/export
09:57:28 system,info router rebooted
...
09:57:33 system,error,critical error while running customized default configuration script: bad command name wireless (line 977 column 25)
09:57:33 system,error,critical
...
09:58:09 system,critical,info ntp change time Apr/05/2022 09:57:43 => Apr/05/2022 09:58:09
Warning: cpu not running at default frequency
Almost every non-CHR Device I upgraded is now showing a warning under System --> Routerboard:
Warning: cpu not running at default frequency
After three times reboots, the problem was solvedErfanDL please contact support@mikrotik.com with more details, such as, what version you upgraded from, what kinds of clients, and if all are affected, and attach a supout.rif file from the device, if possible while it's running 7.2, and clients are experiencing this issue.
"that is not a bug, it is a feature!"Another interesting bug is that I can't seem to paste (from clipboard) my export into the winbox terminal window (I've noticed this since a few builds ago) - even if I only do a few lines at a time. The lines seem to "self-corrupt" as it's busy pasting in. So there seems to be a bug with pasting to terminal, I'm not sure yet if it only affects mac-based winbox sessions or ipv4 winbox sessions also. (I'm on winbox x64 v3.35)
Yeah, because it is relative to 7.1. They should have made a changelog relative to 7.2rc7 as well.Tjeez ... that's a LOONG changelog indeed ...
That's something i'm missing everytime we go out of test/beta/rc to a stable version!Yeah, because it is relative to 7.1. They should have made a changelog relative to 7.2rc7 as well.Tjeez ... that's a LOONG changelog indeed ...
That is some I do miss as well. If you look at Cisco, you have a tool where you can compare each version against each other and even select different hardware.They should have made a changelog relative to 7.2rc7 as well.
I suggested that here before as well. Make a database with all changes (at which version they occur, probably at which version they become irrelevant) and then make a website where you can enter two version numbers and see the changes between them.That is some I do miss as well. If you look at Cisco, you have a tool where you can compare each version against each other and even select different hardware.
Cisco Feature Navigator
https://cfnng.cisco.com/
Not sure how much you can see there without a Cisco account.
I disagree.
make this ugly red line at least blue, informative
or take it away when PPTP is disabled
well, mister @holvoetnI disagree.
That's the right color for that sort of message.
Indeed, it's network/sys admins choice, if you're not that person, suck it up.well, mister @holvoetnI disagree.
That's the right color for that sort of message.
i understood this approach when you, for example build a new network
but, no
it is not my choice to use pptp
and if you think, that someone could call the multi/hyper/giga/mega company and tell them: you know, my MT router is red , please change vpn type ...
hahaha
no, it is not our choice what will we use
If it is filesystems issue and it might be one, upgrade will not solve it, you will need to netinstall it with newest netinstall, to get newest filesystem up and running.The "Rare Config loss" issue is unfortunately still present for sure...
oh, noI fully understand it may not be your choice but it remains the appropriate color for that message.
Don't we need something like "discard-v6-configuration-completely-please-I-am-from-v7" to remove any "historical" data from a router?*) backup - added "force-v6-to-v7-configuration-upgrade" option on backup load to clear RouterOS v7 configuration and trigger reimport of RouterOS v6 route configuration (CLI only);
If it is a filesystem issue then there is a bug in v7 that should urgently be fixed. This problem is so commonly reported that it apparently occurs under normal operating conditions, and that should not happen.If it is filesystems issue and it might be one, upgrade will not solve it, you will need to netinstall it with newest netinstall, to get newest filesystem up and running.The "Rare Config loss" issue is unfortunately still present for sure...
Nice workChanges since last rc (rc7) Find using compare duplicate cells in Excel.
Winbox uses the red colored font for any messages. e.g. for informing you that a new LTE-firmware is available. I guess you would agree, that a firmware-update is not an error. And many more places, where they use that color.again, no
red -> error
blue -> warning
viewtopic.php?t=184711#p923967Missing RouterOS configuration after a reboot on very rare occasions
RouterOS already has such a feature, it is called /system reset-configuration. "force config upgrade" feature was added, to trigger v6 config reimport whenever RouterOS add parts of config upgrade that were not implemented in previous v7 versions.Don't we need something like "discard-v6-configuration-completely-please-I-am-from-v7" to remove any "historical" data from a router?*) backup - added "force-v6-to-v7-configuration-upgrade" option on backup load to clear RouterOS v7 configuration and trigger reimport of RouterOS v6 route configuration (CLI only);
How to safely use it on remote devices available only over L3 networks?RouterOS already has such a feature, it is called /system reset-configuration.
/interface ovpn-server server
set auth=sha1,md5
I would hold off on that for at least a week, you do not want critical infrastructure on a just released stable.Wow, this is great. Now it seems I'll migrate my infra to 7.2 from 6.xx.
MT, great work 👍
The defaults changed, to get rid:I don't use the openvpn server. I don't think it's a problem, though.Code: Select all/interface ovpn-server server set auth=sha1,md5
/interface/ovpn-server/server/set auth=md5,sha1,sha256,sha512;
That resets the v7 config as well. It would be reasonable to expect a command that removes v6 configuration from a v7 device, to be sure that it will never bite in the future (and reduce the size of backups).RouterOS already has such a feature, it is called /system reset-configuration.
Don't we need something like "discard-v6-configuration-completely-please-I-am-from-v7" to remove any "historical" data from a router? :)
It will likely never be fixed when there are only reports like that, without supout.rif file sent to support/jira.unfortunately, the memory leak is not fixed (hap ac2)
It mainly depends on what features you use and do not use. When you use BGP, you likely want to wait for a 7.3 release. When it is a home router/AP, you could likely upgrade without many issues.I would hold off on that for at least a week, you do not want critical infrastructure on a just released stable.Wow, this is great. Now it seems I'll migrate my infra to 7.2 from 6.xx.
