Are they just missing from the changelog and were silently added or ? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯*) console - improved ":execute" command to output a string when a file is not specified;
*) route - added hoplimit and metric parameters to SLAAC routes;
*) winbox - added missing cipher properties for OVPN server and client;
*) winbox - added missing filtering properties under "Tools/Packet Sniffer" menu;
I do not check the others but this is simply REMOVED so no valid for 7.8:[…]
Are they just missing from the changelog and were silently added or ? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
because is REPLACED with*) console - improved ":execute" command to output a string when a file is not specified;
?*) console - added "as-string" parameter to the ":execute" command;
It's there, in all_packages-arm-7.8.zip file.why there is missing zero tier on Arm?!!!
me tooNo sector writes statistics on hAP ac^2 (WinBox 64bit v3.37).
res.png
[–]
enum Topic {
_BAD_TOPIC,
INFO,
WARNING,
[–]
NETWATCH,
VPLS,
NETINSTALL,
};
[–]
Someone is try to add directly NETINSTALL on DHCP server?...[237610.752320] iSCSI_F:iscsi_target_login.c:803:iscsi_post_login_handler Login - I[MikroTik][MTK_IP:42944], T[iqn.2000-01.com.synology:valhalla.default-target.cf7d36ec4c8][SYNOLOGY_IP:3260], P[iSCSI/TCP]
[237610.788037] iSCSI:target_core_transport.c:1735:target_cmd_size_check TARGET_CORE[iSCSI]: Expected Transfer Length: 2048 does not match SCSI CDB Length: 0 for SAM Opcode: 0x12
[237610.803688] iSCSI:iscsi_target_datain_values.c:116:iscsit_set_datain_values_yes_and_yes ITT: 0x0000002f read_data_left is zero!
[237610.815245] iSCSI:iscsi_target.c:3227:iscsit_send_datain iscsit_get_datain_values failed for ITT: 0x0000002f
[237610.825176] iSCSI_F:iscsi_target.c:4746:iscsit_close_connection Close - I[MikroTik][MTK_IP:42944], T[iqn.2000-01.com.synology:valhalla.default-target.cf7d36ec4c8]
All the CPU is used for MANAGE the device...High CPU usage after upgrade to 7.8 Stable:
Available on RB5009 still.No sector writes statistics on hAP ac^2 (WinBox 64bit v3.37).
res.png
But there was no problem with 7.8 RC3 !All the CPU is used for MANAGE the device...High CPU usage after upgrade to 7.8 Stable:
It stop when you close winbox, or probably when SNMP stop syncronizing with the device...
Reinstall 7.7 and check.
Thanks for this...more confirmation please...any 60Ghz or AX tested?Following works ok:
- RBmAP2n ("mAP 2n")
- RBD25G-5HPacQD2HPnD ("Audience")
- 2011UiAS-2HnD
- hAP RB951Ui-2nD ("hAP")
- RB4011iGS
- hEX 750G r3 ("hEX")
I can read I know there is no change for 60Ghz...but noone is gonna instal it on 60Ghz?With a (just) newly released OS that doesn't have any improvements for 60GHz???
I don't see this problem on RB5009. Sector writes (total and since reboot) do have values on my setup.Available on RB5009 still.No sector writes statistics on hAP ac^2 (WinBox 64bit v3.37).
res.png
It makes no sense to risk in a device that does not benefit from it, then with a version of RouterOS that has just come out...I can read I know there is no change for 60Ghz...but noone is gonna instal it on 60Ghz?
AC3 and AX3 upgraded, so far no issues seen.Thanks for this...more confirmation please...any 60Ghz or AX tested?
probably something is wrong since routeros 7.8 + wifiwave2 + container use 32.6 MiB of 64.5 MiB on hAP ax^3I have two 64MiB partitions on Audience, after downloading the update (ROS 7.8 + wifiwave2) there was only left 1% free, it barely fit in it.
After the actualization 41MiB of 64.3 MiB used (believe me I don't store files on the router).
@MIKROTIK Can it be slimmed down?
I can confirm that this is fixed, now I can use 2.5G NIC's when using the RB5009 with the S+RJ10 on the SFP+ slot. Also 10G on the same module is also working fine.*) sfp - fixed false link detection with S+RJ10 on RB5009;
you are wrong....normally when you have the package already installed the upgrade in winbox automaticaly upgrade the package installed.@parham @rox169 ---> Zerotier and wifiwave2 are separate packages ( like others ) and for each new version you have to re-install those as well. Bit of a pain but minimal and then we get access to great functionality without overloading older routers if all included in the main file. Kudos to MT for making this type of setup.
[ But I didnt find the zerotrust cloudflare tunnel options package? ;-)) ]
system, error, cricical: error while running customized default configuration script: no such item
*) mpls - improved stability when neighboring router reboots;
Upgrading ROS+wifiwave2 on my audience with partitioned disks failed with earlier ROS versions (it might be when upgrading from 7.5 to 7.6 or something). It actually refused to download upgrade stuff due to lack of free space.I have two 64MiB partitions on Audience, after downloading the update (ROS 7.8 + wifiwave2) there was only left 1% free, it barely fit in it.
After the actualization 41MiB of 64.3 MiB used (believe me I don't store files on the router).
@MIKROTIK Can it be slimmed down?
It probably has been made more intelligent, when a package has no changes it simply isn't upgraded.you are wrong....normally when you have the package already installed the upgrade in winbox automaticaly upgrade the package installed.
I would not want to upgrade with so little free space, maybe it needs a little temporary space during the upgrade and the disk-full situation isn't properly handled, resulting in invisible corrupted installation.But then, why do you worry about (temporary) lack of space, it gets freed immediately after upgrade is done?
Our backbone is up and running in dual-stack since 7.5. What part of OSPFv3 is not working for you?
Same, I am not seeing proper LSA exchanges or routes being installed between neighbors. This is a regression from v7.7 and needs to be treated as a critical bug.
Oh Mikrotik, we sing your praise
For the gift of ROS v7.8 released today
Your routers and switches, they work so well
With your firmware updates, they'll never fail
Your powerful features are second to none
We rely on your stability, it's always on
With this new release, we'll surely soar
Our networks will thrive, forever more
Thank you Mikrotik, for all that you do
For keeping our networks fast, and always true
We'll continue to trust in your brand
As you lead us into the future, hand in hand
# # #
O Mikrotik, mēs dziedājam par tavu godu
Par dāvanu - ROS v7.8 izlaišanu šodien
Tavi maršrutētāji un komutatori darbojas tik labi
Ar tavām programmatūras atjauninājumiem, tie nekad nenokrīt
Tavi spēcīgie iespējām nav nekas līdzīgs
Mēs paļaujamies uz tavu stabilitāti, kas vienmēr ir pieejama
Ar šo jauno izlaišanu mēs noteikti gādāsim augšup
Mūsu tīkli būs veiksmīgi, uz mūžu
Paldies, Mikrotik, par visu, ko tu dari
Par to, ka uztur mūsu tīklus ātrus un drošus
Mēs turpināsim ticēt tavam zīmolam
Kamēr tu ved mūs nākotnē, roku rokā.
/interface/wifiwave2/info contry-info "Country"
Hello, still no mention in the documentation regarding the use of this: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/IPsec.*) ike2 - added support for "address", "key-id" and "dn" for Remote ID matching (CLI only);
Ah, there is a change in the doc description column, but new values are still missing from the property column enum.Hello, still no mention in the documentation regarding the use of this: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/IPsec.*) ike2 - added support for "address", "key-id" and "dn" for Remote ID matching (CLI only);
dhcp,critical,error dhcp-client on wan2 lost IP address XX.XXX.XXX.X - lease expired
High CPU usage after upgrade to 7.8 Stable. Device is RB2011UiAS-2HnD.
Screenshot (146).jpg
Yes, the ipv6 neighbors have been bad since 7.6, 7.7 like the cluster, 7.8 too, and have fallen back to 7.6.Same, I am not seeing proper LSA exchanges or routes being installed between neighbors. This is a regression from v7.7 and needs to be treated as a critical bug.
[edit: this seems to be a problem when interoperating with v7.7 neighbors, the bug may be in v7.7; perhaps this is related to the ospf-type fix mentioned in the changelog?]
Urgent?Urgent issue - LLDP-MED (auto voice VLAN for phones) is not functioning after upgrading from 7.7 to 7.8 on CRS328-24p
@rextended - Urgent as in someone else here, with phones, might upgrade since everything else is working fine and this was released as stable.Urgent?Urgent issue - LLDP-MED (auto voice VLAN for phones) is not functioning after upgrading from 7.7 to 7.8 on CRS328-24p
Did you do not do any test on lab before put the release on production?
[admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1 duration=10s
Columns: MAC-ADDRESS, AC-NAME
MAC-ADDRESS AC-NAME
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE lab-core02
[admin@lab-cpe] >
[admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1 duration=10s
[admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
ospf v2 and v3 between v7.7 and v7.8 is working ok for me. I tried to recreate this issue before upgrading anything in production just in case, but can't seem to. All IPv6 routes working. Any other specific situation you might have we should look out for / try?Same, I am not seeing proper LSA exchanges or routes being installed between neighbors. This is a regression from v7.7 and needs to be treated as a critical bug.
[edit: this seems to be a problem when interoperating with v7.7 neighbors, the bug may be in v7.7; perhaps this is related to the ospf-type fix mentioned in the changelog?]
Thanks, I thought I was going nuts.Still miss
since 7.7 :(Code: Select all/interface/wifiwave2/info contry-info "Country"
We're sorry for the caused inconvenience. The information just have been added to documentation.Urgent issue - LLDP-MED (auto voice VLAN for phones) is not functioning after upgrading from 7.7 to 7.8 on CRS328-24p
EDIT: Turning on PoE LLDP seems to solve it, but it doesn't function if that is off per port (off is the default setting when upgrading).
DoH server connection error: Address not available
Same - we would be using several of CCR2116 and upgrading our whole MikroTik fleet to v7 if there was working BFD implementation.BFD!!!!! WHEN!!!! Come on guys - If you are having issues deploying it tell us!
A lot of us have fleets of CCR2004 we cannot use or if we are using them they are so unstable but we cannot go to v7 without BFD!
I don't know why. It start with 7.7, clicking download&install using winbox, reboot and still at 7.6Nadol - Why? There was no problem description.
would like to know as well. remember the changelog in the release candidates saying to not use on CRS devices, is that still the case?Is still not recommended for CRSs ?
Best Regards from Rome
Andrea
Hello.RouterOS version 7.8 has been released in the "v7 stable" channel!
/certificate/add name="r1-ca" common-name="r1-ca" subject-alt-name="email:r1-ca" key-size=prime256v1 key-usage=key-cert-sign,crl-sign
:do {/certificate/sign [find name=r1-ca] name=r1-ca} on-error={:delay 2}
/certificate/add name="r1" common-name="192.168.2.14" subject-alt-name="IP:192.168.2.14" key-size=prime256v1 key-usage=digital-signature,content-commitment,key-encipherment,key-agreement,tls-server
:do {/certificate/sign [find name=r1] ca=r1-ca name=r1} on-error={:delay 2}
/certificate/add name="r1-r2" common-name="r1-r2" subject-alt-name="email:r1-r2" key-size=prime256v1 key-usage=digital-signature,key-encipherment,data-encipherment,key-agreement,tls-client
:do {/certificate/sign [find name=r1-r2] ca=r1-ca name=r1-r2} on-error={:delay 2}
:delay 2
/certificate/export-certificate r1-ca file-name=r1-ca
/certificate/export-certificate r1 file-name=r1
/certificate/export-certificate r1-r2 file-name=r1-r2 type=pkcs12 export-passphrase=passphrase
/ip/pool/add name=r1-r2 ranges=192.168.1.2
/ip/ipsec/mode-config/add address-pool=r1-r2 address-prefix-length=32 name=r1-r2 split-include=0.0.0.0/0 system-dns=no
/ip/ipsec/policy/group/add name=group1
/ip/ipsec/profile/add dh-group=ecp256 enc-algorithm=aes-256 hash-algorithm=sha256 name=profile1 prf-algorithm=sha256 proposal-check=strict
/ip/ipsec/peer/add exchange-mode=ike2 local-address=192.168.2.14 name=peer1 passive=yes profile=profile1
/ip/ipsec/proposal/add auth-algorithms=sha256 enc-algorithms=aes-256-cbc,aes-256-gcm lifetime=8h name=proposal1 pfs-group=ecp256
/ip/ipsec/identity/add auth-method=digital-signature certificate=r1 generate-policy=port-strict match-by=certificate mode-config=r1-r2 peer=peer1 policy-template-group=group1 remote-certificate=r1-r2
/ip/ipsec/policy/add dst-address=192.168.1.0/24 group=group1 proposal=proposal1 src-address=0.0.0.0/0 template=yes
/certificate/import file-name="r1-ca.crt" name="r1-ca" passphrase=""
/certificate/import file-name="r1.crt" name="r1" passphrase=""
/certificate/import file-name="r1-r2.p12" name="r1-r2" passphrase="passphrase"
/ip/ipsec/mode-config/add name=cfg1 responder=no
/ip/ipsec/policy/group/add name=group1
/ip/ipsec/profile/add dh-group=ecp256 enc-algorithm=aes-256 hash-algorithm=sha256 name=profile1 prf-algorithm=sha256 proposal-check=strict
/ip/ipsec/peer/add address=192.168.2.14/32 exchange-mode=ike2 name=peer1 profile=profile1
/ip/ipsec/proposal/add auth-algorithms="" enc-algorithms=aes-256-gcm lifetime=8h name=proposal1 pfs-group=ecp256
/ip/ipsec/identity/add auth-method=digital-signature certificate=r1-r2 generate-policy=port-strict match-by=certificate mode-config=cfg1 my-id=dn peer=peer1 policy-template-group=group1 remote-certificate=r1
/ip/ipsec/policy/add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 group=group1 proposal=proposal1 src-address=0.0.0.0/0 template=yes
Can you please advice how to rename the disk?You can rename the disk to something of your liking, and then it will not change again. That is why this change was made (disk1 wasn't a stable name).
Thank you very much. Just an update. Using CRS317, ip address configured on a vlan (vlan belongs to a bridge with L3 HW enabled), currently after turning off IGMP Snooping for the bridge, ospfv3 works fine. The problem is whether IGMP Snooping is blocking some packets of ipv6denisnk - Thank you for your report. Although it is not version related. We will try to fix this as soon as possible. Yes, several devices might not show this on WinBox.
parham - Please contact us through support@mikrotik.com. These files are not missing on upgrade servers. We would like to figure out what is going on here with your router.
nichky - What kind of an issue do you refer to? Contact support@mikrotik.com and please leave this topic strictly related to the issues introduced in. v7.8 that were not present in v7.7.
Babujnik, tigran, fornuftFTW, strzinek, dlemery - We will look into this.
ErfanDL, jovaf32128, benkreuter, verbovet, nickcarr, SumNathan, blacksnow - Please send supout.rif file from this router running v7.8 to support@mikrotik.com.
Pl07R3K - We do not increase packages for some particular reason. Packages grow with extra functionality that is added and requested by our users. We do our best that each and every router can be upgraded without problems with the RouterOS package installed. The upgrade is working properly for each and every model device that we manufacture at the moment with pre-defined packages installed (GPS< WifiWave2, etc.) and default configuration running.
darklord - I can not reproduce the problem. Please contact us through support@mikrotik.com so we can find the root cause of this issue.
ToTheCLI - Thank you for your report. We will look into this.
lluu131 - Please see this - viewtopic.php?t=192529#p987012
sirca - No, you can use this version with CRS as well.
Nadol - Why? There was no problem description.
murrayis - We can only repeat that this is a work in progress. It will be ready when it will be ready. Unfortunately, using release topics in order to raise this question will not help in any way. So please, stick with the main purpose of these topics - discovering issues introduced in the particular release.
What you need to change is the "slot" parameter.Can you please advice how to rename the disk?You can rename the disk to something of your liking, and then it will not change again. That is why this change was made (disk1 wasn't a stable name).
I habe usb1 or nvme1 and if I change the name, the error "can not change device type (6)" appears.
I don't know why. It start with 7.7, clicking download&install using winbox, reboot and still at 7.6Nadol - Why? There was no problem description.
Have you turned on IGMP Snooping?Same, I am not seeing proper LSA exchanges or routes being installed between neighbors. This is a regression from v7.7 and needs to be treated as a critical bug.
[edit: this seems to be a problem when interoperating with v7.7 neighbors, the bug may be in v7.7; perhaps this is related to the ospf-type fix mentioned in the changelog?]
Thanks we will check thisROSE-MANAGER still cannot mount iscsi devices from QNAP/Synology NAS to CHR:
thanks, this is Winbox bug, should work from CLI -Can you please advice how to rename the disk?
I habe usb1 or nvme1 and if I change the name, the error "can not change device type (6)" appears.
Hello,
Just FYI
On hap ac3 on 7.7 with a single usb flash drive mounted on /usb and adguard container running from usb drive, after the upgrade to 7.8 I’ve got
* usb drive is now mounted on /usb1-part1
* trying to change back to /usb results in an incorrect partition size error…
* existing docker containers fails to start becaus of root path is now not existing (and cannot be changed, apparently)
* pulling an image from dockerhub results in error 401 (known issue from other posts)
* recreated the container after updating the mount points and uploading the container tar file, but it does not start and no logs whatsoever except for the image import success notice…
I’ve deleted the container and used a raspberry pi to run it :(
The change that others are complaining about now, was made exactly to prevent the problem that you had!I've this problem since v7.7 --> viewtopic.php?t=192427&start=300#p982228.
No follow up or update from Mikrotik staff. I guess either i don't know what i'm doing or they don't ... :-)
The change that others are complaining about now, was made exactly to prevent the problem that you had!I've this problem since v7.7 --> viewtopic.php?t=192427&start=300#p982228.
No follow up or update from Mikrotik staff. I guess either i don't know what i'm doing or they don't ... :-)
Instead of "scanning the devices at boot and assigning them numbered names" like disk1 usb1 etc, now disks get fixed "slot" names that you can assign yourself.
I encounter the same with another gpon sfp module (FS GPON-ONU-34-20BI), the module is not detected anymore (Module present in GUI is unchecked), reverting back to v7.7 solve the issue.RB5009 on 7.8 Stable does not recognize Huawei MA5671A GPON SFP at all (with auto-neg on or off) was working fine on 7.7 stable (with auto-neg on and off fixed 2.5Gbps)
SFP seems to be a systematic problem with v7.8. At least on some boardsI encounter the same with another gpon sfp module (FS GPON-ONU-34-20BI), the module is not detected anymore (Module present in GUI is unchecked), reverting back to v7.7 solve the issue.
I did a bit more testing, and I can say this issue depends on the sfp module.SFP seems to be a systematic problem with v7.8. At least on some boards
viewtopic.php?t=193986#p987210
Can you please explain in more detail what issues are you facing with the Chateau LTE12? Do you already have a support ticket open?Chateau LTE12 RBD53G-5HacD2HnD
No go, same as 7.7
I had a ticket (SUP-105105) open for this issue on ROS 7.7. Reply wasThank you very much. Just an update. Using CRS317, ip address configured on a vlan (vlan belongs to a bridge with L3 HW enabled), currently after turning off IGMP Snooping for the bridge, ospfv3 works fine. The problem is whether IGMP Snooping is blocking some packets of ipv6
and after inquiring if this was expected behaviour I gotOSPF relies on multicast to send HELLO packets, altering those multicast packets in any way (including igmp proxy, nat etc) will cause OSPF not to work properly.
.As mentioned previously, OSPF may not work properly with features enabled that alter multicast packets and it does not matter OSPFv3 or OSPFv2.
I've noticed the same, my disk2 changed to usb1-part1. I've changed my backup scripts as you did.need change to my backup script, on system disk something change too sd1-part1, is this on the changelog?
How it is an OSPF bug if igmp snooping is blocking?and after inquiring if this was expected behaviour I gotOSPF relies on multicast to send HELLO packets, altering those multicast packets in any way (including igmp proxy, nat etc) will cause OSPF not to work properly..As mentioned previously, OSPF may not work properly with features enabled that alter multicast packets and it does not matter OSPFv3 or OSPFv2.
I didn't push any further since I don't need IGMP snooping ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I consider it a bug, though.
/interface bridge mdb
add bridge=bridge1 group=ff02::5 ports=bridge1,ether2,ether3,ether4,ether5
add bridge=bridge1 group=ff02::6 ports=bridge1,ether2,ether3,ether4,ether5
Thank you for your advice, unfortunately it does not work, anyway the default should be both.@Pl07R3K try setting: /interface/wifiwave2/security/set yourWiFiprofile sae-pwe=hunting-and-pecking
Can I have some more details please, my Chateau LTE12 is running 7.8rc3 testing without issues, what issues have you seen on 7.7 and 7.8 stable?Chateau LTE12 RBD53G-5HacD2HnD
No go, same as 7.7
The possible initialization race condition with the dual R11e-LTE6 modem setup is reproduced and fixed, fix will be included in the next RouterOS v7 releases.LtAP router with factory fitted R11e-LTE6 and another extra R11e-LTE6 module in the upper mini-PCIe slot.
After each reboot/restart top modem hangs up and is not reachable. USB bus reset helps (each time).
/system script remove [find name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler]
/system script add dont-require-permissions=yes name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler policy=read,write source="\
:local iTimeout 60\r\
\n\r\
\n:local iLoop 0\r\
\n:while ([/interface/lte/print as-value count-only]!=2 and \$iLoop<\$iTimeout) do={\r\
\n :set iLoop (\$iLoop+1)\t\t\r\
\n :delay 1s\r\
\n }\r\
\n:if ([/interface/lte/print as-value count-only]=2) do={\r\
\n :local usbType [/system/routerboard/usb/get type]\r\
\n :log info \"setting USB to USB-type-A\"\r\
\n :put \"setting USB to USB-type-A\"\r\
\n /system routerboard usb set type=USB-type-A\r\
\n :delay 1s\r\
\n :log info (\"restoring initial USB type setting: \".\$usbType)\r\
\n :put (\"restoring initial USB type setting: \".\$usbType)\r\
\n /system routerboard usb set type=\$usbType\r\
\n }\r\
\n:log info \"script ended\"\r\
\n"
/system scheduler remove [find name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler]
/system scheduler add name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler on-event=ltap_dual_lte_enabler policy=read,write start-time=startup
Dear Artis,Hello,
The possible initialization race condition with the dual R11e-LTE6 modem setup is reproduced and fixed, fix will be included in the next RouterOS v7 releases.LtAP router with factory fitted R11e-LTE6 and another extra R11e-LTE6 module in the upper mini-PCIe slot.
After each reboot/restart top modem hangs up and is not reachable. USB bus reset helps (each time).
Please tell them you need BFD!P.S. If possible issue a new release ASAP, because we use LtAP installation all across our Latvian country in emmergency vehicles (police and ambulances). New routers come with 6.* version installed, but we need to upgrade to 7.* before we proceed fitting new installations in 100 new ambulances... Paldies! :)
Could be. But my Audience (running wave2 driver) lijes it very much, since upgrade to 7.8 WiFi works much smoother, I don't have to play tricks with Huawei MediaPad T5 tablet to use 5GHz band (it used to stick to 2.4GHz a lot).After a quick check on this topic, I see the 7.8 as an ALPHA... not a "stable" release...
Unfortunately, I think you're right.After a quick check on this topic, I see the 7.8 as an ALPHA... not a "stable" release...
Well, I can tell you that I don't like the fact that my RB4011 still is not supported by wave2 driver while retaining 2GHz support. It is one of their flagship routers for the home, and a workaround to make both drivers work alongside (each on their respective bands) still has not been made. I can understand that for a first try, but after so many releases...Could be. But my Audience (running wave2 driver) lijes it very much, since upgrade to 7.8 WiFi works much smoother, I don't have to play tricks with Huawei MediaPad T5 tablet to use 5GHz band (it used to stick to 2.4GHz a lot).
