Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
[ASM]
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Contact:

Lower throughput at each hop

Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:38 pm

I have the following situation:
Point A<--39MBps-->Point B<--39MBps-->PointC<--39MBps-->Point D
     |<-------------36MBps------------->|                 |
     |<-----------------------33MBps--------------------->|
As you can see each hop lower the throughput with 3 MBps. All devices are wireless bridges....

Any suggestions?

P.S.: not a CPU problem
 
tully
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:07 am

Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:06 pm

802.11 has a built in ack time that makes the link go slower over distance. Nstreme protocol addresses this bottleneck and a few others.

John
 
User avatar
[ASM]
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Contact:

Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:02 pm

802.11 has a built in ack time that makes the link go slower over distance. Nstreme protocol addresses this bottleneck and a few others.

John
Let me explain.... I'm using n-streme over 3 50+ km links...

From Point A to Point B I've got 39 MBps.
From Point B to Point C I've got 39 MBps.
From Point A to Point C I've got 36 MBps bridged in Point B. I mean I've got no direct connection betwwen Point A and Point C
 
wildbill442
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1055
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:00 pm

Are you routing or bridging between A<->B<->C<->D?

If bridging I could see throughput dropping due to broadcast traffic...
 
User avatar
[ASM]
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Contact:

Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:05 pm

bridgeing....

Can you explain in more details??

All speeds are from bandwight-test, protocol=tcp
 
wildbill442
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1055
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:19 pm

Well if your network is completely bridged then EVERY node on your network recieves a message "hey did you request this packet" and they have to respond "nope sure didn't" or "yep that was me" basically you have one big collision domain, you need to route between MT's (OSPF is awesome) that will decrease broadcast traffic and only the requesting node will recieve the traffic increasing throughput and bandwidth! :)


Wikipedia definition - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_domain

Your network would end up looking like this...


A (10.0.0.1) <-> (10.0.0.2) B (10.0.1.1) <-> (10.0.1.2) C (10.0.2.1) <-> (10.0.2.2) D

If you route between AP's it gives you a much more granual level of control on your network (firewalling between APs dropping traffic like netbios from being sent over your network). It also decreases the broadcast/collision domain so you cut out alot of the broadcast traffic (NetBIOS is broadcasted to every node on the broadcast domian).