system;error;critical;13328;39528;13328 error while running customized default configuration script: expected end of command (line 1310 column 53)
Is this comparable to "ondemand" scheduler from x86 linux? Any numbers on expected power savings when the device is idle?*) arm - added support for automatic CPU frequency stepping for IPQ4018/IPQ4019 devices;
It saves power and runs less hot.I wonder what's the real advantage of running my router with ondemand scheduler?
And on the 4011RM and the hEX-S the same error message:Can you please send the supout.rif file from your device to support@mikrotik.com?
13:04:38 system,error,critical error while running customized default configuration script: expected end of command (line 1310 column 53)
13:04:38 system,error,critical
I also lost direct Winbox access to my 4011RM which is behind the the hEX-S and now only able to connect through Romon. The configuration did not change and Winbox just flashes by on my screen. For the safety I revered to 6.47 on my hEX-S.msatter Do you have custom set of packages installed and wireless package is not installed?
Correct. My system has system, dhcp, advanced-tools & security installed. Opened SUP-21264 with support output.msatter Do you have custom set of packages installed and wireless package is not installed?
This is about forwarding? Looks like queries are still sent via DoH for me.*) dns - do not use DoH for local queries when a server is specified;
I do not understand that one... How could type be "A" and unspecified at the same time?*) dns - do not use type "A" for static entries with unspecified type;
Not only on ARM. They probably withdrew the build due to the problems mentioned above.On ARM: Check for updates: ERROR: file not found
I had that same message on my hEX-S, so I manually uploaded the firmware file.See:
Maybe there should be some more testing before new version is released?*) bridge - fixed dynamic VLAN assignment when changing port "frame-type" property (introduced in v6.46);
*) crs3xx - fixed HW offloading for netPower 15FR and netPower 16P devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) crs3xx - fixed increased CPU temperature for CRS354-48G-4S+2Q+ device (introduced in v6.47);
*) dns - fixed listening for DNS queries when only dynamic static entries exist (introduced in v6.47);
*) filesystem - fixed increased "sector writes" reporting (introduced in v6.47);
*) ipsec - do not update peer endpoints for generated policy entries (introduced in v6.47);
*) metarouter - fixed image importing (introduced in v6.46);
*) profile - fixed "unclassified" load reporting on PowerPC devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) qsfp - fixed break-out cable linking after reboot (introduced in v6.47);
*) qsfp - ignore FEC mode when set to fec91, only fec74 mode is supported (introduced in v6.47);
*) routerboard - fixed "mode-button" support on SMIPS devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) smb - fixed SMB server (introduced in v6.47);
Does any of these changes mean it will help with this viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162930?*) ppp - added "ipv6-routes" parameter to "secrets" menu;
*) ppp - added support for "Framed-IPv6-Route" RADIUS attribute;
*) ppp - allow specifying pool name for "remote-ipv6-prefix-pool" parameter;
What is not able to support the new linux kernel in v7? (other than really old devices, ex. mipsle)There will continue to be 6.X versions for the foreseeable future as not all the chip sets out there will be able to support the new linux kernel in 7.X
I am sorry, but I won't go for that.@msatter What feature sets are you using in the versions with the flash write counter issue that are preventing you from just rolling back to a version without this issue?
Maybe there should be some more testing before new version is released?*) bridge - fixed dynamic VLAN assignment when changing port "frame-type" property (introduced in v6.46);
*) crs3xx - fixed HW offloading for netPower 15FR and netPower 16P devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) crs3xx - fixed increased CPU temperature for CRS354-48G-4S+2Q+ device (introduced in v6.47);
*) dns - fixed listening for DNS queries when only dynamic static entries exist (introduced in v6.47);
*) filesystem - fixed increased "sector writes" reporting (introduced in v6.47);
*) ipsec - do not update peer endpoints for generated policy entries (introduced in v6.47);
*) metarouter - fixed image importing (introduced in v6.46);
*) profile - fixed "unclassified" load reporting on PowerPC devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) qsfp - fixed break-out cable linking after reboot (introduced in v6.47);
*) qsfp - ignore FEC mode when set to fec91, only fec74 mode is supported (introduced in v6.47);
*) routerboard - fixed "mode-button" support on SMIPS devices (introduced in v6.47);
*) smb - fixed SMB server (introduced in v6.47);
10 errors was introduced in 6.47
2 errors was introduced in 6.46
That is 12 in total, maybe more that still are not found.
