Hi,,When I create multiples interfaces 6to4, I have same local link address assigned.
It's a bug ?
Thank's
Bug in 6.49 rc2 ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
-
vecernik87
Forum Veteran
- Posts: 891
- Joined:
Re: Bug in 6.49 rc2 ?
I don't see any issue with that:
Firstly, you can test it yourself that other versions do that as well. Therefore it can't be version related bug.
Secondly, it is link-local address. in IPv6 world, it serves similar purpose as MAC addresses in IPv4 world. As long as they are on different networks, there shouldn't be any colission.
Finally, you will likely add different address anyway once you connect the tunnel.
Firstly, you can test it yourself that other versions do that as well. Therefore it can't be version related bug.
Secondly, it is link-local address. in IPv6 world, it serves similar purpose as MAC addresses in IPv4 world. As long as they are on different networks, there shouldn't be any colission.
Finally, you will likely add different address anyway once you connect the tunnel.
Re: Bug in 6.49 rc2 ?
We have official 6.49. Why to test 6.49 rc2?
Re: Bug in 6.49 rc2 ?
Ok, thank youI don't see any issue with that:
Firstly, you can test it yourself that other versions do that as well. Therefore it can't be version related bug.
Secondly, it is link-local address. in IPv6 world, it serves similar purpose as MAC addresses in IPv4 world. As long as they are on different networks, there shouldn't be any colission.
Finally, you will likely add different address anyway once you connect the tunnel.
Re: Bug in 6.49 rc2 ?
Yes, I will upgrade to stable..We have official 6.49. Why to test 6.49 rc2?
Thank's,
Jean Luc
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests