Legacy mikrotik devices are pretty slow when working as NAS devices. And providing "only" USB2 doesn't explain it, after all USB2 is supposed to go up to 480Mbps (half the speed of a gigabit ethernet) but most people experience file transfers (via SMB) far slower than that. And simply including USB3 in new ax devices will not improve this experience. Now, if ROS v7 came with better SMB implementation, that would be a major step forward ...
Please do not write nonsence....did you see the video?USB is not for storage, its for external devices like LTE modems and such.
on their official YT?It's a LEAK ... Wait for the device to appear on the MikroTik website.
1.3gb/s read and 1.3gb/s write is what I measured on a RB5009ug a few months ago. At least one core was at >90% utilization which looks like the limiter. This was single file copy and the network was otherwise idle during the test. I didn't see improvement when copying multiple files concurrently. MT support told me 1.3gb/s is expected. viewtopic.php?p=916528&hilit=rb5009+usb ... ut#p916528Maybe we can ask owners of RB5009 how fast is their USB 3 with ROS7....
Is not the same type of CPU, RB4011 uses an Out-of-order execution CPU with a wider Memory Bus Allowing it to provide Much more performance per core and MHz, at least until now "small" devices like hAP use in-order execution CPU with narrower Memory Bus, in consequence, performance is lower, power consumption is lower, size, and the cost is lower too, so i think is fairYou can check mikrotik chateau AX....there is the same CPU with 1.8....I would say it is disappointing comparing to RB4011...
Don't expect hAP ax3 to provide similar performance, RB5009 System of Chip is far more powerful, like RB4011, is another Tier in terms of performanceI wonder if the 2.5gbe link uses the same chipset/configuration as RB5009. I still can't saturate the RB5009 2.5gbe port with single stream traffic and have stopped using it.
yesHi,
will Zerotier work on this device?
Wow i hope is not a typoWow a level 6 license.
Except artificial limitation, the wireless chip is not involved on max tx power, but only the amplifiers on board:Does hAP ax3 really have more tx power than hAP ax2, considering that wireless chips are the same (QCN-5022)?
I own both hAP ac2 and hAP ax2. Coverage zone by ax2 is not worse than ac2, both theoretically and practically. I can't speak for ax3, as I don't own it, yet (for the same reason that I don't need USB for now as I can use hAP ac2 for tethering via USB).I doubt between buying hAP ax2 now or waiting for hAP ax3. I don't need USB or CPU running at the max clock, however, the coverage zone should not be worse than currently with hAP ac2.
Is there any interesting use-case for USB or USB3?
The Woobm is a WiFi-to-serial bridge. This device enables wireless access to RouterBOARD devices which have a USB port, but do not have wireless interfaces.
2.5G ethernet uses a little more, but primarily because of clock speed. The difference is really minimal in practice. You might be thinking about 2.5GbE SFP+ modules and those DO consume a lot more, power.What the whole preceding post was quoted for? Is it a problem to just use "Post Reply" button?
OK, many thanks for the info!2.5G ethernet uses a little more, but primarily because of clock speed. The difference is really minimal in practice. You might be thinking about 2.5GbE SFP+ modules and those DO consume a lot more, power.
Many thanks for confirming my suspicions. Sadly, currently both devices located far from power sockets, as wiring was designed with PoE functionality in mind. Guess I'll stick with ac3 for now, just wanted to tinker with the new device. As aside question - any clues what is rationale behind such design? Every networking device I got before had PoE-in and PoE-out on different ports: RB4011, ac3, cAP. And it sounds pretty logical to me, to chain several devices in such way while current consumption allows.Correct.
Only one port for both functions.
Use poe injector from cap ?
I am from Latvia by the way Guess I need to evolve to catch up with the Mirkotik vision.Ah, those are the mysterious ways guys in Latvia think
It's cheaper. But also does simplify the default config/QuickSet, since "Internet In" may be an outside wireless device that needs PoE-out power (and hAPaxX is inside where AC power is easier). Or conversely, you want to put hAPaxX someplace different than where the hardline ISP modem lives, so PoE-IN be useful so it's one cable. Both cases go to the port that says "Internet In".I don't fully understand the rationale behind that change either.
The same percentage of bad blocks was right after unpacking, when there were no records on the flash drive.You have more "Totals Sectors Write" than i ever had on my hap ac in 5 year time.
Nothing compares to a fine top-notch MikroTik forum post and a good coffee to start the week.IMHO Microtik urgently needs a competent industrial designer. What massive big eared plastic ugliness is this?
Why does a new router from the factory have different versions of "Factory Software" and "Factory Firmware"?
Is this normal or does it mean that the router was reflashed in the store before the sale?
Does Netinstall change this version of "Factory Firmware"?
Hi! To version 7.7, I updated it myself.Why does a new router from the factory have different versions of "Factory Software" and "Factory Firmware"?
Is this normal or does it mean that the router was reflashed in the store before the sale?
Does Netinstall change this version of "Factory Firmware"?
Netinstall doesn't touch "factory firmware". However, it is possible to upgrade factory firmware to 7.6, check this manual page.
It's not usual to see different factory software and factory firmware versions. It's not unheard of, but not with recent releases.
If your hAP ax3 came installed with v7.7 from the dealer, then somebody did upgrade it. Whether dealer did it for you ... or your unit was sold before and returned (and previous owner did the upgrade) ... can't be told. But anyway, it's not in state as it left the factory, so you should at least netinstall it (with option "don't keep configuration") to wipe out anything that previous installer might leave behind.
Sorry for the misinformation. I made these entries after rebooting the router, I tried 2 times to completely write the flash to the end to see if more bad blocks appeared. They didn't show up anymore.@Larin my ccr2004-16G has factory firmware 7.4.1 and factory software of 7.3.1, so not out of the ordinary it seems. What does seem concerning is that you had so many writes during your uptime of less than 5 hours.
Are you doing any work with containers or a lot of graphing?
That does sound weird. I'd open a support case (with supout.rif attached) since only Mikrotik know something like that.But 1.2% was also on the newly unpacked router, then there were no records in the flash.
I contacted support (but I did not attach the supout.rif file), they answered me quickly enough in support and said that this is normal, even for a new routerThat does sound weird. I'd open a support case (with supout.rif attached) since only Mikrotik know something like that.But 1.2% was also on the newly unpacked router, then there were no records in the flash.
Yes, USB3 will kill any 2.4ghz connection. I battled whit this on my PCs wireless mice and keyboard.I contacted support (but I did not attach the supout.rif file), they answered me quickly enough in support and said that this is normal, even for a new router
That does sound weird. I'd open a support case (with supout.rif attached) since only Mikrotik know something like that.
They said that if the percentage of bad blocks does not grow, you can forget about it. Or flash the router via netinstall - then this counter, in theory, should be reset.
========================
I also noticed today another glitch hap ax3.
I noticed that 2 GHz network does not work for me, and I configured it and it worked successfully and after that I did not make any major changes to the router configuration.
What I just did not do .... but then by chance I discovered that if I rotate one of the antennas by 90 degrees, then the 2 GHz network miraculously appears.
It turns out that the interference for the 2 GHz network was the USB cable from an external 2.5-inch drive, which I recently connected and the wire from it ran a centimeter from one of the antennas.
When I removed this wire away, everything worked by itself.
I don't know if this is the normal quality of a new product (hap ax3) and whether it should be so, but I decided to share this experience.
ps: I think I found the answer to this problem here:
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/p ... -paper.pdf
Metal vs Plastic drives.Hi,
I have Samsung flash disk usb3 and WiFi is working fine...