YES finally I can have Safe Mode Enabled and not fear that I forget to disable it and trying to close Winbox. Before the prompt if I still would like to close was not formatted correctly and I could only select Yes. No I can see all options and select no!What's new in v3.25:
*) improved window resizing and scaling behavior on systems that include high DPI monitors;
It is a very nice addition and makes it easier to use external IP addresses in rules/line without first to have resolve it manually. It is a one-time-resolve and if you have to use dynamic then a addresslist could be used.What is the advantage (uses of),
"* added support for DNS names in address type fields;" ?
What a pity... it appears they do not consider it important. I cannot believe it is difficult to reproduce because it isProblem with moving firewall rules and jumping around randomly has not been resolved.
can you give an example?It is a very nice addition and makes it easier to use external IP addresses in rules/line without first to have resolve it manually. It is a one-time-resolve and if you have to use dynamic then a addresslist could be used.What is the advantage (uses of),
"* added support for DNS names in address type fields;" ?
Okecan you give an example?It is a very nice addition and makes it easier to use external IP addresses in rules/line without first to have resolve it manually. It is a one-time-resolve and if you have to use dynamic then a addresslist could be used.What is the advantage (uses of),
"* added support for DNS names in address type fields;" ?
Hope the ROS makes the resolving, not the winbox itself in the system of the client... If not, it is reason for subsequent errors...It is a very nice addition and makes it easier to use external IP addresses in rules/line without first to have resolve it manually. It is a one-time-resolve and if you have to use dynamic then a addresslist could be used.What is the advantage (uses of),
"* added support for DNS names in address type fields;" ?
In the already existing OTR (one-time-resolve) it uses the DNS of the router. I tested it with a domain only existing in static DNS of router. That domain is not present in the DNS that the client uses.Hope the ROS makes the resolving, not the winbox itself in the system of the client... If not, it is reason for subsequent errors...It is a very nice addition and makes it easier to use external IP addresses in rules/line without first to have resolve it manually. It is a one-time-resolve and if you have to use dynamic then a addresslist could be used.What is the advantage (uses of),
"* added support for DNS names in address type fields;" ?
That's something I can be thankful for with my lazy eyes
*) added support for CTRL+ and CTRL- keyboard shortcuts for Zoom in and Zoom out;
Therefore I thought that it could be "corrected" now... :-)It's the opposite and it's been always like this (and confusing beginners). For example, if you do "ping some.hostname.tld" in terminal, it uses resolver on router and you'll see it added in cache. If you enter some.hostname.tld in Tools->Ping in WinBox, then it's WinBox doing the resolving on the client where it runs. When you check router's dns cache, you won't find it there (assuming that client doesn't use the same router as own resolver).
Why would they do that? There should be no reason for winbox to touch user input unless it is required by the router...For example, if you do "ping some.hostname.tld" in terminal, it uses resolver on router and you'll see it added in cache. If you enter some.hostname.tld in Tools->Ping in WinBox, then it's WinBox doing the resolving on the client where it runs.
Thanks for that!*) fixed crash when an active Terminal window was opened when WinBox was minimized;
Wow... It looks like these issues are really fixed now. At least on my 3 computers.*) fixed session file size increase with each WinBox usage;
*) improved window resizing and scaling behavior on systems that include high DPI monitors;
Well ... for me (and a few colleagues), it's CTRL = is zoom in and for zoom out it's CTRL ù*) added support for CTRL+ and CTRL- keyboard shortcuts for Zoom in and Zoom out;
you probably use right numeric pad with plus and minus, those have differ scan codes and won't work unless MT add it as synonymic alternativeCTRL+ or CTRL- did not work with me.
What's new in v3.25:
*) added support for CTRL+ and CTRL- keyboard shortcuts for Zoom in and Zoom out;
I thought you are confusing Webfig and WinBox until you mentioned Adobe ... so unless you are confusing Adobe with Microsoft Edge I really do not nderstand what you are talking about ...CTRL+ and CTRL- keyboard shortcuts for Zoom in and Zoom out work in Firefox, Chrome, Adobe products. Not in this release of WinBox.What's new in v3.25:
*) added support for CTRL+ and CTRL- keyboard shortcuts for Zoom in and Zoom out;
Well, technically, there's a "dash" key on main keyboard and "minus" key on numpad. The difference is width: "minus" and "plus" signs have the same width, dash is short :) Historically, on Windows both keys produce the same sign - a dash.A it's the other - and + keys that we normally use. Never thought of that being different but clearly it is here.
Same issue hereWhen I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
I am running 9 CAPs (18 radios) and cannot reproduce this. All CAPs are running RouterOS 6.47.2You can say that this version has a killer feature.
Open CAPsMAN, click on "Radio" tab and watch all your CAPs disconnect.
Also keeping that tab open will not let any CAP connect back. "failed to connect, timeout".
The same for me, I was clicking between different tabs, no disconnects happened.I am running 9 CAPs (18 radios) and cannot reproduce this. All CAPs are running RouterOS 6.47.2You can say that this version has a killer feature.
Open CAPsMAN, click on "Radio" tab and watch all your CAPs disconnect.
Also keeping that tab open will not let any CAP connect back. "failed to connect, timeout".
CAPsMAN runs on CCR1009 with RouterOS 6.47.2
The only time I see this happen is when you click on the radio tab, and then select a previously provisioned radio, then hit provision. Seems to come right back though. That's all I've experienced...Nothing really...You can say that this version has a killer feature.
Open CAPsMAN, click on "Radio" tab and watch all your CAPs disconnect.
Also keeping that tab open will not let any CAP connect back. "failed to connect, timeout".
LE: they do come back eventualy but nothing shows up on the Radio tab though.
Not fun, not fun at all.
