Hi!
I have a config like this:
532 routerboard (2.9.27)+ 2 Atheros 5413 wireless card (ap bridge, 2.4 Ghz B) - default
Bridge1 = LAN + 2 wireless atheros 5413
IP for the LAN interface - 192....
Everithing works fine the AP-s Running there is the"R" in the wireless list. But sometimes, the "R" dissapier, and the clients disconnects, after I do a SCAN with the card the users reconnects, but only when I'm scan with the wireless card.
This strange problem appears other 5 MT config like this.
So where am I search?
LOGs from the MT-s:What is shown in the logs, when users are disconnected ?
wireless_AP1;data from unknown device 00:02:..., sent deauth
Wireless_AP1;data from unknown device 00:0E, ...sent deauth
Wireless_AP1;data from unknown device 00:4F..., sent deauth
wireless_AP1;data from unknown device 00:02:..., sent deauth (6 events supressed)
wireless_AP1 disconnected, extensive data loss
Given log entries mean,
packets from the clients are being dropped at the AP, because client
isn't registred to the AP anymore (previosly disconnected from the AP
due to extensive data loss). The client should connect to the AP
again, but the client haven't noticed yet that it has been disconnected.
packets from the clients are being dropped at the AP, because client
isn't registred to the AP anymore (previosly disconnected from the AP
due to extensive data loss). The client should connect to the AP
again, but the client haven't noticed yet that it has been disconnected.
Ok! thanks, but how can this be. There is no MAC authentication, everybody can access the AP. Why this happen? Bad configuration...Or something else. How could I prevent this connection lose???Given log entries mean,
packets from the clients are being dropped at the AP, because client
isn't registred to the AP anymore (previosly disconnected from the AP
due to extensive data loss). The client should connect to the AP
again, but the client haven't noticed yet that it has been disconnected.
-
-
moshtaqahmed
just joined
- Posts: 14
- Joined:
- Location: Mbabane
- Contact:
I got the same problem
I am also having to AR5213 Cards in MT532. when client connects - it automatically disconnects...
Moshtaq
Moshtaq
Re: I got the same problem
I am also having to AR5213 Cards in MT532. when client connects - it automatically disconnects...
Moshtaq
Hi there!
I have the same problem with AR5212 on PC with v2.9.7 on a station and AR5212 on the ap, same PC with v2.9.6.
ap give me log entry such as:
wireless,info wlan2: disconnected 00:14:78:74:16:C7, decided
to deauth: authentication not valid (2)
and the station log entry is smt. like that: extensive data loss...
Is there anybody with any suggestions?
Deauth with AR5006xs
We are seeing the same issue in high noise areas.
Our builds are using MT 2.9.27 on Wrap.2C with the EnGenius EMP-8602.
It appears that when there is lots of noise (high traffic on designated channel or adjacent channels), these cards will behave strangely. Most notible is the deauth disconnect.
We have sniffed frames and have not seen any evidence of deauth attacks.
Earlier, we were seeing the systems actually shut down due to noise. We adjusted the noise-floor-threshold up to -92 and it appears to correct that problem (the reported noise floor is approximately -96), but the deauth disconnects seem to remain.
Problem does not appear to exist when using the SR2 which uses the AR5004 chipset. So for noisy areas we are recommending the use of SR2, but for areas that are relatively clean, the EMP-8602 seems to work fine.
Our builds are using MT 2.9.27 on Wrap.2C with the EnGenius EMP-8602.
It appears that when there is lots of noise (high traffic on designated channel or adjacent channels), these cards will behave strangely. Most notible is the deauth disconnect.
We have sniffed frames and have not seen any evidence of deauth attacks.
Earlier, we were seeing the systems actually shut down due to noise. We adjusted the noise-floor-threshold up to -92 and it appears to correct that problem (the reported noise floor is approximately -96), but the deauth disconnects seem to remain.
Problem does not appear to exist when using the SR2 which uses the AR5004 chipset. So for noisy areas we are recommending the use of SR2, but for areas that are relatively clean, the EMP-8602 seems to work fine.
want to be feeel ok and confot??
1st change the AP to standalone AP (viewing signal clients and all those info didnt help so lets get rid of it)
trust me u will be more more more than staicsfy you will feel that you are free and u have to hangout becouse you dont have anything to do
Sorry mikrotik you are excellent in every thing except wireless seriously you need to change it from A to z it seems like a alpha testing for me
1st change the AP to standalone AP (viewing signal clients and all those info didnt help so lets get rid of it)
trust me u will be more more more than staicsfy you will feel that you are free and u have to hangout becouse you dont have anything to do
Sorry mikrotik you are excellent in every thing except wireless seriously you need to change it from A to z it seems like a alpha testing for me
what you exactly meant, taloot...
what you meant with
, tal? what can we do to make "standalone AP".want to be feeel ok and confot??
1st change the AP to standalone AP (viewing signal clients and all those info didnt help so lets get rid of it)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: GoogleOther [Bot] and 13 guests