the newest RouterOS version which will help to solve this problem.Our test-CCR just died. No traffic, OSPF running.
Have to powercycle. RC9. Runtime 2 days.
Thank you, we already working on your ticket.hello,
please, check mail about [Ticket#2013020666001015], we have made access through rs232 port another mikrotik, and get supout.rif at the moment of freeze.
please update your support ticket with this information so we could check what is going on with that router.We had a complete freeze. No access with serial port. Have to RMA it.
normis wrote:
RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
Any timeframe on when this would be remedied?I don't know if it has been noted, but it doesn't seem that the UPS package is functional on the ccr with 6.0rc9.
bug report:
RC11
LCD info slideshow, fan & fan2 to 0 rpm....
Okay, maybe it's the device and not the ccr. I just assumed the ups package for the ccr needed some work.popcorrin, which port do you use for connecting UPS, serial0 or usb1?
usb1 should work without changes in existing configuration. (works for me on CCR with v6.0rc9)
serial0 by default is used by Console, it needs to be disabled in System -> Console menu. Also it might need Baud Rate change in System -> Ports.
Any news are welcome!RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
I tried the exact same device on an mipsbe platform and it seemed to work as expected which leads me to believe that it has something to do with the ccr. Anybody at mikrotik have a serial ups that they can test with?
Okay, maybe it's the device and not the ccr. I just assumed the ups package for the ccr needed some work.
The device is the ups-mt from http://tandem.ck.ua/ups_mtm-eng.php.
It is a serial device and I have disabled serial0 under the system>console menu.
The ccr doesn't even recognize it.
I have a ups-mt on a RB450G and it is recognized by the RB450G but it doesn't seem to be very accurate. Shows online when it is actually off line and incorrect voltages. I'm starting to get the impression that these devices aren't quite up to snuff.
I'll try to find time to test with a ups from some other manufacturer and report back.
normis wrote:
RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times.
VRRP, PPTP Server, Firewall (Layer 7 is not used), Queues,Traffic Flow, SNMP, Radius (login, ppp) . In my forgotten nothing.Oleg, what features do you use there?
They know about this.. I`m testing rc12 with changed ethernet driver buffer size, but is the same after 2-5 days uptime .. TX drops is showing up...Im having issues with TX drops on the Ethernet ports on the CCR1036-12G-3S. Changed cables still the same and there is no tx drops when connected to the old RB1100
RC12 has improvements for this issue. Try this version: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npkHi,
cisco 2901 replaced with CCR1016-12, updated to v6.0rc11, 3 nat rules, 2 firewall rules, only 3 ethernet ports connected,
around 50Mbits traffic, only TX Drops on ethenet ports. WOW!!!!
No packets dropped with old cisco.
when did you download rc12? it is being updated every 30 minutes or so. try newer.Normis,
RC12 causes router reboot when traffic reaches around 200MB. Log message says: "router was rebooted without proper shutdown".
I have one CCR1016 with 10 RB 751 plugged. When I btest from one RB 751 and traffic reaches 200MB the router reboot.
After new update I saw no changes. The problem remains...when did you download rc12? it is being updated every 30 minutes or so. try newer.Normis,
RC12 causes router reboot when traffic reaches around 200MB. Log message says: "router was rebooted without proper shutdown".
I have one CCR1016 with 10 RB 751 plugged. When I btest from one RB 751 and traffic reaches 200MB the router reboot.
latest build was 13 minutes ago (6.0rc12 (2013-Mar-06 15:17)
I guess the same issue rebooted my RB750UP in switch mode when passing much transit traffic in only one direction (but OK with another direction).Actually the problem is something about "management" process. I started test from 2 RBs 751 using direction=transmit and I saw no problem.
But when I started test from one RB 751 using direction=receiving "management" process reaches 6% on CCR1016 and after 90 seconds the router reboot.
Look like Btest causes memory leak on the CCR. Thanks! We will fix it.Normis,
Actually the problem is something about "management" process. I started test from 2 RBs 751 using direction=transmit and I saw no problem.
But when I started test from one RB 751 using direction=receiving "management" process reaches 6% on CCR1016 and after 90 seconds the router reboot.
we already fixed it, try new build (same link)Normis,
Maybe it is not...
Seems like the new ethernet buffer optimization for CCR is causing the problem. When I started best from CCR using direction=transmit and Local TX Speed=95Mbps test took 5 minutes and I saw no problem. When I changed Local TX Speed to 98Mbps the problem shows up!
Has any code been implemented in RC12 to help with some of all these issue? I still some cores (1 or 2) hit 100 percent with 400-600Mbits of traffic.RC12 will have significant speed speed increase for Queues on CCR
Yes, I don't think it's related to BGP. We run BGP on our CCR and I don't have such problems.It`s the wrong way to find problem... becouse I dont have BGP and I have problem always after 2-3 days TX drops..
