When mikrotik releasing the wireguard? All platform released that !!!!!

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page= ... buts-macOS

Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk

I think you did not read until the end

On the Linux kernel front for the long-awaited mainlining of the WireGuard kernel bits, there is unfortunately nothing new to report. It doesn't look like WireGuard will be merged for Linux 5.1 as the code has yet to be staged in net-next. When I asked Donenfeld about it on Saturday, he said he expects to have a new revision of those patches available for review soon and that work is happening behind the scenes.

quoting OP:

All platform released that !!!!!

vs
quoting article which OP linked:

But sadly on the Linux front, the kernel bits still have yet to be mainlined.

Windows client is still on its way but is taking a while due to writing a new TUN driver for Windows 7 and newer.

lets summarize it:

• Specs are subject to change and whole code is in experimental stage (source: https://www.wireguard.com/#work-in-progress )
• Author of WireGuard released client for iOS and macOS only. (minor mobile and desktop platforms)
• There is no stable client for windows (major desktop platform)
• There is no stable client for linux (major mobile and server platform)
• All clients are so far developed by author of WireGuard, not by platform developers itself so there is no native implementation in any of systems.
• In reality it is a one-man project which means if Jason gets bored, the project is dead.
• Jason even owns a trademark on logo and name! That is so typical for "start free, become paid" platforms...

So in the end, you want mikrotik staff to implement a platform, which is officially considered to be in experimental stage, therefore will be outdated within couple of weeks or months (and will require developers attention to fix it again), It can bring hidden fees at any single time due to trademarked name or can disappear anytime if author decides to do something else?

I really like all things promised by wireguard but we really don't need another unstable attempt for tunnel, which will deplete resources of developers even more. We didn't even got an OpenVPN over UTP yet. EoIP crashes whenever it transmits an STP frame. ROMON is not stable when it runs through VPLS or EoIP on CHR, bridged VLANs don't really work on CHR, Whole CCR1072 will freeze in when src-nat runs out of available ports... I could go on but I think you already got my point - I don't think we should ask for another unstable technology.

We didn't even got an OpenVPN over UTP yet.

That's not true! I personally used MikroTik's OpenVPN over UTP...

... at least Cat 5E and Cat6, also S/FTP and possibly others, various 802.11something, even 10BASE2 coax, I think. And yes, I know it's childish joke.

But on topic, once WireGuard makes in into Linux kernel, most of your concerns should go away. As I understand it, lot of people like it, so it won't die. And they won't let it in if it's not under GPL.

Just because it isn't mainlined doesn't mean it isn't available. I've been using it in production for months via DKMS and I'm very happy with it. There are open source Windows clients available, performance is great and setup is so refreshingly easy compared to something like IPSec. And it's actually built to only use secure crypto, unlike many options in Mikrotik which allow (or even require for HW accel) deprecated or obsolete ciphers.

That's not true! I personally used MikroTik's OpenVPN over UTP...

... at least Cat 5E and Cat6, also S/FTP and possibly others, various 802.11something, even 10BASE2 coax, I think. And yes, I know it's childish joke.

You owe me 15 minutes of my life! I was looking for post from Normis where he confirmed there is no plan for such feature.
And of course, only after that I read your little text...

@vecernik87: Sorry. But you should be looking for this much more interesting post.

I knew it! It will happen!
... and then the rest of bugs I mentioned plzzzz

I knew it! It will happen!
... and then the rest of bugs I mentioned plzzzz

Its a promise for your grand children. 6.43.13, 6.43.14, 6.43.15.................................... 6.43.aa, 6.43.ab, 6.43.ac...........................................
6.44.1, ........6.44.aa
6.45.1,...........6.45.aa
6.001.1, ..................6.001.aa
6.999.1................6.999.aa....................6.999.aaa..........................6.999.aaaa
zzzzzzzzz 15 minutes......... more like 15 years LOL.

We use Veeam backup solution at work and today's newsletter was pointing to the following blog article. You will learn, why Veeam has switched to WireGuard. Seems like days of OpenVPN are over in maybe not so distant future ....

https://www.veeam.com/blog/veeam-pn-v2-wireguard.html

As of today WireGuard is part of the Linux Kernel:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke ... 9d2857adfd
This should open the road for MikrotTik to easily integrate WireGuard into RouterOS.
Don't expect this to happen tomorrow.

As of today, it was released into Linux 5.6 kernel to the general public.

As of today (and a lot of days before) MikroTik is using the long term supported kernel (4.x) for Ros7. So it wil take a while.

Also highly interested in support for WireGuard
Kind regards,
Philippe.

Any news about wireguard?

