RouterOS v6.27 released

Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:08 pm

What's new in 6.27 (2015-Feb-11 13:24):

*) console - added 'comment' parameter for '/system script'
*) api - return sentences can have property ".section" that groups values
from commands such as "monitor", "traceroute",
"print" (with non-zero 'interval' value);
*) cloud - add time zone detection feature "/system clock time-zone-autodetect";
*) cloud - rename "/ip cloud enabled" to "/ip cloud ddns-enabled";
*) cloud - make "/ip cloud update-time" independent from "/ip cloud ddns-enabled"
*) cloud - when setting "/ip cloud ddns-enabled" to "no" router will send
message to server to disable DNS name for this routerboard;
*) cloud - "/ip cloud force-update" command now will work also when
"/ip cloud ddns-enabled = no". usefull if user wants to disable DDNS;
*) RB4xxGL - improved ethernet throughput (less dropped packets);
*) RouterBOARD - fixed health reporting;
*) check-installation: fixed wrong kernel crc on powerpc boards
*) watchdog: fix software watchdog for x86
*) ssh - check conn state before sending disconnect message;
*) ipsec - fixed crash that happened in specific situation;

bommi · Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:00 pm

What's new in 6.27 (2015-Feb-11 13:24):
*) ipsec - fixed crash that happened in specific situation;

In what specific situation?

I try to setup an IPSec IPv4-over-IPv6 VPN between Mikrotik and Juniper ScreenOS.
The Mikrotik Device crashes when trying to establish Phase 2.

Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:12 pm

Oh. This was unexpectedly fast release.

Ljubo · Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:16 pm

Again the same after upgrade from 6.26 to 6.27 DHCP doesn’t work.

DHCP.JPG

rpingar · Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:17 pm

Normis,
what about Ticket#2014122166000217
(When the number of PPPoE sessions on the device becomes more 1000 - when you turn off the one PPPoE session on all other sessions observed packet loss)

thanks
Ros

Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:56 pm

Again the same after upgrade from 6.26 to 6.27 DHCP doesn’t work.

DHCP.JPG

Please make a support output file when you see this problem and report to support@mikrotik.com

tvrebac · Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:05 pm

RouterOS auto upgrade script is broken, there is no more "current-version" and "latest-version" properties in "/system package update".
Also if you issue "/system package check-for-updates without-paging" output will never stop.
If you issue "/system package update check-for-updates without-paging once" the output is this:

current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

DjM · Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:46 pm

Hello community,

results after quick test:

1) SSTP stop working
- RB (RB2011UAS-2HnD, firmware 3.19) is not able to connect to SSTP server 6.25 (RB750)
- SSTP clients 6.25 (RB750, RB951-2n) are not able to connect to 6.27 SSTP server (RB2011UAS-2HnD)
- in /tool profile there are CPU peaks (80%) for "ssl", in time-period 10s the peaks are 2-3 times for around 1s (probably SSTP client attempts to connect)
- after downgrade to 6.25 everything is working fine

2) Set script variable via SMS
- still not working, http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=58934

Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:27 pm

*) api - return sentences can have property ".section" that groups values
from commands such as "monitor", "traceroute",
"print" (with non-zero 'interval' value);

I didn't even know monitor-traffic could monitor multiple interfaces at once... Awesome! Big win for API application efficiency here

.

Ljubo · Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:08 pm

Again the same after upgrade from 6.26 to 6.27 DHCP doesn’t work.

DHCP.JPG
Please make a support output file when you see this problem and report to support@mikrotik.com

Already done.

Thu Feb 12, 2015 7:55 am

Again the same after upgrade from 6.26 to 6.27 DHCP doesn’t work.

DHCP.JPG

is ether1 in the bridge?? if yes you need to move DHCP to Bridge, it doesn't work on bridge ports.
Before (RouterOS v5 ) it was invisibly moved to master bridge interface anyways.

But "comment error" like in firewall would be nice any ways

Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:03 am

RouterOS auto upgrade script is broken, there is no more "current-version" and "latest-version" properties in "/system package update".
Also if you issue "/system package check-for-updates without-paging" output will never stop.
If you issue "/system package update check-for-updates without-paging once" the output is this:

current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

Sounds like you have DNS/connection problems, i am upgrading all boards like that since this feature came out.
But i have also observed that check-for-update, if unsuccessful, never stops, it will try until successful...

Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:24 am

Hello community,

results after quick test:

1) SSTP stop working
- RB (RB2011UAS-2HnD, firmware 3.19) is not able to connect to SSTP server 6.25 (RB750)
- SSTP clients 6.25 (RB750, RB951-2n) are not able to connect to 6.27 SSTP server (RB2011UAS-2HnD)
- in /tool profile there are CPU peaks (80%) for "ssl", in time-period 10s the peaks are 2-3 times for around 1s (probably SSTP client attempts to connect)
- after downgrade to 6.25 everything is working fine

FYI v6.25 was the problematic version for me. I even reported that to support. I was fixed in v6.26
Make sure that you have both ends of the tunnel with latest version.
I just upgraded both ends of my SSTP tunnels tp 6.27 - all is working as expected

Ljubo · Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:05 am

Again the same after upgrade from 6.26 to 6.27 DHCP doesn’t work.

DHCP.JPG
is ether1 in the bridge?? if yes you need to move DHCP to Bridge, it doesn't work on bridge ports.
Before (RouterOS v5 ) it was invisibly moved to master bridge interface anyways.

But "comment error" like in firewall would be nice any ways

Yes you are right but, but it was not enough to switch to the bridge.
I had to delete the bridge and re-create it then it worked.
Thank you.

netwpl · Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:50 am

Unbenannt.JPG

system health does not work..

DjM · Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:04 am

FYI v6.25 was the problematic version for me. I even reported that to support. I was fixed in v6.26
Make sure that you have both ends of the tunnel with latest version.
I just upgraded both ends of my SSTP tunnels tp 6.27 - all is working as expected

@macgaiver:
Thank you for hint, upgrade of both ends fixed the issue

I was doing just a quick test so I have not tried this option and also I didn't have any issues with SSTP in 6.25 .

Unbenannt.JPG
system health does not work..

/system health print

This works for me on RB2011, ROS6.27, latest firmware.

honzam · Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:11 am

system health does not work..

It is NOT bug. What do you want to see in system health?
RB951 don´t have voltage monitor and don´t have temperature monitor. http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD

netwpl · Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:16 am

system health does not work..
It is NOT bug. What do you want to see in system health?
RB951 don´t have voltage monitor and don´t have temperature monitor. http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD

doh! im sorry, my false!

NathanA · Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:45 am

Holy schnikes, 6.26 just came out last week!

*) cloud - add time zone detection feature "/system clock time-zone-autodetect";

How does this work exactly? IP address geolocation? The accuracy of that can be hit-and-miss. If it detects the wrong timezone, I assume we just report this to support?

-- Nathan

honzam · Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:37 am

Oh. This was unexpectedly fast release.

It is true. Mikrotik Support is there any known serious problem in 6.26?

Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:40 am

Oh. This was unexpectedly fast release.
It is true. Mikrotik Support is there any known serious problem in 6.26?

since there were no other big issues, we wanted to fix the health very badly

zero bugs left

tomaskir · Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:55 am

Normis, can you please look at these:

Ticket#2014122966000079
Ticket#2014120866000733
Ticket#2015020266000252

tvrebac · Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:07 pm

RouterOS auto upgrade script is broken, there is no more "current-version" and "latest-version" properties in "/system package update".
Also if you issue "/system package check-for-updates without-paging" output will never stop.
If you issue "/system package update check-for-updates without-paging once" the output is this:

current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

Sounds like you have DNS/connection problems, i am upgrading all boards like that since this feature came out.
But i have also observed that check-for-update, if unsuccessful, never stops, it will try until successful...

It was working fine, upgrading from 6.25 -> 6.26 -> 6.27.

After "/system package update check-for-updates without-paging" I', getting following output (on several RBs, 951, 2011, 751)
current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

current-version: 6.27
latest-version: 6.27
status: System is already up to date

current-version: 6.27
latest-version: 6.27
status: System is already up to date ...... and so on

After "/system package update check-for-updates", first I get
current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

then, after about 1,5 seconds i get:
current-version: 6.27
latest-version: 6.27
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

Some of my RouterBoards are connected to the internet via PPPoE (direct connection to the ADSL modem), and some are behind internet router, but all of them are using working DNS servers (some of them are querying 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4, some of them query local LAN cacheing DNS).

Regards

NathanA · Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:08 pm

zero bugs left

You wish.

-- Nathan

Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:32 pm

zero bugs left

I wish it would be true.

DjM · Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:36 pm

Oh. This was unexpectedly fast release.
It is true. Mikrotik Support is there any known serious problem in 6.26?
since there were no other big issues, we wanted to fix the health very badly
zero bugs left

@normis:
What about setting variable in script via SMS - multiple year bug?

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=58934
Multiple support tickets created for this bug.

Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:58 pm

Normis, can you please look at these:

Ticket#2014122966000079
Ticket#2014120866000733
Ticket#2015020266000252

The first two are more feature requests than bugs. The latest is new, so not answered yet, but before our specialist has looked at it, it may be specific hardware problem or something else, not a bug for sure.

tomaskir · Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:32 pm

Normis, can you please look at these:

Ticket#2014122966000079
Ticket#2014120866000733
Ticket#2015020266000252
The first two are more feature requests than bugs. The latest is new, so not answered yet, but before our specialist has looked at it, it may be specific hardware problem or something else, not a bug for sure.

Ticket#2014122966000079
This is a bug with the route table not being available over SNMP.
How is that a feature request?

Ticket#2014120866000733
This is a bug with VirtualAP showing inside SNMP Station Interface table (mtxrWlStatEntry)
How is that a feature request?

Ticket#2015020266000252
Random packet-loss and port-flapping.
Its an issue, whether hardware or software (yes, not strictly a bug).

honzam · Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:51 pm

Auto upgrade still offer latest version - 6.25. Why?

upgrade.jpg

rmmccann · Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:06 pm

Can anyone comment if dynamic IPSec policies are being properly removed after disconnect/timeout in these newer versions?

See:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82757

isaiservices · Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:19 pm

Hi ,

Im having a issue , I need to set up 25 new X86 boxes with RouterOS , having issue knowing what motherboards to get....your WIKI is VERY out of date , please can you provide a compatibility list...surely you want your client to know if your product would work?
Also does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?
Does it work with Atheros GbE LAN chip (10/100/1000 Mbit)?
Is the Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H board supported?

Thanks

ufm · Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:40 pm

Normis,
what about Ticket#2014122166000217
(When the number of PPPoE sessions on the device becomes more 1000 - when you turn off the one PPPoE session on all other sessions observed packet loss)

thanks
Ros

Mikrotik totally ignore this bug. I think after some time they will say - "It's not the bug. It's the feature".

Mendesvel · Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:17 pm

Normis,
what about Ticket#2014122166000217
(When the number of PPPoE sessions on the device becomes more 1000 - when you turn off the one PPPoE session on all other sessions observed packet loss)

thanks
Ros
Mikrotik totally ignore this bug. I think after some time they will say - "It's not the bug. It's the feature".

It will be more like... "your ppoe sessions loose packets when you turn off one of them in sign of mourning, it's not a bug it's a non-documented feature"

Sob · Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:48 pm

since there were no other big issues, we wanted to fix the health very badly
zero bugs left

If you're out of big bugs, feel free to fix the smaller ones, like [Ticket#2014120466000688] (brokerless 6to4 is unusable starting from 6.20). I understand that it isn't a highest priority one, as the user base is probably small. On the other hand, it's been broken for almost half a year now. And in a way, it's a dream bug, it's reliably broken (on 6.27 too) and does not require any special effort to reproduce.

bad1 · Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:41 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!

PtDragon · Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:19 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!

For me it works faster...
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?

bad1 · Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:51 pm

yes, I am sure. Downgrade back to RouterOS 6.23, full speed again with same speedtest.net server.

goughy000 · Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:08 am

What about Ticket#2015020466000267 ?

Constant reboots, was told it was a Winbox issue?? Upgraded to latest winbox 3RC4 and to v6.27 ROS, router still crashes once or twice per day (if twice, it's within a few minutes of each other)

michelsantos · Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:42 am

Efetuei o upgrade para a versão 6.27 em uma RB 750 e o processamento foi as alturas, ficando entre 90 e 100%, chegando travar e reiniciar. O que fiz para sanar o problema foi: fazer o downgrade para a versão 6.25 e voltou tudo ao normal, o processamento fico entre 9 e 12%. Outro detalhe que reparei foi, algumas páginas abriam, outras não, conferi se era problema de DNS, troquei vários DNS e o problema persistiu.

Então por enquanto o que mantive a solução foi voltar a versão 6.25.

mitry · Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:46 am

This bug still not fixed in 6.27:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=92996

docmarius · Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:00 am

On my OmniTIK UPA-5HnD I still get wrong health info on 6.27:

/system health> print
voltage: 21.8V
temperature: -23C

Now unless there's an efficient freezer inside this is wrong. Outside temp is -5...

Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:25 am

Auto upgrade still offer latest version - 6.25. Why?
upgrade.jpg

Most probably you have too old version to have this feature working

I found v6.7 in my network from that it worked fine. So you most probably need to upgrade ... so that you can upgrade

Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:28 am

Hi ,

Im having a issue , I need to set up 25 new X86 boxes with RouterOS , having issue knowing what motherboards to get....your WIKI is VERY out of date , please can you provide a compatibility list...surely you want your client to know if your product would work?
Also does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?
Does it work with Atheros GbE LAN chip (10/100/1000 Mbit)?
Is the Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H board supported?

Thanks

RouterOS v6 uses Linux Kernel 3.3.5. , if that motherboard have drivers for that Linux Kernel - probably you are fine, but only way to find for sure is to actually try. I myself waiting to ROuterOS v7 only to get all the good driver stuff that will come with new Linux Kernel

Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:33 am

If you're out of big bugs, feel free to fix the smaller ones, like [Ticket#2014120466000688] (brokerless 6to4 is unusable starting from 6.20). I understand that it isn't a highest priority one, as the user base is probably small. On the other hand, it's been broken for almost half a year now. And in a way, it's a dream bug, it's reliably broken (on 6.27 too) and does not require any special effort to reproduce.

I'm pretty sure that 6to4 works, i use it a lot, maybe it is configuration error? or you have very very specific problems.if there would be mayor problem with 6to4 since 6.20 we would have s..t storm here in forum for sure. I suggest to open separate topic about this issue so we can give you a hand.

Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:17 am

Normis,
what about Ticket#2014122166000217
(When the number of PPPoE sessions on the device becomes more 1000 - when you turn off the one PPPoE session on all other sessions observed packet loss)

thanks
Ros
Mikrotik totally ignore this bug. I think after some time they will say - "It's not the bug. It's the feature".

We already responded that this is not a bug that is easily fixable. This is one of fundamental flaws of the whole system, reason comes from kernel. If you have thousands of interfaces that are being listed, removing entries is very CPU intensive. We cannot fix it in RouterOS v6

Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:30 am

We already responded that this is not a bug that is easily fixable. This is one of fundamental flaws of the whole system, reason comes from kernel. If you have thousands of interfaces that are being listed, removing entries is very CPU intensive. We cannot fix it in RouterOS v6

I have a suggestion, though not sure it can be implemented. What if you add an option to just disable (and mark somehow) such interfaces instead of permanently deleting them from the list. And then reuse these interfaces for new PPPoE sessions later. Will this solve the original problem?

isaiservices · Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:49 am

does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?

paka · Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:03 pm

Hi Normis,

system clock error in RouterOS v6.25 by x86!
It is synchronized with NTP-Servers unproblematic
But it works delayed in time (look on seconds).
we can't upgrade our live system to v6.27 to test it.

we have tested v6.25 in RouterOS v6.25 by mipsbe, it works

for your reply thank you in advance
Regards,
paka

Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:12 pm

Hi Normis,

system clock error in RouterOS v6.25 by x86!
It is synchronized with NTP-Servers unproblematic
But it works delayed in time (look on seconds).
we can't upgrade our live system to v6.27 to test it.

we have tested v6.25 in RouterOS v6.25 by mipsbe, it works

for your reply thank you in advance
Regards,
paka

please explain more, what is wrong with seconds ?
can you post some image, or other details about this ?

paka · Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:48 pm

Hi Normis,

system clock error in RouterOS v6.25 by x86!
It is synchronized with NTP-Servers unproblematic
But it works delayed in time (look on seconds).
we can't upgrade our live system to v6.27 to test it.

we have tested v6.25 in RouterOS v6.25 by mipsbe, it works

for your reply thank you in advance
Regards,
paka
please explain more, what is wrong with seconds ?
can you post some image, or other details about this ?

here i have attached gif image, that shows difference system takt time between mipsbe and x86

Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:06 pm

Maybe Winbox is slow to give updates beause your router is 100% CPU loaded? What is the cause of CPU load ?

isaiservices · Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:10 pm

does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?

Just love how some questions just gets ignored.........

paka · Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:13 pm

Maybe Winbox is slow to give updates beause your router is 100% CPU loaded? What is the cause of CPU load ?

100 % CPU load is since we have upgraded from v6.6 to v6.22.
The cause for that is bug

see here http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=91468

in v6.22 we had not problem with system time

kristaps · Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:30 pm

does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?
Just love how some questions just gets ignored.........

Yes it works with 6gb/s ports
in motherboard GA-Z77MX-D3H with kingston V300 ssd

Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:54 pm

Maybe Winbox is slow to give updates beause your router is 100% CPU loaded? What is the cause of CPU load ?

100 % CPU load is since we have upgraded from v6.6 to v6.22.
The cause for that is bug
see here http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=91468

in v6.22 we had not problem with system time

You say v6.22 but image shows v6.25, but this topic is actually about v6.27 ...

mars · Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:57 pm

we find that with the new ros versions after a day or two the ccq drops and the data across the links starts getting less till the router is rebooted then it is back to normal for the next two days
mostly we see this on the newer rbs
anybody else have this problem

und3ath · Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:14 pm

What about Nstreme? When will it be fixed? (not polled for too long disconnections)

THG · Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:30 pm

Is there any reasons not to fix this issue? As you can see in the picture, TCP traffic through the Ethernet interface shows over 80 percent more than the VLAN interface. UDP shows the correct speed on both interfaces and the issue appears only in the X86 version of RouterOS.

