Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
# NAME TYPE ACTUAL-MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU
0 RS ether1-GW ether 1500 1598 2028
1 RS ether2-Telia ether 1500 1598 2028
2 RS ether3-RaspberryPi ether 1500 1598 2028
3 pwr-line1 ether 1500 1598 2028
4 XS wlan-2GHz wlan 1500 1600 2290
5 R LAN bridge 1500 1598
6 R LAN-Telia bridge 1500 1598
7 RS vlan-LAN vlan 1500 1594
The issue is fixed in:v6.44 does not contain:
""!) winbox - improvements in connection handling to router with open winbox service (CVE-2019–3924);" ?
It is no information in changelog.
these changes are starting from v6.43.12, this change was already there, so it will not show up in 6.44 changelogv6.44 does not contain:
""!) winbox - improvements in connection handling to router with open winbox service (CVE-2019–3924);" ?
It is no information in changelog.
I got new features on my hAP mini!
Interface #3, pwr-line1
Code: Select allFlags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave # NAME TYPE ACTUAL-MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU 0 RS ether1-GW ether 1500 1598 2028 1 RS ether2-Telia ether 1500 1598 2028 2 RS ether3-RaspberryPi ether 1500 1598 2028 3 pwr-line1 ether 1500 1598 2028 4 XS wlan-2GHz wlan 1500 1600 2290 5 R LAN bridge 1500 1598 6 R LAN-Telia bridge 1500 1598 7 RS vlan-LAN vlan 1500 1594
*) interface - added "pwr-line" interface support (more information will follow in next newsletter);
*) winbox - allow specifying interface lists in "CAPsMAN/Access List" menu;
rejected, forbidden by access-lis
Is there an up-to-date manual on Hotspot? Or at least what does that option do?*) hotspot - added "https-redirect" under server profiles;
236 changes to have new bugs introduced.....Congratulations on this massive release with 236 changes. I'm really looking forward to test.
Thx a lot!
Take a look at the log entries:2011 ok
951G ok
hap ac lite...................... couldn't update to stable or testing from 6.43.11, went to 6.42.12 long..... ok. Retries to stable or beta nothing...... still stuck on long term.
u can get the support file from here.
https://mega.nz/#!JnZ1iIZL!MT9wQ2vhAXA4 ... _xZnMMqljo
You should not use Extra package bundle on devices with 16MiB disk space.2011 ok
951G ok
hap ac lite...................... couldn't update to stable or testing from 6.43.11, went to 6.42.12 long..... ok. Retries to stable or beta nothing...... still stuck on long term.
u can get the support file from here.
https://mega.nz/#!JnZ1iIZL!MT9wQ2vhAXA4 ... _xZnMMqljo
I've done that but see no difference@WirelessRudy
If you set BTEST Authenticate, you need use full command like:
/tool speed-test user=YourUsernmae password=YourPassword address=10.30.30.30
a bit more details on this change? Those default rules are not upgraded automatically, so it would be good to see what exactly changed.*) defconf - fixed IPv6 link-local address range in firewall rules;
filter add chain=input action=accept protocol=udp dst-port=546 src-address=fe80::/16 comment="defconf: accept DHCPv6-Client prefix delegation."
filter add chain=input action=accept protocol=udp dst-port=546 src-address=fe80::/10 comment="defconf: accept DHCPv6-Client prefix delegation."
[admin@xxxx] > /system backup save
Saving system configuration
Configuration backup saved
08:54:42 echo: backup,critical error creating backup file: could not read all configuration files
[admin@xxxx] > /system resource print
uptime: 41m36s
version: 6.44 (stable)
build-time: Feb/25/2019 14:11:04
free-memory: 100.9MiB
total-memory: 128.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 74Kc V4.12
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 600MHz
cpu-load: 1%
free-hdd-space: 108.2MiB
total-hdd-space: 128.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 1252
write-sect-total: 27904308
bad-blocks: 0%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: RB951G-2HnD
platform: MikroTik
Try to regenerate the ssh host keys:Upgraded a RB851G (both RouterOS and RouterBOOT) from 6.42.12 today. I get errors every time I try to save a backup file (both local and cloud, same error).
Code: Select all[admin@xxxx] > /system backup save Saving system configuration Configuration backup saved 08:54:42 echo: backup,critical error creating backup file: could not read all configuration files
/ ip ssh regenerate-host-key
Thank you @eworm! You nailed it! I was just reading this other thread where you had the same issue, but for a previous version.Try to regenerate the ssh host keys:Upgraded a RB851G (both RouterOS and RouterBOOT) from 6.42.12 today. I get errors every time I try to save a backup file (both local and cloud, same error).
Code: Select all[admin@xxxx] > /system backup save Saving system configuration Configuration backup saved 08:54:42 echo: backup,critical error creating backup file: could not read all configuration files
Code: Select all/ ip ssh regenerate-host-key
Take a look at the log entries:2011 ok
951G ok
hap ac lite...................... couldn't update to stable or testing from 6.43.11, went to 6.42.12 long..... ok. Retries to stable or beta nothing...... still stuck on long term.
u can get the support file from here.
https://mega.nz/#!JnZ1iIZL!MT9wQ2vhAXA4 ... _xZnMMqljo
"11:58:41 system,error not enough space for upgrade "
I have only a backup file inserted and nothing more in files and the long term package intalled....... so what do u suggest?You should not use Extra package bundle on devices with 16MiB disk space.2011 ok
951G ok
hap ac lite...................... couldn't update to stable or testing from 6.43.11, went to 6.42.12 long..... ok. Retries to stable or beta nothing...... still stuck on long term.
u can get the support file from here.
https://mega.nz/#!JnZ1iIZL!MT9wQ2vhAXA4 ... _xZnMMqljo
I believe that will be in the futurecan we have cloud backup in winbox. me not so fan of cli.