Where is 6.47.1 to fix errors introduced in 6.47?
I was hoping for no 6.48, but for 7.0beta
Updated RBM33G and LtAP LTE kit successfully.*) lte - fixed modem initialization when multiple modems are used simultaneously;
After update no traffic flows through to station devices. cannot mactel to them or macping. Downgraded back to 6.46.6*) w60g - added "mdmg-fix" parameter for RBwAP60Gx3 (CLI only);
crs3xx - added initial Bridge Port Extender support (CLI only);
*) crs3xx - added initial Controlling Bridge support for CRS317, CRS309, CRS312, CRS326-24S+2Q+ and CRS354 devices (CLI only);
is this 802.1BR?
if so, how long until we get also support for this in CCRs? i'd love to see ports from port extenders to show up as 'virtual ports' on the connected CCRs...
/system routerboard settings set cpu-frequency=auto
Now I tried it, the result: with any frequency, consumption does not change, only the full load on the processor increases it by about one watt.Code: Select all/system routerboard settings set cpu-frequency=auto
-What's new in 6.48beta12 (2020-Jul-06 13:33):
Changes in this release:
*) ppp - added "ipv6-routes" parameter to "secrets" menu;
*) ppp - added support for "Framed-IPv6-Route" RADIUS attribute;
*) ppp - allow specifying pool name for "remote-ipv6-prefix-pool" parameter;
Multihoming and load balancing?..No NAT tensions....
BGP Multihoming can be done but not sure about Load balancing...... Well for ISP always NAT is the biggest problem. So much of tension in maintaing NAT Logs and also issues with Govt. Sites when Multiple Clients use same Public IP...Multihoming and load balancing?..No NAT tensions....
Upgraded a pair of Wireless Wire dishes and experienced the same thing. Link comes up but passes no traffic, not even mactel. Downgraded both sides to 6.47.1 for it to work again.After update no traffic flows through to station devices. cannot mactel to them or macping. Downgraded back to 6.46.6*) w60g - added "mdmg-fix" parameter for RBwAP60Gx3 (CLI only);
msatter
I also lost direct Winbox access to my 4011RM which is behind the the hEX-S and now only able to connect through Romon. The configuration did not change and Winbox just flashes by on my screen. For the safety I revered to 6.47 on my hEX-S.
Update.
The TikAPP can access the 4011 directly without problem. Really strange!
Update:
Ignoring the saved VIW file gives access again and I hope that this will not happen again and I have to make backups of those VIW files in case of that.
i don't know how to send info to check this issue, logs on WinBox don't show any error, after reboot DNS has back work..
Are these devices known to have an issue with the memory failing? I've had dd-wrt devices flashed and written to for 10+ years without failure, and these devices had new firmware flashed at least twice a month.There seems to be testing but internal. We start 6.48 at version beta twelve.
The flash write counter is a big problem despite it not be actual writes. It will decrease the resell value of your router because the write counter is extremely high due to this bug. This bug alone should have been tackled by 6.47.1 version at a earlier moment.
I don't think it is wise to have two active beta's side by side, being developed.
What ever it is supposed to do or what device it shall affect, but all my ptp w60g do the same - links are up, romon can see them and even ssh into them, but no ip traffic or even arp is working.After update no traffic flows through to station devices. cannot mactel to them or macping. Downgraded back to 6.46.6*) w60g - added "mdmg-fix" parameter for RBwAP60Gx3 (CLI only);
/ipv6 pool
add name=pool1 prefix=2a01:5e0:501::/48 prefix-length=56
/ipv6 dhcp-server
add address-pool=pool1 interface=bridge1 lease-time=10m name=server1 use-radius=yes
/ipv6 pool used print ///empty table, not posting :)
/ipv6 dhcp-server binding print
Flags: X - disabled, R - radius, D - dynamic
# ADDRESS DUID SERVER STATUS
0 RD 2a01:5e0:501:f00::/56 0xb869f499c7f8 server1 bound
Context?what about 6.48Beta23 ??