Sob · Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:21 pm

I'm pretty sure that 6to4 works, i use it a lot, maybe it is configuration error? ...

It depends on what kind of 6to4 you use. If it's connection to tunnel broker (6to4 interface has remote-address set), then it works. But if it's the automatic kind (no remote-address for 6to4 interface, address derived from IPv4 in 2002::/16 range and default route with gateway ::192.88.99.1%<6to4_interface_name>), then it does not. This is complete config. Since then, they fixed the first problem ("hop limit exceeded" for 2002::/16) in 6.24. But the second one ("no route to host" for everything else) persists. Last reply ("we will look into it") from support is from 16th December, so I'm getting a little worried if the issue got lost in queue or something.

bronx · Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:45 pm

Hi Normis,

system clock error in RouterOS v6.25 by x86!
It is synchronized with NTP-Servers unproblematic
But it works delayed in time (look on seconds).
we can't upgrade our live system to v6.27 to test it.

we have tested v6.25 in RouterOS v6.25 by mipsbe, it works

for your reply thank you in advance
Regards,
paka
please explain more, what is wrong with seconds ?
can you post some image, or other details about this ?

Normis, but the same packet loss occurs when one pppoe reach keepalive-timeout or only if removed from shell/gui by administrator?
In order to understand if in this case is better to restart pppoe-client on the CPE.

The limit of 1000 pppoe it's valid on CCR1036 ?

Thank you

Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:15 pm

There is no limit, just on large numbers it takes a lot of resources, what happens then, depends on your CPU and number of clients

bronx · Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:18 pm

There is no limit, just on large numbers it takes a lot of resources, what happens then, depends on your CPU and number of clients

But keep-alive reached/CPE disconnect pppoe/Administrator remove ppppoe from server take the same CPU resources ?

ufm · Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:18 pm

what about Ticket#2014122166000217
We already responded that this is not a bug that is easily fixable. This is one of fundamental flaws of the whole system, reason comes from kernel. If you have thousands of interfaces that are being listed, removing entries is very CPU intensive. We cannot fix it in RouterOS v6

Nowhere in documentation or promotional materials not described this serious limitation.
Several times I asked - when the wait though, would be the beta v7? No answer.

Yes, we are small company from small country.
I really try not to swear.

But I very much hope that there will some big company вы.бет вас за такое поведение при помощи своих юристов - по полной программе.

Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:34 pm

There is no limit, just on large numbers it takes a lot of resources, what happens then, depends on your CPU and number of clients
But keep-alive reached/CPE disconnect pppoe/Administrator remove ppppoe from server take the same CPU resources ?

In our test, the effect is very mild, not like Ufm describes, so I guess this is a question to him. We are still doing everything we can to repeat this problem, but so far, we are not successful.

Kalpar · Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:35 pm

Oh. This was unexpectedly fast release.
It is true. Mikrotik Support is there any known serious problem in 6.26?
since there were no other big issues, we wanted to fix the health very badly
zero bugs left

Hello Normis,

Any chance that Support TicketID: 2014030666000236 will get fixed?
Router always looks in the main table when it has to send ICMP TTL exceeded in transit (type 11)

It is detailed at:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p414018
and
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p413242

Thanks.

noyo · Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:44 pm

is bug?
Polish shortcuts:

pl.png

English shortcuts

en.png

Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:45 pm

You have localized Windows version? Yes, RouterOS only understands settings in english.

noyo · Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:49 pm

You have localized Windows version? Yes, RouterOS only understands settings in english.

Debian 7 + wine + winbox

That's what he sets RouterOS Polish?

galaxynet · Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:22 pm

routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk - seems that this package is missing....

Both in the zip file for download on the 'download' page and via packages 'update' under ROS.....

Thom

paoloaga · Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:13 pm

routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk - seems that this package is missing....

There is no "routerboard" package in ROS v6, it is included into system.

galaxynet · Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:16 pm

routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk - package missing is what ROS tells me from the Winbox /system packages download.

It is not I who is telling 'you' its missing, it's ROS telling me it's missing.

Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:15 pm

RB133C3 - Sytem/Packages/Check shows 6.27 available but version 6.xx bricks RB133C3.
Should be therefore 6.xx be reported to this router as upgrade ?

plentyofbug · Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:17 pm

does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?
Just love how some questions just gets ignored.........

No, routeros doesn't work on any new x86 system, especially Intel C202 or many many similar new chipsets, including Intel® i217LM + Intel® i210AT ethernet controllers family and so on...

Basdno · Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:58 am

does RouterOS work on SATA 6gb/s?
Just love how some questions just gets ignored.........

Maybe that is because you ask them in the totaly wrong thread?!
This is a thread about the latest release of RouterOS, and bugs/questions regarding that particular subject. Meaning the guys who come into this thread doesnt necesserily pay attention to off subject topics when they screen through the thread in look for answers.

Asking about what hardware to use would probably be best put in an OWN thread under f.ex. GENERAL or maybe even Hardware talk section, then you would probably have gotten straight to people interested and capable of replying fast to you.

I am not saying you cant get an answer here(clearly you did already anyway), just pointing out that it does matter WHERE you post your questions about different topics. And whining you arent getting any attention when in the wrong thread isnt the best way to go about it.

This is not meant as criticism, only a well meant general advice!
Wish u all the best!

Cheers

Sat Feb 14, 2015 3:09 pm

Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:

A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B

A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.

Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.

Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…

Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.

Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]

galaxynet · Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:07 pm

Well I was able to resolve my own issue. I was upgrading units from 5.26 to 6.27 and got this as an error:
"routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk - package missing " That is what package update is telling me when I tried downloading the latest update.

The solution was to upgrade to an earlier version of 6. In my case I used 6.17, once I upgraded to 6.17, the update/upgrade to 6.27 went fine.

Still - this should be fixed in 6.27. It should not be necessary to do intermediate upgrades from a mature ROS version to a newer 'mature' version. Just my two cents worth.

Paoloaga - just thowing out, ROS 6.27 doesn't have "routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk" is not an answer. I knew it didn't have it, I was looking for a solution to the upgrade issue.

ibm · Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:25 pm

I have a kernel failure and so a forced reboot on the routerboard pinged when I ping with a frame size of 1470 and more a pppoe client or a pppoe server address, the pppoe client and server interfaces run on a bridge in each rb in which I have an eoip tunnel that allow the L2 communications between the 2 devices. Both have 6.27 with latest firmware.

redbullsteve · Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:01 am

Upgraded a few CCR1036-12G-4S to 6.27 and have seen BPG become very unstable, connected to 4 peers, session connects fine then randomly drops all peer sessions and reset between 4 hours and 10 mins.

Not sure what the cause is, nothing errors or looks incorrect, downgraded to 6.26 and BGP is stable again.

Could either be an issue with OSPF or BGP, very hard to tell.

Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:47 am

routerboard-6.27-mipsbe.npk - package missing is what ROS tells me from the Winbox /system packages download.

It is not I who is telling 'you' its missing, it's ROS telling me it's missing.

this is not the right command. "/system packages update check-for-updates" is the right command

Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:48 am

RB133C3 - Sytem/Packages/Check shows 6.27 available but version 6.xx bricks RB133C3.
Should be therefore 6.xx be reported to this router as upgrade ?

You are right, that auto-upgrades shouldn't be shown to incompatible routers, but old RouterOS doesn't know about limitations of new RouterOS, and we can't simply tell old RouterOS some new instructions.

As you know, Download page states "RB111, RB112, RB133C, RB150 devices are not supported in v6, please use v5.", but yes, I agree, we need to think of some way to disable auto-upgrades for these devices.

zyzelis · Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:58 am

Upgraded a few CCR1036-12G-4S to 6.27 and have seen BPG become very unstable, connected to 4 peers, session connects fine then randomly drops all peer sessions and reset between 4 hours and 10 mins.

Not sure what the cause is, nothing errors or looks incorrect, downgraded to 6.26 and BGP is stable again.

Could either be an issue with OSPF or BGP, very hard to tell.

I have running CCR1036-12G-4S 3 days. bgp uptime equal to routers uptime. So You should check configs

Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:12 am

Upgraded a few CCR1036-12G-4S to 6.27 and have seen BPG become very unstable, connected to 4 peers, session connects fine then randomly drops all peer sessions and reset between 4 hours and 10 mins.

We have the same router running 6.27 with 4 peers running OSPF, BGP, BFD, MPLS, VPLS, L3VPN with 9000+ byte MTU and holding around 60,000 routes via BGP.