Create a rule in input chains for ipsecupdated a CCR1009 from 6.43.12 to 6.44 -> Lost connectivity on all eoip (ipsec) interfaces.
After unistalling some packages all done in 6.44 stable like i expected............. ty.You have so many extra packages installed which are not part of bundle. That is why there is no free space.
I would suggest to install unnecessary packages.
problem(
inside flash folder or outside and reboot? Which is the right one place to put it?fix_space.zipproblem(
In my cases it didn't matter.inside flash folder or outside and reboot? Which is the right one place to put it?fix_space.zipproblem(
#!/bin/bash
if [ "$bootimage" != "1" ]; then rm -f /flash/bootimage; fi
mv /var/pdb/fix-space/image /tmp
rm -rf /var/pdb/fix-space
Both the client and the router that for the test need to be upgrade I found out in the eve of this day.I've done that but see no difference@WirelessRudy
If you set BTEST Authenticate, you need use full command like:
/tool speed-test user=YourUsernmae password=YourPassword address=10.30.30.30
The 'status' shows that the test is performing the different tests (udp and tcp up- and download) but comes back with status "done". No further info.
Maybe both the units engaged in the test have to be running 6.44? (I am not ready for that. Not going to to upgrade my main routers towards this new 6.44 for at least a week or two..... 6.44 has to proof itself first....
I did it both ways......... will i have to watch something happens after or just install and go on? What exactly do this package? The scipt is other way to install it or is the only way?In my cases it didn't matter.inside flash folder or outside and reboot? Which is the right one place to put it?fix_space.zipproblem(
But I think better flash folder
Code: Select all#!/bin/bash if [ "$bootimage" != "1" ]; then rm -f /flash/bootimage; fi mv /var/pdb/fix-space/image /tmp rm -rf /var/pdb/fix-space
Corrects a memory full error.
I did it both ways......... will i have to watch something happens after or just install and go on? What exactly do this package? The scipt is other way to install it or is the only way?
Is it ok to install it in machines with no size problems like 2011 or 951g? Ty for the all info by the wayCorrects a memory full error.
I did it both ways......... will i have to watch something happens after or just install and go on? What exactly do this package? The scipt is other way to install it or is the only way?
download/file.php?id=35767
Just bought a Cap AC and these changes are really in time*) wireless - improved connection stability for new model Apple devices;
*) wireless - improved NV2 performance for all ARM devices;
*) wireless - improved system stability for all ARM devices with wireless;
*) wireless - improved system stability for all devices with 802.11ac wireless;
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input protocol=udp dst-address="router IP" src-address="router IP"
/caps-man manager interface
set [ find default=yes ] forbid=yes
add disabled=no interface=bridge-local
/interface wireless cap
set discovery-interfaces=bridge-local interfaces=wlan1
/ip ipsec identity
add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=alfandega1
add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=alfandega2
add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=paternot
add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=valida
add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=victor
/ip ipsec peer
add comment="Redescambo psk xauth" name=peer9 passive=yes profile=profile_1
Just upgraded to 6.44
All of them are related to a "peer9" group. It didn't exist - was created on the upgrade.Code: Select all/ip ipsec identity add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=alfandega1 add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=alfandega2 add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=paternot add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=valida add auth-method=pre-shared-key-xauth generate-policy=port-strict peer=peer9 policy-template-group=redescambo xauth-login=victor
This is my peer tab:that was my point User has been replaced with pre-shared-key-xauth user and password.Code: Select all/ip ipsec peer add comment="Redescambo psk xauth" name=peer9 passive=yes profile=profile_1
I want to be sure before implement on my clients
Working ok after upgrade.
Hi,Hello,
After the upgrade, the VPN client cannot connects. One of my colleague updated 5 routers. Please don't ask me why, but not working. Can I ask any expert where and what can I have to change to make it working again?
TIA
OK understood.In short, if under "/radius" menu you have selected service "DHCP", then "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" is supported. If under "/radius" menu you have selected "PPP" service, then "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" is not supported at the moment.
in v6.44 this does not work for me.One step at the time - we added "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" suport for DHCP in v6.43, we will see what we can do about PPP service in future RouterOS releases.
I can't find this option under server profiles !*) hotspot - added "https-redirect" under server profiles;
As this pops up every now and then... Mikrotik should consider extending the error handling - in case of ssh host key file print something like: "could not read ssh host key file, try to regenerate: / ip ssh regenerate-host-key"Thank you @eworm! You nailed it! I was just reading this other thread where you had the same issue, but for a previous version.Try to regenerate the ssh host keys:Upgraded a RB851G (both RouterOS and RouterBOOT) from 6.42.12 today. I get errors every time I try to save a backup file (both local and cloud, same error).
Code: Select all[admin@xxxx] > /system backup save Saving system configuration Configuration backup saved 08:54:42 echo: backup,critical error creating backup file: could not read all configuration files
Code: Select all/ ip ssh regenerate-host-key
I was using pre-shared-key-xauth and password. Yes, the system created that "peer9" out of the blue - but it did it only to have something on the peers tab. It is just a placeholder.
that was my point User has been replaced with pre-shared-key-xauth user and password.
I want to be sure before implement on my clients
Working ok after upgrade.
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
Some of my device are in 6.43.12. I ll test.Strange ... IPSec works for me after upgrade 6.43.12 -> 6.44
IPSeced IPIP and GRE tunnels work smooth after upgrade, self-reconnected without problems. Comments still in place.
ROS 6.44. When exporting, inversion is not taken into account. Be careful!Code: Select all/ip neighbor discovery-settings
ROS_6.44_neighbor.jpg
@Emils,Currently looks like missing IPsec configuration after an upgrade is caused by having a 6.44beta version installed at some point in the past. If the router is missing some IPsec related configuration after an upgrade, please generate a supout.rif file as soon as possible before doing any other changes and send it to us.
Paternot, everything looks good for you. Users menu was removed, each user is automatically converted to an identity and assigned to the peer.