MT, great work 👍
I have it running on AC3. I am not that impressed as far 5Ghz is concerned. I get more or less the same speeds as the old drivers.any hope to get a smaller wifiwave2 packages, i have an early cap ac / hap ac2 version with 256 meg of ram but with the small space, i would love to try it out
Seems not to be a general problem, my CAPsMAN on RB4011 (7.2) runs smooth with 5x CAP AC (XL) on 7.1.5. Even the update on the CAPs to 7.2 went smooth, also.CAPsMAN broken on my RB3011, both of my CAPS (running 7.1.5) get failed: timeout when trying to register.
e.g.:
Apr 5 07:20:47 aruma-downstairs-cap-hapac2 CAP selected CAPsMAN aruma-RB3011-gw (::ffff:10.1.xxx.xxx:5246)
Apr 5 07:21:07 aruma-downstairs-cap-hapac2 CAP connect to aruma-RB3011-gw (::ffff:10.1.xxx.xxx:5246) failed: timeout
Apr 5 07:21:07 aruma-downstairs-cap-hapac2 CAP failed to join aruma-RB3011-gw (::ffff:10.1.xxx.xxx:5246)
Apr 5 22:21:07 aruma-upstairs-cap-hapac2 CAP connect to aruma-RB3011-gw (B8:69:F4:8E:88:97/6/0) failed: timeout
Apr 5 22:21:07 aruma-upstairs-cap-hapac2 CAP failed to join aruma-RB3011-gw (B8:69:F4:8E:88:97/6/0)
Had to roll back to 7.1.5 on my RB3011 to resolve.. will wait for 7.2.1 for a fix.
Side question: where the hell did you get those ? There is nowhere cAP AC or XL AC to be found anymore ...runs smooth with 5x CAP AC (XL) on 7.1.5....
Seems not to be a general problem, my CAPsMAN on RB4011 (7.2) runs smooth with 5x CAP AC (XL) on 7.1.5. Even the update on the CAPs to 7.2 went smooth, also.
CAP AC: https://mikrotik.com/product/cap_acSide question: where the hell did you get those ? There is nowhere cAP AC or XL AC to be found anymore ...runs smooth with 5x CAP AC (XL) on 7.1.5....
100% agree.Yeah, because it is relative to 7.1. They should have made a changelog relative to 7.2rc7 as well.Tjeez ... that's a LOONG changelog indeed ...
Sage advice, and I would go one step further, wait for the first LONG term release on vers7 !!I would hold off on that for at least a week, you do not want critical infrastructure on a just released stable.Wow, this is great. Now it seems I'll migrate my infra to 7.2 from 6.xx.
MT, great work 👍
Thanks.The defaults changed, to get rid:
Code: Select all/interface/ovpn-server/server/set auth=md5,sha1,sha256,sha512;
...really? I get 500+ Mbps compared to 280Mpbs on my ac3 units, running wifiwave2 (on 7.1.1)I have it running on AC3. I am not that impressed as far 5Ghz is concerned. I get more or less the same speeds as the old drivers.any hope to get a smaller wifiwave2 packages, i have an early cap ac / hap ac2 version with 256 meg of ram but with the small space, i would love to try it out
I get 400+ before and after wifiwave2, maybe a tad more on the latter. So really not impressed :lol:...really? I get 500+ Mbps compared to 280Mpbs on my ac3 units, running wifiwave2 (on 7.1.1)
Edit: see viewtopic.php?p=909465#p909378
Still waiting for the bugfix for this.*) pppoe - use default MTU of 1492;
/interface/pppoe-client/monitor [find] once
status: connected
mtu: 1480
...then you are one of the lucky users, where standard wifi drivers worked good already (never had 300+ here). Maybe you should upgrade your clients to see a difference like I do ;-)I get 400+ before and after wifiwave2, maybe a tad more on the latter. So really not impressed :lol:
Well, when it is used in a link device without a lot of features enabled it likely is not loaded that heavily and the clock remains low.See here, new product: https://mikrotik.com/product/cube_60pro_ac
The same ipq4019 advertised as 448 - 896 MHz instead of the default 716MHz.
So this seems to be the new default, sadly, for these chips.
....standard for DFS channel search/wait on 5GHz band...has always been there (must be, as per country regulations).EDIT: got up after almost 10 minutes of waiting.
Radar detection-avoidance?hAP-ac3, after upgrade to 7.2 only 2.4 GHz wifi is announced, 5 GHz is not visible although WiFi interface is present and enabled.
Anyone else facing same issue?
EDIT: got up after almost 10 minutes of waiting.
Yup. Look no further then this.....standard for DFS channel search/wait on 5GHz band...has always been there (must be, as per country regulations).EDIT: got up after almost 10 minutes of waiting.
*) arm - fixed "auto" CPU frequency setting;
How can you change the frequency on devices which allow to do so ?But something was fixed. We do not know.Code: Select all*) arm - fixed "auto" CPU frequency setting;
I'd say this:Don't we need something like "discard-v6-configuration-completely-please-I-am-from-v7" to remove any "historical" data from a router? :)*) backup - added "force-v6-to-v7-configuration-upgrade" option on backup load to clear RouterOS v7 configuration and trigger reimport of RouterOS v6 route configuration (CLI only);
force-v6-to-v7-configuration-upgrade=no
How can you change the frequency on devices which allow to do so ?
/system/routerboard/settings/set cpu-frequency=auto
You upgraded from what version?I just upgraded my RB4011 and no more IPv6 routing... (or firewalling blocking evrything ? even if I piut an acceot as first rule).
You upgraded from what version?I just upgraded my RB4011 and no more IPv6 routing... (or firewalling blocking evrything ? even if I piut an acceot as first rule).
