For sure, use one PPPoE Server per VLAN. Much better than bridge them
Hi guys sorry to bump into an old topic.. but this somehowe has confused me now..
i have the following scenario ATM..and i have some doubts regarding cpu usage and pppoe-server
we have a deployed scenario with CCR1036 2SFP+ model and OLT fiber manufacturer 16PON device..
CCR SFP1+ Receiving internet Link from our CCR BGP , and SFP2+ port uplink 10Gbps to OLT PON device 10G port connected.. so far so good..
we have 1 unique PPPOE-Server with 1 VLAN, this VLAN is the same for all 16PONs on the same OLT... which we currently have around 700 pppoe-sessions..
we have same dns servers for all devices.. we are radius server machine which delivers only 4 or 5 different profiles for internet plans..
would it be optimal to use as it is? or would it be optimal cpu wise on the CCRs.. to use different VLAN per PON on the OLT with separate Interface Uplink PON on the OLT directly connected to CCR mikrotik ethernet interface with specific unique vlan and pppoe-server on that specific address also?
i have read that on the CCRs diagram each Interface is directly connected to the CPU wright? just not sure if each interface has direct connection to a certain specific number os cpu cores tilera.. or if 1 unique interface has direct access to all the Tilera cpu cores on the mikrotik...
Any Tips on which ideal scenario would be? split each PON on the OLT with its own unique VLAN, and it own Unique Interface uplink directly connected to the specific unique interface ethernet on the mikrotik, or i can just use 1 Uplink interface 10G direclty connected to the 10G mikrotik interface sfp+ using just 1 vlan and 1 pppoe-server?
BTW just to clarify the OLT PON device has got 2 10G sfp+ uplink ports + 8 ports ethernet interfaces, thats why i tought if i could split the OLT PON 8 ports device to work each single port as uplink port with specific vlan (paired with PON vlan specific) and connect directly to mikrotik CCR ether port with same vlan..
just curious which option would be optimal for cpu wise low consumption on the CCR and best speeds performance.