Do you know if there is also a Beta48 fix for the crashing Winbox (64) the next time after you alter any columns in Winbox? Before testing backup your Winbox config files because the one altered has become unusable.ROS 6.48Beta23 should bring fix for CRS354 switches.
And it is "unpublic" release....
Me too. Reported for 6.47beta12 as SUP-21264, just re-opened.btw.after install I see in log this :
system,error,critical,,, error while running customized default configuration script: expected end of command (line 1315 column 53)
Which U-NII-2 ecactly: 2A, 2B or 2C?*) wireless - added support for U-NII-2 for cAP ac;
*) wireless - added support for U-NII-2 for wAP ac;
I was also confused by this but I think this is an unlock for US as I think all U-NII-2 bands where locked on US equipment. So for me with EU equipment do not have to care about this.Which U-NII-2 ecactly: 2A, 2B or 2C?*) wireless - added support for U-NII-2 for cAP ac;
*) wireless - added support for U-NII-2 for wAP ac;
5350-5470 MHz is U-NII-2B; 2A and 2C were already supported weren't they? Or do you mean in some specific countries?
With the latest beta I went in more cautious mode and did not upgrade too many devices before finding out it being still broken. What is with that?What ever it is supposed to do or what device it shall affect, but all my ptp w60g do the same - links are up, romon can see them and even ssh into them, but no ip traffic or even arp is working.After update no traffic flows through to station devices. cannot mactel to them or macping. Downgraded back to 6.46.6*) w60g - added "mdmg-fix" parameter for RBwAP60Gx3 (CLI only);
I will try to get downgrade to v6.47.1.
Tiny little problem with this, it keeps resolving hostname even when peer is disabled. It doesn't break anything, but it's unnecessary.*) ipsec - refresh peer's DNS only when phase 1 is down;
Unable to reproduce such behavior. Do you see actual DNS requests going out the router? How are you determining the hostname is being resolved when the peer is disabled?Tiny little problem with this, it keeps resolving hostname even when peer is disabled. It doesn't break anything, but it's unnecessary.
Is this feature enough to automatically assign IP Phones to specific VLAN (ie configuring a VoiceVLAN per port) ?Version 6.48beta35 has been released.
...
*) discovery - added "lldp-med-net-policy-vlan" property for assigning VLAN ID (CLI only);
I guess IPv4 is still preferred if a domain resolves with A and AAAA record. Try a domain that has just an AAAA record or use IPv6 address.Not sure this is working ? The DoH server I'm using is https://doh.opendns.com/dns-query , and I see requests to 146.112.41.2 , but none to 2620:119:fc::2
set use-doh-server="https://[2606:4700:4700::1111]/dns-query"
Wow. It's possible to make this change for vpls, pptp, openvpn interfaces too?*) ipsec - do not kill connection when peer's "name" or "comment" is changed;
In fact this should be done for every possible item in the config. Don't know what is the exact status now, but I have seen many things go down-up when changing only a comment.Wow. It's possible to make this change for vpls, pptp, openvpn interfaces too?*) ipsec - do not kill connection when peer's "name" or "comment" is changed;
netwatch too, just changing the comment should not update the uptimeIn fact this should be done for every possible item in the config. Don't know what is the exact status now, but I have seen many things go down-up when changing only a comment.
That's very helpful, but it did not answer my most pressing question - does this create a single point of failure from the controller bridge perspective? Is there a way to have failover for the controller bridge? If you look at traditional stacking situations (ex. two switches stacked), either one can die and the remaining switch will carry on as normal. This is really helpful for ISP situations, you can get two cross connects with important providers so that if one switch dies your cross connect does not go down. With 802.1BR it seems that if you have one switch as a control bridge and the other as a port extender, if the control bridge switch dies, you lose both, so it seems that you don't really get redundancy as in traditional stacking. Can you clarify this?Also, for everyone how is interested in the new Bridge Controller and Extender feature, we have created an article that describes it in more detail, more advanced examples are coming soon. Follow this link - https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... t+Extender. Feel free to share you feedback and recommendations, or report if something goes wrong.