I've pretty same opinion. 3 weeks of testing CCR in office, random restarts, failing updates, looking forward to have RTM version, but when? Two CCR waiting for installation with simple config (50 NAT, FW, VRRP, 3 active interfaces) but feeling the same fear of running web farm over them ... (reading posts above didn't make me feel better). We're thinking of switching to 1100Ahx :S I really want to use this shiny piece of HW!!!Hi, Mikrotik!
Where comments on the described problem? Exit to communicate with customers
I purchased a ССR1036, but in the real world I'm afraid to use it
Hi all,
@andrewe02000 - The latest RC12 builds can be downloaded from http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
I'm seeing the same thing with rc11 running on both the 1036 and the 2011. Thought it might be the sfp's so I ordered mikrotik sfp's and they behave exactly the same way. Plug in two 2011's connect and pass traffic. Remove sfp from one 2011 and place in 1036 and no connection seen by 2011. Power cycling after the modules are installed made no difference. No combination seemed to give me a link.I'm trying to setup the CCR1036-12G-4S using the SFP ports but no matter what settings (auto-neg on/off, fixed speeds and duplex, sfp-rate) or gbics I throw at the ports, I'm unable to get a link in the other end. The CCR seems to think it has a link but the other ends don't agree. I've tried this on rc6 and rc7. Plugging the gbic into an RB2011LS (with v5) and it links up correctly right away.
Any ideas of what could be wrong?
I think - yes U should.. Its new version from 12/03 .. I`m testing tooshould I test RC12 or wait?
Yes I agree with you. But it`s too slow to become real production. During MT tries to develop their CCR, Ubiquiti already launched many products such as AirFiber, AirEdge, New UniFi bla bla... I understand of course it is not easy to integrate new CPU (new architecture) with their new ROS. But guys... already past whole 1 year since MT announced the CCR.I think people are being a little impatient.
It is widely known that:
- The CCR is pre-production
- Not all parts of RouterOS are optimized for Tilera (particularly Routing and PPP)
- IPSEC is currently not accelerated on Cloud Core Router
Im being optimistic, but I would say within a few RC's the majority of the issues people are experiencing will be resolved.
and look how flexible and feature rich they areDuring MT tries to develop their CCR, Ubiquiti already launched many products such as AirFiber, AirEdge, New UniFi bla bla...
And check their forum, edge max light has more issues than the CCR and seems to be harder to get hold of.and look how flexible and feature rich they areDuring MT tries to develop their CCR, Ubiquiti already launched many products such as AirFiber, AirEdge, New UniFi bla bla...
They are completely different products for completely different markets.
at the moment CCR is not doing almost anything and is certainly less "feature rich".and look how flexible and feature rich they are
Andrew at what time do u download the upgrade? Becouse yesterday at 3pm (15.00) GMT+1 time there was a new build of rc12..Hi,
I have problems with my ccr1016 [Ticket#2013031166000479] . I've upgraded yesterday with latest rc12 but i observed that one cpu is 100 % (and others 0). On profile it shows it's used for management. I've stopped all the services but it looks the same. I've downgraded to RC11
I also have problems with a script that use /toot/fetch mode=http. It gets a txt file without newlines inside. In RC9 it works perfectly. [Ticket#2013031366000402]
Please help
Andrew
I've downloaded it at 10 pm. Its true i didn't deactivate btserver.Andrew at what time do u download the upgrade? Becouse yesterday at 3pm (15.00) GMT+1 time there was a new build of rc12..Hi,
I have problems with my ccr1016 [Ticket#2013031166000479] . I've upgraded yesterday with latest rc12 but i observed that one cpu is 100 % (and others 0). On profile it shows it's used for management. I've stopped all the services but it looks the same. I've downgraded to RC11
I also have problems with a script that use /toot/fetch mode=http. It gets a txt file without newlines inside. In RC9 it works perfectly. [Ticket#2013031366000402]
Please help
Andrew
Normis, thank you for your reply!Let's not compare apples and oranges. If any of you guys need help with something, let us know. RouterOS v6.0rc12 looks great so far, if you want a pre-release, check above. We will release it this week.
i checked above, and I don't see your problem description. to get an answer from mikrotik, please email support. this is a user forum mostly. we have an official suppor system (check top of the forum for links)Normis, hello! We want to see the comments Mikrotik.
you mean, tomorrow at MUM?RouterOS v6.0rc12 looks great so far. We will release it this week.
I can release it now, if you have no objections Everything is good in this latest build?you mean, tomorrow at MUM?RouterOS v6.0rc12 looks great so far. We will release it this week.
Normis has the Red Button!I can release it now
No, do you think the problem is solved? I will upgrade now.Andrew you have build from Mar/13 ~12:00?
ahhh.. damn it.. When MK will solve this problemI have the same problem with latest v6.0rc12
I talked about a similar issue not so long ago, my message was ignored.I have also upgraded router yesterday by latest rc12, which is build on 12th March. I glad that my special simple queues started to work again. Hope random reboot never happens again. I have one more bug that simple queue graphics does not work, when login by Winbox. Also the simple queue color indicator is not correct. But real traffic passes through and queue works fine in background. PPP active customers are around 200-210.