I thought I was the only one in the world this this damn tablet 😂with Huawei MediaPad T5 tablet to use 5GHz band (it used to stick to 2.4GHz a lot).
Nah, we're two ... and a a few million Chineze ....I thought I was the only one in the world this this damn tablet 😂with Huawei MediaPad T5 tablet to use 5GHz band (it used to stick to 2.4GHz a lot).
Sorry but that's not how I see it.Well, I can tell you that I don't like the fact that my RB4011 still is not supported by wave2 driver while retaining 2GHz support. It is one of their flagship routers for the home,...
Finally I found the problem. When I try install 7.7 something went wrong and I get 0 hdd free space.Can I have some more details please, my Chateau LTE12 is running 7.8rc3 testing without issues, what issues have you seen on 7.7 and 7.8 stable?Chateau LTE12 RBD53G-5HacD2HnD
No go, same as 7.7
Are you updating Routerboard as well as RouterOS, kernel failure usually means your Routerboard version is causing an incompatibility with RouterOS.
i'm about to do that, before that that , can you confirm whether Route-Reflector works together with VRF on v7.8?nichky - What kind of an issue do you refer to? Contact support@mikrotik.com and please leave this topic strictly related to the issues introduced in. v7.8 that were not present in v7.7.
Which MT device? Try to forget and reconnect to the network.iPhone 12 with iOS 16.3.1 cannot connect to WiFi if wpa3-psk is enabled.
system,error,critical RBD25G-5HPacQD2HPnD: error while running customized default configuration script: bad command name wireless (line 985 column 25)
Unfortunately, after setting the MDB entry in this way, ospfv3 does not work after snooping is turned onHow it is an OSPF bug if igmp snooping is blocking?
and after inquiring if this was expected behaviour I got
.
I didn't push any further since I don't need IGMP snooping ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I consider it a bug, though.
You can add static MLD entries for all the addresses ospfv3 is using
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... centries.1
Code: Select all/interface bridge mdb add bridge=bridge1 group=ff02::5 ports=bridge1,ether2,ether3,ether4,ether5 add bridge=bridge1 group=ff02::6 ports=bridge1,ether2,ether3,ether4,ether5
Is there a RB5009 with wireless?Sorry but that's not how I see it.
That position has been taken by RB5009 already last year.
The fact you don't like it, I completely understand. But it is what it is.
Observed this also here on a heX S. Version 7.7 ran flawlessly for weeks without any interruption, but 7.8 is an instability improvement concerning OVPN. :-(The OVPN service is unstable, and it will cause a Kernel crashes after 2,3 hours of uptime.
SUP-96432
The same issue, but without Kernel crashes and any errors in log.The OVPN service is unstable, and it will cause a Kernel crashes after 2,3 hours of uptime.
SUP-96432
That report is much too vague and the problem is probably due to your own local configuration.RB750Gr3 - containers inside docker does not resolving local domains, says "bad address" and nslookup return some error with NXDOMAIN. Version 7.7 and older works fine.
Dear Artis,Hello,
The possible initialization race condition with the dual R11e-LTE6 modem setup is reproduced and fixed, fix will be included in the next RouterOS v7 releases.LtAP router with factory fitted R11e-LTE6 and another extra R11e-LTE6 module in the upper mini-PCIe slot.
After each reboot/restart top modem hangs up and is not reachable. USB bus reset helps (each time).
As an alternative to USB power reset, the following modem "re-plug" script can be used (copy/paste in CLI):This will be faster and will not reset the modem or another device without necessity.Code: Select all/system script remove [find name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler] /system script add dont-require-permissions=yes name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler policy=read,write source="\ :local iTimeout 60\r\ \n\r\ \n:local iLoop 0\r\ \n:while ([/interface/lte/print as-value count-only]!=2 and \$iLoop<\$iTimeout) do={\r\ \n :set iLoop (\$iLoop+1)\t\t\r\ \n :delay 1s\r\ \n }\r\ \n:if ([/interface/lte/print as-value count-only]=2) do={\r\ \n :local usbType [/system/routerboard/usb/get type]\r\ \n :log info \"setting USB to USB-type-A\"\r\ \n :put \"setting USB to USB-type-A\"\r\ \n /system routerboard usb set type=USB-type-A\r\ \n :delay 1s\r\ \n :log info (\"restoring initial USB type setting: \".\$usbType)\r\ \n :put (\"restoring initial USB type setting: \".\$usbType)\r\ \n /system routerboard usb set type=\$usbType\r\ \n }\r\ \n:log info \"script ended\"\r\ \n" /system scheduler remove [find name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler] /system scheduler add name=ltap_dual_lte_enabler on-event=ltap_dual_lte_enabler policy=read,write start-time=startup
# RouterOS 7.8 bug workaround
:do {
:set $msg "Checking if lte1 is alive...";
:log info message="$msg"; :put "$msg";
/interface lte at-chat lte1 input="AT";
} on-error={
:set $msg "lte1 is dead, resetting usb bus(0)...";
:log error message="$msg"; :put "$msg";
/system routerboard usb power-reset bus=0 duration=1s;
:delay 45s;
}
:do {
:set $msg "Checking if lte2 is alive...";
:log info message="$msg"; :put "$msg";
/interface lte at-chat lte2 input="AT";
} on-error={
:set $msg "lte2 is dead, resetting usb bus(0)...";
:log error message="$msg"; :put "$msg";
/system routerboard usb power-reset bus=3 duration=1s;
:delay 45s;
}
denisnk - Thank you for your report. Although it is not version related. We will try to fix this as soon as possible. Yes, several devices might not show this on WinBox.
parham - Please contact us through support@mikrotik.com. These files are not missing on upgrade servers. We would like to figure out what is going on here with your router.
nichky - What kind of an issue do you refer to? Contact support@mikrotik.com and please leave this topic strictly related to the issues introduced in. v7.8 that were not present in v7.7.
Babujnik, tigran, fornuftFTW, strzinek, dlemery - We will look into this.
ErfanDL, jovaf32128, benkreuter, verbovet, nickcarr, SumNathan, blacksnow - Please send supout.rif file from this router running v7.8 to support@mikrotik.com.
Pl07R3K - We do not increase packages for some particular reason. Packages grow with extra functionality that is added and requested by our users. We do our best that each and every router can be upgraded without problems with the RouterOS package installed. The upgrade is working properly for each and every model device that we manufacture at the moment with pre-defined packages installed (GPS< WifiWave2, etc.) and default configuration running.
darklord - I can not reproduce the problem. Please contact us through support@mikrotik.com so we can find the root cause of this issue.
ToTheCLI - Thank you for your report. We will look into this.
lluu131 - Please see this - viewtopic.php?t=192529#p987012
sirca - No, you can use this version with CRS as well.
Nadol - Why? There was no problem description.
murrayis - We can only repeat that this is a work in progress. It will be ready when it will be ready. Unfortunately, using release topics in order to raise this question will not help in any way. So please, stick with the main purpose of these topics - discovering issues introduced in the particular release.
Plase fix VPRN route reflector
Change OVPN udp to tcp - fix an issue. RB5009 now on v7.8. udp OVPN very unstable...The same issue, but without Kernel crashes and any errors in log.The OVPN service is unstable, and it will cause a Kernel crashes after 2,3 hours of uptime.
SUP-96432
RB5009, udp ovpn client, BGP.
After 2 hours of uptime, traffic stops going into the ovpn-tunnel (ovpn client shows "Connected" and server tunnel ip get ping answer). Enabling/disabling the ovpn-interface does not solve the problem (shows "Connected"). Only reboot routerboard resolve it. But at the same time, when you click on the reboot, the router continues to work for about 40-60 seconds (usually the router goes into reboot instantly). Downgrade to v7.7 - none of the above problems!
RB750Gr3:
Wireguard+BGP - no issue on v7.8.
Sorry for my "rude" post, but I am using and testing the v7 release from the beginning.Maggiore81 - Why do you say so? If we sum up the topic, then basically we have found out that few SFP modules are not working properly, which were working on v7.7. Rest of the issues discussed here are already known issues from previus versions, misconfiguraiton, or minor bug reports about trivial issues or issues from older versions (not introduced in 7.8 ). Of course many posts are not realted to release at all.
