I would not use the Cisco if it is only 100Mbps. The RB2011 surely will do better than that. My guess is that you can reach 200 Mbps to 400 Mbps throughput:
https://mikrotik.com/product/RB2011UiAS ... estresults
so a user case is important here, for example, if you have large amount of data to be transferred (like backup NAS to another location, have CCTV cameras on both LAN but the only NVR is at one of the locations) or if you just want to use the printer on the other LAN,
@anav
your approach is what I'd do. but it won't work just yet. you will also need both ADSL router to have a static route, on LAN1, if you want to reach 192.168.1.0/24, go to gateway 10.41.39.xx (which is the IP of RB2011 on LAN1, and same for the LAN2, static route: if you want to reach 10.41.39.0/24, go to gateway 192.168.1.xx (IP of RB2011 on LAN2)
also correct routing on the Mikrotik, so it can forward reply packet to the correct gateway / Interface.
that's probably it but I might missed something.