It has been stable for 3 days now. Maybe your instability is something specific to your configuration. You may want to email support@mikrotik.com with more details so they can help you.

yozz · Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:17 am

script not work in 6.27

:foreach i in=[/ip firewall address-list find ] do={
:if ( [/ip firewall address-list get $i comment] = "OpenBL" ) do={
/ip firewall address-list remove $i
}
}
/import file-name=disk2/openbl.rsc;
:log info "Removal old openbl and add new";

/tool fetch url="http://joshaven.com/dshield.rsc" mode=http dst-path=disk2/dshield.rsc;
:log info "Downloaded dshield.rsc from Joshaven.com";

skibi82 · Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:01 pm

And again, the same can not be imported and name of the certificate.
As I will now want it to be 100 certificates then i have totally fuck
Fairy where I have a certificate?

Maybe cert_42 can cert_23 wtf?
I have all displayed in the CLI and then look for

Great Improvement

dupa.png

DjM · Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:03 pm

Normis, MikroTik support team,

what is the reason of no-reply or no-answer to my question related to SMS bug, please?

@normis:
What about setting variable in script via SMS - multiple year bug?

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=58934
Multiple support tickets created for this bug.

Thank you

Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:44 pm

DjM - Please try to do the following:

1) Delete your variable from "/system script environment";
2) Remove ":global myvar" definition from script and leave only log and beep functions.

It works for me like that.

Please let us know how it goes.

DjM · Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:06 pm

DjM - Please try to do the following:

1) Delete your variable from "/system script environment";
2) Remove ":global myvar" definition from script and leave only log and beep functions.

It works for me like that.

Please let us know how it goes.

Hello strods,

great, it is working.

I can't believe that it takes years to get the hint that the variable shouldn't be declared as ":local" or ":global" in the script source, but it is great that it is working and we finally have found the solution

All related tickets can be closed, if they are still open.

Thank you for the hint.

ubikt23 · Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:46 am

What's new in 6.27 (2015-Feb-11 13:24):
*) ipsec - fixed crash that happened in specific situation;
In what specific situation?

I try to setup an IPSec IPv4-over-IPv6 VPN between Mikrotik and Juniper ScreenOS.
The Mikrotik Device crashes when trying to establish Phase 2.

me pasa lo mismo despues de actualizar el dhcp dejo de funcionar

deanMKD1 · Tue Feb 17, 2015 3:36 pm

@ubikt23 English please. We dont understand Spanish

ndnet · Tue Feb 17, 2015 7:41 pm

How can I configure Mikrotik hotspot to allow IP Phones to make calls without authentication and computer connected to the other IP Phone Ethernet port to be authenticated?
I am a new user of Mikrotik and i love using it. Please any help will be appreciated.
This is the challenge am having using IP Phones in the office with Mikrotik 1100 as my server.
Thanks in advance.

pbr3000 · Tue Feb 17, 2015 8:24 pm

How can I configure Mikrotik hotspot to allow IP Phones to make calls without authentication and computer connected to the other IP Phone Ethernet port to be authenticated?
I am a new user of Mikrotik and i love using it. Please any help will be appreciated.
This is the challenge am having using IP Phones in the office with Mikrotik 1100 as my server.
Thanks in advance.

Maybe you should create a new topic because this one is specific for v6.27 and issues related to it. A good place to look is the wiki page.

TonyJeppesen · Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:00 pm

EoIP tunnels stopped working after 6.27 release... Any Ideas or other known issues with this upgrade like this. Simple EoIP just two routers connected to each other with public IPs any help would be greatly appreciated.

Chupaka · Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:28 am

[offtop]
A week after 6.27 release, and no new RC builds... Seems like v7 is coming

Or some Latvian holidays?..

P.S. To make this post completely off the topic: Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...
[/offtop]

LaZyLion · Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:51 am

RouterOS auto upgrade script is broken, there is no more "current-version" and "latest-version" properties in "/system package update".

I would like to re-iterate this issue.

In 6.26 we get:

[user@myrouter] /system package update> :put [get current-version ]
6.26

But in 6.27 we get:

[user@thisrouter] /system package update> :put [get current-version ]
input does not match any value of value-name

Same thing happens with "latest-version".

Using the question mark (?) we should be able to get a list of properties.
In 6.26 it works:

[user@myrouter] /system package update> :put [get value-name=?

ValueName ::= current-version | latest-version | status

But in 6.27, no properties are shown.

[user@thisrouter] /system package update> :put [get value-name=?

ValueName ::=

Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:10 am

LaZyLion - Since 6.27 "/system package update check-for-updates" is dynamic and gives output to console. That has caused changes.

You can use command like this:
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "current-version")

ibm · Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:15 am

Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...

+1

Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:25 am

Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...
+1

easy to access "View Active Topics" without scrolling to top

ibm · Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:30 am

Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...
+1
easy to access "View Active Topics" without scrolling to top

Yes, but the solution is simply to let it have always the same height (the smallest would be good).

magchiel · Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:23 pm

RB1100AHx2 switch functionality seems affected after upgrading from ROS6.25/RB3.18 to ROS6.27/RB3.22 resulting in periodic dropouts of the network as well as a flapping port to my 10MBit VoIP device.

Switch configuration is:

/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether6 ] arp=proxy-arp
set [ find default-name=ether7 ] master-port=ether6
set [ find default-name=ether8 ] master-port=ether6
set [ find default-name=ether9 ] master-port=ether6
set [ find default-name=ether10 ] master-port=ether6
set [ find default-name=ether11 ] comment=WAN
/interface ethernet switch port
set 5 default-vlan-id=1 vlan-header=always-strip vlan-mode=secure
set 6 default-vlan-id=1 vlan-header=always-strip vlan-mode=secure
set 7 default-vlan-id=1 vlan-header=always-strip vlan-mode=secure
set 8 default-vlan-id=1 vlan-header=always-strip vlan-mode=secure
set 9 vlan-header=add-if-missing vlan-mode=secure
set 10 vlan-header=add-if-missing vlan-mode=secure
/interface ethernet switch vlan
add independent-learning=yes ports=ether6,ether7,ether8,ether9,ether10,switch1-cpu switch=\
    switch1 vlan-id=1
add independent-learning=yes ports=ether10,switch1-cpu switch=switch1 vlan-id=100

ether 1-5 are unused.
ether 6-9 are access ports.
ether10 is trunk port for VLAN1 and VLAN100 to an HP switch.

In addition, ether6 (master port) had a VLAN configured on the CPU-side configured as

/interface vlan
add interface=ether6 l2mtu=1594 name=vlan100 vlan-id=100

This has been running fine for over a year on various releases of RouterOS, however after the update of both ROS and RB traffic was erratic and the log was filled with a flapping ethernet port (up/down).

Placing a dedicated switch on the non-switched ether2 port to all the ports solves the issue. Aside from necessary reconfigurations to keep the network running, i.e. move the VLAN interface from ether6 to ether2 along with addresses, DHCP (both for VLAN1 and VLAN100) and hotspot services (running VLAN100), no further changes to the network have been made.

Any ideas?

Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:28 pm

magchiel - Please generate supout file on your device and send it to support@mikrotik.com.

magchiel · Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:11 pm

magchiel - Please generate supout file on your device and send it to support@mikrotik.com.

done.

PashaT · Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:21 pm

RB951g-2Hnd

Interfaces - Blink not working.

rextended · Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:55 pm

RB133C3 - Sytem/Packages/Check shows 6.27 available but version 6.xx bricks RB133C3.
Should be therefore 6.xx be reported to this router as upgrade ?

The only valid system for RB133C3 are RouterOS 2.9.51...

rextended · Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:09 pm

EoIP tunnels stopped working after 6.27 release... Any Ideas or other known issues with this upgrade like this. Simple EoIP just two routers connected to each other with public IPs any help would be greatly appreciated.

All my network work with EoIP, no one single problem on 6.27,
the error are surely your configuration, paste it on the forum.

rextended · Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:23 pm

After some days of use 6.27 on ALL my 200 network devices
(i have also near 4000 CPE all upgraded up to to 6.20, and 4 Gateway for PPPoE all forced to 6.7 for the unresolved bug also described on my signature)

All 200 devices with 3.22 BIOS except 2 RB1200 at 3.10, because for RB1200 (AMCC460) the latest released bios are 3.10

1) No single nstreme or nv2 problem on 5GHz (I not use 802.11 or 2.4GHz)
2) No single BGP, VRRP or EoIP problem
3) No single pppoe problem on transit from CPE (6.20) to Gateway (I'm forced to 6.7 on pppoe servers)
4) No system healt problem on any device
5) No strange shutdown or other problems.
6) No misaligned clock on x86, mipsbe, tilera or powerpc device (i not longer use obsolete mipsle)

7) The only problem are the OID for system voltage, on some random boards (7 from 200, various models), after upgrade, I stop get only the voltage value (obviously the function are supported on that devices!)
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.8.0
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.14988.1.1.3.8.0 )
Simply reboot the device, do not get the solution.
The solution (my solution...): open the device with clean winbox (no load previous session), click on system/healt, open new terminal, write "/system healt;print", press enter, and write "print oid", press enter and after that, reboot the device, and the system healt voltage oid are get again by snmp.

mike910815 · Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:51 pm

I had a problem on my 2009 vintage RB433 after installing v6.27. I had the MTU on all Ethernet ports set to 1522 as advertised here http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Ma ... uterBoards

Everything was working fine before the upgrade reboot (I think I was running 6.22), but after the reboot ports 2 and 3 were dead. I had to set the MTU down to 1518 to get them to work and it will not accept a setting of 1522 anymore. An MTU value of 1522 still works on the first port.