+10, Real Production BGP network requires BFDBFD!!!!! WHEN!!!! Come on guys - If you are having issues deploying it tell us!
A lot of us have fleets of CCR2004 we cannot use or if we are using them they are so unstable but we cannot go to v7 without BFD!
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan received ack with id 3593833787 from 89.133.164.82
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: hops = 2
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: flags = broadcast
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: ciaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: yiaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: siaddr = 80.244.108.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: giaddr = 89.133.164.82
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: chaddr = DC:2C:6E:48:95:18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Subnet-Mask = 255.255.255.0
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Unknown(2) = 00-00-0E-10
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Router = 178.48.233.254
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Unknown(4) = 50-F4-6C-B6
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Domain-Server = 80.244.99.37,80.244.99.36
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Domain-Name = "chello.hu"
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Address-Time = 86400
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Msg-Type = ack
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Server-Id = 80.244.108.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:07 dhcp,debug,state debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan entering <bound> state
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,state debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan entering <renewing...> state
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan sending request with id 3593833787 to 80.244.108.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: ciaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: chaddr = DC:2C:6E:48:95:18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Host-Name = "xxx"
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Msg-Type = request
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Parameter-List = Subnet-Mask,Classless-Route,Router,Static-Route,Domain-Server,NTP-Server,CAPWAP-Server,Vendor-Specific
Mar/01/2023 23:56:12 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Client-Id = 01-DC-2C-6E-48-95-18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan sending request with id 3593833787 to 80.244.108.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: secs = 2
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: ciaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: chaddr = DC:2C:6E:48:95:18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Host-Name = "xxx"
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Msg-Type = request
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Parameter-List = Subnet-Mask,Classless-Route,Router,Static-Route,Domain-Server,NTP-Server,CAPWAP-Server,Vendor-Specific
Mar/01/2023 23:56:14 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Client-Id = 01-DC-2C-6E-48-95-18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,state debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan entering <rebinding...> state
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan sending request with id 3593833787 to 255.255.255.255
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: flags = broadcast
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: ciaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: chaddr = DC:2C:6E:48:95:18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Host-Name = "xxx"
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Msg-Type = request
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Parameter-List = Subnet-Mask,Classless-Route,Router,Static-Route,Domain-Server,NTP-Server,CAPWAP-Server,Vendor-Specific
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Client-Id = 01-DC-2C-6E-48-95-18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan received ack with id 3593833787 from 89.133.164.82
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: hops = 2
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: flags = broadcast
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: ciaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: yiaddr = xxx
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: siaddr = 80.244.108.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: giaddr = 89.133.164.82
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: chaddr = DC:2C:6E:48:95:18
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Subnet-Mask = 255.255.255.0
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Unknown(2) = 00-00-0E-10
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Router = 178.48.233.254
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Unknown(4) = 50-F4-6C-B6
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Domain-Server = 80.244.99.37,80.244.99.36
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Domain-Name = "chello.hu"
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Address-Time = 86400
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Msg-Type = ack
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,packet debug: Server-Id = 80.244.1,08.182
Mar/01/2023 23:56:18 dhcp,debug,state debug: dhcp-client on vlan1000-wan entering <bound> state
Why don't you take a 7.x and then just BUGFIX that version to finally release a LTS? Why every time just add a bunch of new features without fixing the previous issues? I don't think that is a productive way to build software. I love MT, I am also a trainer and diffuse Mikrotik's verb everywhere ... but it begins to become a difficult way to use them since I am no longer sure of the stability of the units ...
mikrotik transmit self instead of learned NEXT_HOP value and ignore propagate setting for vrf route. Due to it VPRN completely brokenPlase fix VPRN route reflector
what is wrong with that?
Don't you feel the resentment on this forum? Yes, mikrotik choose a "Understandable" way and got these all "praise".Why don't you take a 7.x and then just BUGFIX that version to finally release a LTS? Why every time just add a bunch of new features without fixing the previous issues? I don't think that is a productive way to build software. I love MT, I am also a trainer and diffuse Mikrotik's verb everywhere ... but it begins to become a difficult way to use them since I am no longer sure of the stability of the units ...
I operated a software firm for a while, so I have some, however little, experience with shipping software. You are indeed correct that super massive firmware releases make products unstable. A change log with 50 items means broken software every time. MikroTik has been around a while. They were developing and shipping before modern programming disciplines became mainstream.
That's understandable. But it will be difficult for them to make the internal culture change to accommodate a stability track (aka long term). It has to start at the top. It will need to be a C level decision. But change is hard. Much easier to throw a bunch of stuff at the wall to see what sticks vs. testing regressions. I think testing their type of product is really hard and why the slow down of a LTS version would be very helpful.
Done, SUP-109576Pl07R3K please write to support@mikrotik.com ,let us know what security profile settings you have configured, and share a supout.rif file with us, made after a connection attempt.
In another thread MT did write that next version would be 7.9I too am dying waiting for a LT release of v7.
ROUTE,OSPF,WARNING SSX0123-v2 { version: 2 router-id: 10.20.30.1 } backbone-v2 { 0.0.0.0 } interface { broadcast 10.107.***.***%vlan1030 } neighbor { router-id: 10.107.**.** state: Full } crypto sequence invalid
ROUTE,OSPF,WARNING SSX0123-v3 { version: 3 router-id: 10.20.20.1 } backbone-v3 { 0.0.0.0 } interface { broadcast fe80::****:34ff:fe0a:****%ether6 } corrupted auth trailer from fe80::****:b5f7:****:f8d7%*6
There are no reason for MT to keep working on 7.8.1, 7.8.2 etc without adding any new functionality, just fix bugsI can fully understand why MT doesn't release LT version of v7. This forum is full of reports of bugs, missing functionality and what not.
Of course the reason not do do that it that it means extra work, to backport all fixes to an older version without introducing new functions and bugs.There are no reason for MT to keep working on 7.8.1, 7.8.2 etc without adding any new functionality, just fix bugsI can fully understand why MT doesn't release LT version of v7. This forum is full of reports of bugs, missing functionality and what not.
I think what they lack is not a developer but a core developer. So they can't fix the core routing problem but add new features over and over again.Of course the reason not do do that it that it means extra work, to backport all fixes to an older version without introducing new functions and bugs.
There are no reason for MT to keep working on 7.8.1, 7.8.2 etc without adding any new functionality, just fix bugs
That requires extra developers, and they already are short on those.
Can I recommend you move to the testing branch for your ax2, it'll require a little more involvement but you will be able to push issues regarding the new wifi6 devices and instead of seeing this on the stable branch, the team producing the testing releases will be aware of wifi degradation for wifi6 devices, which is affecting new products.With the release of versions 7.7, but also with version 7.8, the wifi signal strength dropped dramatically by approximately 15-20% compared to version 7.6, both for the 2.4 band and for the 5Ghz band. I use hap ax2.
SPOT ON.I do need a rock solid reliable OS that runs PPPoE (client and server) and doesn't break SFP modules that previously worked. Routing protocols matter (it's a router!), firewall matters, and tunnels matter. Beyond that I'd be thrilled if everything else was added through separate packages like in the old days. I understand why people want and use these other packages, and I have no complaint against them being developed and supported, but I can't even disable wireguard, yet I'd rather it didn't even exist on my devices so that I can run my devices as lean and clean as possible without unnecessary packages that aren't going to be utilized and may or may not introduce stability bugs or vulnerabilities in the platform. Lastly, I REALLY don't want to have important updates and core functionality bug fixes delayed or unnecessary updates released because of extraneous features that simply don't apply to the core functionality of routing and firewalling.