System Routerboard and hit upgrade.I upgraded from 7.1.5, just downgraded back to 7.1.5 and I get same problem.. So options are now :
1) I must also downgrade firmware (but How can I do it)
Dude server isn't released yet for 7.x under any platform that I know of.Issue with 7.2
I try to upgrade CHR 6.49.5 running DUDE to 7.2.
at reboot "no system package found!"
Kernel panic.
*) wireguard - fixed IPv6 traffic processing with multiple peers;
That's the point of having it set to auto.Audience CPU Frequency bounces all over the place.
Are you sure your config is correct? This was broken before for me aswell. But it has been working since some rc-versions now and still works.*) wireguard - fixed IPv6 traffic processing with multiple peers;
IPv6 traffic processing with multiple peers is not fixed, broken since 7.1rc4. Have to reenter allowed address to allow IPv6 but only for one peer. SUP-78547.
Thanks. Indeed, it seems to be a bug was corrected that lead to this on my particular setting.System Routerboard and hit upgrade.I upgraded from 7.1.5, just downgraded back to 7.1.5 and I get same problem.. So options are now :
1) I must also downgrade firmware (but How can I do it)
It will align with installed ROS version (so downgrade).
Perhaps it's just that Detect Internet is adding a dhcp-client if there is no "internet" being detected?Like with previous v7.x versions my Internet Detect feature was borked after the update (RB4011, hex S, hAP ac2). Disable and re-enable does the trick. No clue why this is ...
So if an interface does not have a DHCP client listening, detect internet may add one for you – to solve the "can obtain...DHCP address". But this "feature" of internet detect has messed me up before –e.g. an unexpected default route being injected by dhcp-client taking over all routing.an interface can obtain (or has obtained) an address from DHCP (does not apply if DHCP server is also running Detect Internet on the DHCP server interface).
Are you sure your config is correct? This was broken before for me aswell. But it has been working since some rc-versions now and still works.
IPv6 traffic processing with multiple peers is not fixed, broken since 7.1rc4. Have to reenter allowed address to allow IPv6 but only for one peer. SUP-78547.
/interface/wireguard/add listen-port=443 mtu=1420 name=ep3
/interface/wireguard/add listen-port=63016 mtu=1420 name=njalla
/interface/wireguard/peers/add allowed-address=0.0.0.0/0,::/0 endpoint-address=x.x.x.x endpoint-port=51820 interface=njalla public-key="..."
/interface/wireguard/peers/add allowed-address=10.2.1.2/32,fd02:21::2/128 interface=ep3 public-key="..."
/interface/wireguard/peers/add allowed-address=10.2.1.3/32,fd02:21::3/128 interface=ep3 public-key="..."
/routing/table/add name=njalla fib
/ip/address/add address=10.2.0.1/21 interface=lo1 network=10.2.0.0
/ip/address/add address=10.2.1.1/24 interface=ep3 network=10.2.1.0
/ip/address/add address=10.13.37.100/24 interface=njalla network=10.13.37.0
/ip/firewall/nat/add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=njalla
/ip/firewall/address-list/add address=10.2.0.0/21 list=njalla
/ip/firewall/mangle/add chain=prerouting src-address-list=njalla dst-address-list=!bogon action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=njalla passthrough=no
/ip/firewall/mangle/add chain=forward out-interface=njalla action=change-mss new-mss=clamp-to-pmtu passthrough=no protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn
/ip/route/add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=njalla routing-table=njalla
/ipv6/address/add address=fd03:1337::100/128 interface=njalla
/ipv6/address/add address=fd02:20::1/64 interface=lo1 advertise=yes
/ipv6/address/add address=fd02:21::1/64 interface=ep3 advertise=yes
/ipv6/firewall/nat/add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=njalla
/ipv6/firewall/mangle/add action=change-mss chain=forward out-interface=njalla new-mss=clamp-to-pmtu passthrough=no protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn
/ipv6/route/add dst-address=2000::/3 gateway=njalla
Or, if you do follow the docs like:Like with previous v7.x versions my Internet Detect feature was borked after the update (RB4011, hex S, hAP ac2). Disable and re-enable does the trick. No clue why this is ...
/interface/detect-internet/set internet-interface-list=all wan-interface-list=all lan-interface-list=all detect-interface-list=all
/interface/detect-internet/set internet-interface-list=all
Dude is back since 7.2 in all plateformDude server isn't released yet for 7.x under any platform that I know of.Issue with 7.2
I try to upgrade CHR 6.49.5 running DUDE to 7.2.
at reboot "no system package found!"
Kernel panic.
No. RB3011 does not support l3hw and fastpath/fasttrack is not hardware offloading either.Do these apply to RB3011? Because I see hardware offloading gets disabled if I enable vlan-filtering on the bridge.
Thanks for the info. Have you tried BGP signaled by VPLS?Awesome, have already started labbing 7.2.0, interesting though seems like L3VPN with route reflector still not working correctly, can see my routes dancing to a beat here https://streamable.com/3b8y3j
its dumb.. most people know what PPTP is.. but many of us have to work on Old stuff.. we still have devices out in the world running on modems and floppy drives.. not my choice but it works and we get paid to fix them..I disagree.
make this ugly red line at least blue, informative
or take it away when PPTP is disabled
That's the right color for that sort of message.
Did you check CPU Frequence?upgrade hAP ac^2 from 6.48.4 to 7.2 finish fine
But after upgrade, youtube videos, netflix video too, are very long to start (from 10 to 30s), some video/film pictures in youtube & netflix stay black too, it seems the download is difficult to start.
Never see that with another version.
