MikroTik

If money is no object (must be nice), go big.  We have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+ that serves about 2000 customers, runs nearly 800 megs during peak time and the CPU does not work hard at all!  In fact, the other day we were the victim in a massive DOS attack and the router was running about 30% on the cpu at the time.

But, if you describe in more detail what you plan to do, an appropriate router could be easier to recommend.

It´s a big luxury villa with a lot of security-cams, door stations, KNX-lightning, video streaming and so on... I need a robust and decent router.
I think it´s a good way to do "overkill" in this case?

If money is no object (must be nice), go big.  We have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+ that serves about 2000 customers, runs nearly 800 megs during peak time and the CPU does not work hard at all!  In fact, the other day we were the victim in a massive DOS attack and the router was running about 30% on the cpu at the time.

But, if you describe in more detail what you plan to do, an appropriate router could be easier to recommend.

If money is no object (must be nice), go big.  We have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+ that serves about 2000 customers, runs nearly 800 megs during peak time and the CPU does not work hard at all!  In fact, the other day we were the victim in a massive DOS attack and the router was running about 30% on the cpu at the time.

But, if you describe in more detail what you plan to do, an appropriate router could be easier to recommend.

I have a CCR1009 too, it work great but flash too small (80mb free) for storing database.
Take 1016 or higher if you want to using usermanager.

even the mighty ccr1072 have only 128mb of nand, the rb1100ahx2 too

even the mighty ccr1072 have only 128mb of nand, the rb1100ahx2 too

Gx2 has 512MB.

If money is no object (must be nice), go big.  We have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+ that serves about 2000 customers, runs nearly 800 megs during peak time and the CPU does not work hard at all!  In fact, the other day we were the victim in a massive DOS attack and the router was running about 30% on the cpu at the time.

But, if you describe in more detail what you plan to do, an appropriate router could be easier to recommend.

I have a CCR1009 too, it work great but flash too small (80mb free) for storing database.
Take 1016 or higher if you want to using usermanager.

is not possible to move that database to micro sd??

even the mighty ccr1072 have only 128mb of nand, the rb1100ahx2 too

even the mighty ccr1072 have only 128mb of nand, the rb1100ahx2 too

I tried some microsd but IO very slow.

An SD card capable of 15 MB/s might not guarantee 10 MB/s sustained for video if it's not Class 10.

You don't need to limit yourself to Class 10. You can look for UHS.

even the mighty ccr1072 have only 128mb of nand, the rb1100ahx2 too

I tried some microsd but IO very slow.

Which microSD? You see, there's 2 things we must pay attention to:
1) A "Class10" microSD has a guaranteed minimum speed of 10MB/s. But it doesn't say anything about the effective speed. A SD capable of 15MB/s is class10 - but a capable of 50MB/s is class10 too.
2) Wich microSD you used? Maybe it's a slow one.

Here You can see what I mean:
http://www.kingston.com/us/flash/microsd_cards

Micro SD not good for random write, I tried Apacer 16G class10, Transcend 16G class10, Sandisk 4G class 4
They are running fine with fat32, but some time it's lost all database and require to format after power outage
Then I tried ext3, I/O very low, write delay 1000 ~ 10000ms and timeout ~ 5%

Micro SD not good for random write, I tried Apacer 16G class10, Transcend 16G class10, Sandisk 4G class 4
They are running fine with fat32, but some time it's lost all database and require to format after power outage
Then I tried ext3, I/O very low, write delay 1000 ~ 10000ms and timeout ~ 5%

fat32 has no protection whatsoever against file system corruption. ext3 is journaled, so much better than fat32 on this point. But it can be a little... slow. Especially when updating the journal. The class4 sd will be too slow. Are You sure the other two are fast? Are them able to do more than, let's say, 40MB/s?

I tried some microsd but IO very slow.

Which microSD? You see, there's 2 things we must pay attention to:
1) A "Class10" microSD has a guaranteed minimum speed of 10MB/s. But it doesn't say anything about the effective speed. A SD capable of 15MB/s is class10 - but a capable of 50MB/s is class10 too.
2) Wich microSD you used? Maybe it's a slow one.