@Normis & Team, PLEASE focus efforts first and foremost on making the core routing, firewalling, and tunnel capabilities of RouterOS, as well as SFP and interface compatibility and reliability and provide that in a LT release as soon as possible. It feels like you're close, but it's not quite there yet. Once any/all bugs are worked out in the core functions, the remainder of the extraneous features can be worked on in the dev and stable trees while those of us that just need our devices to route & switch can do so without fear.
your 3 mentioned features are not only almost but only introduced with v7@actck
you have 2 posts and you are such clever....I do welcome new feature, I have only few devices feom MT but I laready use QOS CAKE, ZEROTIER,WIREGUARD almost all new features introduced in v7. And it is pretty stable on my setup. I do understand it is problem for big ISP that some features are not sorted yet but they can use v6. Just install version 6 and wait for long term version 7.
But I'm not the first to notice these issues related to the decrease in wifi signal once with the upgrade to 7.7 and 7.8. No fix, no solution. I repeat, I don't even have advanced knowledge in this field....Can I recommend you move to the testing branch for your ax2, it'll require a little more involvement but you will be able to push issues regarding the new wifi6 devices and instead of seeing this on the stable branch, the team producing the testing releases will be aware of wifi degradation for wifi6 devices, which is affecting new products.With the release of versions 7.7, but also with version 7.8, the wifi signal strength dropped dramatically by approximately 15-20% compared to version 7.6, both for the 2.4 band and for the 5Ghz band. I use hap ax2.
So as soon as the new testing release is out, test, compare to 7.6, if issues post in the testing topic, advise why you are going back to 7.6 if wifi degradation is still an issue.
I'm having the same problem here, on an RB4011. After updating to 7.8, the system has a kernel error and restarts before completing 5 minutes of uptime. I have about 150 ovpn connections.The OVPN service is unstable, and it will cause a Kernel crashes after 2,3 hours of uptime.
SUP-96432
could you send wi-fi settings for aх2 ?mine 5Ghz is working on AX2 and even AX3....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhI2dNzRpHY
I'm having the same problem here, on an RB4011. After updating to 7.8, the system has a kernel error and restarts before completing 5 minutes of uptime. I have about 150 ovpn connections.
Broke my Pihole as well, so I deleted old container and this is what I did to get it back up:This update broke my containers because disk1 was automatically renamed to usb1-part1 for some reason, and then disk1 was automatically re-added, so the update corrupted all the paths.
When I try to change the container root dir, I just the error "Couldn't change Container - Can't change root directory. (6).
How do I fix the bug?
What happens if you try to downgrade it using this procedure?and "...Just install version 6 and wait..." is not suitable for recent devices. i do not know if you knew, but also some v6/v7 devices are not able to run v6 if they are shipped and FACTORY INSTALLED with v7! (i got 3 CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS which i cannot operate with v6 because of that very reason!!)
and i hope the 3 ccr1072 which i am still waiting for are able/eligible to run with v6!)
host livingcam.not.luminal.org 10.0.1.1
Using domain server:
Name: 10.0.1.1
Address: 10.0.1.1#53
Aliases:
livingcam.not.luminal.org has address 10.0.3.106
Host livingcam.not.luminal.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host livingcam.not.luminal.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
host livingcam.not.luminal.org 10.0.1.1
Using domain server:
Name: 10.0.1.1
Address: 10.0.1.1#53
Aliases:
livingcam.not.luminal.org has address 10.0.3.106
You can rename the disks (change the name of the slot)This update broke my containers because disk1 was automatically renamed to usb1-part1 for some reason, and then disk1 was automatically re-added, so the update corrupted all the paths.
Can't confirm. My RB4011iGS+ r2 is running fine von 7.8, including firmware.So it seems I was wrong. On latest firmware RB4011 starts randomly, sometimes it boots normally, sometimes it hangs. I bought serial cable ... just to see what is happening during boot.
(if you are lucky... RB4011 in netinstall shows "READY" and clicking install just shows "Sending offer..." and then nothing happens - it stays in READY state)
My recommendation is to stay away from this version if you have RB4011 rev2. I've bricked my device by upgrade. Do not upgrade internal firmware. ...I'm probably left with paperweight.
using netinstall on windoze or on linux?So it seems I was wrong. On latest firmware RB4011 starts randomly, sometimes it boots normally, sometimes it hangs. I bought serial cable ... just to see what is happening during boot.
(if you are lucky... RB4011 in netinstall shows "READY" and clicking install just shows "Sending offer..." and then nothing happens - it stays in READY state)
My recommendation is to stay away from this version if you have RB4011 rev2. I've bricked my device by upgrade. Do not upgrade internal firmware. ...I'm probably left with paperweight.
well ... thanks for that, i need to try that. did not think of looking to openWRT for mikrotik firmware downgrade honestly. thanks in advanceWhat happens if you try to downgrade it using this procedure?and "...Just install version 6 and wait..." is not suitable for recent devices. i do not know if you knew, but also some v6/v7 devices are not able to run v6 if they are shipped and FACTORY INSTALLED with v7! (i got 3 CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS which i cannot operate with v6 because of that very reason!!)
and i hope the 3 ccr1072 which i am still waiting for are able/eligible to run with v6!)
https://openwrt.org/toh/mikrotik/common ... g_routeros
Windoze. At this stage I do not care about config, the problem is that "netinstall" is not even starting, the etherboot port is blinking for like 3-4 seconds and then there is nothing (following official procedures, It was working in the past, using intermediate eth hub and stuff, tried multiple reset button combinations without luck).using netinstall on windoze or on linux?
since the linux netinstall is available i only use linux version anymore and i got the same response from 2 trainers too.
maybe try that one. (caution "-r" wipes config to defaults!)
good luck
I've tried :D (pressed reset without power, power up - wait with reset pushed, I've even waited 5 minutes once). I hope that with console cable I can see boot log or something. I have 5 mkt devices, did that in the past numerous times with success - this time its different.Keep pressing reset until it appears in netinstall.
Sorry I was not clear, I've ordered one, will have it in 1-2 days. Thanks all for replies and trying to help.Several posts above you wrote that you have a serial cable. Try entering the Netinstall mode from the RouterBOOT menu.
BGP in v7 simply isn't finished yet (and appears to be at a standstill). Achieving feature parity is apparently at a lower priority than introducing new features.BGP vpn4 still problem, cust bgp path did not advertised to other PEs.
Please check mikrotik this problem did not happen in v6.
hi sergejs.We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.
pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8?
VPRN ?? if you fix VPRN i ll drink beer until fall under table.We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.
pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8?
RouterBOOT backup booter 6.45.9
RB4011iGS+
CPU frequency: 1400 MHz
Memory size: 1024 MiB
NAND size: 512 MiB
Press any key within 2 seconds to enter setup..
loading kernel... kernel not found or data is corrupted
Ethernet link absent...
trying bootp protocol.................. OK
Got IP address: 192.168.88.5
resolved mac address 68:05:CA:XX:XX:XX
transfer started .......................................... transfer ok, time=3.39s
setting up elf image... OK
jumping to kernel code
@uCZBpmK6pwoZg7LRmikrotik transmit self instead of learned NEXT_HOP value and ignore propagate setting for vrf route. Due to it VPRN completely broken
They are aware of the issue with BFD. Unfortunately there is apparently some situation that keeps them from fixing such issues.MT is aware of the issue with RR
We have successfully upgraded everything to ROS v7.8 without issues, where there was no need for BFD.We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.
this is not the place for thisWhat's the best way to monitor for issues with l3hw? Are there any counters I could watch or some other performance metrics?
After a long break I've replaced an aging EdgeRouter 4 (behaving flawlessly save for lack of updates) with CCR2116 on 7.8 and started getting complaints of intermittent poor forwarding performance from clients. Mostly observed with RTP or WebRTC traffic. Connections slow down, with dropped packets and packet delays over 1000ms judging by ICMP echo. Anecdotally, getting a new DHCP lease or turning l3hw off and on fixes the issue, but I want to have a better metric, something specific I can monitor. Clients roam between different APs within same subnet if that makes any difference.
Well, as I had written about my gripes with BGP anyway, here I paste it again for your information. I hope you can fix them in 7.9.We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.
pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8?
The "Right ting (tm)" - you should have static blackhole route for your prefix(es) in route table. And magic knob "synchronize" not need at all.- in v6 the "bgp networks" have a "synchronize" option. without that, the prefix will be announced even when the route is not present. v7 no longer has this option, it will advertise ONLY prefixes that actually exist in the routing table. so any "bgp networks" in v6 that don't have synchronize=yes will have the potential to fail in v7.