I've roll back to 6.48.4 to check and videos are working fine again, so I've upgrade again to 7.2 but still the problem
(MKT support contacted)
I've try to set each of the available values wo any change... so I've set back to autoupgrade hAP ac^2 from 6.48.4 to 7.2 finish fine
But after upgrade, youtube videos, netflix video too, are very long to start (from 10 to 30s), some video/film pictures in youtube & netflix stay black too, it seems the download is difficult to start.
Never see that with another version.
I've roll back to 6.48.4 to check and videos are working fine again, so I've upgrade again to 7.2 but still the problem
(MKT support contacted)
with CPU set at 716Mhz, it is a little bit better (less time to wait) but still not like with v6.48.4, it was playing instantlyDid you check CPU Frequence?upgrade hAP ac^2 from 6.48.4 to 7.2 finish fine
But after upgrade, youtube videos, netflix video too, are very long to start (from 10 to 30s), some video/film pictures in youtube & netflix stay black too, it seems the download is difficult to start.
Never see that with another version.
I've roll back to 6.48.4 to check and videos are working fine again, so I've upgrade again to 7.2 but still the problem
(MKT support contacted)
Auto does not seem to work in mA hap ap2 aswell
No v6, the is little bit complicated, with 2 vpn and som fw ruleswith CPU set at 716Mhz, it is a little bit better (less time to wait) but still not like with v6.48.4, it was playing instantly
Did you check CPU Frequence?
Auto does not seem to work in mA hap ap2 aswell
After reconfigure from scratch : it is working fine !No v6, the is little bit complicated, with 2 vpn and som fw rules
with CPU set at 716Mhz, it is a little bit better (less time to wait) but still not like with v6.48.4, it was playing instantly
I will try to reset the conf and redo it form scratch
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/UM/Chateau+LTE12Chateau LTE12 completely dead after Upgrading Firmware to 7.2 !!!!
Any idea what to do now ?
I didn´t tried netinstall in 7.2 but in my experience netinstall is a pricky thing. :-/Netinstall didn't work !
Resetted to factory defaults and then restored the Backup.
Strange thing but for now it looks ok
I didn´t tried netinstall in 7.2 but in my experience netinstall is a pricky thing. :-/Netinstall didn't work !
Resetted to factory defaults and then restored the Backup.
Strange thing but for now it looks ok
If you have specific improvement ideas in mind that should be added to https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... forWindows ,please write to support@mikrotik.com
This one would resolve like a tons of issues.one most concrete one is to handle multiple interfaces on machine running netinstall binary gracefully (e.g. present dialog asking user which interface he wants to use).
SIGTERM[soft,remote-exit] received, client-instance exiting
1. please fix IPv6 on help.mikrotik.com it has been down for quite some time already. when you cannot keep IPv6 working on the webservers it is better to remove it.If you have specific improvement ideas in mind that should be added to https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... forWindows ,please write to support@mikrotik.com
/ip routes
*) route - fixed "suppress-hw-offload" update;
It would be nice when there would be a new selection in System->RouterBoard->settings->Boot Device like "ethernet-if-fail-then-nand".And regarding Etherboot for all devices, the most error-free method is - to press the reset button, keep it pressed, power on the device, and wait until the device shows up in the Netinstall window, then release the button. This holds true for the Audience as well.
Which is described here as well: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:E ... set_button
Of course it is! It works only on the newest switches that have a switch chip that can do L3 routing.Is HW offloading forlimited to certain models? Because all of my routes on RB3011 are not hardware offloaded at all.Code: Select all/ip routes
*) crs3xx - improved SFP+/QSFP+ link stability for CRS309, CRS312, CRS326-24S+2Q+ and CRS354 devices (introduced in v7.2rc1);
If you use CTRL-F in your browser and search for part of that line, you would see it is included in the change log for 7.2 posted in the very first post of this thread.Is the fix below, which was introduced in 7.2rc2, also included in the final 7.2?*) crs3xx - improved SFP+/QSFP+ link stability for CRS309, CRS312, CRS326-24S+2Q+ and CRS354 devices (introduced in v7.2rc1);
It doesn't make sense to me, I can't find the text.If you use CTRL-F in your browser and search for part of that line, you would see it is included in the change log for 7.2 posted in the very first post of this thread.Is the fix below, which was introduced in 7.2rc2, also included in the final 7.2?
If it is in the changelog, it should be included.
Makes sense, no ?
*) crs1xx/2xx - fixed static switch host addresses after link down;
*) crs1xx/2xx - ignore static bridge host addresses (switch unicast-fdb should be used instead);
*) crs3xx - fixed CPU load balancing for ARM dual core devices;
*) crs3xx - fixed QSFP+ interface LEDs;
*) crs3xx - fixed watchdog timer functionality;
*) crs3xx - improved SFP+ interface linking after reboot for CRS312 device;
*) crs3xx - improved maximum allowed ACL rule calculation;
*) crs3xx - improved system stability when creating many ACL rules on CRS317, CRS309, CRS312, CRS326-24S+2Q+ and CRS354 devices;
*) defconf - made "192.168.188.1/24" the default LAN IP address for LTE CPE devices;
Weird? I had an old RB2011 and the routes were marked hardware offloaded?Of course it is! It works only on the newest switches that have a switch chip that can do L3 routing.Is HW offloading forlimited to certain models? Because all of my routes on RB3011 are not hardware offloaded at all.Code: Select all/ip routes
Why?After upgrade CAP AC i see warning "cpu not running at default frequency", but i use default frequency is 716 Mhz.
I don't want to set "auto".
Please fix it
Shouldn't that be auto ? It's there for a reason.Set it at 716, ignore the warning.
So, as I've said, the fix is to set it at 716MHz and ignore the warning.After upgrade CAP AC i see warning "cpu not running at default frequency", but i use default frequency is 716 Mhz.
I don't want to set "auto".
