Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
hendry
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Fri Nov 13, 2015 8:34 am

Hi there, I'm trying to replicate the setup of http://wingloon.com/2012/01/22/how-to-s ... v4-dd-wrt/ on my 951Ui-2HnD.

But I didn't quite understand his instructions. I already know I have a working IPTV setup on port 5 with VLAN id 600. So I created a new VLAN 592 to be able to send the PPPoE internet down through port 5, but my current setup does not work.

http://s.natalian.org/2015-11-13/592.png
http://s.natalian.org/2015-11-12/supout.rif

I tried so far as tcpdumping each port `sudo tcpdump -n -e -vv -ttt -i enp0s25 vlan | grep vlan` and oddly on each port 2-5 I see vlan 1 (where does that come from!?!!). I see VLAN id 592 on ports 2-4 which shouldn't be the case and worryingly no VLAN id 592 on 5! So where am I going wrong??

Some things I don't understand about Mikrotik:

WebFig 6.32.3 is good, but a typical vlan setup seems to span LOTS of menus. Is there a better way to get a summary?! http://192.168.88.1/webfig/#Interfaces comes close but it lacks a lot of details about which ports are connected where!!

I connect to the Internet via a PPPoE client on VLAN id 500. Now what I don't understand in the UI is where the internet gets mapped to. Am I correct in assuming it's bridge-local?
 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 3051
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:09 pm

I connect to the Internet via a PPPoE client on VLAN id 500. Now what I don't understand in the UI is where the internet gets mapped to. Am I correct in assuming it's bridge-local?
Not sure what you're trying to achieve, why are you creating a new VLAN then? To send PPPoE where??
Create a new VLAN interface on the WAN interface, ID=500 and put the PPPoE client on that VLAN interface, why do you want to dial pppoe from another router??
 
User avatar
hendry
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:04 am

I am creating VLAN592 not to send PPPoE, but to share the internet that the PPPoE internet provides over "bridge-local" IIUC with the DHCP service 192.168.88.x.

Sorry there was a long delay replying since I going back and forth with Mikrotik support who just suggested a simple port 5 bridge with VLAN600. This approach doesn't work with my IPTV box. I have no idea why. I suspect the IPTV doesn't like untagged traffic.

So my current approach was to create VLAN592 on bridge-local and bridge to bridge-iptv. But it doesn't work. I have no idea why.
 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 3051
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:07 pm

You should provide an export of your configuration (edit out any sensitive info) of the router and a diagram of your network devices and connections, otherwise it's hard to help...
 
User avatar
hendry
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:30 am

Thanks. With the help of Mikrotik support I FINALLY have it working! http://ix.io/mlR :D

WRONG:
add interface=bridge-local l2mtu=1594 name=vlan592-eth5 vlan-id=592
add bridge=bridge-iptv interface=vlan592-eth5
RIGHT:
add interface=ether5-local l2mtu=1594 name=vlan592-eth5 vlan-id=592
add bridge=bridge-local interface=vlan592-eth5

I thought that ONLY a bridge could be connected to a port 5. I didn't realise that the VLAN could be connected straight to ether5.

So confusing! :shock:

I wish this all could be setup from:
http://192.168.88.1/webfig/#Interfaces

Not bouncing between:
http://192.168.88.1/webfig/#Interfaces.VLAN &
http://192.168.88.1/webfig/#Bridge.Ports
 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 3051
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:41 pm

Use winbox, is much more practical
 
User avatar
hendry
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:49 pm

I don't use Windows. How is it more practical? I thought Webfig mirrored its functionality. Why shouldn't it?
 
User avatar
bajodel
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:02 pm

I don't use Windows. How is it more practical? I thought Webfig mirrored its functionality. Why shouldn't it?
Winbox is extremely more practical, you can show any column/field on tables and save your customized views in different profiles as you like .. ..

Try it! ..you will never come back to webfig :D
 
User avatar
hendry
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:41 pm

I can't Winbox it since I don't have Windows. I hope Mikrotik improve their Web interface!
 
User avatar
BartoszP
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3044
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:13 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:14 pm

 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 3051
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Pumping two VLANs down port 5 (IPTV+Internet)

Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:52 pm

I don't use Windows. How is it more practical? I thought Webfig mirrored its functionality. Why shouldn't it?
Me neither... as BartosZ pointed, use wine.

If you use OS X, with winebottler (winebottler.kronenberg.org) to generate a "standard" self-contained app is a two click task.

Imagine how practical it is, that for me and all the colleagues I know, is one of the key factors putting Mikrotik away from the rest, big "irons" included.

Just take a spare hour along with http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Winbox and play with it and you'll see for yourself.

There are two key facts also that you will miss if not using it: Neighbor discovery/Mac telnet and RoMON, features that are uber-practical to work in layer 2 with any device, even unconfigured ones.