Yes, it all works great - excellent job! I was pointing out to nichky that the upgrade went smooth.Paternot, everything looks good for you. Users menu was removed, each user is automatically converted to an identity and assigned to the peer.
Already know the answer. Both units need to be 6.44 to have all CLI bandwidth features working.WirelessRudy - Do you have an access to this IP address? Please provide supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. Speed Test works just fine for me to/from all accessible IP addresses;
What's new in 6.44 (2019-Feb-25 14:11):
Changes in this release:
*) upgrade - made security package depend on DHCP package
Please can you explain this new feature and how is working....
ErfanDL - Not yet added to GUI "/ip hotspot profile set https-redirect=";
...
Yes please, an exaplanation ?Please can you explain this new feature and how is working....
ErfanDL - Not yet added to GUI "/ip hotspot profile set https-redirect=";
...
Tks
If this means reporting the neighbor on each interface of the bond, then it works as expected.*) discovery - detect proper slave interface on bounded interfaces;
tamagochi - Do you mean that e-mail settings were corrupted? I do not see how this would be possible by this upgrade. If you downgrade router back, then setting re-appears? Please test if when you downgrade device, set TO parameter, upgrade back and the setting is gone again;
No, e-mail settings are not corrupt, showing good, but sender address is null <>... Settings are not gone, i checked all parameters.
I try downgrade to 6.42.12 e-mail is perfekt when VPN user logged in. Set TO parameters also are good admin received email, but sender empty.
email_setting.PNG
log_to_email.PNG
Tried to update WAP-LTE with CLI - it shows that exist new firmware - enter "upgrade"*) lte - added "firmware-upgrade" command for R11e-LTE international modems (CLI only);
I have 2 carriers with 2 different SIMs. One works, one seems to block it!/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1 upgrade=yes
.... lost connection.... reboot.... same version on modem
Did you login via LTE connection? Lost connection is expected then, probably failed upgrade is as well. I use this script for remote upgrade: unattended-lte-firmware-upgradeHi,
Didn't understand this topic (how it works):Tried to update WAP-LTE with CLI - it shows that exist new firmware - enter "upgrade"*) lte - added "firmware-upgrade" command for R11e-LTE international modems (CLI only);
/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1
installed: MikroTik_CP_2.160.000_v008
latest: MikroTik_CP_2.160.000_v010
/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1 upgrade=yes
.... lost connection.... reboot.... same version on modem
we have the same problem in our company where we have a lot of HP notebooks with intel wifi cards. I don't have time to analyze this, so we go back to 6.42.12............ Since on 6.43.12 customer has complained that either laptops cannot connect or connect for 10 minutes and get kicked out. Log investigation showed computers were unable to get their DHCP lease renewed, (increasing to 24 hours kind of solved that), and the router frequently logging certain mac address disconnected, group key exchange timeout. Investigation indicated these are all windows devices.
6.43.12 also caused the router to rename a usb disk from disk2 to disk 3.
Upgrade to 6.44 from 6.43.12 went mostly ok, but the issues persisted - both the broken dhcp lease renew and the bund of wireless devices getting disconnected with a group key exchange timeout. I am able to reproduce with another 952 and a laptop in my lab. The group key exchange timeout happens approximately every 5 minutes.
Quote!!Updated a CCR1009 and RB4011 without any issues. Great work MT!
Now please make us happy with some BGP improvements in 6.45
Yes, the same connection of course because that's LTE router, it didn't had another one "internet" inside only from mobile provider....Did you login via LTE connection? Lost connection is expected then, probably failed upgrade is as well. I use this script for remote upgrade: unattended-lte-firmware-upgradeHi,
Didn't understand this topic (how it works):Tried to update WAP-LTE with CLI - it shows that exist new firmware - enter "upgrade"*) lte - added "firmware-upgrade" command for R11e-LTE international modems (CLI only);
/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1
installed: MikroTik_CP_2.160.000_v008
latest: MikroTik_CP_2.160.000_v010
/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1 upgrade=yes
.... lost connection.... reboot.... same version on modem
Maybe that's my case too, will try to investigate too...I have 2 carriers with 2 different SIMs. One works, one seems to block it!/ interface lte firmware-upgrade lte1 upgrade=yes
.... lost connection.... reboot.... same version on modem
Yes, it is.Quote!!Updated a CCR1009 and RB4011 without any issues. Great work MT!
Now please make us happy with some BGP improvements in 6.45
is it true that for the BGP sessions, RouterOS use only one core?
Check System / ClockAnother "bug" from version to version, form stable to stable release
"Future" time on GRE tunnels in (up\down) status field
May be someone know how it resolve?
Thanks!