My friends have an office here with 200+ client ports, with all cable runs going into a single rack with five 48-port access switches (something from HP as far as I remember), and one 16-port switch sitting in between these 5 access switches and the rest of the equipment in their server room. Managing VLAN memberships here is a pretty tedious task, I would say. Tracking the configuration history is not easy either. This setup already has SPOF, and in this particular case that's fine/acceptable. This port extension thing would be very beneficial for this kind of setups.All I am saying is, that those who have enough switches that will benefit from a single management plane, will almost certainly need HA features to go with it.
Right, this isn't stacking - but where this all started was a thread where people were asking for stacking, and MikroTik said they would look for an open standards way, and then they came out with this. Also, they just said in the response to my request for clarification that they are looking for ways to make the control bridge failover, so presumably this is intended to be their solution for stacking.Port Extension is NOT stacking...
I have talked with Mikrotik's support about this problem for some time.May we expect the 60G devices to still be broken?
This should be fixed now, if you are still experiencing issues - please contact us through support portal, so we can debug even further.I have talked with Mikrotik's support about this problem for some time.May we expect the 60G devices to still be broken?
They have applied a fix in 6.48beta48, which fixed the issues for me.
My 3,7km Link is stable again with 6.48beta48. It had massive stability issues (very frequent disconnects) with anything above 6.46.6.
Is "interface disable" optional feature?Version 6.48beta48 has been released.
*) interface - added temperature warning and interface disable on overheat for SFP and SFP+ interfaces (CLI only);
Where is new MIB?*) snmp - added information from IPsec "active-peers" menu to MIKROTIK-MIB;
*) snmp - added new LTE monitoring OID's to MIKROTIK-MIB;
Thnx. Found glitch - mtxrLTEModemInterfaceIndex not returned:The MIB file is available on our wiki:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:S ... _.28MIB.29
Mikrotik.mib:516: warning: index element `mtxrWlCMRtabAddr' of row `mtxrWlCMRtabEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB
Mikrotik.mib:626: warning: node `mtxrWlCMRtabEapIdent' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:691: warning: node `mtxrWlCMState' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:698: warning: node `mtxrWlCMChannel' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:736: warning: node `mtxrWlCMRemoteName' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:743: warning: node `mtxrWlCMRemoteState' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:750: warning: node `mtxrWlCMRemoteAddress' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:757: warning: node `mtxrWlCMRemoteRadios' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:954: warning: node `mtxrWl60GStaPhyRate' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:961: warning: node `mtxrWl60GStaRssi' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:968: warning: node `mtxrWl60GStaDistance' must be contained in at least one conformance group
Mikrotik.mib:976: warning: current group `mtxrWirelessGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1281: warning: current group `mtxrQueueGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1485: warning: current group `mtxrHealthGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1537: warning: current group `mtxrLincenseGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1724: warning: current group `mtxrHotspotActiveUserGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1758: warning: current group `mtxrDHCPGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1823: warning: current group `mtxrSystemGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1881: warning: current group `mtxrScriptGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1924: warning: current group `mtxrScriptRunGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:1999: warning: current group `mtxrNstremeDualGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:2091: warning: current group `mtxrNeighborGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:2155: warning: current group `mtxrGPSGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:2184: warning: current group `mtxrWirelessModemGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:2762: warning: current group `mtxrInterfaceStatsGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:2911: warning: current group `mtxrPOEGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:3064: warning: current group `mtxrLTEModemGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:3151: warning: current group `mtxrPartitionGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:3192: warning: current group `mtxrOpticalGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:3335: warning: current group `mtxrIkeSAGroup' is not referenced in this module
Mikrotik.mib:3544: warning: current group `mtxrTrapGroup' is not referenced in this module
I am pretty sure they are. Log in to the support portal and see your closed cases.So a general remark: I think cases should remain browseable for the submitter, even after they have been closed by MikroTik.
Ok now I see that with even more clicking they can be made visible...I am pretty sure they are. Log in to the support portal and see your closed cases.So a general remark: I think cases should remain browseable for the submitter, even after they have been closed by MikroTik.
Yes, it very very betterI can confirm w60g connections are stable on beta48
this is great. looking forward to the final 6.48 release.What's new in 6.48beta48 (2020-Oct-14 10:26):
*) traffic-flow - added NAT event logging support for IPFIX;
That is not done by your MikroTik router, it is done by the operating system of your phone. When it connects wifi and succeeds, it goes on to perform other tests like DHCP request and then DNS check and when something fails it disconnects and deems the connection unusable.Who could explain me why my phone suffers from intermittent drops. I've updated to the latest version the same issue persists.