Please fix it
I am still seeing SFP+ port flapping with CRS328s, that has now spread to ethernet ports as well. SUP-68278 has been updated, yet again, since 7.2 is impacted, not just 7.1. No support has responded to the ticket in months, even though multiple supouts are attached. I've verified with other friends and forum members who have these switches that they encounter the same problems ever since 7.x upgrades.Yes, changes that are introduced in rc1 and fixed in rc2, will not be mentioned in 7.2, because the changelog is comparison between last 7.1 release. People who are staying on "stable" branch would not have seeen any such issues, they were not affected.
Same thing for me on a hex-S with AES-256-CBC/SHA-1 and SHA-256 using TCP-Mode. This broken OpenVPN implementation resets its successfully established connection in an infinite loop.OpenVPN is not working anymore - log:
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: initializing...
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connecting...
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: using encoding - AES-256-CBC/SHA256
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connected
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: terminating... - explicit peer disconnect
21:24:39 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: disconnected
This was introduced in 7.2rc5. Several users reported over in the 7.2rc5 topic, that using cpu-frequency=auto is either unstable or slows things down (like queues which are quite cpu-intensive). So I am still waiting for a detailed explanation of this changelog entry.*) arm - fixed "auto" CPU frequency setting;
Good point, Ill have to restore an image to check, but I believe for RIP I was using Prefix Lists and for BGP I use Routing Filters. If using Prefix Lists, are these depreciated in 7,x?Routing filter or prefix-list was removed? If it was routing filters then please provide the export from v6 routing filters that did not upgrade.
Yes, prefix lists are deprecated, now everything is filtered by routing filters.If using Prefix Lists, are these depreciated in 7,x?
Maybe some Guide / Introduction into changes to Router7.Yes, prefix lists are deprecated, now everything is filtered by routing filters.
There is documentation at https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Routingmrz write:Maybe some Guide / Introduction into changes to Router7.Yes, prefix lists are deprecated, now everything is filtered by routing filters.
The same problem on firmware 7.2, rolled back to 7.1.5, the problem is gone. Model: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnDSince the update to 7.2 I have "router was rebooted without proper shutdown" events every few hours.
Installed April 5th at 22:50 hours local time. With firmware reboot at 22:54 hours.
Now April 6th 16:05 hours and I have 22 connection failure events. 2 of them are the update.
The other 20 are unknown spontanious reboots of my routerboard.
/ip/firewall nat
add comment="Masquerade LTE NOMINAL" chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.1.0/24 action=masquerade out-interface=lte1
add comment="Masquerade LTE SECOURS" chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.1.0/24 action=masquerade out-interface=ether2
/ip route
add check-gateway=bfd comment="Check DNS via LTE NOMINAL" disabled=no distance=1 dst-address=4.2.2.2/32 gateway=lte1 pref-src="" routing-table=main scope=11 suppress-hw-offload=no target-scope=10
/ip route
add check-gateway=bfd comment="Bascule flux vers LTE NOMINAL via check DNS" disabled=no distance=1 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=4.2.2.2 pref-src="" routing-table=main scope=10 suppress-hw-offload=no target-scope=12
/ip route
add check-gateway=bfd comment="Bascule flux vers LTE SECONDAIRE" disabled=no distance=5 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=192.168.50.1 pref-src="" routing-table=main scope=10 suppress-hw-offload=no target-scope=12
??? But the functionality is present in V7.1.3 and functioning ?BFD is not yet implemented :-(
My error message isHi there,Same thing for me on a hex-S with AES-256-CBC/SHA-1 and SHA-256 using TCP-Mode. This broken OpenVPN implementation resets its successfully established connection in an infinite loop.OpenVPN is not working anymore - log:
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: initializing...
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connecting...
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: using encoding - AES-256-CBC/SHA256
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connected
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: terminating... - explicit peer disconnect
21:24:39 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: disconnected
In RouterOS 7.1.5 everything was fine tough... :-(((
Regards,
bronco
but other things are the same: infinite loop of connect-disconnect after upgrade to 7.2apr/05 22:10:33 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: initializing...
apr/05 22:10:33 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: connecting...
apr/05 22:10:36 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: using encoding - AES-256-CBC/SHA1
apr/05 22:10:36 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: connected
apr/05 22:10:41 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: terminating... - peer disconnected
apr/05 22:10:41 ovpn,info ovpn-4net: disconnected
Btw, router is HEX 750gr3*) ovpn - added SHA2 authentication algorithm support;
*) ovpn - added hardware acceleration support for IPQ4018/IPQ4019 and AL* series chipsets;
*) ovpn - added option to send disconnect message in UDP mode;
*) ovpn - fixed large option message parsing;
*) ovpn - improved UDP session handling;
*) ovpn - improved memory allocation on Tile in "ethernet" mode;
*) ovpn - improved system stability in high load scenarios;
Exactly, that many changes should be like perfect occasion to separate like wiki for ros6 and new one Jira documentation for ros7 and then it's easy for us then to read/learn from begin.There is documentation at https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Routing
Unfortunately not really a "when you are used to doing things like this, now it is done like that".
That's a bad UI/UX/Status design - HW-Off-Candidate would make more sense? The current implementation is misleading us. And maybe an actual flag that confirms whether a route is hardware offloaded or not.To clarify, the H flag does not mean that route IS hardware offloaded, but rather indicates that the route is a candidate to be chosen for hardware offloading.
Upgraded remote:Upgraded at home:
Hex
hAP AC3
hAP AC2
hAP
map Lite
CHR
No problems so far upgrading nor afterwards. From the limited time it was active on Hex (updated around 09h00) it "looks" like that memory leak is still present.
Usage is slightly going up every hour without any clear indication what causes it.