/interface wireless set wlan1 band=5ghz-onlyac;
:do { /interface wireless set wlan1 band="5ghz-n/ac"; :log info "usage 5g-n/ac"; } on-error={
:do { /interface wireless set wlan1 band="5ghz-onlyn"; :log info "usage 5g-n"; } on-error={
:do { /interface wireless set wlan1 band="5ghz-a"; :log info "usage 5g-a"; } on-error={
}
}
}
[admin@4p_DUT_DISC Lite5] /interface wireless> set band=5ghz-n/ac
Script Error: action cancelled
[admin@4p_DUT_DISC Lite5] /interface wireless> set 0 band=5ghz-n/ac
failure: bad band or frequency, see 'wireless info' for supported channels
[admin@4p_DUT_DISC Lite5] /interface wireless> :do { set 0 band=5ghz-n/ac } on-err
or={ :put "error"}
error
Hello strods,Kampfwurst - What is the error that you get? Does your router have an access to cloud2.mikrotik.com? Test it from CLI (Winbox would use computers DNS in order to resolve this address);
Simono - Please provide an example rule that you use in access list and interface configuration within an e-mail to support@mikrotik.com;
Chupaka - We will update wiki page as soon as possible;
WirelessRudy - Do you have an access to this IP address? Please provide supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. Speed Test works just fine for me to/from all accessible IP addresses;
osc86, MDE, geiger - Please provide supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com;
lenciso - Please provide more information about what kind of crash did you experience on your router;
isacalmeida - Please provide an example. This fix was made in order to fix an issue when, for example, you have PPPoE tunnel which creates default route and then have an L2TP tunnel over it. Then special route towards L2TP server must be created dynamically which uses PPPoE as a gateway, if L2TP adds its own default route. Otherwise L2TP server would be reachable over L2TP tunnel itself which is not correct;
Chaosphere64 - Are these devices discovered by MNDP? If yes, then please provide supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com;
Pea - This change allows to specify interfaces under "/caps-man manager interface" menu and at the same time allows to use router itself as a CAP and CAPsMAN at the same time. Before you could not forbid all and allow traffic from router itself to CAPsMAN. It affects interface list not the firewall. Firewall accept rule still must be present;
saaremaa - What is the question here actually? Delegated-IPv6-Prefix is already working for DHCP service (RADIUS). Such parameter is not available yet for PPP service. If you make PPPoE server which then distributes addresses by using DHCP service, then this will not work since users are authenticated by using PPP service, not DHCP;
tamagochi - Do you mean that e-mail settings were corrupted? I do not see how this would be possible by this upgrade. If you downgrade router back, then setting re-appears? Please test if when you downgrade device, set TO parameter, upgrade back and the setting is gone again;
Nicky - If details about new IPsec implementation are not clear from the changelog, then please write to support@mikrotik.com. Provide your configuration and an example of configuration which can not seem to get working. We will help you as soon as possible;
What terminal command can get time UP|DOWN from gre interface status in terminal???Incorrect time is cosmetic Winbox bug noticed when there are multiple Winbox instances open. If you check in terminal, time is reported correctly.
Checked, ntp-ok, sync- ok, auto-time-zone-off-manual, cloud tyme resync-off, that's on both sides of tunnelCheck System / ClockAnother "bug" from version to version, form stable to stable release
"Future" time on GRE tunnels in (up\down) status field
May be someone know how it resolve?
Thanks!
All tunnel interfaces show the correct date and time on my devices.
eoip-tunnel1: bridge port received packet with own address as source address ([MAC address of this bridge]), probably loop
When will it be fixed? This has been reported for many releases by now.Incorrect time is cosmetic Winbox bug noticed when there are multiple Winbox instances open. If you check in terminal, time is reported correctly.
Well, this must be of help to Mikrotik. I also still see the same on my last up- and downtime columns in my wAP60G devices. Future times. Before it could be days ahead, now its the proper day, but some hours ahead..... (and yes, timesettings are properly configured. Log and time on header show correct time.)Another "bug" from version to version, form stable to stable release
"Future" time on GRE tunnels in (up\down) status field
May be someone know how it resolve?
Thanks!
Well, would still be nice to see it corrected in a new update since I have it in all my wAP60G's shown in winbox to see when and how many times the links still disconnect.Incorrect time is cosmetic Winbox bug noticed when there are multiple Winbox instances open. If you check in terminal, time is reported correctly.
well, the context was in the sense of mixing "mipsbe" (and "mipsle") devices with "arm" equipped processors where several people seems to have problems with."NV2 in this release has been improved for mixed networks."
Please, explain the definition of "mixed networks". As far as I know I can only use NV2 with mikrotik gear.
And what happend to what Mikrotik stated a few month ago when they've released version 6.42.3 saying that now one bad client don't affect the whole sector? I jumped from 6.42.3 to 6.44 and the experience was terrible! In version 6.42.3 everything was in balance, one or two bad signal clients is not affecting the others at lease not in a way clients can tell. I had to downgrade to 6.42.3...
But it happen for me even with one winbox instance, I had this problem with 3.17/3.18 and no problem with 3.16Incorrect time is cosmetic Winbox bug noticed when there are multiple Winbox instances open. If you check in terminal, time is reported correctly.
This has been reported for the beta and rc releases as well. Now idea if Mikrotik is aware, write at support@mikrotik.com to make sure.*) gps - increase precision for dd format;
Hi, could it be that the calculation from dms-format to dd-format is incorrect ?
For example: in winbox/system/GPS-GUI I switch between dms and dd format.
In dms I get 49 29' 6.954'
when I switch to dd I get 49.004852
in my calculation it should be 49.485265
Is ist my false or is this a wrong calculation....in firmware 6.43.12 there was no problem.
Regards
<tab> <tab> after address reveals additional optionsspeedtest - added "/tool speed-test" for ping latency, jitter, loss and TCP and UDP download, upload speed measurements (CLI only)
This feature is nice indeed!
It wouldn't be me not to ask for more though :
- Can the time the test run either be adjusted by administrator of just set longer. In many occasions the connection rates between the client and AP have to step up before a longer lasting level is
reached. The test average is kept low due this.
A full 1 minute test would be preferred, 2 would even be better, admin adjustable would be perfect.....
- Is this going to be implemented in Winbox?
/tool speed-test
connection-count do duration file interval password test-duration user address
Fix is in 6.45beta3This has been reported for the beta and rc releases as well. Now idea if Mikrotik is aware, write at support@mikrotik.com to make sure.*) gps - increase precision for dd format;
Hi, could it be that the calculation from dms-format to dd-format is incorrect ?
For example: in winbox/system/GPS-GUI I switch between dms and dd format.
In dms I get 49 29' 6.954'
when I switch to dd I get 49.004852
in my calculation it should be 49.485265
Is ist my false or is this a wrong calculation....in firmware 6.43.12 there was no problem.
Regards
6.45 beta3 already? Wow, You guys are really cranking up the speed!Fix is in 6.45beta3
It's like 7.0 beta1 - it's probably here, but you don't see it and cannot upgrade to it xD Sorry...6.45 beta3 already? Wow, You guys are really cranking up the speed!
