hehehe, beware!!!I have strange excitement about version that was build on the Friday 13th and with full moon (at least where i'm from).
Just upgraded my home network CRS226, RB750Gr2 and few WAP ac, so far so good. Tomorrow will play with test network @ work.
No, 6.38.1 also bugged, as 6.38 (ipsec tunnel dont work)I really hope the 6.38 bugs are squashed
Just upgrade from within winbox using the check for updates under tools. Works fine for me, although I am using my own wrapped version. It's pretty easy to do yourself if you want to learn. I use WineBottler with the separate Wine app as it keeps disk space usage down and Wine can be shared with other apps. Either way, with Winbox there's really no extra stuff you need, so it's easy to wrap.Latest for Mac hasn't been done yet...
http://joshaven.com/resources/tools/winbox-for-mac/
Still stuck on 3.7..
2017-Jan-13 05:51
O RLY?05:51
Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Configuration exchange type mode config REPLY
Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Short attribute XAUTH_TYPE = 0
Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Attribute XAUTH_USER_NAME len 6
Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Attribute XAUTH_USER_PASSWORD len 11
Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,info Xauth login failed for user: ******
/ip ipsec peer> print
Flags: X - disabled, D - dynamic, R - responder
0 R address=0.0.0.0/0 passive=yes auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth secret="**********" generate-policy=port-override policy-template-group=RoadWarrior
exchange-mode=main mode-config=RW-cfg send-initial-contact=yes nat-traversal=yes proposal-check=obey hash-algorithm=sha1 enc-algorithm=aes-256
dh-group=modp1024 lifetime=1d dpd-interval=2m dpd-maximum-failures=5
Just did this -- it got me 3.8, but not 3.9 (am I misinterpreting announcement by strods, above?)Just upgrade from within winbox using the check for updates under tools. Works fine for me, although I am using my own wrapped version. It's pretty easy to do yourself if you want to learn. I use WineBottler with the separate Wine app as it keeps disk space usage down and Wine can be shared with other apps. Either way, with Winbox there's really no extra stuff you need, so it's easy to wrap.Latest for Mac hasn't been done yet...
http://joshaven.com/resources/tools/winbox-for-mac/
Still stuck on 3.7..
Click "tools -> check for updates" and upgrade your Winbox Mac version! You do not have to wait for somebody to re-compile it.Latest for Mac hasn't been done yet...
http://joshaven.com/resources/tools/winbox-for-mac/
Still stuck on 3.7.. wonder if joshaven hides out here somewhere, if so, would you be so kind and give us a 3.9 version when you get a few minutes. Thank you.
**Update**
I have just dropped joshaven a quick email to see if he can upgrade winbox for us macOS users to 3.9 as a temp fix until Mikrotik one day decides to give us a native version. Fingers crossed he is willing to do it.
GMT time2017-Jan-13 05:51O RLY?05:51
Omg I never knew that, thanks so much for pointing that out to me. How could I be so blind. Thanks again.Click "tools -> check for updates" and upgrade your Winbox Mac version! You do not have to wait for somebody to re-compile it.Latest for Mac hasn't been done yet...
http://joshaven.com/resources/tools/winbox-for-mac/
Still stuck on 3.7.. wonder if joshaven hides out here somewhere, if so, would you be so kind and give us a 3.9 version when you get a few minutes. Thank you.
**Update**
I have just dropped joshaven a quick email to see if he can upgrade winbox for us macOS users to 3.9 as a temp fix until Mikrotik one day decides to give us a native version. Fingers crossed he is willing to do it.
screen 13.jpg
Thanks, will be fixed in next 39RC and 6.38.2Unfortunately the bug with IPSec - "pre shared key xauth" introduced in 6.38 was not fixed in 6.38.1
When testing VPN with Android phone VPN type "IPSec Xauth PSK" (Nexus 5X Android version 7.1.1) RouterOS incorrectly recognizes XAUTH password length.
Password for above user attempt is in reality 10 characters long (both in "/ip ipsec user" and in Android phone).Code: Select allJan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Configuration exchange type mode config REPLY Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Short attribute XAUTH_TYPE = 0 Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Attribute XAUTH_USER_NAME len 6 Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,debug Attribute XAUTH_USER_PASSWORD len 11 Jan/16/2017 21:23:42 ipsec,info Xauth login failed for user: ******
IPSec peer config:With the same config RouterOS version 6.37.3 succesfully established IPSec tunnel (Phase 1 and Phase 2).Code: Select all/ip ipsec peer> print Flags: X - disabled, D - dynamic, R - responder 0 R address=0.0.0.0/0 passive=yes auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth secret="**********" generate-policy=port-override policy-template-group=RoadWarrior exchange-mode=main mode-config=RW-cfg send-initial-contact=yes nat-traversal=yes proposal-check=obey hash-algorithm=sha1 enc-algorithm=aes-256 dh-group=modp1024 lifetime=1d dpd-interval=2m dpd-maximum-failures=5
Can anyone repeat the above problem?
Can you be more specific, please?with the same config on bugfix version 6.37.4 i have a lot of trouble too with capsman wifi like the current release....