Do you have a working openvpn with UDP on 7.1.5 ?This version also broke OpenVPN for me, have rolled back to 7.1.5 for now and it is working again with no issues.
could something like this work?In the past I have set devices to "try-ethernet-once-then-nand" under the assumption that this would exactly be what I need, but unfortunately it gets reset to "nand-if-fail-then-ethernet" after reboot.
/system/scheduler/add name="set-boot-mode" disabled=no start-time=startup interval=0 on-event="/system/routerboard/settings/set boot-device=try-ethernet-once-then-nand"
Have a new BGP Gateway Stack - Access Switch, Auth server and Border router - CCR 1072 x2 and a CRS317.
Upgraded as our new provider advertises 1M+ routes. Was Buit and tested on 7.1.3/7.1.5.
Border Routes seems happy enough - but freezes up when showing large chunks or routes (on 7.1.5 was just slow). Closing the route window or putting in a filter fixes this (as long as you filter out enough routes to view)
Access router has been in testing for over a month - now falls over every 1-5 hours on 7.2. have caught it 2 times and manually rebooted - but the last 2 times were "watchdog". Just before the last reboot it was showing data throughput to the border ~ 2-3x actual throughput. This was on the screen - updates in winbox were every 40-60seconds and were showing ~ correct throughput. Also - when this dies - the ethernet port fails - and the SFP+ port lights that are connected blink in unison on the act light (normally random with data)
that's the CCR's - the CRS317 seems to be happy enough - no apparent dramas there.
Had yet to put in my second access router - will be doing soon and will roll back the 1072 Acess router to 7.1.5 to hopefully stabilise it... if not will give it a rebuild and see how we go.
Regretting pulling the trigger for the bgp "improvements" considering the build went so well. if i get a chance will update.
No issues with my RB5009 but, from what I’ve observed, some of the bugs and issues have been wholly dependent on setup and configuration. For example, I power my RB5009 via PoE+ versus the supplied power brick.My RB5009 unit just won't resume (Port LEDs not light up at all) operation after I applied the firmware and reboot it. I had to unplug and replug the power socket to bring it back.
Any other RB5009 users has this problem?
My RB4011 has an uptime of 1d 15 hours on 7.2 now. It has a very complicated setup.I've upgraded a RB4011. It started to freeze once in every 1-5 hours. All leds going dark (except power) and the router just reboots. In the log i see nothing, only the "router rebooted without proper shutdown".
Had to downgrade to long-term.
Works fine for me...After upgrade from 6.49.5 to 7.2 RoMon stopped seeing almost all devices in our network. If needed I can post the config here?
Hi,Yeah, because it is relative to 7.1. They should have made a changelog relative to 7.2rc7 as well.Tjeez ... that's a LOONG changelog indeed ...
No offense, but RTFM about what a RC is, and how it works would have saved you some time ;-)Changes since last rc (rc7) Find using compare duplicate cells in Excel.
Get of your high horse, Mikrotik does not adhere to the known logic of releases.No offense, but RTFM about what a RC is, and how it works would have saved you some time ;-)Changes since last rc (rc7) Find using compare duplicate cells in Excel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_ ... _candidate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_ ... le_release
"Also called production release, the stable release is the last release candidate (RC) which has passed all verifications / tests. The remaining bugs are considered as acceptable"
Having worked with project mgmt for many years and bitching with devs about versioning for equal amount of years I can only say that the more devs, the more opinions on what the standards are.Get of your high horse, Mikrotik does not adhere to the known logic of releases.
No offense, but RTFM about what a RC is, and how it works would have saved you some time ;-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_ ... _candidate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_ ... le_release
"Also called production release, the stable release is the last release candidate (RC) which has passed all verifications / tests. The remaining bugs are considered as acceptable"
Test/RC at Mikrotik doesn't mean what you would expect, this you can learn on the forum during the years.
So true, unfortunately
Having worked with project mgmt for many years and bitching with devs about versioning for equal amount of years I can only say that the more devs, the more opinions on what the standards are.
Sad.
I have also RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD updated to 7.2., now with uptime 1 day and 21 hours without any reboots or problems.The same problem on firmware 7.2, rolled back to 7.1.5, the problem is gone. Model: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnDSince the update to 7.2 I have "router was rebooted without proper shutdown" events every few hours.
Installed April 5th at 22:50 hours local time. With firmware reboot at 22:54 hours.
Now April 6th 16:05 hours and I have 22 connection failure events. 2 of them are the update.
The other 20 are unknown spontanious reboots of my routerboard.
Well if that's your experience, in this case: continue relying on excel if you consider it the right thing to do (and hope that they did not forgot to add a line to the changelog).Get of your high horse, Mikrotik does not adhere to the known logic of releases.No offense, but RTFM about what a RC is, and how it works would have saved you some time ;-)
Test/RC at Mikrotik doesn't mean what you would expect, this you can learn on the forum during the years.
"bitching with devs about versioning"? Seriously? No need to "bitch around" with anyone - you should be a project manager and not a yelling choleric.Having worked with project mgmt for many years and bitching with devs about versioning for equal amount of years I can only say that the more devs, the more opinions on what the standards are.
Sad.
I'm using TCP for OVPN - which didn't work in 7.2 but is working fine in 7.1.5.Do you have a working openvpn with UDP on 7.1.5 ?This version also broke OpenVPN for me, have rolled back to 7.1.5 for now and it is working again with no issues.
Then why does it present a drop down list? In v6 it gave a list of interfaces.gateway is not supposed to give you any predefined gateways.