This version should be taken down fast.
Same here!!When I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
,No reply at all...Same here!!When I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
+++,No reply at all...Same here!!When I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
The same here, ROS 6.45.9. Yesterday we almost raised security alarm, because entire wireless network suddenly was down, until I discovered it was me using Winbox. Crazy!You can say that this version has a killer feature.
Open CAPsMAN, click on "Radio" tab and watch all your CAPs disconnect.
Also keeping that tab open will not let any CAP connect back. "failed to connect, timeout".
LE: they do come back eventualy but nothing shows up on the Radio tab though.
Not fun, not fun at all.
This version should be taken down fast.
And HOTSPOT!ROS 6.44.5 ... CAPSMA & WiFi killed with 3.25
Maybe because i have them running on 6.46.6. I only have 4 CAPs. This is how they usualy look, from terminal, in 3.25 clicking on the Radio tab I don't get the chance to see any of them, just the logs showing that they are joining back.I am running 9 CAPs (18 radios) and cannot reproduce this. All CAPs are running RouterOS 6.47.2You can say that this version has a killer feature.
Open CAPsMAN, click on "Radio" tab and watch all your CAPs disconnect.
Also keeping that tab open will not let any CAP connect back. "failed to connect, timeout".
CAPsMAN runs on CCR1009 with RouterOS 6.47.2
/caps-man radio> print
Flags: L - local, P - provisioned
# RADIO-MAC INTERFACE REMOTE-CAP-NAME REMOTE-CAP-IDENTITY
0 P C4:AD:34:D0:95:6E eth-rd-z3-cap3-1 CAP-C4AD34D0956C eth-rd-z3-cap3
1 P C4:AD:34:D0:95:6F eth-rd-z3-cap3-2 CAP-C4AD34D0956C eth-rd-z3-cap3
2 P C4:AD:34:D0:92:D6 eth-rd-z3-cap1-1 CAP-C4AD34D092D4 eth-rd-z3-cap1
3 P C4:AD:34:D0:92:D7 eth-rd-z3-cap1-2 CAP-C4AD34D092D4 eth-rd-z3-cap1
4 P C4:AD:34:D0:92:9A eth-rd-z3-cap2-1 CAP-C4AD34D09298 eth-rd-z3-cap2
5 P C4:AD:34:D0:92:9B eth-rd-z3-cap2-2 CAP-C4AD34D09298 eth-rd-z3-cap2
6 P C4:AD:34:D0:95:1A eth-rd-z3-cap4-1 CAP-C4AD34D09518 eth-rd-z3-cap4
7 P C4:AD:34:D0:95:1B eth-rd-z3-cap4-2 CAP-C4AD34D09518 eth-rd-z3-cap4
And remove Winbox 3.25 from downloads and upgrade ASAP.IMHO You shold fix WinBox not ROS ASAP as upgrade to ROS > 6.47 is not always possible
After struggling for some time with firewall order issue and now with all this wireless killer bugs I am reverting back to winbox64-3.21 that seems to work the best ...And remove Winbox 3.25 from downloads and upgrade ASAP.IMHO You shold fix WinBox not ROS ASAP as upgrade to ROS > 6.47 is not always possible
ROS 6.45.9 is supported, this is the latest long-term version. So, while we are waiting for backporting something (we don't know what) from stable to long-term, Winbox 3.25 should be removed from downloads and from built-in upgrade, or at least there should be two versions downloadable from MikroTik page - for ROS 4.72 and above, and for older versions.Or atleast there should be some warning regarding this, when it encounters unsupported (anymore) ROS versions instead of the current unfortunate behaviour.
When I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
Back in the future.....I faced the same problem. When I downgraded to 3.34 everything works fine...
When I update to Winbox v3.25, on the Hotspot>Active tab, everything is ok, the connection is ok. But in the event when turn to Hotspot>Host tab, everything is gone wrong, everybody in the hotspot has been disconnected, then when I back to the Hotspot>Active tab, all the active has been disconnected. Pls, refer to the attached pic...
For now, I'll back using v3.24 which is back to normal status...
BTW, my unit is hap ac2...
Links are in this post:I do not see version 3.24 available to download, wtf?
I join to this question too.how can we force to not follow system DPI setting?
A workaround is using "High DPI compatibility settings".Hi,
"Micro font" problem on MS Surface laptops is sill here on windows interface upscale to 150-175%...
I agree with this. It may be caused by a ROS bug but surely there is some way you can have Winbox check the RouterOS version and adjust its behavior based on the version? Perhaps you can use the old code if the ROS version is older and doesn't have the patch for this bug.IMHO You shold fix WinBox not ROS ASAP as upgrade to ROS > 6.47 is not always possible
+1Newer WinBox versions shouldn't break client's routers running stable, older ROS versions, disconnecting CAPs or whatever else the current version is able to kill or mess up with.
Or atleast there should be some warning regarding this, when it encounters unsupported (anymore) ROS versions instead of the current unfortunate behaviour.
+1+1Newer WinBox versions shouldn't break client's routers running stable, older ROS versions, disconnecting CAPs or whatever else the current version is able to kill or mess up with.
Or atleast there should be some warning regarding this, when it encounters unsupported (anymore) ROS versions instead of the current unfortunate behaviour.
i tried this but its not as good as 3.20, im trying to get the behavior backA workaround is using "High DPI compatibility settings".Hi,
"Micro font" problem on MS Surface laptops is sill here on windows interface upscale to 150-175%...
Right-click winbox (shortcut), "Compatibility" Tab, "Change High DPI settings" (I'm translating back to English from non-English Windows), check "Override High DPI Scaling" checkbox at the bottom, select "System" in the now enabled drop-down menu.
Hope this helps.