It usually happens when my internal DNS server is down. You might tell me - there is no internet connection. However I've got AC68U at hand when my phone connects to it provided the router doesn't have an ISP cable, the phone behaves in an ordinary way . Why does MikroTik drops connections and force it to reconnect?
Interesting, what Mikrotik 60g boxes are 3,7km capable?I have talked with Mikrotik's support about this problem for some time.May we expect the 60G devices to still be broken?
They have applied a fix in 6.48beta48, which fixed the issues for me.
My 3,7km Link is stable again with 6.48beta48. It had massive stability issues (very frequent disconnects) with anything above 6.46.6.
None are. At least not officially.Interesting, what Mikrotik 60g boxes are 3,7km capable?I have talked with Mikrotik's support about this problem for some time.May we expect the 60G devices to still be broken?
They have applied a fix in 6.48beta48, which fixed the issues for me.
My 3,7km Link is stable again with 6.48beta48. It had massive stability issues (very frequent disconnects) with anything above 6.46.6.
Did you already contact Mikrotik support on this? e-mail: support@mikrotik.comTried 6.48beta48
L2TP IPSec using certificates is still broken for my clients.
Searched the forums, but haven't found any resolution.
My L2TP/IPSec clients failed after 6.47, was able to downgrade back to 6.46.6 and everything worked ok again.
A clear disadvantage of having a hAP ac² with 256 MB RAM - with the standard 128 you'd notice that much sooner :) Send the supout.rif to support@mikrotik.com to help them identify the process which leaks.Looks like there is a memory leak in 6.48 beta(s)
I wonder if they have better tools to examine the supout.rif than the viewer available online (in your mikrotik.com account).Send the supout.rif to support@mikrotik.com to help them identify the process which leaks.
Done. [SUP-31833]Send the supout.rif to support@mikrotik.com to help them identify the process which leaks.
I did that, but although the issue I identified is a possible DoS problem I heard nothing until I solved it myself and sent info about my findings...pe1chl - Of course we do. That is why we always ask to contact support@mikrotik.com and send a supout file if there is a potential software issue.
I gave this a quick try and I see few problems or possible improvements:*) quickset - added "Port Mapping" to QuickSet;
/ip firewall nat
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment=web dst-port=80 protocol=tcp to-addresses=192.168.88.10 to-ports=80
MetaRouter & LTE Fixed - good !!!*) lte - increased "at+cops" reply timeout to 1 minute;
*) metarouter - allow creating RouterOS metarouter instances on devices with 16MB flash storage;
*) winbox - added "operator" parameter under "Interface/LTE" menu;
*) winbox - do not allow MAC address changes on LTE interfaces;
Could you please elaborate on that point?*) sstp - fixed "idle-timeout" on TILE and CHR devices;
I was pulling my hair out because of this!....Well, the idle-timeout parameter did not work at all on those systems. The tunnels were disconnected even if there was active traffic sent over the tunnel.
It now resolves them correctly into the DNS cache but it still does not load them correctly into address lists... (see SUP-28445)*) dns - improved stability with large table of static records;
Me too, especially because I just saw it on some of my connections to a specific CHR but not all.I was pulling my hair out because of this!....Well, the idle-timeout parameter did not work at all on those systems. The tunnels were disconnected even if there was active traffic sent over the tunnel.
I think is regarding the arm64 ie 2004s as we were told the issue we have with that was solved by this release.*) arm - improved system stability;
Can you elaborate please? Does this fix the 4011 & 1100AHx4 management lockouts?
Yes, I believe this fix is for the RB4011 / RB1100AHx4 issues*) arm - improved system stability;
Can you elaborate please? Does this fix the 4011 & 1100AHx4 management lockouts?
Version 6.48beta58 has been released.
*) dhcpv6 server - added support for "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" for PPP services;
Can Anyone from Mikrotik Support address this please?!!!Version 6.48beta58 has been released.
*) dhcpv6 server - added support for "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" for PPP services;
Dose this means support is added for Radius Accounting or Can Anyone please Explain this???