Recently I found that exact behavior between a Wi-Fi 6 card from Intel and a Wi-Fi 6 AP from Ubiquity.after upgrading my hAP ax^2 from 7.8rc3 to 7.8 one of my laptop has started reconnecting every second to WiFi when AX band is on. After downgrading notebook WiFi adapter to AC band it connects fine.
It seems like a bug in the firmware, Mikrotik please take a look.
that is a complete other kind of function/implementation of route (re)destribution and surely not always a good idea to setup your routing exchangeThe "Right ting (tm)" - you should have static blackhole route for your prefix(es) in route table. And magic knob "synchronize" not need at all.- in v6 the "bgp networks" have a "synchronize" option. without that, the prefix will be announced even when the route is not present. v7 no longer has this option, it will advertise ONLY prefixes that actually exist in the routing table. so any "bgp networks" in v6 that don't have synchronize=yes will have the potential to fail in v7.
Even when that is a solution (in my case it is a little more complicated), it still is a thing to watch out for when upgrading a router using BGP from v6 to v7.The "Right ting (tm)" - you should have static blackhole route for your prefix(es) in route table. And magic knob "synchronize" not need at all.- in v6 the "bgp networks" have a "synchronize" option. without that, the prefix will be announced even when the route is not present. v7 no longer has this option, it will advertise ONLY prefixes that actually exist in the routing table. so any "bgp networks" in v6 that don't have synchronize=yes will have the potential to fail in v7.
[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s
Columns: MAC-ADDRESS, AC-NAME
MAC-ADDRESS AC-NAME
DC:77:4C:XX:XX:XX FBG0PINS-PuNas02
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
Thanks for the idea. I've just installed the latest driver from the official source, but the issue is still persists. I'm facing constant reconnections :(Recently I found that exact behavior between a Wi-Fi 6 card from Intel and a Wi-Fi 6 AP from Ubiquity.after upgrading my hAP ax^2 from 7.8rc3 to 7.8 one of my laptop has started reconnecting every second to WiFi when AX band is on. After downgrading notebook WiFi adapter to AC band it connects fine.
It seems like a bug in the firmware, Mikrotik please take a look.
Please don't jump to conclusions as probably there's a broader problem at stake...
I would start by suggesting that you download and install the latest drivers available on the Intel website for your card.
I will also do that for my setup (as previously I work around the issue like you did)...
setting the frequency to 5220 helped me
I meant to use blackholes to publish prefixes in BGP.I might have misunderstood the point but what "scheme" are you referring to?
Let we see together what he s promised in 7.9We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.
pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8?
The change that others are complaining about now, was made exactly to prevent the problem that you had!I've this problem since v7.7 --> viewtopic.php?t=192427&start=300#p982228.
No follow up or update from Mikrotik staff. I guess either i don't know what i'm doing or they don't ... :-)
Instead of "scanning the devices at boot and assigning them numbered names" like disk1 usb1 etc, now disks get fixed "slot" names that you can assign yourself.
"recvd P_DATA packet, dropping"..
19:36:40.916 -- Connected via tun
19:36:40.916 -- EVENT: CONNECTED info=blabla@blabla.zzzzz:1194 (x.x.x.x) via /UDPv4 on tun/192.168.222.14/ gw=[192.168.222.13/]'
19:36:40.949 -- TUN write exception: write_some: Invalid argument
19:36:46.149 -- Session invalidated: KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT
19:36:46.151 -- Client terminated, restarting in 2000 ms...
19:36:48.152 -- EVENT: RECONNECTING
/interface ovpn-server server
set auth=sha256,sha512 certificate=zzzzz.ovpn.crt_0 cipher=aes256-cbc default-profile=OVPN_Server enabled=yes [b]keepalive-timeout=10[/b] max-mtu=1300 protocol=udp \
require-client-certificate=yes tls-version=only-1.2
Wireguard has been rock solid so far for me on Mikrotik - Would suggest to give it a try!OVPN stability is horrible for me as well...
would not consider it rock solid but WAY BETTER than OVPN implementationWireguard has been rock solid so far for me on Mikrotik - Would suggest to give it a try!OVPN stability is horrible for me as well...
That is often a useless suggestion. When people have setup a specific VPN server and have configured several clients to use it, they usually cannot simply switch to another one.Wireguard has been rock solid so far for me on Mikrotik - Would suggest to give it a try!OVPN stability is horrible for me as well...
/disk> print
Flags: E, B - BLOCK-DEVICE; M, F - FORMATTING
Columns: SLOT, MODEL, SERIAL, INTERFACE, SIZE, FREE
# SLOT MODEL SERIAL INTERFACE SIZE FREE
0 BM Ght SanDisk Ultra Fit 4xxx USB 2.10 480Mbps 15 376 318 464 15 051 894 784
1 E usb1 USB 3.00 5000Mbps
Go to terminal window. Type:
/disk
see the number under # for your disk. type:
set 0 slot=MTL7
(assuming line 0 is the one you want to change)
ppp profile add
ppp profile set *0
That assumption is wrong. You would have to change your container configuration (one time) to use Ght instead of usb1. See above.Thank you for the information.
So, i have set usb2 with a slot name Ght assuming the system will have no choice but to stick with usb1 and hence I can keep using usb1 in the container configuration.
Same on RB5009.PPPoE scan is now broken, it used to be working on version 7.7. It looks like there is a bug in version 7.8
I am using hAP ac^3
version 7.7:Code: Select all[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s Columns: MAC-ADDRESS, AC-NAME MAC-ADDRESS AC-NAME DC:77:4C:XX:XX:XX FBG0PINS-PuNas02 -- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
version 7.8:Code: Select all[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s -- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
Your placement is perfect. I think everyone has their needs. I tested Wireguard and it really is working very well, it's something I plan to implement for some types of cases, but I can't change all the clients because of a version error, it would be too radical. I think each case is different. For example, I work with OVPN with TCP for monitoring and accessing Asterisk VOIP switches that are installed in my clients, this for at least 12 years. As the switches are behind routers and firewalls, I use OVPN as a solution to access them. We know that TCP is a much more reliable protocol than UDP, as it guarantees data delivery and integrity, so for this type of situation where devices need to be monitored, OVPN is excellent.That is often a useless suggestion. When people have setup a specific VPN server and have configured several clients to use it, they usually cannot simply switch to another one.
Wireguard has been rock solid so far for me on Mikrotik - Would suggest to give it a try!
There appears to be an issue in 7.8 and that should be fixed, not by simply waving people off to another service.
How is this not a place for bug report for firmware 7.8? Once I turned off L3HW, the issue never came back. If I wanted to process route the packets, I would have purchased a server, not a router with built in ASIC. This bug is not any less significant than any other bugs, and is definitely not any less significant than 'missing features' which are discussed here at length.this is not the place for this
create a separate topic about your situation providing relevant info
Doesnt't work for meGo to terminal window. Type:
/disk
see the number under # for your disk. type:
set 0 slot=MTL7
(assuming line 0 is the one you want to change)
[admin@RB1100AHX4-Dude] /disk> print
Flags: B - BLOCK-DEVICE; M, F - FORMATTING; p - PARTITION
Columns: SLOT, MODEL, SERIAL, INTERFACE, SIZE, FREE, FS
# SLOT MODEL SERIAL INTERFACE SIZE FREE FS
0 B sata1 FORESEE 64GB SSD H26956J002615 SATA 6.0 Gbps 64 023 257 088
1 BMp sata1-part1 @512-64'023'257'088 64 023 256 576 56 235 614 208 ext4
[admin@RB1100AHX4-Dude] /disk> set 1 slot=SSD
failure: partition table modification only possible for guid-partition-table, format/wipe disk first
[admin@RB1100AHX4-Dude] /disk>
I have the same problem. 7.8 kills 751U-2HnDRB751U-2Hn running 7.7. Tried to upgrade twice. Same result.
I recommend to do "/export show-senssitive file=config" and download the config.rsc file, then netinstall version 7.8 without config and upload and import your config again.How can I solve this?