Which device? One of our CRS is trashed flash.One device had to be netinstalled for some unknown reason (happens time to time)
So basically it is only eye candy and should not interfere with other functions.The adding of slave ports dynamically to the bridges allows monitoring STP/RSTP port status. None of the forwarding between switched ports actually happens in the bridge.
Use netinstall to repair. After netinstall find router but BEFORE start installing - copy and save to safe place "Software ID" and "Key" values.The router keeps beeping and rebooting constantly.
Same problem with CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, VLAN port belongs to bridge and doesn't work,VLAN interfaces that have a bridge declared as a belonging interface don't work anymore. You need to declare a physical interface instead for it to work properly.
It worked ok in previous versions. At least in RB951G-2Hnd
found at RB750, RB450G, RB951Ui-2HnD but routerboard running ok without problem, just still confusing me why sometime appear sometimes dissapear@Caribetech could you send supout.rif or config, from that router? We will try to replicate your issue locally.
@aditrodostress witch RouterBoard your are using ?
Thanks, I did that and it works now.Same problem with CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, VLAN port belongs to bridge and doesn't work,VLAN interfaces that have a bridge declared as a belonging interface don't work anymore. You need to declare a physical interface instead for it to work properly.
It worked ok in previous versions. At least in RB951G-2Hnd
Downgrade to ver. 6.37.4 (Bugfix only) and problem solved.
Regards,
EDIT: Typo corrected
Can anyone from @MT respond will this be fixed or is this a intended behavior and I have to stick to 6.37.x for ever?HI - I made a topic out of this in General discussion - but I thought that i posted here as well (since it is a bug in 6.38.1)
This first happened in ROS 6.38. I have bonds to switches and servers (different vendors and different routerboards) 802.3ad (for throughtput). The bonds are always in bridges.
Untill last 6.37 all was working fine - but in 6.38 the slave ports of the bonds dinamically added to the same bridges the "master" bonds are in.
This STOPS the bonds from working. I am unable to communicate with devices connected to the switches or servers and switches connected to the bonds themselves.
In 6.38 I Was able to remove the dynamic member ports from the bridge - then everything started working again. And now - in 6.38.1 You blocked dynamic port removal - so i can't make the bonds work. I reverted to 6.38 - removed dynamic ports from the bridge and everything started working again.
Logically - i think this will always be a problem (the slave ports of a bond cannot take part in communication themselves only the master bond can - so the slaves cannot be a part of anything except the master bond).
Lukasz
Backups are not meant to move/copy configuration between different routers. Do not use it to move the configuration even between two routers of exactly the same model. It not only may lead to an undesirable effect like the one you've just described, but it also copies values which are meant to be different on different boards (for instance interface MAC addresses).1. Backup configuration via Files (copy/paste in Winbox) on A
2. Copy backed up configuration via Files (copy/paste in Winbox) from A to B
3. Restore configuration via Files on B
Appreciated for this information. I've moved disputable configuration which leads to rebooting to a different router (RB951Ui-2HnD) with 6.38.1 firmware. Will see.When you need to transfer the configuration from one router to another use /export instead.
Thanks.ditonet - Yes, that is correct. We will try to fix this in next RouterOS release.
Do you have DPD enabled?every time responder size changes its IP adress and reconnect before the old dynamic policy is flushed, there is an invalid policy
yes, Interval 5 max. failures 3. but it does not do anything. the old policy ist still there after 15 seconds and even after several minutes and does not get removed at all.Do you have DPD enabled?every time responder size changes its IP adress and reconnect before the old dynamic policy is flushed, there is an invalid policy
I saw similar problem, There is a traffic, but can't connect via winbox to RB with station-bridge mode set and no response to ping.I have problem with 6.38.1 wireless connection between 2 RB.
1 ap bridge, 2 station bridge. Both connected but no traffic.
I discovered that this:yes, Interval 5 max. failures 3. but it does not do anything. the old policy ist still there after 15 seconds and even after several minutes and does not get removed at all.Do you have DPD enabled?every time responder size changes its IP adress and reconnect before the old dynamic policy is flushed, there is an invalid policy
devices used: ccr1009 as responder (with aes-ctr and sha256 to avoid reordering problem) and RB3011, RB751G, hAP ac lite, hEX, two RB951G as initiator
Normally I am using just bugfix releases, but RSTP sounds very well, so I tried to upgrade one CRS112-8G-4S and enable RSTP. It is working on all ports except the ether6 - there is no forwarding nor learning, see the screenshot. Why? There is an old RB250GS 1.17 connected. It is not compatible? Newer RB260GS on ether8 is working fine.Still having problems when on local bridge enabled rstp. After disabling rstp, everything works as it should. This was broken in release before this one.
Two Mikrotik routers connected to each other. When rstp is enabled, I can't ping the other Mikrotik.
I have the same problem, but I had short time to look using Wireshark what happens: bridge does not send Topology Change Notification BPDU, so both bridges think I'm root bridge and then disconnect the other bridge ("split brain")Still having problems when on local bridge enabled rstp. After disabling rstp, everything works as it should. This was broken in release before this one.
Two Mikrotik routers connected to each other. When rstp is enabled, I can't ping the other Mikrotik.
/system leds
set 0 interface=ether1-wan
set 1 interface=ether2-lan-master
set 2 interface=ether3-lan
set 3 interface=ether4-lan
set 4 interface=ether5-lan