It's like 7.0 beta1 - it's probably here, but you don't see it and cannot upgrade to it xD Sorry...6.45 beta3 already? Wow, You guys are really cranking up the speed!
I solved that - in IPsec peer identity there was My ID Type set to address, I switched it do auto and use the router's (internal - its behind nat) IP in other end settings (It is Kerio Control)since 6.44 IPsec tunnels stop working for me, it says: no identity suits proposal, failed to get valid proposal. Maybe my setup is not the best but until 6.43.12 it was working well.
You can't redirect HTTPS - the security provided by HTTPS means that unless you control the client devices and can install custom root certs, certificate validation will fail and users will see security errors. Mikrotik of all people should know this... what does this option even try to do?https-redirect is not working
So, these fixes made for improving NV2 with mixed devices has made things worse for those running mipsbe only devices? Because for me it is bad now and I only use mipsbe devices. It now means that I can't upgrade my APs anymore? I'm stuck to 6.42.3 or Mikrotik will do something about it?
well, the context was in the sense of mixing "mipsbe" (and "mipsle") devices with "arm" equipped processors where several people seems to have problems with.
Apart from that you are right, in NV2 only mikrotik gear works. But in 802.11 you can also use any other 802.11 brand device.
Another advantage (a bit beside the topic though) is that 802.11 is the only way to ran a frequency band SSID scan (NOT a spectral scan for most devices!) while not breaking the client-AP connection.
That is a real valuable tool in nowadays P2MP networks. (A spectral scan would be preferable though.)
What is actual dependency behind this?
*) ike2 - send split networks over DHCP (option 249) to Windows initiators if DHCP Inform is received;
Where are you getting the information that the upgrade make things worse for mipsbe only devices? Nobody said that. I have full mipsbe P2MP networks too and they run fine after the upgrade. I don't know if NV2 has been improved for them, I run them in 802.11 anyway. But nobody reported so far in full mipsbe networks the new version is worse...So, these fixes made for improving NV2 with mixed devices has made things worse for those running mipsbe only devices? Because for me it is bad now and I only use mipsbe devices. It now means that I can't upgrade my APs anymore? I'm stuck to 6.42.3 or Mikrotik will do something about it?
well, the context was in the sense of mixing "mipsbe" (and "mipsle") devices with "arm" equipped processors where several people seems to have problems with.
Apart from that you are right, in NV2 only mikrotik gear works. But in 802.11 you can also use any other 802.11 brand device.
Another advantage (a bit beside the topic though) is that 802.11 is the only way to ran a frequency band SSID scan (NOT a spectral scan for most devices!) while not breaking the client-AP connection.
That is a real valuable tool in nowadays P2MP networks. (A spectral scan would be preferable though.)
I myself would prefer using 802.11 instead of NV2, but in my scenario I find NV2 to be more stable then 802.11, not regarding throughput, but quality in general.
In my network things were running smoothly without complaints from clients, the day after going from 6.42.3 to 6.44 we starded receiving many complaints about slow internet speed. In two sectors we have two clients with signal going from -68 to -72 and these clients were using the Internet without any complaint along with the other ones on the same sector, but right after upgrading to 6.44 these "bad" signal clients and others that never complained about something started calling us saying the internet was slow...My conclusion is, something is not as good as it was on 6.42.3 in NV2 for misbe devices. You were the one that said something was done to improve things for mixed networks so I assumed that these improvements have caused something negative for mipsbe only networks or for them all regarding "bad" signal clients on the sector. Mikrotik had made a promise a few months ago that from that time on bad clients would not affect other clients on the same sector, but it seems this is not true for the newer ROS versions.
Very stupid dependence! I don't need DHCP at many situations, but need SSH. So i have had installed: advanced-tools, security, system packages only. But now i have to use DHCP?! Nonsense!!!This is not a bug, it tells you that you must install DHCP package now, read carefully the change list:
*) upgrade - made security package depend on DHCP package
Ideally, the new function of IKEv2 that requires DHCP would just be disabled until DHCP is installed (preferably with a remark in the user interface).Very stupid dependence! I don't need DHCP at many situations, but need SSH. So i have had installed: advanced-tools, security, system packages only. But now i have to use DHCP?! Nonsense!!!
saaremaa - Sorry about that. I mixed both services together. We do support Delegated-IPv6-Prefix for DHCP service but not for PPP yet. It is in our plans to add support for this in the future;
dadoremix gave you a possible answer..In my network things were running smoothly without complaints from clients, the day after going from 6.42.3 to 6.44 we starded receiving many complaints about slow internet speed. In two sectors we have two clients with signal going from -68 to -72 and these clients were using the Internet without any complaint along with the other ones on the same sector, but right after upgrading to 6.44 these "bad" signal clients and others that never complained about something started calling us saying the internet was slow...My conclusion is, something is not as good as it was on 6.42.3 in NV2 for misbe devices. You were the one that said something was done to improve things for mixed networks so I assumed that these improvements have caused something negative for mipsbe only networks or for them all regarding "bad" signal clients on the sector. Mikrotik had made a promise a few months ago that from that time on bad clients would not affect other clients on the same sector, but it seems this is not true for the newer ROS versions.
We use superchannel.In my network things were running smoothly without complaints from clients, the day after going from 6.42.3 to 6.44 we starded receiving many complaints about slow internet speed. In two sectors we have two clients with signal going from -68 to -72 and these clients were using the Internet without any complaint along with the other ones on the same sector, but right after upgrading to 6.44 these "bad" signal clients and others that never complained about something started calling us saying the internet was slow...My conclusion is, something is not as good as it was on 6.42.3 in NV2 for misbe devices. You were the one that said something was done to improve things for mixed networks so I assumed that these improvements have caused something negative for mipsbe only networks or for them all regarding "bad" signal clients on the sector. Mikrotik had made a promise a few months ago that from that time on bad clients would not affect other clients on the same sector, but it seems this is not true for the newer ROS versions.