That will make for some ugly remote-folder namesI think it should be possible to set the slot for disk 0 to SSD and then disk 1 will become SSD-part1.
/disk/add slot=FOLDERNAME type=symlink destination=/sata-x-part-0-ugly-name
downgrade to a firmware where it works?Is there any ETA for a new version that fixes all these OVPN problems? I depend a lot on them and, right now, it's unusable, the routers are constantly overloaded and rebooting. I think this is a really important bug that should have been addressed right away...
Are you using Spanning Tree protocol on the bridge?I have problem with:
board-name: RB1100AHx4...
PCAP shows the PPPoE PADO responses being received but if they have a null/empty Service-Name they are ignored/not shown.PPPoE scan appears to be broken after upgrading from 7.7 stable to 7.8 stable.
version 7.7 StableCode: Select all[admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1 duration=10s Columns: MAC-ADDRESS, AC-NAME MAC-ADDRESS AC-NAME 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE lab-core02 [admin@lab-cpe] >
version 7.8 Stable
Left it scanning for 5 minutes and still got nothing.Code: Select all[admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1 duration=10s [admin@lab-cpe] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface=ether1 -- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
Downgrading to 7.7 Stable made PPPoE scan work again.
Yes, RSTPAre you using Spanning Tree protocol on the bridge?I have problem with:
board-name: RB1100AHx4...
Thx. a lot!I recommend to do "/export show-senssitive file=config" and download the config.rsc file, then netinstall version 7.8 without config and upload and import your config again.How can I solve this?
It is easiest when you can connect via MAC address, so prepare to have winbox on a machine on the LAN and check first if you can connect via MAC address.
Then after the netinstall, try a /export in the terminal to see if the config really is empty and remove any config that is there (e.g. dhcp client) before doing the import.
what do you even mean by "too much time"? 7.8 [stable] is not even a MONTH OLD ... next RC release might bring BGP/OSPF improvements and those seem to take some dev time, you know ... that stuff which dynamically should work in sub-second margins and also shall be stable and reliable.Hi,
Im just wondering why introducing 7.9 take too much time? :) Isnit gonna be revolutionary build? :) What you wish for?
I would like to see: seamless roaming including 800.11v, compatible samba with Hikvision cameras, thats all :)
I think he might just be talking about the fact that it's usually only a couple of days and there is a new version testing build to look at some of the upcoming changes. Obviously 7.9 is going to be a month or more to release. For my network 7.8 is MUCH more stable, hoping they take some time and get 7.9 all polished so I can sleep a little better at night :)what do you even mean by "too much time"? 7.8 [stable] is not even a MONTH OLD ... next RC release might bring BGP/OSPF improvements and those seem to take some dev time, you know ... that stuff which dynamically should work in sub-second margins and also shall be stable and reliable.Hi,
Im just wondering why introducing 7.9 take too much time? :) Isnit gonna be revolutionary build? :) What you wish for?
I would like to see: seamless roaming including 800.11v, compatible samba with Hikvision cameras, thats all :)
(seamless) roaming in wifi also is not a "easy peasy simple task" (as quite nothing is, in wireless!)
and a samba server surely is not a CORE FEATURE of a router i reckon.
16:46:27 dot1x,debug s ether4 "3C:2C:30:DE:99:50" re-authorized with username:user1@ad.redacted.com
16:46:27 dot1x,debug s ether2 "0C:37:96:94:43:3C" re-authorized with username:user2@ad.redacted.com
16:46:28 dot1x,debug s ether9 "D8:CB:8A:51:6A:85" re-authorized with username:user3@ad.redacted.com
16:46:29 dot1x,debug s ether20 "38:60:77:2F:70:6D" re-authorized with username:user4@ad.redacted.com
16:46:45 dot1x,debug s ether9 "D8:CB:8A:51:6A:85" re-authorized with username:user3@ad.redacted.com
16:46:45 dot1x,debug s ether4 "3C:2C:30:DE:99:50" re-authorized with username:user1@ad.redacted.com
16:46:45 dot1x,debug s ether2 "0C:37:96:94:43:3C" re-authorized with username:user2@ad.redacted.com
16:46:46 dot1x,debug s ether20 "38:60:77:2F:70:6D" re-authorized with username:user4@ad.redacted.com
16:47:04 interface,info ether11 link down
16:47:04 dot1x,debug s ether11 BLOCK
16:47:06 interface,info ether11 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
16:47:21 dot1x,debug s ether11 "" fallback to mac-auth
16:47:21 dot1x,debug s ether11 "" mac-auth start: 00:1C:2A:02:F6:C5
16:47:21 dot1x,debug s ether11 "00:1C:2A:02:F6:C5" add to vlan 1
16:47:21 dot1x,debug s ether11 "00:1C:2A:02:F6:C5" authorized
16:47:21 dot1x,debug s ether11 UNBLOCK
16:47:45 dot1x,debug s ether4 BLOCK
16:47:45 dot1x,debug s ether2 BLOCK
16:47:45 dot1x,debug s ether9 BLOCK
16:47:46 dot1x,debug s ether20 BLOCK
Same for me, PPPoE scan broken, but on hAP ax3.PPPoE scan is now broken, it used to be working on version 7.7. It looks like there is a bug in version 7.8
I am using hAP ac^3
version 7.7:Code: Select all[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s Columns: MAC-ADDRESS, AC-NAME MAC-ADDRESS AC-NAME DC:77:4C:XX:XX:XX FBG0PINS-PuNas02 -- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
version 7.8:Code: Select all[admin@Router] > interface pppoe-client/scan interface="W1 WAN" duration=20s -- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
not at the present 7.8Could someone please kindly let me know if there will be x86 LCD support in v7.8+? This module was available in version 6.x.
You can set up a samba server by using a container...Hi,
Im just wondering why introducing 7.9 take too much time? :) Isnit gonna be revolutionary build? :) What you wish for?
I would like to see: seamless roaming including 800.11v, compatible samba with Hikvision cameras, thats all :)
I wish MT do the samba server Hikvision compatible. MT claims that Hikvision is using some strange settings but with others NAS the Hikvision cameras are working. Which conteiner do you mean? Do you have already any in use?You can set up a samba server by using a container...Hi,
Im just wondering why introducing 7.9 take too much time? :) Isnit gonna be revolutionary build? :) What you wish for?
I would like to see: seamless roaming including 800.11v, compatible samba with Hikvision cameras, thats all :)
maybe checkout this oneI wish MT do the samba server Hikvision compatible. MT claims that Hikvision is using some strange settings but with others NAS the Hikvision cameras are working. Which conteiner do you mean? Do you have already any in use?
You can set up a samba server by using a container...
This does not seem to work on AX3 ?*) wifiwave2 - enabled additional channels in UNII-3 and UNII-4 bands for Europe and USA on hAP ax^2, hAP ax^3 and Chateau ax;
/interface/wifiwave2/radio print detail
0 L radio-mac=AB:CD:EF:GH:IJ:KL phy-id=0 tx-chains=0,1 rx-chains=0,1
bands=5ghz-a:20mhz,5ghz-n:20mhz,20/40mhz,5ghz-ac:20mhz,20/40mhz,20/40/80mhz,
5ghz-ax:20mhz,20/40mhz,20/40/80mhz
ciphers=tkip,ccmp,gcmp,ccmp-256,gcmp-256,cmac,gmac,cmac-256,gmac-256
countries=all 5g-channels=5180,5200,5220,5240,5260,5280,5300,5320,5500,5520,
5540,5560,5580,5600,5620,5640,5660,5680,5700,5720,5745,5765,5785,5805,
5825
max-vlans=128 max-interfaces=16 max-station-interfaces=3 max-peers=512
interface=wifi1
Response received.This does not seem to work on AX3 ?*) wifiwave2 - enabled additional channels in UNII-3 and UNII-4 bands for Europe and USA on hAP ax^2, hAP ax^3 and Chateau ax;
The moment I want to use any UNII-4 frequency, wifi interface shows red message and no supported channels.
No problems with UNII-3 frequencies.
Also, when using /interface/wifiwave2/radio print detail I only get a list up til UNII-3 frequencies. Nothing UNII-4.
...
SUP-111009 created.