Hi Guys,

what is the best level for Noise Floor ?

Thank's

man, im learning more about this, so i'm need more explanation to input in my MT, for now i let default.

You can search in the forum to get more detailed information aboit 'noise-floor' values, e.g. the particular topic gives exact answer, what does 'noise-floor' means:
http://forum.mikrotik.com//viewtopic.ph ... loor#33302

If you are talking about 'noise-floor-threshold' configuration, most likely value is not actual to your wireless cards, some older chipsets supported this option.

You can search in the forum to get more detailed information aboit 'noise-floor' values, e.g. the particular topic gives exact answer, what does 'noise-floor' means:
http://forum.mikrotik.com//viewtopic.ph ... loor#33302

If you are talking about 'noise-floor-threshold' configuration, most likely value is not actual to your wireless cards, some older chipsets supported this option.

But Sergejs , high noise-floor is better then low ? ( actually we have on a BTS -86dbm and on other -119/-123 )

The first one have a senao 8602FCC+Plus , the second a Zcom H622 ( 23db of power )


Thank's

But Sergejs , high noise-floor is better then low ? ( actually we have on a BTS -86dbm and on other -119/-123 )
Thank's

Less noise is always better, so a low noise floor is better than a high one...

But Sergejs , high noise-floor is better then low ? ( actually we have on a BTS -86dbm and on other -119/-123 )
Thank's

Less noise is always better, so a low noise floor is better than a high one...

So , a BTS with -120 Noise Floor is better than a BTS with -90 Noise floor .. Correct ?

So , a BTS with -120 Noise Floor is better than a BTS with -90 Noise floor .. Correct ?

Yes, i think this is obviously.

So , a BTS with -120 Noise Floor is better than a BTS with -90 Noise floor .. Correct ?

Yes, i think this is obviously.

Mipland , on MT and here , nothing is obviously.

Yes, you are right, but this is not MT, this is basic physics...

Yes, you are right, but this is not MT, this is basic physics...

If you start from zero (0), and continue in a negative direction (towards -90) then continue towards -120, then -90 is a higher value than -120, capish?

eg:

High number
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
.
.
.
-90..... [noise here is higher (louder) than noise below]
.
.
.
-120.... [noise here is not so loud]
.
low number

Yes, you are right, but this is not MT, this is basic physics...

If you start from zero (0), and continue in a negative direction (towards -90) then continue towards -120, then -90 is a higher value than -120, capish?

eg:

High number
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
.
.
.
-90..... [noise here is higher (louder) than noise below]
.
.
.
-120.... [noise here is not so loud]
.
low number

oh .. I capish and you ?

Yes, you are right, but this is not MT, this is basic physics...

Yes , I know that. Only for remark.

We have a lot of problem with MT . We have a real scenario in dense urban coverage.

So , in next days , i post our experience and our problems.


Ciao

You have to be more specific about problems. I think posts 'we have a lot of problems' are useless without problem detailed description, as there might a lot of reasons not connected with MikroTik, that can cause your issues.