Hello,
I actually have 2 questions that are kinda related.
Where I work we have several buildings joined together via metro ethernet. Each building has a 10,x ip address on the metro ethernet interface. The issue is I have noticed every single building is behind NAT even though the ip addresses are all private. The network administrator no longer works there and for now ( and hopefully for later too ) I'm taking over. We have had issues in the past with packets being randomly dropped etc and I wonder if this could have something to do with it.
So my question is...
Is NAT (by NAT I mean srcnat on the metro ethernet interface) even needed on metro ethernet? I have always been taught to avoid it if possible. Also, there are zero firewall rules on these routers. everything is wide open. This leads me to my next question.
I always thought srcnat would hide everything behind it but I can ping all computers on the network behind the NAT. Why is this possible? I thought I should have to set up a dstnat for each computer I wanted to be reachable.
Thanks for the help!