Check country code in ros
And signals
They kill power in some countrys
The country setting now has priority, so your superchannel won't work unless you have country set to no_country_set. The forum is full of discussions about this change...We use superchannel.
Hi, my RBSXTLTE3-7 stops working after firmware upgrade. LTE interface is not working with status "Changing band", also there is an error in log "reply timeout for ate0".*) lte - fixed LTE interface not working properly after reboot on RBSXTLTE3-7;
I have same problemHi, my RBSXTLTE3-7 stops working after firmware upgrade. LTE interface is not working with status "Changing band", also there is an error in log "reply timeout for ate0".*) lte - fixed LTE interface not working properly after reboot on RBSXTLTE3-7;
[Ubuntu Desktop] <-- Office LAN (172.26.2.0/24) --> [RouterBoard "ovpn-endpoint" running OpenVPN server] <-- OpenVPN --> [RouterBoard "router2" running OpenVPN client] <-- bridge-local --> [Raspberry Pi]
ssh foo@172.28.2.179
OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.2, OpenSSL 1.0.2n 7 Dec 2017
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/kal/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for *
debug1: Connecting to 172.28.2.179 [172.28.2.179] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_rsa type 0
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/kal/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.2
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 ;;; default configuration
chain=input action=accept protocol=icmp log=no log-prefix=""
1 ;;; default configuration
chain=input action=accept connection-state=established,related log=no log-prefix=""
2 ;;; default configuration
chain=input action=drop in-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
3 ;;; default configuration
chain=forward action=accept connection-state=established,related log=no log-prefix=""
4 ;;; Allow only the registration and scan raspberry pis and the scanner to access the internet.
chain=forward action=accept src-address-list=with_internet_access out-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
5 ;;; Forbid everybody else from accessing the internet.
chain=forward action=drop out-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
6 ;;; Forward related and established connections from the internet to the registration and scan raspberry pis and the scanner.
chain=forward action=accept connection-state=established,related in-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
7 ;;; Drop forwarding from the internet for everybody else.
chain=forward action=drop in-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
8 ;;; default configuration
chain=forward action=drop connection-state=invalid log=no log-prefix=""
9 ;;; default configuration
chain=forward action=drop connection-state=new connection-nat-state=!dstnat in-interface=ether1-gateway log=no log-prefix=""
16:05:46 firewall,info debug forward: in:bridge-local out:ovpn-out1, src-mac b8:27:eb:53:4c:91, proto TCP (SYN,ACK), 172.28.2.179:22->172.26.2.229:55490, len 60
16:05:48 firewall,info debug forward: in:ovpn-out1 out:bridge-local, proto TCP (ACK,FIN), 172.26.2.229:55490->172.28.2.179:22, len 52
16:05:57 firewall,info debug forward: in:ovpn-out1 out:bridge-local, proto TCP (ACK,PSH), 172.26.2.229:55500->172.28.2.179:22, len 93
16:05:58 firewall,info debug forward: in:bridge-local out:ovpn-out1, src-mac b8:27:eb:53:4c:91, proto TCP (SYN,ACK), 172.28.2.179:22->172.26.2.229:55500, len 60
16:06:04 firewall,info debug forward: in:ovpn-out1 out:bridge-local, proto TCP (ACK,PSH), 172.26.2.229:55500->172.28.2.179:22, len 93
16:06:06 firewall,info debug forward: in:bridge-local out:ovpn-out1, src-mac b8:27:eb:53:4c:91, proto TCP (SYN,ACK), 172.28.2.179:22->172.26.2.229:55500, len 60
16:06:18 firewall,info debug forward: in:ovpn-out1 out:bridge-local, proto TCP (ACK,PSH), 172.26.2.229:55500->172.28.2.179:22, len 93
16:06:22 firewall,info debug forward: in:bridge-local out:ovpn-out1, src-mac b8:27:eb:53:4c:91, proto TCP (SYN,ACK), 172.28.2.179:22->172.26.2.229:55500, len 60
Send report to support@mikrotik.com including .rif File.i update to 6.44 but when i wana use ip cloud sometimes about half of time i try "Error: request Timed out" what should i do?
Exactly my problem.Hi, my RBSXTLTE3-7 stops working after firmware upgrade. LTE interface is not working with status "Changing band", also there is an error in log "reply timeout for ate0".*) lte - fixed LTE interface not working properly after reboot on RBSXTLTE3-7;
I am wondering tooPWR-Line port on hAP
I have a suggestion that the problem is in the firewall (6.44)Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Can you share an example of this established related firewall rule please if you don't mind.I have a suggestion that the problem is in the firewall (6.44)Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Connection-state errors (estabilished, invalid, related)
To be precise
That connection is dropped for reasons that are not understandable.
I found a solution for myself
Create an allow rule above (estabilished, related)
But it's not right
This is a rough example.Can you share an example of this established related firewall rule please if you don't mind.I have a suggestion that the problem is in the firewall (6.44)Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Connection-state errors (estabilished, invalid, related)
To be precise
That connection is dropped for reasons that are not understandable.
I found a solution for myself
Create an allow rule above (estabilished, related)
But it's not right
Yeah I agree, this is no right.
Would love some answers from Mikrotik, because I have 6 cases in 3 last week and open cases open since last week.
1 action=accept chain=forward dst-address=10.10.10.10 src-address=8.8.8.8
2 action=accept chain=forward connection-state=established,related
3 action=drop chain=forward connection-state=invalid
Maybe it could be related to the bug that I reported above? (loose TCP connection tracking no longer works)I have a suggestion that the problem is in the firewall (6.44)Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Connection-state errors (estabilished, invalid, related)
To be precise
That connection is dropped for reasons that are not understandable.