For anyone with an RB433 I suggest setting your MTU to 1518 or less before performing the upgrade to 6.27. I'm not sure if this will apply to any other hardware.

ibm · Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:37 pm

After some days of use 6.27 on ALL my 200 network devices
(i have also near 4000 CPE all upgraded up to to 6.20, and 4 Gateway for PPPoE all forced to 6.7 for the unresolved bug also described on my signature)

The bug is also present with non standard eoip and pppoe server configuration?

rextended · Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:50 pm

After some days of use 6.27 on ALL my 200 network devices
(i have also near 4000 CPE all upgraded up to to 6.20, and 4 Gateway for PPPoE all forced to 6.7 for the unresolved bug also described on my signature)
The bug is also present with non standard eoip and pppoe server configuration?

The bug are present on all possible variant of config, I write "default settings" to underline the easy way for reproduce the bug.
For make it all worst, if you use default-encryption on pppoe server over EoIP tunnel, the kernel crash at the first logged user.

If you read my previous post on the previous version topic, you can read me proposing that kernel crash bug propably since 6.8, and I open also the ticket, but nothing is changed till now.

alibalalo · Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:59 pm

Trouble seeing where health sxt for not offering voltage and temperature this problem only in sxt

0.PNG

1.PNG

ibm · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:01 am

After some days of use 6.27 on ALL my 200 network devices
(i have also near 4000 CPE all upgraded up to to 6.20, and 4 Gateway for PPPoE all forced to 6.7 for the unresolved bug also described on my signature)
The bug is also present with non standard eoip and pppoe server configuration?
The bug are present on all possible variant of config, I write "default settings" to underline the easy way for reproduce the bug.
For make it all worst, if you use default-encryption on pppoe server over EoIP tunnel, the kernel crash at the first logged user.

If you read my previous post on the previous version topic, you can read me proposing that kernel crash bug propably since 6.8, and I open also the ticket, but nothing is changed till now.

Are you sure about this?
A few days ago I tested a configuration with 3 rb951 with 6.27 and ospf running, on the first rb I create an eoip tunnel to the third and I created also a pppoe server on a bridge in wich there is also the eoip tunnel. Then i created an eoip tunnel in the third rb to first and I put a pppoe client on a bridge in which there is also the eoip tunnel. I had encryption activated on pppoe and I had no problem for the time of test (about 1 hour).
PPPoE MTU is 1500, EOIP MTU is 1512 and interfaces MTU are 1554 (I reserved 4 byte for future vlans on the eoip).

marcodefreitas · Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:26 am

The bug are present on all possible variant of config, I write "default settings" to underline the easy way for reproduce the bug.
For make it all worst, if you use default-encryption on pppoe server over EoIP tunnel, the kernel crash at the first logged user.

If you read my previous post on the previous version topic, you can read me proposing that kernel crash bug propably since 6.8, and I open also the ticket, but nothing is changed till now.

Did you tried VPLS/MPLS in this setup?

hossain2004a · Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:21 am

There is a little problem annoying me each time I upgrade and:
after each upgrade all of my counter will reset.

Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:11 am

Counters are reset by reboot.

Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:47 am

rextended - I have created configuration which you did describe. Will see if we manage to reproduce your issue.

alibalalo - Which model of SXT are you using? Not all devices has something to show under Health menu.

ibm · Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:27 am

Are you sure about this?
A few days ago I tested a configuration with 3 rb951 with 6.27 and ospf running, on the first rb I create an eoip tunnel to the third and I created also a pppoe server on a bridge in wich there is also the eoip tunnel. Then i created an eoip tunnel in the third rb to first and I put a pppoe client on a bridge in which there is also the eoip tunnel. I had encryption activated on pppoe and I had no problem for the time of test (about 1 hour).
PPPoE MTU is 1500, EOIP MTU is 1512 and interfaces MTU are 1554 (I reserved 4 byte for future vlans on the eoip).

This is a screen on the rb1 (the pppoe server), as

you can see there is also the encryption running.

paka · Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:14 am

Maybe Winbox is slow to give updates beause your router is 100% CPU loaded? What is the cause of CPU load ?

100 % CPU load is since we have upgraded from v6.6 to v6.22.
The cause for that is bug
see here http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=91468

in v6.22 we had not problem with system time
You say v6.22 but image shows v6.25, but this topic is actually about v6.27 ...

I've upgraded to v6.27, regardless system time does not work
For problem with 100 % CPU found - dude usage over 72%
but i can't understand why dude usage? - dude is not activated, see package state by attachment

Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:29 am

paka - Do not simply disable Dude package. Please remove it and check your CPU usage then. If load drops, then check clock again.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:30 am

The bug are present on all possible variant of config, I write "default settings" to underline the easy way for reproduce the bug.
For make it all worst, if you use default-encryption on pppoe server over EoIP tunnel, the kernel crash at the first logged user.

If you read my previous post on the previous version topic, you can read me proposing that kernel crash bug propably since 6.8, and I open also the ticket, but nothing is changed till now.
Did you tried VPLS/MPLS in this setup?

Not, I not use VPLS or MPLS on any point of my net.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:40 am

There is a little problem annoying me each time I upgrade and:
after each upgrade all of my counter will reset.

The couter are not stored inside RB and is perfectly normal to lost all,
is not a bug.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:42 am

Are you sure about this?
A few days ago I tested a configuration with 3 rb951 with 6.27 and ospf running, on the first rb I create an eoip tunnel to the third and I created also a pppoe server on a bridge in wich there is also the eoip tunnel. Then i created an eoip tunnel in the third rb to first and I put a pppoe client on a bridge in which there is also the eoip tunnel. I had encryption activated on pppoe and I had no problem for the time of test (about 1 hour).
PPPoE MTU is 1500, EOIP MTU is 1512 and interfaces MTU are 1554 (I reserved 4 byte for future vlans on the eoip).
This is a screen on the rb1 (the pppoe server), as
you can see there is also the encryption running.

Your test are invalid, you put the pppoe-server on the bridge, not the pppoe-server on eoip directly.
I never mentioned bridges.

ibm · Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:46 am

Are you sure about this?
A few days ago I tested a configuration with 3 rb951 with 6.27 and ospf running, on the first rb I create an eoip tunnel to the third and I created also a pppoe server on a bridge in wich there is also the eoip tunnel. Then i created an eoip tunnel in the third rb to first and I put a pppoe client on a bridge in which there is also the eoip tunnel. I had encryption activated on pppoe and I had no problem for the time of test (about 1 hour).
PPPoE MTU is 1500, EOIP MTU is 1512 and interfaces MTU are 1554 (I reserved 4 byte for future vlans on the eoip).
This is a screen on the rb1 (the pppoe server), as
you can see there is also the encryption running.

Your test are invalid, you put the pppoe-server on the bridge, not the pppoe-server on eoip directly.
I never mentioned bridges.

Mmh, ok.
Using bridge is not for you a good workaround?

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:02 pm

rextended - I have created configuration which you did describe. Will see if we manage to reproduce your issue.

alibalalo - Which model of SXT are you using? Not all devices has something to show under Health menu.

If you take in charge the bug,
I can make again the test config and post it on the forum.
(On the past RB1100AHx2 + RB951Ui-2HnD, but also happen on new CCR... is not hardware related...)

Those are the links for all post about this two bug:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... x2#p411334
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... x2#p411343
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... x2#p417272
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... x2#p421337
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... x2#p440221
The various links also contain some ticket # already opened.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:14 pm

Mmh, ok.
Using bridge is not for you a good workaround?

You probably find the solution for circumventing the problem (must be tested with real traffic first),
but the problem still present.

I also stop using "default-encription", but the memory leak when pass traffic, hang the board after some time is used....

ibm · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:22 pm

Mmh, ok.
Using bridge is not for you a good workaround?
You probably find the solution for circumventing the problem (must be tested with real traffic first),
but the problem still present.

I also stop using "default-encription", but the memory leak when pass traffic, hang the board after some time is used....

I forgot to mention that with all default MTU when I tried to ping the pppoe server from the pppoe client routerboard with a MTU size bigger than 1454 the rb1 rebooted due a kernel panic.
So the problem could be related to MTU.

Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:25 pm

rextended - Could you please generate new supout file after your device has crashed and send it to our support mail? I will check it out and try to rerpoduce.

For a few hours my setup is running now and no issues. Links to previous posts include few ticket numbers but they are from old versions and more related to other issues. Supout file from latest version with crash report would be very helpful.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:30 pm

Mmh, ok.
Using bridge is not for you a good workaround?
You probably find the solution for circumventing the problem (must be tested with real traffic first),
but the problem still present.

I also stop using "default-encription", but the memory leak when pass traffic, hang the board after some time is used....
I forgot to mention that with all default MTU when I tried to ping the pppoe server from the pppoe client routerboard with a MTU size bigger than 1454 the rb1 rebooted due a kernel panic.
So the problem could be related to MTU.