Can you further explain? I had problems with a couple of pwr-line adapters both in recent 6 versions and 7 beta, and I wonder it this could be related. I have a support ticket open, but no contact related to it since a couple of months ago. I actually bought a couple of no name pwr-line adaptors to substitute the mikrotik ones because of them not being operative.*) interface - fixed pwr-line running state (introduced in v6.45);
And the reason is..?Both times failed to upgrade, and rebooted back into build 48 instead of 58.
No idea with regards to accounting, but in terms of what it now brings to the table I can explain.Can Anyone from Mikrotik Support address this please?!!!Version 6.48beta58 has been released.
*) dhcpv6 server - added support for "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" for PPP services;
Dose this means support is added for Radius Accounting or Can Anyone please Explain this???
Try with a clean update system:Hrmm maybe? I downloaded the .zip file with 'all extras' for arm and scp'd the .npk files as normal and validated they were all there and the right size.
When that didn't work after two attempts of scp and reboot, I tried the winbox method and it showed download complete and rebooted, but again failed.
I don't have any failure log messages just a normal boot up message after it boots as well.
I just tested it - RADIUS accounting is now working too for Delegated-IPv6-Prefix!Version 6.48beta58 has been released.
*) dhcpv6 server - added support for "Delegated-IPv6-Prefix" for PPP services;
Dose this means support is added for Radius Accounting or Can Anyone please Explain this???
No change... Even tried it completely from the command line, same behavior; reboots with the same beta 48 build.Try with a clean update system:Hrmm maybe? I downloaded the .zip file with 'all extras' for arm and scp'd the .npk files as normal and validated they were all there and the right size.
When that didn't work after two attempts of scp and reboot, I tried the winbox method and it showed download complete and rebooted, but again failed.
I don't have any failure log messages just a normal boot up message after it boots as well.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=161887&p=798175#p798175
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /system package update print
channel: testing
installed-version: 6.48beta48
latest-version: 6.48beta58
status: New version is available
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /system package update cancel
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /system package update print
channel: testing
installed-version: 6.48beta48
latest-version: 6.48beta58
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /system package update check-for-updates
channel: testing
installed-version: 6.48beta48
latest-version: 6.48beta58
status: New version is available
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /system package update install
channel: testing
installed-version: 6.48beta48
latest-version: 6.48beta58
status: Downloaded 94% (12.9MiB)
Received disconnect from x.x.x.1 port 22:11: shutdown/reboot
I have to recall that, it does not fix the issue, the router still exhausts the memory and crashes when large DNS responses are received.It now resolves them correctly into the DNS cache but it still does not load them correctly into address lists... (see SUP-28445)*) dns - improved stability with large table of static records;
what's in the disk log?
/log pr where buffer=disk topics~"critical"
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] > /log pr where buffer=disk topics~"critical"
[admin@sw0-number-city-state-country] >
When was this bug introduced?Version 6.48beta58 has been released.
What's new in 6.48beta58 (2020-Nov-24 08:31):
*) sstp - fixed "idle-timeout" on TILE and CHR devices;
I Just Tried but no improvement Still Not Sending Delegated IPv6 Prefix to Radius on Accounting :(The remaining issue now is that it considers the IPv6 DHCP to be a completely separate RADIUS session from the PPPoE, and the username does not match (it uses the MAC instead). But at least it is being reported back to the RADIUS server.
Do you have any bridge in the config? Check its MTU, maybe it was decreased to the tunnel MTU value and is dropping certain (mostly https) connections now.6.48 beta58 randomly starts dropping traffic.
DNS looks ups are fine
Some sites load others don’t. After a reboot suddenly starts working again for a few hours then stops again. Reboot fixes it.
Internet is up, no packet loss, dns working, disabled fast track, enabled fast track, checked route cache, no explanation. No complex configuration, however started using an IPSec tunnel but the hosts having issues are not even routing through the IPSec and are going straight through the WAN connection.
Everything shows fine but random hosts stop routing to random sites. Google works but can’t access some sites, clear connections no luck.
Checked everything and eventually couldn’t find the culprit. Dropped way back down to stable release.. not sure if anyone has had similar issues running on x86.
