Hello,

Can someone explain why this isn't working?
Tested on 6.44.1 and 6.45beta27.

try remove "" from string

@ADahi: That is not a solution. He clearly wants to work with string. If you do , then you got variable named "string" containing boolean value. There would be no point in converting it to boolean if it already is boolean.

@sin3vil:
If you really require it to work with "true" and "false" strings, you can use condition: I am not quite sure why your code does not work, but it seems that is really broken. I tried to use as parameter true/false, yes/no, 1/0 (both string or integer) and it does not produce any result. I can't figure out what possible input I need to use in order to get boolean result.
On the other hand, my proposed solution is actually shorter than your original idea - I guess no reason to use this conversion command at all.

Currently :tobool does not work at all. If you could list all values that you would like to convert then we can try to implement it.

Hello all,

Sorry, too a different path around this (string comparison instead of boolean) in my script and forgot about the thread.

I'm guessing any type of boolean operator should be translated by :tobool to true/false, so 1/0, yes/no, true/false.

Currently :tobool does not work at all. If you could list all values that you would like to convert then we can try to implement it.

Actually ran into this... I thought it did work, but :tobool is just extremely conservative in what it converts. I did think it dealt with -1 as "false" – that isn't true, it's true. Very confusing difficult bug in one of my script... Anyway, why I write here so it's a little more clear how this works to me – my help to others.

I think this is right about "bool type:
:tobool only takes a [:typeof $x]="num", where only/exactly a num type of 0 is false, all other num are true. Thus, negative numbers, including -1, are also true.

The tri-state return (e.g. "nil"), especially for "-1", is the biggest issue here IMO since it means :tobool is "unsafe". :while (true) :for :toip it also returns nil, instead of say 0.0.0.0, for an invalid IP value provided to :toip...

I think this is the simplest script to show what's happening: from the following: My vote is a more liberal approach be more useful, since ROS uses many "synthetic bools" like "yes"/"no" in particular today:

• if num, =<0 for false (thus >0 for true) - like the conditionals :while or :if
• "yes"/"no", as used in "disabled=yes" etc
• if string, "" means false, any text but "no" above is true
• if nothing, false
• if nil, nothing
• if :ip, :ip6, others, true if "something" valid.

I'm sure others heavily using scripts have functions mask some of the weird type artifacts – i.e. looking at [:nothing], but see nil. Now I did learn [:tobool "1"] is one easy way to assign nil...