Page 1 of 1

MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:01 am
by alnet
Hi all!

I read several posts on the subject but none with solution apparently.

in several cities and different noise scenarios I see that the MantBox has some problem (we use 15 and 19) With optimal signals (between -50 to -70) we get really low CCQ (5 to 30%) so the throughput is collapses

We use Ap only AC, Nv2, for the moment at 20mhz because the performance is low. Are there ways to improve this?

The channel is at 0% of use and the snooper does not find stations either, so the 5300 channel is good. In 5800 it gets worse.

Any recommendation?

Image
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=5ghz-onlyac country=argentina \
    default-forwarding=no disabled=no disconnect-timeout=5s frequency=5300 \
    frequency-mode=superchannel hide-ssid=yes mode=ap-bridge nv2-cell-radius=10 \
    nv2-preshared-key=wpm18 radio-name=AP_PM_NORTE security-profile=SEGURIDAD \
    ssid=AP_PM_NORTE tdma-period-size=auto wds-default-bridge=bridge1 wds-mode=\
    dynamic wireless-protocol=nv2

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:15 am
by spacex
nv2 will return to normal when this is normal traffic

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 3:11 pm
by adilsemedo
Try to use N/AC band, and CW to 20/40 Mhz... if the radio detect free free air will use 40 Mhz or 20 if it´s noised.
band=5ghz-n/ac channel-width=20/40mhz-Ce \
And mANT must be shielded to better performance, the matterial is plastic type.

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 5:42 pm
by InoX
Isn't this your problem?
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=136002

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 7:24 pm
by honzam
Isn't this your problem?
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=136002
It is solved in 6.44

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:05 pm
by spacex
Test client to ap bandwith test check it.

Re: MantBox with sxtq and lhg ac - Bad CCQ

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:03 am
by InoX
Isn't this your problem?
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=136002
It is solved in 6.44
I know, does he?