Well.. I could use it without metarouter but would really want to see this working ... looks like there is some work in progress regarding metarouter and multicore cpu support, hopefully not just for tilera CPU ...As with the RB450G before it, this unit is only really useful with metarouter. It having a dual core probably
means it doesn't have this feature. Anyone from Mikrotik?
I'm sure that's the case for you, but plenty other people find ethernet routers useful for other thingsAs with the RB450G before it, this unit is only really useful with metarouter
We have plans for a major rework in this are sometime in the future.It having a dual core probably means it doesn't have this feature
Why would I want 512MB flash and 512MB RAM if I can't do metarouter? It's not enough for a BGP full table, and it's too much for everything else.I'm sure that's the case for you, but plenty other people find ethernet routers useful for other thingsAs with the RB450G before it, this unit is only really useful with metarouter
We have plans for a major rework in this are sometime in the future.It having a dual core probably means it doesn't have this feature
Whoa, wait, what? I thought that the RB850Gx2 was only going to have 128MB flash. As soon as I saw that, I immediately dismissed it as an RB450G replacement.Why would I want 512MB flash and 512MB RAM if I can't do metarouter?
Given KVM support for MIPS32 is coming in QEMU 2.1 and already exists for PPC, I am hopeful this is the direction Mikrotik takeWe have plans for a major rework in this are sometime in the future.
You are right. They changed this. First version was with 128MB. Read this post from Normis:EDIT: Huh, weird...I just downloaded the MikroTik catalog and it does show 512MB of NAND flash on the RB850Gx2 now. I could swear it used to say something else. Did MikroTik change this, or is this a misprint?
this is most probable path that we are going to take. MIPS most probably will still be metarouter, while other arch. will use KVM as basis for virtualization (including mutlicore and singlecore PPC)
Given KVM support for MIPS32 is coming in QEMU 2.1 and already exists for PPC, I am hopeful this is the direction Mikrotik take
Thanks for the teaser Janisk. We look forward to this coming to fruitionthis is most probable path that we are going to take. MIPS most probably will still be metarouter, while other arch. will use KVM as basis for virtualization (including mutlicore and singlecore PPC)
Given KVM support for MIPS32 is coming in QEMU 2.1 and already exists for PPC, I am hopeful this is the direction Mikrotik take
this is most probable path that we are going to take. MIPS most probably will still be metarouter, while other arch. will use KVM as basis for virtualization (including mutlicore and singlecore PPC)
Given KVM support for MIPS32 is coming in QEMU 2.1 and already exists for PPC, I am hopeful this is the direction Mikrotik take