Here You can see what I mean:
http://www.kingston.com/us/flash/microsd_cards

Micro SD not good for random write, I tried Apacer 16G class10, Transcend 16G class10, Sandisk 4G class 4
They are running fine with fat32, but some time it's lost all database and require to format after power outage
Then I tried ext3, I/O very low, write delay 1000 ~ 10000ms and timeout ~ 5%

Which microSD? You see, there's 2 things we must pay attention to:
1) A "Class10" microSD has a guaranteed minimum speed of 10MB/s. But it doesn't say anything about the effective speed. A SD capable of 15MB/s is class10 - but a capable of 50MB/s is class10 too.
2) Wich microSD you used? Maybe it's a slow one.

Here You can see what I mean:
http://www.kingston.com/us/flash/microsd_cards

Micro SD not good for random write, I tried Apacer 16G class10, Transcend 16G class10, Sandisk 4G class 4
They are running fine with fat32, but some time it's lost all database and require to format after power outage
Then I tried ext3, I/O very low, write delay 1000 ~ 10000ms and timeout ~ 5%

normal micro sd is not intended for that use
try industrial micro sd

https://www.sandisk.com/oem-design/indu ... rial-cards

http://panasonic.net/avc/sdcard/industr ... html#micro

Guys i am running my wifi network with x86 routeros for 2 years and decided to move to CCR1009-x but i need your advice in 2 things
- CCR1009 came with microsd card slot and microUSB type AB slot, which one of those u suggest me to move user manager too, forgive me for such a basic question cause in x86 none of this info matters for the huge hdd space available

- the second question and i would appreciate your opinions before doing that, can i use microUSB AB to attach "1 TB External Hdd storage" with a lot of movies stored inside to let my clients watch them offline instead of eating the ISP bandwidth with downloading movies but the microUSB AB which i think it's of USB 2.0 type not 3.0 so i don't know will the speed rate of data throughput be enough so i take a step forward and start doing that what do you think guys

I tested with Samsung microSD Evo and Pro, work very well.
Hotspot ~ 400 active clients, radius interim update 5 mins

stick to UHS-I (UHS-II feats(same to UFS, XQD, which is ~ basically propriatery fork/derrivation of UHS-II))imply extra-contacts and electrial support, underlying, which is most devices lacking aswell as UHS-I support itself, but UHS-I label atleast mean that controller within card - wouldn't be so weak as it usually are. and of course UHS-I class 1 are slower than UHS-I Class 3.
after you sorted that out - you may(and would cuz, its imply 20-30x more flash storage and sometimes about 2.5x real/sustained speed benefits) go for cards/storage with "SLC" flash within.
usually those labeled with "Industral" in name - had SLC memory within. in NA for example brand "Swissbit" was popular, in Europe that was Apacer in Japan i saw lot of Pansonics and some Micron-branded cards(weird, that would be ODM product).

stick to UHS-I (UHS-II feats(same to UFS, XQD, which is ~ basically propriatery fork/derrivation of UHS-II))imply extra-contacts and electrial support, underlying, which is most devices lacking aswell as UHS-I support itself, but UHS-I label atleast mean that controller within card - wouldn't be so weak as it usually are. and of course UHS-I class 1 are slower than UHS-I Class 3.
after you sorted that out - you may(and would cuz, its imply 20-30x more flash storage and sometimes about 2.5x real/sustained speed benefits) go for cards/storage with "SLC" flash within.
usually those labeled with "Industral" in name - had SLC memory within. in NA for example brand "Swissbit" was popular, in Europe that was Apacer in Japan i saw lot of Pansonics and some Micron-branded cards(weird, that would be ODM product).

Yes thank you Zorro i will go with Sandisk Ultra UHS-I class 10 it's been used by many hi speed data rate devices and working well, maybe i won't need that high speed rate for my needs it will be for usermanager anyway thank you for the detailed info

I use ssd SLC instead of MLC in my x86 server (debian). There is only one problem it does not support the TRIM.
http://www.ebay.de/itm/KingSpec-SSD-1-8 ... Sw8d9Uv7Ez