Internal builds with wireguard support are rumored to exist.
Search the v7 section for details.

wait for wireguard

can anyone please help me to configuring wireguard

i setup peer and wg interface
but traffic cant go throw the tunnel

can anyone please help me to configuring wireguard

i setup peer and wg interface
but traffic cant go throw the tunnel

There is a good tutorial here from Rick Frey

https://rickfreyconsulting.com/wireguard/

what are you talking about................. if its a beta version you are in the wrong forum bud.
Try here............
viewforum.php?f=1

Mikrotik did not put out any kind of documentation on Wireguard except it was now in 7.1beta2.

Any documentation, even in a general topic, over Wireguard on a Miktotik is welcome.

Mikrotik did not put out any kind of documentation on Wireguard except it was now in 7.1beta2.

Any documentation, even in a general topic, over Wireguard on a Miktotik is welcome.

absolutely agree but the proper place to discuss wireguard and add that documentation is in the beta forums.
of course perhaps the nick should be anti-smatter - if you like chaos ;-P

smatter...I had to look that one up ;-)

smatter...I had to look that one up ;-)

jajajajaj perhaps I am dyslexic LOL. It just rolled better off the tongue then anti-msatter.
Of course I should have probably put it as anti-smarter :-) (anti-smatter is actually a complement)

I can't test it myself on the moment. I have installed the NordVPN client to see which port NordLynx (Wireguard version by NordVPN) and I got destination port UDP/51820 each time.

Could someone having a NordVPN account test if the 7.1beta2 can connect to NordVPN?

NordVPN uses more than just a plain WireGuard connection... This is to make sure an individual can not be associated with public traffic.
I can not give any more detail, though... I would be interested to make this work as well.

I just noticed the the manual by Rick Frey also states the 51820 UDP port and maybe he tried already.

Update: it appears that UDP/51820 is the default server port for Wireguard.

There is a good tutorial here from Rick Frey

I would not say that it is good...
There are a lot of questionable settings and it just does not work as described!

What manual are you speaking about? Can you give a link?

Sure eworm,

I don't want to stir up a can of worms ..... but
or perhaps more appropriate
>>"The other day I got out my can opener and was opening a can of worms when I thought, "What am I doing?!""

So I was going to send the link but thought better of it.........
Instead try this
www.google.com

I think you know what the entry arguments are.
Effing lazy worm.........

By the way......
To a worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish

What manual are you speaking about? Can you give a link?

not a manual, a short tutorial... just google Frey wireguard...

Is there an echo in here, or do you just like to hear yourself type @satman

So I was going to send the link but thought better of it.........
Instead try this
www.google.com

Are you nuts?

I know how to use google and I know the link given by IPANetEngineer.

My understanding was that the answer was about connecting to NordVPN via Wireguard, which is not handled by Rick Frey. That's why I asked, just wanted to be sure we discuss the same tutorial.

No reason to be rude, still you are. So... PLONK.

Manual, tutorial, guide, help doc, but dont worry there is no manual because satman1 said so. As if he/she is the keeper of knowledge of every document published on the net. My bad he may know Mr Frey personally and was told directly no there is no companion manual to my tutorial................ If you are even discussing a Frey manual, as there could be many other manuals about the topic by other parties............
Would you jump off a cliff if he.she told you too?

As for NordVPN, couldnt give two flying effs about a third party ripoff, oops I didnt mean to disparage the illegal use of your internet.

If Mikrotik had made a short manual then that could have avoided some irritations.

I would love to see that Mikrotik would update their opening post with information that came forward in posting in that thread. And not have the users find out on their selves where that additional information can be found if is present.

I found a manual, its really really short.
Author was leery of too many words.

https://wisp.net.au/forum/t/wireguard-v ... teros-7/61

Of course this has nothing to do with 3rd party crap but real vpns......
the kind where the end point and start point are under your control!! (and nothing in between)

Is there an echo in here, or do you just like to hear yourself type @satman

I would like to hear myself sometimes, but you are so loud...

Manual, tutorial, guide, help doc, but dont worry there is no manual because satman1 said so. As if he/she is the keeper of knowledge of every document published on the net. My bad he may know Mr Frey personally and was told directly no there is no companion manual to my tutorial................ If you are even discussing a Frey manual, as there could be many other manuals about the topic by other parties............
Would you jump off a cliff if he.she told you too?

As for NordVPN, couldnt give two flying effs about a third party ripoff, oops I didnt mean to disparage the illegal use of your internet.

skipped your pills again???

Thats what the problem is...... thanx!! ;-)

Does WireGuard require public IP (or port redirection) on both sides of the tunnel?

Can I use WiteGuard when one of the sides are behind the masquerade ?

viewforum.php?f=1

Here people are using it, perhaps they can test stuff for your requirements!!

One accessible side is enough. In theory, it could work even with both sides behind NAT and without port forwarding using this.