I do not know what is happen, but all start with RouterOS 6.8, when mikrotik has rewrited ppp:

*) kernel drivers for ppp, pppoe, pptp, l2tp are now lock-less on transmit %26 receive;
but it deplete free memory until kernel crash, if pppoe-server are (DIRECTLY) over EoIP

*) all ppp packets (except discovery packets) now can be handled by multiple cores;
i not know is it related

*) MPPE driver now can handle up to 256 out-of-order packets;
but crash the kernel if MPPE encryption are used in combination with MRRU on pppoe-server over EoIP, when pass traffic on pppoe link.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:31 pm

rextended - Could you please generate new supout file after your device has crashed and send it to our support mail? I will check it out and try to rerpoduce.

For a few hours my setup is running now and no issues. Links to previous posts include few ticket numbers but they are from old versions and more related to other issues. Supout file from latest version with crash report would be very helpful.

Ok, wait please, I make it again:

I use one CCR-1036-12G-4S and one RB951Ui-2HnD
Both just netinstalled only with routeros-6.27, without keep old configuration, and update the bios with 3.22 on both.
Only one ethernet cable put between the two ether2 of the devices.

Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:06 pm

rextended - Seems like I managed to reproduce. Wil see what programmers can do about it. Thank you.

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:19 pm

rextended - Seems like I managed to reproduce. Wil see what programmers can do about it. Thank you.

VERY VERY VERY THANKS!!!!!!!!

Config on CCR 1:

[admin@MikroTik] > export
# jan/02/1970 00:37:15 by RouterOS 6.27
# software id = ****-****
#
/interface eoip
add !keepalive mac-address=02:4B:D6:06:ED:9B name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=10.0.0.2 tunnel-id=0
/port
set 0 name=serial0
set 1 name=serial1
/interface pppoe-server server
add disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 max-mru=1480 max-mtu=1480 mrru=1600 service-name=service1
/ip address
add address=10.0.0.1/24 interface=ether2 network=10.0.0.0
/ppp secret
add local-address=10.1.0.1 name=test password=test remote-address=10.1.0.2
/system routerboard settings
set cpu-frequency=1200MHz memory-frequency=1066DDR
[admin@MikroTik] >

config on RB951 and lines with errors:

jan/02/1970 00:01:12 system,error,critical System rebooted because of kernel failu
re
jan/02/1970 00:01:12 system,error,critical Out of memory condition was detected
jan/02/1970 00:01:12 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shut
down
[admin@MikroTik] > export
# jan/02/1970 00:05:13 by RouterOS 6.27
# software id = ****-****
#
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] l2mtu=2290
/interface eoip
add !keepalive mac-address=02:81:70:72:C2:07 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=10.0.0.1 tunnel-id=0
/interface pppoe-client
add add-default-route=yes disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 mrru=1600 name=pppoe-out1 password=test user=test
/ip address
add address=10.0.0.2/24 interface=ether2 network=10.0.0.0
/system routerboard settings
set cpu-frequency=500MHz
[admin@MikroTik] >

After more than 100M of traffic are passed, RB951 go out of memory and kernel crash.
For make crash CCR, you must do that various time, because CCR has more memory than RB951

For other users: OBVIOUSLY this configuration is ONLY for test purpose, not how pppoe must be used between two devices.
The config is simulating this:
pppoe-server->EoIP server->various network devices->EoIP client->bridge->wlan->cpe wlan->pppoe client

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:36 pm

Mmh, ok.
Using bridge is not for you a good workaround?
You probably find the solution for circumventing the problem (must be tested with real traffic first),
but the problem still present.

I also stop using "default-encription", but the memory leak when pass traffic, hang the board after some time is used....
I forgot to mention that with all default MTU when I tried to ping the pppoe server from the pppoe client routerboard with a MTU size bigger than 1454 the rb1 rebooted due a kernel panic.
So the problem could be related to MTU.

I do the same test again, using default bridge between pppoe-server and EoIP, and one between eoip and pppoe-client
this not solve temporarly the problem

ibm · Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:30 pm

I do the same test again, using default bridge between pppoe-server and EoIP, and one between eoip and pppoe-client
this not solve temporarly the problem

How is it possible?
These are my export:

RB1 Server:

/interface bridge
add mtu=1554 name=bridge_pppoe
add mtu=1554 name=bridge_wan
add mtu=1500 name=lo
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=2ghz-b/g/n disabled=no frequency=2422 l2mtu=2290 mode=station-bridge ssid="MikroTik test" tx-power=14 tx-power-mode=all-rates-fixed
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether2 ] mtu=1554
/interface eoip
add !keepalive mac-address=02:F5:3B:21:71:7E mtu=1512 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=10.1.0.6 tunnel-id=0
/interface wireless security-profiles
set [ find default=yes ] authentication-types=wpa2-psk eap-methods="" mode=dynamic-keys wpa2-pre-shared-key=test
/ppp profile
set 0 dns-server=10.1.0.1 local-address=10.128.0.1 use-compression=no use-mpls=no use-vj-compression=no
set 1 dns-server=10.1.0.1 local-address=10.128.0.1 use-compression=no use-mpls=no use-vj-compression=no
/routing ospf instance
set [ find default=yes ] redistribute-static=as-type-1 router-id=10.101.0.1
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge_wan interface=wlan1
add bridge=bridge_wan interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge_pppoe interface=eoip-tunnel1
/interface pppoe-server server
add authentication=chap,mschap2 disabled=no interface=bridge_pppoe max-mru=1500 max-mtu=1500 service-name=service1
/ip address
add address=10.1.0.1/30 interface=ether2 network=10.1.0.0
add address=10.101.0.1/32 interface=lo network=10.101.0.1
/ip dhcp-client
add dhcp-options=hostname,clientid interface=bridge_wan
add default-route-distance=0 dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no interface=wlan1
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=bridge_wan
/ip route
add disabled=yes distance=1 dst-address=192.168.0.190/32 gateway=bridge_wan
/ppp secret
add name=test password=test profile=default-encryption remote-address=10.1.0.200 service=pppoe
/routing ospf interface
add authentication=md5 authentication-key=test interface=ether2 network-type=broadcast
/routing ospf network
add area=backbone network=10.1.0.0/30
add area=backbone network=10.1.0.4/30
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Europe/Rome
/system ntp client
set enabled=yes primary-ntp=192.168.0.1

RB3 Client:

/interface bridge
add mtu=1554 name=bridge1
add mtu=1500 name=lo
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] l2mtu=2290
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether2 ] mtu=1554
/interface eoip
add !keepalive mac-address=FE:8A:BC:D5:5E:9B mtu=1512 name=eoip1 remote-address=10.1.0.1 tunnel-id=0
/ip pool
add name=dhcp_pool1 ranges=192.168.1.2-192.168.1.254
/ip dhcp-server
add address-pool=dhcp_pool1 disabled=no interface=ether4 lease-time=3d name=dhcp1
/interface pppoe-client
add disabled=no interface=bridge1 max-mru=1500 max-mtu=1500 mrru=1600 name=pppoe-out1 password=test profile=default-encryption user=test
/routing ospf instance
set [ find default=yes ] redistribute-connected=as-type-1 redistribute-static=as-type-1 router-id=10.101.0.6
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge1 interface=eoip1
/ip address
add address=10.1.0.6/30 interface=ether2 network=10.1.0.4
add address=10.101.0.6/32 interface=lo network=10.101.0.6
add address=192.168.1.1/24 interface=ether4 network=192.168.1.0
/ip dhcp-server network
add address=192.168.1.0/24 gateway=192.168.1.1
/ip dns
set servers=8.8.8.8
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=pppoe-out1 src-address=192.168.1.0/24
/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=pppoe-out1
/routing ospf interface
add authentication=md5 authentication-key=test interface=ether2 network-type=broadcast
/routing ospf network
add area=backbone network=10.1.0.4/30
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Europe/Rome

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:42 pm

/interface bridge
add mtu=1554 name=bridge_pppoe

I do not know, but I use all DEFAULT settings, not mtu=1554

rextended · Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:57 pm

RB951g-2Hnd

Interfaces - Blink not working.

on 6.27 (3.22) it's working like 6.23 (3.18):
works on all connected ethernet ports,
not work on unconnected ethernets.
all connected ethernets blink at the same time, not only the selected.

mcdebugger · Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:32 pm

Any news on CAPsMAN? See nothing in changelogs for recent versions, do U have some development on the topic?

alibalalo · Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:48 pm

Use the device sxt 5ndr2 lite
In the previous version RouterOS v5 was working well

rextended · Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:43 am

Use the device sxt 5ndr2 lite
In the previous version RouterOS v5 was working well

What version exactly?
I downgrade one SXT Lite5 (SXT 5nD r2) serial-number: 46AD048A8FE9 BIOS 3.18
from 6.20 to 5.26 but I not see in both case any info on healt...

I not remember any "Lite" model with temperature or voltage sensor...