[zuul@ccr2216-02.test.lab.ipa] > interface/monitor-traffic interface=bonding1-200g
name: bonding1-200g
rx-packets-per-second: 8 274 077
rx-bits-per-second: 99.5Gbps
fp-rx-packets-per-second: 498 112
fp-rx-bits-per-second: 5.9Gbps
rx-drops-per-second: 0
rx-errors-per-second: 0
tx-packets-per-second: 102
tx-bits-per-second: 484.7kbps
fp-tx-packets-per-second: 0
fp-tx-bits-per-second: 0bps
tx-drops-per-second: 0
tx-queue-drops-per-second: 0
tx-errors-per-second: 0
That's fine, just in 6.x it seems you can only use filters for RIP but they don't migrate to filters upon upgrading, so its an additional step to account for?Yes, prefix lists are deprecated, now everything is filtered by routing filters.If using Prefix Lists, are these depreciated in 7,x?
ok. i honestly didnt know there was any other way to do filtering without prefix lists in 6.x for RIP. for BGP yes, we use route filtering for that, but not for RIP.Yes, even in v6 prefix lists were left only for compatibility from older versions. Now they are removed and you have to account for that when upgrading.
When users are adding static routes to several subnets, it can offer the gateway address of a previously entered gateway.how the router is supposed to know which IP address from the subnet is the gateway?
Had the same issue a couple days ago and opened a ticket. I did hear back, MT is testing a fix. It was working in the previous 7.2rc4, but not 7.2rc7 / 7.2After upgrading from v7.1.5 to v7.2 my lte modem interface is not recognized,
modem: Sierra MC7455
[SUP-79169]
You may want to start with upgrading winbox to 3.35.Good morning THTMC...
I installed 7.2 on my rb4011igs_5hacq2hnd_in this AM and it completely killed my ability to connect with Winbox v3.31, btw, ...
Don't feel too bad.That was so painfully obvious... So, the question is why would that upgrade be allowed from a version of Winbox that it does not support? I honestly had no idea that that was the case!
Ok... thanks. Understood. But I said about UDP. It is one of the most important feature in v7....I'm using TCP for OVPN - which didn't work in 7.2 but is working fine in 7.1.5.
Do you have a working openvpn with UDP on 7.1.5 ?
So we can sum it up: v7.2 kills OVPN server functionality entirely, UDP mode is still not working and TCP mode isn't working anymore!Ok... thanks. Understood. But I said about UDP. It is one of the most important feature in v7....
Still not working in any v7 version....
how the router is supposed to know which IP address from the subnet is the gateway?
sorry, time machine broken, can't go back into past and change old winboxThat was so painfully obvious... So, the question is why would that upgrade be allowed from a version of Winbox that it does not support? I honestly had no idea that that was the case!
Before an upgrade:sorry, time machine broken, can't go back into past and change old winboxThat was so painfully obvious... So, the question is why would that upgrade be allowed from a version of Winbox that it does not support? I honestly had no idea that that was the case!
2024, but first the midterms. So be sure you got your MWGA cap ready!I can see the red hat now!!
"Make Winbox Great Again"
Yes, the blue ones were far away better.I can see the red hat now!!
"Make Winbox Great Again"
at first I think my hap ac2 is defect, but seeing hap ac on 7.2 definitely the rosWeird, I am using 7.2 on my hap ac2 for uptime roughly 2 days 6 hrs and no problem whatsoever. Memory usage is about 64MB.
I also have hap ac2. Also running ROS 7.2at first I think my hap ac2 is defect, but seeing hap ac on 7.2 definitely the rosWeird, I am using 7.2 on my hap ac2 for uptime roughly 2 days 6 hrs and no problem whatsoever. Memory usage is about 64MB.
I'd go with ROS ... but triggered by particular configuration. And I guess you would do Mikrotik developers a favour if you created a supout.rif file while running 7.2 slightly before unit would crash/reboot ... and open a support ticket. The supout file would give devs opportunity to analyze the state of device prior to crash.at first I think my hap ac2 is defect, but seeing hap ac on 7.2 definitely the rosWeird, I am using 7.2 on my hap ac2 for uptime roughly 2 days 6 hrs and no problem whatsoever. Memory usage is about 64MB.
On my Hex I observe that "memory creep" thing for quite some ROS7-versions already BUT it seems to taper of after a while. It gets to a certain level and then it hovers there (as if there is background cleaning happening ? Don't know...).I'd go with ROS ... but triggered by particular configuration. And I guess you would do Mikrotik developers a favour if you created a supout.rif file while running 7.2 slightly before unit would crash/reboot ... and open a support ticket. The supout file would give devs opportunity to analyze the state of device prior to crash.
I've got a hAP ac2 still running 6.x (currently 6.49.3) and it does show memory usage "breathing" ... and it obviously did so for a long time, here's a yearly graph. Device gets rebooted from time to time (mostly due to ROS upgrade), those cause memory usage drops. The unit didn't spontaneously reboot in a few years.
But in 7.1.5 works perfectly, then 7.2 no configuration change turn to memory-leakI also have hap ac2. Also running ROS 7.2
at first I think my hap ac2 is defect, but seeing hap ac on 7.2 definitely the ros
I am not seeing that problem either ... so it's 2 against 1 now.
Most likely config related.
Yes, set it to auto, and don't bother anymore with CPU speed...Default speed is AUTO ??!!
Well, there is "profile" and "graphing". It could be useful to have a more detailed view in "profile" and a memory column.The decision to not even provide basic debugging tools like top, mem, strace doesn't make it easier for us to help finding the problem...
Same for me :-(Same, my openvpn server TCP broken, cannot connect to.OpenVPN is not working anymore - log:
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: initializing...
21:24:37 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connecting...