I have disabled snmp and the cpu is back to normal.
Worked for 1 minute. but then 2 processors appeared with 100 % used by managementblitz.
You say :I have disabled snmp and the cpu is back to normal.
So turning off snmp didnt really work?
please redownload, and try todays build. if still the same, please send us remote access details to support (ssh access with full admin rights). we will try to catch the problemHi all,
@andrewe02000 - The latest RC12 builds can be downloaded from http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
We have two CCRs running with "production" traffic across them - with fairly similar configs however I can't reproduce the issue on our second CCR, so I'm unsure if it's BGP/OSPF related or not. In relation to the 100% core load, Profile shows it as management.
The problem we seem to face here is that we aren't hearing much from MikroTik. Whilst I know we are running on Beta versions of RouterOS and it's a fairly new game porting RouterOS over to tile64, we don't see any acknowledgement or even involvement in the beta process. I've raised these issues as a ticket a few days ago ([Ticket#2013031166000031]) and haven't heard a thing.
Normis - Can we do anything to assist identifying this or do you need us to do anything to aid in resolving the 100% CPU Core Usage / Traffic Freezes to certain IPs?
Regards,
Lee.
It works. And if i disable it it stops working. When the cpu went to 100% ( and management stayed at 6-7 %) i've stopped snmp and all cpus shows 0-1% but after few minutes ( without doing anything) 2 processors stucked at 100 % and management shows 12 %. It seems that he made the support.rif (i've send it to support) but immediately winbox connection was dropped and for a minute the router stopped responding to icmp.Try to run SNMP walk to the router and check if it succeeds.
normis I wanted to try todays (Mar/14) build but it is still from Mar/13/2013 12:08:15please redownload, and try todays build. if still the same, please send us remote access details to support (ssh access with full admin rights). we will try to catch the problem
Same issue with that build; my two CCRs experience high cpu on multiple Cores. It appears that it is not consistent and that both produce same issues; at the same time, or one experiences and the other does not.please redownload, and try todays build. if still the same, please send us remote access details to support (ssh access with full admin rights). we will try to catch the problem
There are a lot of docs on google. Just search "configure mikrotik".how to setup mikrotik cloud core
and how to setup vlan
I am; and on more than 1 too! It is replicable. I can either send 500Mbps at 1500 bytes (~40Kpps) or 500Mbps at 500bytes (~60K pps)The issues still persist with the latest available rc12 build (Mar/13 12:08:15). I'm not seeing 100% core load
It's about 100 mbps. I 've installed now version rc12 from Mar/15 and receive test looks like this. In the other version it shows 100% at 60-70mbps but maybe i'm wrong because i became paranoic watching CPUs ). I just hope now none of CPU's going in 100% without a reason. Still watching themBTest is supposed to load the CPU to 100%, that is it's job. As it only supports one core, what you see is completely normal and is to be expected. If the load would be less than 100%, it wouldn't be much of a test, would it?
And where is NTP update? Or When?This version (Mar18) should not have any management CPU usage problems:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
Please clarify what NTP update are you waiting for?And where is NTP update? Or When?This version (Mar18) should not have any management CPU usage problems:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
It looks like - No troubles with CCR1036-12G-4S
nope, same issue. supout.rif added to ticketThis version (Mar18) should not have any management CPU usage problems:
Same problem.This version (Mar18) should not have any management CPU usage problems:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
I know it is a dangerous question but I must ask because I need the 4 SFP slots for MPLS-router:
HAS ANYONE THE CCR IN PRODUCTION?
[Ticket#2013031966000464]Guys with CCR and Management issue that are using March 18 build. Please email supout.rif file to support, and if possible, also full access via SSH
So its end of menagement problem?
[Ticket#2013031966000464]
I've installed 15 Mar version so from 24 hours the problem did not appeared.
Someone testing build from today? Mar/19/2013 14:28:30 ?
So its end of menagement problem?
[Ticket#2013031966000464]
I've installed 15 Mar version so from 24 hours the problem did not appeared.
what kind of rules do you have? some configurations can only use one core, so this would be normal. you still have the rest of the cores.Yet again, with the new build (Mar/19/2013 14:28)
Sending traffic through routers (Real Traffic, not BTest)
13 Cores 100 Percent CPU.
When the traffic is initiated, it can take anywhere from 10 - 20 minutes before a few cores increase to 100 percent; eventually increasing the count in cores. The allocation of high resources can last anywhere from 3-8, maybe 10 minutes.
I have updated the ticket with SSH and Login details.
#2013031266000315
Thank You
No rules what-so-ever; I have most of the packages disabled.what kind of rules do you have? some configurations can only use one core, so this would be normal. you still have the rest of the cores.
Big Thanks for Master Port feature for CCR (in all product it exist everywhere) from last RC12 Mar/19/2013 14:28:30This version (Mar18) should not have any management CPU usage problems:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.npk
thank you very much. would tryif you need NTP package for rc12, use this link: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .0rc12.zip