SXT 2nD r2 (SXT Lite 2):

[admin@xxx] > sys
[admin@xxx] /system> rou
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: SXT 2nD r2
     serial-number: 467E0240D765
  current-firmware: 3.18
  upgrade-firmware: 3.18
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> ..
[admin@xxx] /system> he
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri

[admin@xxx] /system health>

RB911-5Hn (RB911 Lite5)

[admin@xxx] > sys
[admin@xxx] /system> rou
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: 911-5Hn
     serial-number: 4E6704A1B74B
  current-firmware: 3.18
  upgrade-firmware: 3.18
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> ..
[admin@xxx] /system> he
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri

[admin@xxx] /system health>

SXT 5HnD:

[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: SXT 5HnD
     serial-number: 2DCA012AF8C3
  current-firmware: 3.17
  upgrade-firmware: 3.17
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> ..
[admin@xxx] /system> health 
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri
      voltage: 18.1V
  temperature: 30C
[admin@xxx] /system health>

SXT G-2HnD:

[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: SXT G-2HnD
     serial-number: 41F902558F90
  current-firmware: 3.17
  upgrade-firmware: 3.17
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> ..
[admin@xxx] /system> he
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri
      voltage: 23.8V
  temperature: 36C
[admin@xxx] /system health>

SXT 5HPnD:

[admin@xxx] > sys
[admin@xxx] /system> rou
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: SXT 5HPnD
     serial-number: 45EF023C9C2B
  current-firmware: 3.17
  upgrade-firmware: 3.17
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> ..
[admin@xxx] /system> he
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri
      voltage: 23.6V
  temperature: 34C
[admin@xxx] /system health>

SXT G-5HPnD r2 (SXT SA):

[admin@xxx] > sys
[admin@xxx] /system> rou
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> pri
       routerboard: yes
             model: SXT G-5HPnD r2
     serial-number: 46BC02124E94
  current-firmware: 3.22
  upgrade-firmware: 3.22
[admin@xxx] /system routerboard> .. he
[admin@xxx] /system health> pri
      voltage: 26.7V
  temperature: 18C
[admin@xxx] /system health>

rextended · Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:54 am

After some day of running 6.27,
RANDOMLY
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.8.0
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.14988.1.1.3.8.0 )
stop working on some boards.

STILL WORKING ON API, WINBOX AND TERMINAL, ONLY THIS SPECIFIC SNMP OID STOP WORKING

On 6.24 I never have one problem (Yes, I jump directly from 6.24 to 6.27 on all core machines)

I do not understand why the simple or twice reboot do not solve nothing, buit if I do:

The solution (my solution...): open the device with clean winbox (no load previous session), click on system/healt, open new terminal, write "/system healt;print", press enter, and write "print oid", press enter and after that, reboot the device, and the system healt voltage oid are get again by snmp

after that the OID mtxrHlVoltage work again.

Is the only OID stop working (the OK are for each RB model than support it!),
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlVoltage.0: KO on some random boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlActiveFan.0: OK on all boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlTemperature.0: OK on all boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlProcessorTemperature.0: OK on all boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlCurrent.0: OK on all boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlPower.0: OK on all boards
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.mikrotik.mikrotikExperimentalModule.mtXRouterOs.mtxrHealth.mtxrHlProcessorFrequency.0: OK on all boards

Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:58 am

alibalalo - This model does not have any Health info as already been said in this topic. I double checked also on version 5.26. There are still nothing on Health. Thought maybe there could have been, for example, temperature=0, but still Health window is empty.

rextended · Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:44 pm

I also update MIKROTIK-MIB, but after fix some problem, the bug is still present.

paka · Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:38 pm

paka - Do not simply disable Dude package. Please remove it and check your CPU usage then. If load drops, then check clock again.

Thank you very much! it is working

w0lt · Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:53 pm

Can someone confirm, whether or not, if the EoIP "auto-mtu" function is working correctly in v6.27?
It doesn't seem to be working for me, and wanted to know if anyone else is having this issue?
Works ok for "GRE" tunnels..

I use the EoIP tunnel over the internet, and have different MTU's when using a cable modem on one end, and a DSL (PPPoE) on the other end. and as I said, the "auto-mtu" function seems to compensate very nicely using GRE, but not EoIP. If this needs to be corrected, I would really like to see that in 6.28 if possible.

Thanks,

-tp

rextended · Fri Feb 20, 2015 4:40 pm

Can someone confirm, whether or not, if the EoIP "auto-mtu" function is working correctly in v6.27?
It doesn't seem to be working for me, and wanted to know if anyone else is having this issue?
Works ok for "GRE" tunnels..
I use the EoIP tunnel over the internet, and have different MTU's when using a cable modem on one end, and a DSL (PPPoE) on the other end. and as I said, the "auto-mtu" function seems to compensate very nicely using GRE, but not EoIP. If this needs to be corrected, I would really like to see that in 6.28 if possible.

Thanks,

-tp

I use auto discovery on bridge, EoIP and GRE (from 6.2? to 6.27) and actually I do not have noticed any problem.

More detail, please?

jwcn · Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:24 pm

Still having 100% CPU issues on RB2011's. SNMP disabled, no polling with the Dude. Ticket Ticket#2015020266000038 from three weeks ago still unanswered. Please help. Management process culprit for the CPU spike. Spike to 100% and stops passing data. RB2011 is doing nothing except acting as a switch. Ports 1-5 switched 6-10 bridged to port 1.

rextended · Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:28 pm

Still having 100% CPU issues on RB2011's. SNMP disabled, no polling with the Dude. Ticket Ticket#2015020266000038 from three weeks ago still unanswered. Please help. Management process culprit for the CPU spike. Spike to 100% and stops passing data. RB2011 is doing nothing except acting as a switch. Ports 1-5 switched 6-10 bridged to port 1.

Too few details.
Packages and version of that package installed?

jwcn · Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:39 pm

[img]

Mikrotik%20Screenshot.jpg

[/img]

vortex · Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:14 pm

The banner wastes an unbelievable amount of space on mobile, leaving about half the screen for the actual posts in landscape, and completely obscuring the editing area also in landscape, so that composing posts in such mode is impossible.

I also did not find how to quote, that is why this post was added by itself to the bottom of the thread.

Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:25 pm

[img]
Mikrotik%20Screenshot.jpg
[/img]

Where do you see 100 % cpu on your picture? How profiler looks like?

pturkey · Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:58 pm

I just upgraded to 6.27 on my RB711-5HnD and upgraded the routerboard to 3.22.
It looked good at the start so I ran a speed test at http://www.speedtest.net/.
The router disconnected, then I ran a wireless scan it shows no ap's at all.
Rebooting makes it reconnect but it disconnects as soon as I try a speed test.
Downgrading back to 6.23 make everything work again.

0 R name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros AR92xx mode=station-pseudobridge ssid="" frequency=5300
band=5ghz-a/n channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below scan-list=default wireless-protocol=any wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no
bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=default compression=no

jwcn · Fri Feb 20, 2015 8:53 pm

[img]
Mikrotik%20Screenshot.jpg
[/img]
Where do you see 100 % cpu on your picture? How profiler looks like?

Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.

docmarius · Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:31 pm

It seems that SPF status is broken on CRS-125, with no info shown except 'module present' (S-31DLC20D).
Module works correctly nevertheless.

Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:08 pm

Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.

Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?

infernoltu · Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:53 pm

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.

jwcn · Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:25 am

Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.
Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?

No.

yvhitxcel · Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:23 am

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com

rextended · Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:03 pm

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.

How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

rextended · Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:07 pm

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com

Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.

infernoltu · Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:08 pm

Physical cloadcores run each of them with lic preinstalled.
Virtual mikrotiks, they are clones of each other.
I am using them already for couple years, and did not experienced any problems till now.
So this means if i try to get software upgrade with same ID, it will fail?

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:03 pm

Physical cloadcores run each of them with lic preinstalled.
Virtual mikrotiks, they are clones of each other.
I am using them already for couple years, and did not experienced any problems till now.
So this means if i try to get software upgrade with same ID, it will fail?

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

Did you pay for license for each individual copy?

infernoltu · Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:39 pm

Problem solved.
Its not licensing or smth like that.
Its smth wrong with system>packages updater.
I upgraded manually from 6.21.1 to 6.26 and to 6.27 successfully.

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

yvhitxcel · Sun Feb 22, 2015 5:45 am

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.

interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

Spirch · Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:09 am

I have a RB951G-2HnD with v6.13 and firmware v3.14

is there any reason for me to update to 6.27 if I currently have no issue?

this is a simple home router setup

Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:11 am

If you are happy with your setup, don't touch it.

rextended · Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:17 pm

If you are happy with your setup, don't touch it.

+100

docmarius · Sun Feb 22, 2015 2:16 pm

There is a saying: Better is good's worst enemy.

vortex · Sun Feb 22, 2015 5:16 pm

Upgrading from 5.26 to 6.25 or 6.27 enabled ppp, wireless, and hotspot (these last two very bad).

deanMKD1 · Mon Feb 23, 2015 2:48 am

@vortex what is very bad with wireless and hotspot?

vortex · Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:19 am

That I had them disabled and the upgrade silently activated them, and I don't know if that results in a wide open network.

Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:41 am

A loop [or bridge loop] occurs in computer networks when there is more than one Layer 2 (OSI model) path between two endpoints (e.g. multiple connections between two network hosts). Examine your network topology and find duplicate connection and remove it from your network.

