The connection speed can be way over 1Gbps, indeed the transferspeed is much lower. But that is how wireless works. What are your expectations @Shy?You will not achieve 1000Mbps over wifi. Maybe +- 500Mbps on 5Ghz with a 3x3 AC card in a laptop. If you want a 1000Mbps - use an ethernet cable.
Between the two - frankly if you do no need an SFP port - I would frankly just go for the hap ac2.
What is the layout of the apartment and where will the device be located and where are there other wired outlets?hEX s not hEX
What will be the ac speed of hAP ac compared to hAP ac^2?
I am talking of 100 m^2 square apartment with standard walls.
No, it is in the middle. HEX S has about half the "power" of HAP AC2.Its just in the center of the apartment
Most of the wifi devices are in the radius within 10 to 20 meters from the router.
I had a feeling that hEX s is the mosr powerfull of the 3 compared to hAP ac and hAP ac^2 isn't it?
Why not hAP ac + hAP ac2?So routing plus wireless
hAP ac + hEX S (RB760iGS) ?
HiWhat is the layout of the apartment and where will the device be located and where are there other wired outlets?hEX s not hEX
What will be the ac speed of hAP ac compared to hAP ac^2?
I am talking of 100 m^2 square apartment with standard walls.
NOTE: in terms of processor and testing, hex and hexs are the same. (the difference is SFP port and poe capability both on the hex S)
That what exacly my way of thinking to put hex s as rhe main router ans second device just as a wifi. The problem starts and ends with the way those devices will be in 1 year from now when wifi6 will be more mainstream. That's the reason i wanted device between one device for routing and one for wifi plus benefits of having poe and sfp available.hAP ac with it's tripple-chain wireless radios can give 50% higher throughput ... with clients that support (at least) 3 chains. Many (possibly most) clients support 2 chains and in this case hAP ac in optimal radio conditions doesn't gain anything (compared to hAP ac2). In sub-optimal radio conditions it may gain slightly due to possibility of selecting better oriented antennae for 2-chain operation.
One thing to consider: wifi does push device's CPU and single device doing both routing/firewalling and wifi might end up in CPU overload condition thus limiting achievable throughput, while it might perform quite better when only doing one task. In this case combination of hEx+hAP ac might actually do better than "lone" hAP ac2 ...
I cant remember the default config on the hEX, if it is "switched or not", but will definitely route 1Gb/s depending on your config.Using default config with fasttrack enabled - it will.
Hmmmm, maybe you should add one more to the list (self-opinionated)Geez, I need to add another so called 'experts' to the list (ochwepheshe)
Take your Hex 1GIG and politely shove it.
Don't you worry Shy, we banter back and forth all the time. CZFAN is cool and one of handle full of experts here that really know their stuff.Hmmmm, maybe you should add one more to the list (self-opinionated)Geez, I need to add another so called 'experts' to the list (ochwepheshe)
Take your Hex 1GIG and politely shove it.
Yes the hex will easily handle 200/200 traffic, it will work well into the 600 range as well if you increase your service to 500 down for example.Thats a nice stuff!! I am low on budget so i prefer to buy exactly what is needed to my setup. I want to thank you all for that thread even though i was just shocked earlier.
I will update once i will get the hex s i hope that he will do the magic and will handle the traffic on 200/200 easily. About atttaching AP device to it i still looking for my best option if its hAP or hAP ac^2 i still dont have any idea...
Go ahead Shy, get the HEX, but first get a notarized piece of paper from CZFAN and XVO that you will achieve 1gig speed with default rule set plus maybe 5 extra rules.
The paper should state that if you are unable to achieve 1gig, they will send you $1000US dollars as payment of apology and shame.
Lets see if they put their money where their mouths are........... somehow I dont think the non-accountable MT elites have the guts.
And by the way, @anav, congrats on the CCR.When I get this badboy fired up I will let you know my speed test results........
When I get this badboy fired up I will let you know my speed test results........
If you are talking about this:Phase 2 - 1gig or higher speed
HAPAC2 as router via HEX (acting as a switch only next to modem in closet), hex also attached to the hapac.
ISP
|
hEX
/ \
hAP ac2 hAP ac
ISP
|
hEX
// \
hAP ac2 hAP ac
Less, they must have special propagation only in Ruski land , or xvo is drinking the potatoe schnapps again!!More or less...
With 2x2 and 80MHz width they both show around 400-450-500 in tests, that means in real life with walls, etc. you will have around 300.
In case you have a 3x3 device, you can benefit from hAP ac, but not in the sense that you will get 900 (because of CPU bottleneck), but rather in sense that you will still get 300, when cAP ac shows 200.
My honest opinion: all this matters only when the AP serves tens or hundreds of clients simultaneously.
For single-client performance all these tests don't mean much.
Each wall, each obstacle will cut the speed.
If you need 1gig - use wires.
If you want stable speed - buy more APs, and put them in each room.
Trying to cover the whole apartment with one AP end expect top speeds is naive.
Paying 2x the price of hAP ac over cAP ac when taking in account only wifi performance, but not the other features is ridiculous.
There are better APs on the market for the money in case we are talking of hAP ac's price.
In case of cAP ac's price - I doubt it.
Exactly!You just summarized it clearly, paying twice for hAP ac is not realistic, I should test the hEX s and see how its functioning,
to spread more than one AP. Probably cAP ac will be just sufficient.
Audience, wifi version of 4011.Ok lets focus my question,
Which mikrotik ap will be strong as hAP ac?
Unortanetly Audience and 4011 are ~$160Audience, wifi version of 4011.Ok lets focus my question,
Which mikrotik ap will be strong as hAP ac?
The first reason for me to use Mikrotik because i wanted all devices to be mikrotik so i can manage everything smoothly (hopefully).I have replaced a CAPAC in one location with a TPLink eap245 and so far it seems more stable. However I was also having issues with my router at the time, that may have been the root cause. However, I still have another capac working in the house and will probably put my spare capac in another location. The TPLink is a 1300 unit vice the capac 867 unit. Like the hapac specs but way cheaper at $90Cdn https://www.amazon.ca/TP-Link-EAP245-Wi ... 380&sr=8-1
The Capac costs me $95 cdn, so yes you can get better units at the same price if you shop around. The difference is that the MT unit works on MT RoS with all the settings available, while the TPLINK is a fixed wifi unit (can be powered by STANDARD poe - unlike MT propriertary poe) and is vlan capable so in terms of wifi and power you are not missing anything. In fact, I would say the TPLINK wifi is programmed better than the capac wifi internally.
I hold no allegiance to any brand, (unless Normis sends me the Mikrotik Nerd T-shirt!!!) and will continue to use best price performance products in a home environment.
Well that clears that up LOL. All this time I thought you had a hapac LOL.I dont have hAP ac.
I will have hEX s only. So to sum it up its better to put tplink than cAP ac or hAP ac. Right?
The only cons in this setup is that i cannot have the AP controlled centraly by mikrotik.