The most interesting thing of all is that no one has deigned to answer, as if you were asking for plans to make a dirty nuclear explosive device...bump
I think you said everything... Maybe there really are some nuclear codes in this feature implementationThe most interesting thing of all is that no one has deigned to answer, as if you were asking for plans to make a dirty nuclear explosive device...bump
On the other hand, it is an attempt to connect to the largest European wireless network by a product of one of the largest European network equipment manufacturers....
And it just doesn't work and no one cares...
nice
don't make me laugh... this question was first raised more then ten years ago and was never answered by anyone from mikrotik ... so we can sit and cry ur flush our routers with inferior software which at least will support what we need....The place to ask for features that will definitely boost the sales is by an email to sales@mikrotik.com or by making a support ticket, not by posting a forum topic and typing +1 or bump in it.
/interface wireless security-profiles add authentication-types=wpa2-eap mode=dynamic-keys name=eduroam-wpa2-eap supplicant-identity="eduroam"
/interface dot1x client add eap-methods=eap-mschapv2 identity=me password=mysecret interface=wlan1
I understand you, but don't you think it's at least funny that users ask vendors for such banal functionalities?There are many examples of feature requests that were never answered by MikroTik, never implemented, always promised for v7 but still not implemented there, etc etc.
But I have never seen that a forum topic with hundreds of "+1", "me too!", "up", "bump" etc replies actually accelerated it.
...
However, you should be warned that Eduroam support is among the least of issues with MikroTik WiFi when deploying in an environment with many users and many APs, like a school or university. You may want to think again before you buy MikroTik for that.
onLet's go back to the start here. EDUROAM isn't exactly uncommon — since the whole idea of eduroam is a common Wi-Fi auth scheme across educational institutions. The local university broadcasts where I'm at even supports it, and suggest settings are: https://its.ucsc.edu/wireless/eduroam-m ... onfig.html
.....
/interface wireless security-profiles add authentication-types=wpa2-eap mode=dynamic-keys name=eduroam-wpa2-eap supplicant-identity="eduroam"
/interface dot1x client add eap-methods=eap-mschapv2 identity=me password=mysecret interface=wlan1
input does not match any value of interface
Well, I sometimes doubt that... No idea how many actual developers there are at MikroTik, but to re-implement a feature that actually worked in v6 into v7 they claim it is a "work in progress" for about a year and a half already. That does not give me the confidence that they have a lot of developers.I understand you, but don't you think it's at least funny that users ask vendors for such banal functionalities?There are many examples of feature requests that were never answered by MikroTik, never implemented, always promised for v7 but still not implemented there, etc etc.
But I have never seen that a forum topic with hundreds of "+1", "me too!", "up", "bump" etc replies actually accelerated it.
...
However, you should be warned that Eduroam support is among the least of issues with MikroTik WiFi when deploying in an environment with many users and many APs, like a school or university. You may want to think again before you buy MikroTik for that.
Mikrotik is no longer a 10 man company but a serious networking company,
Yeah sorry, in the reply above I sort of assumed that you were trying to deploy an indoor WiFi network in an educational environment and wanted the users to connect using EDUROAM, which of course is a bit different from using a hAP mini to connect an ethernet-only device to the EDUROAM network in your school.and on the other hand I'm not trying to connect to an obscure HotSpot on a beach in New Zealand (no offense to New Zealanders) but to EDUROAM.
With that, I don't understand your last sentence that Eduroam is at the end of the company's interests, and especially the recommendation that I take something else instead of Mikrotik.
Sorry, I meant this seem like something Mikrotik would want to fix.So I'm still looking for a solution...
There are two distinct set of requirements. For visited organisations the requirement is the APs support WPA2-EAP, for home organisations they are free to use any EAP method(s) between their RADIUS servers and user as long as it will generate symmetric keying material for encryption ciphers and encapsulate the keys.However, I always believed that networks like EDUROAM use WPA2-EAP with EAP-TTLS and MSCHAPv2. And MikroTik does support that.
But the problem may be is while the RADIUS is the same, each institution might have different ways to use those creds. Like most things, there appears to be a spec on how eduroam is suppose to work, but reality may be different.[Have a] ... eduroam wireless network ...
... which implements ttls-pap auth ..
... with Mikrotik equipment as a station.
[T]here is ttls-mschapv2 support, but I can't get it to work...
[Need a] guide how to connect to such network as a station?
I think because in most cases if you're at WPA2-EAP Wi-Fi at a large org, you likely also use some MDM, LDAP/AD, etc. to provision the settings for a device that get's pushed out, like any certs. But as a eduroam guest, that's not an option.With WPA2-PSK you can simply scan a QR code to get onboard, why don't they support WPA2-EAP onboarding QR codes?
One of the main driving forces behind eduroam was to make it easy for members of one academic organisation to gain access to WiFi when visting another without having to find out what SSID and key were needed, etc. Having configured access at your home organisation it just works when you visit another.But as a eduroam guest, that's not an option.
Typically "guests" get some open captive portal, which can accept some RADIUS auth.
So the need for QR doesn't come as often I suspect is the reason.
As a client RouterOS just doesn't support EAP-TTLS/PAP, or any other less common EAP methods. (It's a pity that EAP-EKE was never adopted by OS developers as it offers password-based mutual authentication, is not susceptible to dictionary attacks and does not require public-key certificates which overcomes various issues with all the commonly used mechanisms.)Certainly RouterOS doesn't make using WPA2-EAP easy, but 100% agree it's not easy to begin with... What I'm still trying to understand is just hard to configure, or is there actually some auth mode that's not actually possible?
I know, I do it all the time. Connect to "plain" wifi, download CA cert from intranet, go to "cert management", install it as a WiFi cert, then disconnect (don't forget to delete the wifi network!), go to WPA2-EAP WiFi, enter username, password, select certificate, enter certificate DNS name, connect.It isn't a straightforward process. It requires either a self-signed CA certificate, or pinning information for RADIUS servers secured by public CAs, plus the type of inner method to be specified - using a QR code opens up the possibility of MitM attacks, and it is not possible at all for EAP-TLS as each client needs its own certificate.