Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

dedicated bandwidth

Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:30 am

I have a client I just want to give him a dedicated bandwidth , so my total band is 2Mbps , and he must get 768Kbps as a max whenever he want to reach the max .. can I do it with simple Q by puting his max limit =768k .. and reserving the 768K by limit at ... i mean limit at=768k .......is that correct ?
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:59 pm

anyone ?
 
User avatar
mneumark
Member
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:20 am
Location: Escalon, CA
Contact:

Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:36 pm

Samsoft08,

what your best bet is set the limit at 768K and max-limit at 768K

Matt
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:34 pm

ok.. thanks .. that client has a MT Router Os , and he is connected to me wireless by a stand-alone 5G bridge (whatever brand) .. whats the best way to give him his dedicated band ?
 
User avatar
mneumark
Member
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:20 am
Location: Escalon, CA
Contact:

Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:26 pm

ok.. thanks .. that client has a MT Router Os , and he is connected to me wireless by a stand-alone 5G bridge (whatever brand) .. whats the best way to give him his dedicated band ?
Do you have him connecting to the internet through a pppoe server or static ip address? Do you have a MT that you can enter the simple queue in?

Matt
 
infozone
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:42 pm
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad

Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:50 am

specify "the best way" in more detailed explanation
 
User avatar
jorj
Member
Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: /dev/null

Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:41 pm

Is your client administering his own mt ?
If not, you can put a simple queue on the mt cpe box, and limit the traffic from it to your gateway to desired bandwidth. This is the best solution, packets don't get limited on the air, but before that.
Else, you can put a simple queue on it on your gateway, if it is a mt box. This will work well ........ not so well. The limiting will be made AFTER the traffic leaves the client box, thus retransmit will be likely to appear on the wireless part of the link.
If you put your client on a gateway wich is a mt ( meaning the 5 ghz ap is also a mt), then this is the best solution. On 2 mt links, you can limit the client tx/rx rate. ( only mt to mt works.)

But, again, best way is to put limitation on client device. :)
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Tue May 01, 2007 6:01 am

that was great , yes he has MT gateway , and the link between us will be MT to MT , but not as cpe , i mean the wireless link is between stand-alone AP's connected to MT/PC ..
i dont know if I use point to point RIC/522C , and limiting both cpe to a specific tx/rx .. is that correct ??

i think it will be easier to give him a static IP or even a static DHCP IP .. or should I make a pptp or pppoe ??

i'd never used MT as a cpe before so i dont know exactly how to setup it ..
 
User avatar
jorj
Member
Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: /dev/null

Mon May 07, 2007 9:45 pm

sorry for late answer.
It doesn't matter wich way is he using the mt box in his side.
If it's routed it's better. If it has a nat on it, it's the same.
Use a simple queue on it for limiting. And put whatever ip you want on it, but make it fixed for simple queue to work. Or, put a second ip on gateway (yours) and give to the client the whole subnet on wich the new ip address is.


As a cpe, its' just that simple. If you used any mt as an ap, do copy the configuration on the wireless, and change the mode to station. It's the simplest way. If you copied the wireless part of the ap on wich it connects, it should be connected already. ( if you do it from cli, do remove the MAC part from the command, or strange things will happen with duplicate mac's.... :shock: ) Also, don't forget to set security profiles. It's just so much better to kick off the curious ones at the beggining, and to harden for the knowingly ones to bust you.
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Tue May 08, 2007 12:55 am

thanks alot , but what about the bridge mode in the wireless configuration isnt it a wirless bridge which is my case ? why do i hve to make AP and station ?

my setup will be somthing like this :

my main MT -- MT cpe ====== MT cpe ---- his MT ---- his users .

IP's : 192.168.1.1 -- 192.168.1.2 === 192.168.1.3 --- 192.168.2.1(NAT)

is this OK ?
 
infozone
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:42 pm
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad

Wed May 09, 2007 1:30 pm

theoritically its OK ...assuming the ping replies between the two nodes of the bridge is perfect now limit his bandwidth by queue and show us what is happening