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: using encoding - AES-256-CBC/SHA256
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: connected
21:24:38 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: terminating... - explicit peer disconnect
21:24:39 ovpn,info ovpn-out_1: disconnected
OpenVPN server:
model = RouterBOARD M33G
/interface ovpn-server server
set auth=sha1,sha256,sha512 certificate=osrv2 cipher=aes128,aes192,aes256 default-profile=default-encryption \
enabled=yes mode=ethernet netmask=30 port=1199 protocol=udp require-client-certificate=yes
OpenVPN client:
model = RouterBOARD cAP Gi-5acD2nD
/interface ovpn-client
add auth=sha256 certificate=ocl2 cipher=aes256 comment="LOPEN VPN" connect-to=xxxxxxxxxx.sn.mynetname.net disabled=yes \
mac-address=02:64:D9:E0:5E:69 mode=ethernet name=ovpn-out_1 port=1199 profile=L2TP_BCP protocol=udp use-peer-dns=no user=\
LOVPN
After i downgrade 7.1.5 works fine.
Cannot confirm:Yes, trust the system!
I like my full speed, thank you! :)
My ISP does not offer IPv6. And the HE.net Tunnel I have as an alternative is not fast enough to highlight the problem, if there was one. So I assume I cannot verify the problem you're having, but it sounds logical to me that it could exist under the circumstances you mentioned.Try IPv6, not something that's done under fasttrack.
I think the difference between fasttrack and non-fasttrack Znevna mentioned is much more likely to be at play here. I have not heard of there being different HW Revisions for the 5009. Also my ISP provides a fibre, so I don't believe the length of the cable matters as long as the signal is within the ONTs RX sensitivity and TX power budget, which in my case it very well is.felixka and Znevna
When do you bought a router? Is there any difference between HW revision?
Or how long cable do you have? From ISP...
Thanks
Can't confirm a general problem. My RB4011 (with WLAN and CAPsMAN on it) was updated from 7.1.5 to 7.2 without any probs (ROS and FW). The Config was updated from 6.47.10 over 6.49.5, 7.15 to 7.2. All went smooth.....Watch out, upgrade and reboot seemed OK, did the reboot to update the firmware and now it's bricked. RB4011 with Wifi. Family is about to riot.
<edit> I have reset it and not netinstalled. ROS was then at 7.2 and firmware at 6.44.4 and all is OK. Updating the firmware to 7.2 makes the same brick behaviour. I am going to use 7.1.5 firmware and 7.2 ROS for now.
Same here: RB4011 (without WiFi) bricked. Upgrade and reboot fine, update firmware and reboot fine. It then ran fine for about 24h, then sudden death. I can't even reset it. It just intermittently flashes the SFP+ light, then all port lights.
Update: managed to get back to it with netinstall, no other resets worked. Now reinstalling 7.2 and will put it in the rack again. Had no issues (so far) with our two CRS305-1G-4S+ and one CRS112-8P-4S, but looking at other posts here, it seems something is going wrong with the RB4011 and 7.2.
It is on-topic because of the claim that "it" was fixed. So yeah, let's talk about and report any issue. MT must know.But all this is offtopic, as it's a general issue with the "auto" setting since it was introduced, back in 6.48.
arm - fixed "auto" CPU frequency setting;
It's not, I'll quote the thread ripper, @Znevna: viewtopic.php?t=184351#p921849It is on-topic because of the claim that "it" was fixed. So yeah, let's talk about and report any issue. MT must know.But all this is offtopic, as it's a general issue with the "auto" setting since it was introduced, back in 6.48.
arm - fixed "auto" CPU frequency setting;
"rb5009 is arm64 not arm."
Remember with partioning you can experiment and rollback within a couple of minutes. Of course only on equipment that supports it, but RB4011 is among that.I'll keep a keen eye out next week. I considered rolling back to 7.1.5 but with the netinstall + restore still in muscle memory (if you skip the head scratching and troubleshooting phase and jump straight to 'netinstall -r' you can be back online within the hour), I decided to bite the bullet.
In the title bar and in System->Resources it shows only the version.Hello everyone, there's an option to don't show the date of build, and only show 7.2 (Stable)?, i dont like the build date in Winbox.
Same problem with a RB750g3 after upgrading from 7.1.5 to 7.2. On my RB951Ui-2HnD OpenVPN still works with 7.2.Same for me :-(
Same, my openvpn server TCP broken, cannot connect to.
After i downgrade 7.1.5 works fine.
[username@identity] > routing/bgp/session/dump-saved-advertisements
numbers: 1
[username@identity] > routing/bgp/session/dump-saved-advertisements
numbers: 0
Not the same, but you can install VmWare and use CHR version of RouterOS.I hope that one day my network interface will work
version 6 works without problems
+1Upgraded HEX S with SFP module from 6.49.5 to 7.2 and now all information about SFP module is gone.
Anyone else seeing this?
I hope the support manages to solve this problemNot the same, but you can install VmWare and use CHR version of RouterOS.I hope that one day my network interface will work
version 6 works without problems
I tried using F7 to disable this annoyance. Still if I copy paste config into winbox terminal window, all kinds of gibberish shows up in the terminal. I still think it's a bug ? Pls advise"that is not a bug, it is a feature!"Another interesting bug is that I can't seem to paste (from clipboard) my export into the winbox terminal window (I've noticed this since a few builds ago) - even if I only do a few lines at a time. The lines seem to "self-corrupt" as it's busy pasting in. So there seems to be a bug with pasting to terminal, I'm not sure yet if it only affects mac-based winbox sessions or ipv4 winbox sessions also. (I'm on winbox x64 v3.35)
A very useless and irritating feature. It has been present from long ago.
This they call "Hotlock mode". In that mode, every command and parameter is expanded to full length once it is uniquely matched, but then when you continue to type it adds the new input after that. I could think it was sort of useful when it did not do that.
In RouterOS v6 it was even worse: Hotlock mode was enabled using Ctrl-V. People often wanted to paste stuff into the terminal and typed Ctrl-V. "nothing happened". Then they pasted using right-button and got into this terrible mess.
But in RouterOS v7 the Hotlock key has been changed to F7. So less likely to make this mistake.
Still I think it should simply be removed. You can always auto-expand things using TAB.