your hope is misplaced, any news like that would be saved for MUM Europe anyways, not some monthly newsletter.Was hoping for some 802.11ax news... really hope there's something coming soon!
You could use an SFP+ to ether net adaptor though at the cost of an SFP port.CRS305-1G-4S+IN
Maybe a stupid question but could one use the above device as an ethernet translation/adapter device (ethernet in from the LAN, fibre out to specific locations or devices)?
The info says the ethernet is strictly for management so me thinks not.
$15 ? Really?metallic LHG mount
Don’t cry for 802.11ax until ac drivers has Wave 2 featuresyour hope is misplaced, any news like that would be saved for MUM Europe anyways, not some monthly newsletter.Was hoping for some 802.11ax news... really hope there's something coming soon!
Some pro mount for LHG60G is more needed....$15 ? Really?metallic LHG mount
I get your point, but this is mostly meant for locations where signal is very poor, this is why you use such a big antenna. And this also means, you use it in places where speed is not going to be so great. Otherwise, it would be enough to use a smaller LTE device.LGH-LTe kit is really nice, but for $159 one would expect gigabit ethernet, especially since there's a cat4 modem inside...
Personally I use RBM11G with Wireless Instruments antenna/enclosure because Mikrotik doesn't offer gigabit LAN on any of their pre-made solutions.
And yes, I can go above 100Mbit with my connection because base station I'm connecting to is not overburdened.
Yes, but the problem is that none of your pre-made LTE solutions has gigabit ethernet, yet they have cat4 modems inside. If I'm wrong please point me to that product.I get your point, but this is mostly meant for locations where signal is very poor, this is why you use such a big antenna. And this also means, you use it in places where speed is not going to be so great. Otherwise, it would be enough to use a smaller LTE device.LGH-LTe kit is really nice, but for $159 one would expect gigabit ethernet, especially since there's a cat4 modem inside...
Personally I use RBM11G with Wireless Instruments antenna/enclosure because Mikrotik doesn't offer gigabit LAN on any of their pre-made solutions.
And yes, I can go above 100Mbit with my connection because base station I'm connecting to is not overburdened.
Maybe doable, but not in my case. I use my LTE setup (which is on the building roof) to distribute internet throughout my entire compound. (RBM11G=>RB3011=>20 Mikrotik APs).wAP LTE and LtAP have built in WiFi access points that would allow to use the full benefit of CAT4 max 150Mbit speed
We would like to use LHG for companies in rural aera's with average 4g signal. We use the high gain antenna for stability and higher speeds. The 100mbit port is a unnecesary limitation of a very nice product.wAP LTE and LtAP have built in WiFi access points that would allow to use the full benefit of CAT4 max 150Mbit speed
And more LTE products with old and slow cat4 modems...I dont understand how can anyone even get more than 100mbit from this, i cant get more than 30mbit sitting next to tower, while anything else from super old mobile phone(6-7 years) to 2x cheaper routers achieve at least 2x speed if not more..
Why cant u give us proper product with higher CAT modem like at least CAT6 would be nice?
This is good news especially for B42 band that has been missing. If I may add, do you think in the future perhaps maybe you can modify the wAP R to have Battery backup? And a smaller version like miFi size? That will be awesome. All the same thanks!In this MikroTik newsletter:
new CRS305-1G-4S+IN switch with four SFP+ ports
new LHG LTE kit with 17 dBi LTE antenna for extreme rural locations
new LTE card R11e-4G for extra bands (including 450 MHz, 2.5 GHz, 3.5 GHz and 3.7 GHz)
DINrail PRO for LtAP mini
metallic LHG mount
MUM schedule
Download newsletter here: https://download2.mikrotik.com/news/news_85.pdf
Totally worth it!Finally the CRS305-1G-4S+IN will be available, looking forward to upgrade canadian grand prix com of my network to 10G.
Hopefully the CRS309-1G-8S+PC will follow soon.
You do realize that this particular system costs 159$, right ? I think for that price gigabit lan should have been included.i like the 4x port SFP+ switch!
Also, personally, i feel the complaints about no gig eth on the new LTE product are a bit overblown. its very rare to get 100m+ on a lte C3/C4 device of any kind. Also for those saying what about using this device in a city to improve a decent lte signal to better- it is my understanding that advanced LTE towers will turn down TX power on their side if your side TX is too strong (goal = to keep tx of all devices within a range/threshold for RF QOS). Even if im wrong about that, 100m FD eth is more than enough for cat4 LTE. Also on the MT side, the cost increase of gig vs 100m is not just the port / port chipset itself. Its also the gig POE injector mt has to provide + increase board cpu/ capacity.
You're wrong about that. Basic assumption is that signal in reception point will never be too strong for receiver to cope with it (and, btw, many countries have emission regulations that limits transmitted power so that EM levels at the point which is accessible by public are low enough ... that's partially the reason why pico cells, intended for installation in similar places as WiFi APs, have low Tx power).... it is my understanding that advanced LTE towers will turn down TX power on their side if your side TX is too strong (goal = to keep tx of all devices within a range/threshold for RF QOS).