Good evening, I'm facing a management problem in the links that make up a bond between two CRS328, I randomly lose access to them. The management is carried out in an independent vlan to the vlans that transport the data. In the CCR there is a management bridge in vlan 100 for the interfaces where it needs to be transported. in the CRS you have the vlan mounted on the bridge and added correctly in bridge / vlan.

The end-to-end flow is correct, what does not work properly is the response of the ip of management of the ptp devices.

Is there a way to solve this scenario? mounting a different vlan for each PtP and ensuring that it does not go through the other bonding interfaces is not recommended in the manual. Although I can not find how to solve it. Is there a way to force a mac to be learned within the same interface always within the bonding?

The bonding used in CRS is 802.3ad to optimize resources as indicated by wikis.

While I understand that bonding was designed for ethernet where within it was only a physical link. Wlan bonding solutions are increasingly required.

Regards.

By design, proper solution to what you're doing, is MPLS, not bonding. In that case you won't have problems accessing intermediate devices over non-redundant paths.

By design, proper solution to what you're doing, is MPLS, not bonding. In that case you won't have problems accessing intermediate devices over non-redundant paths.

Thanks for the reply. It is possible that it is a better solution, but more complex, I am testing in the laboratory to see if I can mount a vlan independent of the management and different from each other on each bonding slave interface to ensure the flow to the management of the intermediate devices either by the right interface