In the RADIUS menu you have to check not only the PPP box but also the DHCP box for the RADIUS server, then the delegated prefix will be sent on accounting.I Just Tried but no improvement Still Not Sending Delegated IPv6 Prefix to Radius on Accounting :(
/radius
add address=192.168.88.254 secret=mysecret service=ppp,dhcp
*) ipsec - added SHA384 hash algorithm support for phase 1 (CLI only);
Hi Thank it worked after adding the dhcp.In the RADIUS menu you have to check not only the PPP box but also the DHCP box for the RADIUS server, then the delegated prefix will be sent on accounting.I Just Tried but no improvement Still Not Sending Delegated IPv6 Prefix to Radius on Accounting :(
What MikroTik still has to do is implement the equivalent of the "address-change-immediate-update" setting from Juniper: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index ... id=KB31659Code: Select all/radius add address=192.168.88.254 secret=mysecret service=ppp,dhcp
That "CLI only" remark means setting this up is not currently supported in either WinBox or WebFig. And so when you open that profile entry in WinBox it just changes the "Hash Algorithms" value to the first item from the list of supported values, which happened to be "md5". You may notice that the "Hash Algorithms" label is now blue (which means "has been changed/edited"), so if you click "OK" now you will change it to "md5" in your running configuration.Strange effects when attempting to edit ip ipsec profile created with sha384 hash in Winbox 3.27 - the hash is shown as MD5.Code: Select all*) ipsec - added SHA384 hash algorithm support for phase 1 (CLI only);
Yes you didn't read my other sentence:1. When the accounting is being sent to radius the DHCP is creating seperate User Name=<MAC ID> which is not letting the Radius Fetch the Delegation Details.
Yes you didn't read my other sentence:1. When the accounting is being sent to radius the DHCP is creating seperate User Name=<MAC ID> which is not letting the Radius Fetch the Delegation Details.
Their behavior right now is the same as the default Juniper behavior, so I would not call that a bug. Juniper added the address-change-immediate-update setting, which takes the delegated prefix from the DHCP session and copies it to the PPPoE session so it can be included in the interim-update for the PPPoE session. Without the equivalent of address-change-immediate-update, the DHCP session and PPPoE session remain disconnected from one another.What MikroTik still has to do is implement the equivalent of the "address-change-immediate-update" setting from Juniper: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index ... id=KB31659
Hope Mikrotik Team May Implement the same soon.....Yes you didn't read my other sentence:1. When the accounting is being sent to radius the DHCP is creating seperate User Name=<MAC ID> which is not letting the Radius Fetch the Delegation Details.
Their behavior right now is the same as the default Juniper behavior, so I would not call that a bug. Juniper added the address-change-immediate-update setting, which takes the delegated prefix from the DHCP session and copies it to the PPPoE session so it can be included in the interim-update for the PPPoE session. Without the equivalent of address-change-immediate-update, the DHCP session and PPPoE session remain disconnected from one another.What MikroTik still has to do is implement the equivalent of the "address-change-immediate-update" setting from Juniper: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index ... id=KB31659
One actual bug that I found is that it creates two dynamic simple queues for each user instead of one - a regular simple queue for the PPP interface and a second dual stack simple queue created by DHCP over RADIUS. The dual stack queue is redundant because the simple queue for the PPP interface by itself is enough to shape both IPv6 and IPv4. MikroTik should only create a dual stack dynamic simple queue from DHCPv6-PD if the DHCPv6-PD request is not over a PPP connection.
I hope so too. In the meantime, if you use FreeRADIUS, it is possible to work around this with a bit of unlang code to revise the PPPoE accounting lines since the MAC address can be used to reference either.Hope Mikrotik Team May Implement the same soon.....
Can you please Share me how to do this?I hope so too. In the meantime, if you use FreeRADIUS, it is possible to work around this with a bit of unlang code to revise the PPPoE accounting lines since the MAC address can be used to reference either.Hope Mikrotik Team May Implement the same soon.....
I don't use unlang every day so I don't have the greatest handle on the syntax, but this should be close to what you need:Can you please Share me how to do this?
if (!Delegated-IPv6-Prefix) {
update request {
&Delegated-IPv6-Prefix = %{sql:select delegatedipv6prefix from radacct where username='%{Calling-Station-Id}' and Delegated-IPv6-Prefix is not null limit 1 desc}}
}
}