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.
interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:08 am

I just upgraded to 6.27 on my RB711-5HnD and upgraded the routerboard to 3.22.
It looked good at the start so I ran a speed test at http://www.speedtest.net/.
The router disconnected, then I ran a wireless scan it shows no ap's at all.
Rebooting makes it reconnect but it disconnects as soon as I try a speed test.
Downgrading back to 6.23 make everything work again.

0 R name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros AR92xx mode=station-pseudobridge ssid="" frequency=5300
band=5ghz-a/n channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below scan-list=default wireless-protocol=any wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no
bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=default compression=no

Please provide us more information about your setup. The AP or this Client router stopped working?
Also send the support output files to support@mikrotik.com

simaskkk · Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:23 pm

Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)

Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.

zyzelis · Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:38 pm

Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)
Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.

If queue type is "default" Try to change default queue type to another eg from pfifo to RED. and write here if it helps.

Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:53 pm

simaskkk - Does problem persist if you disable/enable queues? Do you have scripts/schedulers or something else which might change queue settings while they are working?

simaskkk · Mon Feb 23, 2015 4:15 pm

I will do some testing to figure out where the problem is and will open the case soon.

simaskkk - Does problem persist if you disable/enable queues? Do you have scripts/schedulers or something else which might change queue settings while they are working?

Mon Feb 23, 2015 4:35 pm

It seems that SPF status is broken on CRS-125, with no info shown except 'module present' (S-31DLC20D).
Module works correctly nevertheless.

It's possible that system didn't manage to get correct info or get anything at all from eeprom/ddmi on transceiver. In cases like that after several attempts system will give up and leave those fields empty. Replugging the module, reboot or power cycle might help.

docmarius · Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:12 pm

Tnx krisjanis,
Replugging the module did solve the issue - all info is in its place

Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:23 am

rextended - We finally managed to fix crash when PPPoE was being configured over EoIP. Fix should be included in 6.28rc5 and later versions of RouterOS.

rextended · Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:41 am

rextended - We finally managed to fix crash when PPPoE was being configured over EoIP. Fix should be included in 6.28rc5 and later versions of RouterOS.

YES! YES! YES!
Thanks!

sparrow · Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:24 pm

What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;

Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?
This behaviour still persist on 6.27!

Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:03 pm

What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;
Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?
This behaviour still persist on 6.27!

Although similar, this behaviour (one all interface reload after L2MTU changes) is not related to the problem in v6.7.
Users are now warned in wiki about such behaviour.
Warning: L2MTU configuration changes on Cloud Core Routers evoke all interface reload (link down - link up) due to necessary internal processes.
It is recommended to configure L2MTU with caution by keeping in mind that it can cause short interruption with connected devices.

wotoni · Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:27 pm

Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.

Thanks!

bax · Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:27 pm

Well last night i was try to upgrade my x86 ROS to v6.27 ...
Userman is give error like "radius server not responding" so i must fast downgrade to v6.26.
On other routerboard devices it looks that all is fine.
Can someone try to upgrade device with userman ?

micromaxi · Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:34 pm

Funny i just noticed on the download package from this site that the 6.27 software has been updated (release date is now 23-02-2015 where it was 11-02-2015) however i just cant find any changes in the changelog. And why hasnt the version number not been altered ?

Normis ?

Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:08 pm

Funny i just noticed on the download package from this site that the 6.27 software has been updated (release date is now 23-02-2015 where it was 11-02-2015) however i just cant find any changes in the changelog. And why hasnt the version number not been altered ?

Normis ?

The release date changed because we added "smips" RouterOS version for the hAP lite boards in the website. There are no other changes.

hossain2004a · Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:14 pm

Well last night i was try to upgrade my x86 ROS to v6.27 ...
Userman is give error like "radius server not responding" so i must fast downgrade to v6.26.
On other routerboard devices it looks that all is fine.
Can someone try to upgrade device with userman ?

It's been month, I've upgrade router with userman package, but no luck. Still have that error "not responding...." searched the forums and found no solution.
But it works fine except sometimes

finalcutroot · Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:39 pm

This is the third time
when i open winbox and goto the Interfaces
the router crash
i use simple script/scheduler to turn off interfaces on specific time

hapi · Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:01 pm

This is the third time
when i open winbox and goto the Interfaces
the router crash
i use simple script/scheduler to turn off interfaces on specific time

same problem on two x86 routers. Local access is ok but print anything go to crash or not print. Router is not function. Same is fresh install 6.27 is same problem on same router.

Ljubo · Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:12 am

An error, which I don't know the meaning of, occasionally appears in the log.
I would be greateful if you could tell me if this error occurs due to a configuration fault or if someone is trying to connect but I am unable to see the IP from which it is coming from.
This started happening after upgrade 6.27, but before the update I didn't see the error.

Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:19 pm

Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:

A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B

A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.

Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.

Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…

Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.

Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]

To this ticket. I received today info from Mikrotik support that I should have all involved ros devices at the same level (6.27). But the ticket was also about the SSTP not working between two 6.27 devices. So the advice was false.

I found the solution myself: it is the PFS option that is not documented. Correct settings allows communication between both 6.27 as between different versions (for example 6.27-6.18 or 6.27-6.25 in my case).

Mikrotik should take care about the documentation if changing/adding anything!

siavashblade · Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:07 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!

what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

mars · Wed Feb 25, 2015 2:44 pm

anybody having a problem with simple queues and mangle rules in ros 6.27
the mangle rules are not marking the traffic properly so simple queues are not working
in ros 6.26 it works with no problems

deanMKD1 · Thu Feb 26, 2015 1:35 am

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

Farhadgh · Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:36 am

Hello normis. I wanted to inform you of this bug in case of you didn't read that:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=94415
It's making me a lot of effort.

ofca · Thu Feb 26, 2015 4:42 am

so when all_packages torrent/zip will be back?

siavashblade · Thu Feb 26, 2015 7:37 am

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

VagnerBecker · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:22 pm

I'm having trouble with IPv6, the interface I try to add an ip starting from a pool is in red and does not work until you restart the equipment, is an example

ipv6 pool add prefix=2001:db8::/56 prefix-length=64 name=pool1
ipv6 address add interface=ether1 address=::1/64 from-pool=pool1

karina · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:29 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!
For me it works faster...
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?

I can confirm that I also had a speed hit on V 6.27. BAck to 6.19 all good again. I also noticed a degrading of voip quality. This was on a 1100AH. Personally for me with the config I use 6.19 is still the most stable. It is possibe the upgrade is not taking properly somewhere and a fresh install would be fine but I have not tested this

deanMKD1 · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:57 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?
all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.

LaZyLion · Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:43 pm

LaZyLion - Since 6.27 "/system package update check-for-updates" is dynamic and gives output to console. That has caused changes.

You can use command like this:
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "current-version")

Great, that gives me the current version, which I can also get using

 :put [/system resource get version ]

But when I attempt to get the latest-version, it just returns a blank.

:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "latest-version")

Status isn't very helpful either:

:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "status")

resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

Obviously the command needs time to go online and get the information,
so how do I get it to wait?

Any suggestions on how to get the latest-version without doing

/tool fetch url="something.mikrotik.com/something"

Basdno · Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:02 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.

This is clearly the wrong topic for this, a new topic under GENERAL f.ex. would probably have been a lot better place for this!
BUT:
The problem is clearly stated in the error message in Mikrotik winbox, and translated it says your Mikrotik router that recieved the dns adress is BEHIND a Firewalled/NATted gateway. Meaning it is not possible to directly connect to that mikrotik-router from the internett.
This again means if you want to use that DNS adress via the internett, I think you will have to make a NAT RULE(s) in your GATEWAY-ROUTER(Probably your DSL modem or something) that sends all requests the gateway recieves from the internet for that dns-adress to be forwarded directly to your Mikrotik router.
This feature works best and easiest if your Mikrotik router IS the Gateway, since it then has direct contact with the internet.
Hope that helps you understand the problem and how to solve it a little better.

Cheers

rextended · Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:24 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!
For me it works faster...
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?

I can confirm that I also had a speed hit on V 6.27. BAck to 6.19 all good again. I also noticed a degrading of voip quality. This was on a 1100AH. Personally for me with the config I use 6.19 is still the most stable. It is possibe the upgrade is not taking properly somewhere and a fresh install would be fine but I have not tested this

For me 6.27 work faster than 6.24 and previous version used (USED, not only TESTED) on all my network infrastructure
(except for CPE for the huge amount of time to update it all, actually all the CPE are 6.20)

BUT...

the strange thing on pictures:
no one notice the differencies on minutes between the two images?
reboot the machine to start new RouterOS, and start and complete the test again after only 3 minutes???
Or I have misunderstand the images?
I save the picture for not be removed or altered:

4138062096.png

4138069907.png

P.S.
FOR ALL USERS:
I suggest to STOP TO USE SPEEDTEST FOR DO THE TEST (if you not are the owner of the other side...)
Use two other machine to do the test properly. On this way you can also test different packet size and tipology of traffic.
You have never the warranty than the service, on the other side, are overcharged from other users...
I do not think than the various "speedtest" servers have unlimited & warranted bandwidth for you and the all the other users.