I found a solution for myself
Create an allow rule above (estabilished, related)
But it's not right
I can say with complete confidence that on average I have 15% fewer connections. (6.44)Maybe it could be related to the bug that I reported above? (loose TCP connection tracking no longer works)
It could be that there were changes in the connection tracking firewall that have side effects like this.
I have seen issues with BGP when the keepalive time is not set equal at both peers.*) bgp - properly update keepalive time after peer restart;
what exactly this fix for?
i see, yes i have that problem too, after migration, we have all bgp's flapping so i have to set keepalive on both side.I have seen issues with BGP when the keepalive time is not set equal at both peers.*) bgp - properly update keepalive time after peer restart;
what exactly this fix for?
According to the protocol spec the lower of the two keepalive times should be used by both peers.
But in practice it sometimes happened that each peer used its own local keepalive time and the route was flapping when one is >3 times the other.
(e.g. default is 180 and I sometimes set this to 15 on wireless links where BFD is not in use)
Maybe this has been fixed now. But you could always work around it by configuring the same keepalive time on both routers.
Looks like we're all hit by the same problem, manifested over different application protocols. See my post above.Maybe it could be related to the bug that I reported above? (loose TCP connection tracking no longer works)I have a suggestion that the problem is in the firewall (6.44)Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Connection-state errors (estabilished, invalid, related)
To be precise
That connection is dropped for reasons that are not understandable.
I found a solution for myself
Create an allow rule above (estabilished, related)
But it's not right
It could be that there were changes in the connection tracking firewall that have side effects like this.
1 x CRS317-1G-16S+ - Upgraded to version 6.44 and running fine for up to 4 hours, the SNMP and Graphics Tool features stop working and, consequently, the interface view no longer looks like winbox...2 x CRS326-24G-2S+ - Updated to version 6.44 and working fine ..
1 x CCR1072-1G-8S+ - Updated to version 6.44 and working fine ..
1 x CRS317-1G-16S+ - Upgraded to version 6.44 and running fine for up to 4 hours, the SNMP and Graphics Tool features stop working and, consequently, the interface view no longer looks like winbox ...
/interface print
Indeed there really appears to be some bug. Not only are the existing connections lost after reboot (not working loose-tcp-tracking) but also I see firewall log messages that indicate that tracking of existing connections has been lost at some time even though te connections still exist.Looks like we're all hit by the same problem, manifested over different application protocols. See my post above.Maybe it could be related to the bug that I reported above? (loose TCP connection tracking no longer works)
It could be that there were changes in the connection tracking firewall that have side effects like this.
I had the same problem.BUG – v.6.44 on ARM boxes RB3011 is losing IPSEC configuration
After upgrade of ARM boxes (RB3011) to latest stable version 6.44, IPSEC is not working.
Winbox GUI /ip ipsec section in is empty and no new config parameters can be added;
In console /ip ipsec export gives just info that all subsections can’t be exported.
I downgraded to 6.43, exported the config (and certificates), removed everything in /ip ipsec from the text file, fresh installed 6.44 and imported the config from the text file.Yes, this confirms the issue is caused by some old 6.44beta version converting some of the configuration. And when you downgraded and upgraded again, it run into these issues.
All our APs are set to "no_country_set" since forever.The country setting now has priority, so your superchannel won't work unless you have country set to no_country_set. The forum is full of discussions about this change...We use superchannel.
A bit more info: it appears (for me at least) that this problem crops up if the forward and return paths of the connections are somehow not symmetrical.Indeed there really appears to be some bug. Not only are the existing connections lost after reboot (not working loose-tcp-tracking) but also I see firewall log messages that indicate that tracking of existing connections has been lost at some time even though te connections still exist.Looks like we're all hit by the same problem, manifested over different application protocols. See my post above.Maybe it could be related to the bug that I reported above? (loose TCP connection tracking no longer works)
It could be that there were changes in the connection tracking firewall that have side effects like this.
(of course that was less of a problem when loose tracking was still working)
In my case it were TCP TLS connections (port 443) and the loss of those is often not catastrophic, they will be re-established without the user noticing, but in case of VoIP it could be different.
I hope MikroTik will look into this matter. I see no changelog entry that explains what is happening here.
[ My PC ] ==(office LAN)==>
[ Main RouterBoard of my office (RouterOS 6.43.2) ] ==(office LAN)==>
[ OpenVPN endpoint RouterBoard (RouterOS 6.43.12) ] ==(OpenVPN connection)==>
[ Remote RouterBoard (RouterOS 6.44) ] ==(bridge-local)==>
[ Raspberry Pi ]
[ Raspberry Pi ] ==(bridge-local)==>
[ Remote RouterBoard ] ==(OpenVPN connection)==>
[ OpenVPN endpoint RouterBoard ] ==(office LAN)==>
[ My PC ]
unfortunately, I had to go back to version 6.43.12, the CRS317, which turned out to be good again and did not crash or give graphics anymore ...1 x CRS317-1G-16S+ - Upgraded to version 6.44 and running fine for up to 4 hours, the SNMP and Graphics Tool features stop working and, consequently, the interface view no longer looks like winbox...2 x CRS326-24G-2S+ - Updated to version 6.44 and working fine ..
1 x CCR1072-1G-8S+ - Updated to version 6.44 and working fine ..
1 x CRS317-1G-16S+ - Upgraded to version 6.44 and running fine for up to 4 hours, the SNMP and Graphics Tool features stop working and, consequently, the interface view no longer looks like winbox ...
CRS317-1G-16S+ - After 4 hours the switch stops responding to the command ... which gets frozen when digit is not returned by the console ...
Code: Select all/interface print
Not a bug.I am wondering tooPWR-Line port on hAP
And the new powerline with microusbNot a bug.I am wondering tooPWR-Line port on hAP
Interface for new PWR line adapter comming next months.
hAP mini & hAP lite has it. Basicly power the device and transfer data via microusb port.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Also the mAP Lite 2nd (at least mine, revision r2. I'm not sure about older ones)Interface for new PWR line adapter comming next months.
hAP mini & hAP lite has it. Basicly power the device and transfer data via microusb port.
