Branding.... The ability to put our logo on the webbox / web landing page... Like we used to be able to..
This would help us with so many customers.
Lee
Why not? It will be really useful for clients who want to dial more then one pppoe connection (eg. some neighbours with two independent accounts) via one wireless device. And it should be easy to implement I think ... http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcm ... -relay.htmnot planned at the moment.add pppoe relay agent
this feature will pass pppoe by wlan pseudo bridge
very good sugestion, if this is supportable by the hardware (which I'm not sure that it would be), I would definitly like to see it added.We need to able to reuse the same channel on a single site to support much more subscribers thus improving economics....
Is there any news on this matter? I really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really could use this for a lot of customerswe already support protocol IGMP for IP Multicast (compliance with RFC 2236)
Support IP Multicast with use Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) and Sparse and Dense Mode (compliance with RFC 2362, 3973) are being developed.
It is already possible if you log to syslog, or better syslog-ng, on any *nix. You can use any log parsing tool and execute commands on Mikrotik via SSH to add a rule to the filter to disable the offending IP, and send mail to the admin.Can you add option that we can handle some system events, like login failure? It would be gogod if we can block out Ip which from login failures come, and also option to send warning email to admin. It could be useful for other system critical events.
I'll take this as a jokeIt is already possible if you log to syslog, or better syslog-ng, on any *nix. You can use any log parsing tool and execute commands on Mikrotik via SSH to add a rule to the filter to disable the offending IP, and send mail to the admin.
No I'm dead serious. It's working setup, that can do magic things. Many tasks that Mikrotik is incapable of, can be offloaded to a smarter host and for me it works like a charm. But of course YMMV.I'll take this as a jokeIt is already possible if you log to syslog, or better syslog-ng, on any *nix. You can use any log parsing tool and execute commands on Mikrotik via SSH to add a rule to the filter to disable the offending IP, and send mail to the admin.
I've found getting Linux based Syslog systems to be quite the PITA. Kiwi Syslog for Windows works great "out of the box".It is already possible if you log to syslog, or better syslog-ng, on any *nix. You can use any log parsing tool and execute commands on Mikrotik via SSH to add a rule to the filter to disable the offending IP, and send mail to the admin.Can you add option that we can handle some system events, like login failure? It would be gogod if we can block out Ip which from login failures come, and also option to send warning email to admin. It could be useful for other system critical events.
Regards,
Andrzej
Of course, and I think it's also very easy to make them available in PDF, CSV and a format suitable for network-aware refrigerators. Just one question. What for? SNMP can do magic, in a few minutes you can pull these data and convert it to whatever you want.It would be fien if we could have Traffic and system resource graphing available in XML format together with HTML. XML is easier to parse and use data. This is not hard to do and would be very useful.
agreed. focus should be on improving SNMP features, not developing XML tools.IMHO RouterOS lacks far more important features, I would not waste developer time to address such an issue.
Looks like its in RC6 Have you tested yet?Is there any news on this matter? I really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really could use this for a lot of customers
don't forget a jitter measurement while running the test... jitter is a bigger problem to VoIP then latency...I would really like to see packet loss counters as part of the speedtest utility. This request comes from running more and more voice over the network.
For example, we simulate 3 concurrent voip calls by setting up 300kb bi-directional UDP data streams. It would be great to have total packets/packet loss counters as part of the UDP test.
George
i don't see the value of adding this... besides, isn't that what a wrist watch is for?HeadsUp display of date and time in winbox, in the top bar. Tnx.
I was trying to be nice...... or windows taskbar?
Normis,we already support protocol IGMP for IP Multicast (compliance with RFC 2236)
Support IP Multicast with use Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) and Sparse and Dense Mode (compliance with RFC 2362, 3973) are being developed.