I live in Sweden but I must say the UK plug is one of the bulkiest to work work with it is also one if the smartest with fuse in the plug and designed for a large contact surface and also be child friendly.Maybe its time for UK to change to EU plug.
Ahh, I did forget UK goes out of EU
I have travel around the world and UK plug is one the ugliest and largest plug out there....
They say that is the most safety Plug, as you need to insert the earth ping to "unlock" the energizing plug as well with this individually surge protection with fuses another handly about the UK plug is that they have a switch so y can shut down the plug without removing the plug I think this clever move, the only downside of this is that you lose a lot of space, so in a wall outlet can be only 2 plugI live in Sweden but I must say the UK plug is one of the bulkiest to work work with it is also one if the smartest with fuse in the plug and designed for a large contact surface and also be child friendly.Maybe its time for UK to change to EU plug.
Ahh, I did forget UK goes out of EU
I have travel around the world and UK plug is one the ugliest and largest plug out there....
Houses with proper electrical installation like most in (West-?)Europe have fuses and differential to protect the user. An extra protection in the plug is overdone.They say that is the most safety Plug, as you need to insert the earth ping to "unlock" the energizing plug as well with this individually surge protection with fuses another handly about the UK plug is that they have a switch so y can shut down the plug without removing the plug I think this clever move, the only downside of this is that you lose a lot of space, so in a wall outlet can be only 2 plugI live in Sweden but I must say the UK plug is one of the bulkiest to work work with it is also one if the smartest with fuse in the plug and designed for a large contact surface and also be child friendly.Maybe its time for UK to change to EU plug.
Ahh, I did forget UK goes out of EU
I have travel around the world and UK plug is one the ugliest and largest plug out there....
This requires the new hardware, old mAP lite can not get this from software.Also the mAP Lite 2nd (at least mine, revision r2. I'm not sure about older ones)Interface for new PWR line adapter comming next months.
hAP mini & hAP lite has it. Basicly power the device and transfer data via microusb port.
If you compare this (the block diagram of a mAP LiteI still do not get what really is this new power line.
Hi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
GreetingsHi,
I have noticed on this forum that many times the problem is not due to updates, but in fact due to incorrect configurations.
Maybe a suggestion will be to engage with one of your registered dealers / re-sellers which are also Mikrotik Certified to look into the issue (I am both).
This way the Mikrotik Certified consultants can also gain financially and the distributor also supports the registered dealers / re-sellers
I confirmStatic host route is very unreliable in this release. I have a web server that I need to reach through another gateway and it works sporadically.
I didn't count but it works approx. 30 seconds and then a timeout for 30 seconds and so on.
!) ipsec - added new "identity" menu with common peer distinguishers;
!) ipsec - removed "users" menu, XAuth user configuration is now handled by "identity" menu;
@CZFanHi
Since the last update we have had multiple clients complaining about existing sites where VoIP experiences issues, from de-registration, no audio, one way audio.
Currently we downgrading the clients back to 6.43.8 which works.
I've sent multiple supouts and support tickets to Support with no feedback.
We're a big distributor of Mikrotik, and this is the first we get with VoIP.
Hi,
I have noticed on this forum that many times the problem is not due to updates, but in fact due to incorrect configurations.
Maybe a suggestion will be to engage with one of your registered dealers / re-sellers which are also Mikrotik Certified to look into the issue (I am both).
This way the Mikrotik Certified consultants can also gain financially and the distributor also supports the registered dealers / re-sellers
Without knowing even a little bit about your configuration, no one here will be able to help identify the issue. Since we don't even know which router features you are using (bridge, ike1, ike2, IPsec, etc.), it is hard to know what might have changed in the update that can cause you issues.Not sure if you read the thread properly, however, we're also both and all of us are at least up to MTCRE. I also cannot share the config of our clients due to a Non-Disclosure agreement. This is companies that's been using these units quite a lot, we talk few thousands of the routers especially the RB750 and 951G. We don't touch their config which work. When they downgrade with the exact same config everything works. When they use 6.44, it stops working. Even our in house Mikrotik Certified Trainer looked at it and suggested to downgrade.
So config is not a problem.
Currently all our clients are happy with 6.43.8. No issues reported or anything. We'll keep it that way till another update has been released.
@DeanTwoWithout knowing even a little bit about your configuration, no one here will be able to help identify the issue. Since we don't even know which router features you are using (bridge, ike1, ike2, IPsec, etc.), it is hard to know what might have changed in the update that can cause you issues.Not sure if you read the thread properly, however, we're also both and all of us are at least up to MTCRE. I also cannot share the config of our clients due to a Non-Disclosure agreement. This is companies that's been using these units quite a lot, we talk few thousands of the routers especially the RB750 and 951G. We don't touch their config which work. When they downgrade with the exact same config everything works. When they use 6.44, it stops working. Even our in house Mikrotik Certified Trainer looked at it and suggested to downgrade.
So config is not a problem.
Currently all our clients are happy with 6.43.8. No issues reported or anything. We'll keep it that way till another update has been released.
If you can't share the config here and believe it is a bug in the update, make a supout while the issue is occurring and mail it to support@mikrotik.com. Then they can help you troubleshoot it and find the issue.
It depends on your files, for example on mine Hap ac lite there is nearly 4MB. On these boards the update package is saved on RAM instead of HDD.Is it ok that we have < 3 MB of free space on our 16 MB devices after update?
/interface print
/export
# mar/13/2019 13:07:54 by RouterOS 6.44
# software id = QS0J-S1KQ
#
# model = CRS328-24P-4S+
# serial number = xxxxxxxxx
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted
#interrupted