MikroTik

Hello, are you working on MC-LAG for CRS3xx in RouterOS 7 ?

Hello, are you working on MC-LAG for CRS3xx in RouterOS 7 ?

+ ERPS

MC-LAG is a "must have" for CRS3xx I really hope Mikrotik add it soon.


ERPS is on the roadmap AFAIK....

Hello, are you working on MC-LAG for CRS3xx in RouterOS 7 ?

+ ERPS

+MC-LAG
+ERPS
+ QinQ basic and Selective ( vlan translation single, double and tripple tags)
+ Ethernet EVC
+ MEF compliance

+MC-LAG

I agree with all of this again, but I would rather than ROS 7 be stabilized first instead of them introducing too many new features right away. The new kernel and rewritten OSPF/BGP are big changes already. I think it is smart for MikroTik to focus on feature parity with ROS 6 when it comes to the initial releases for ROS 7 instead of trying to introduce all missing features that everybody has wanted for years all at once. If they were to try to add all of these improvements into the initial release of ROS 7, it will certainly increase the bugs in ROS 7 and increase the beta period instead of it becoming stable sooner. I really want to be able to upgrade all of my production equipment to ROS 7 as soon as it is stable enough, particularly for the BGP and OSPF improvements (which are already done and are really critical).

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

Awesome! Thanks

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

Our setups are massively based on MC-LAGs (or vLAGs at IBM/Lenovo). Can't wait for MC tags to be supported.

+1000 for MC-LAG

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

Great news!!!!


Thanks for the update Reinis

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

Great so if I get CRS326-24S+2Q+RM and that support is added will it work on these switches. I hope

We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG

@Reinis:
Hi,
Do you have any specific information about this MC-LAG feature ?
Should it come with RouterOS 7 first as this thread title implies, or may it come with 6.4X ?
Thanks in advance

+ 1000

+ 1000

EVPN multihoming is better than MC-LAG
MC-LAG is dead.

EVPN multihoming is better than MC-LAG
MC-LAG is dead.

I've never heard about EVPN before.
After reading about it, it does seem to be very interesting.
Thanks for mentioning it here !

EVPN multihoming is better than MC-LAG
MC-LAG is dead.

I've never heard about EVPN before.
After reading about it, it does seem to be very interesting.
Thanks for mentioning it here !

https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Enterpris ... a-p/298924

Now that VxLAN is supported in v7, EVPN would be fantastic to have as well to use as a control plane for VxLAN and for multihoming.

Now that VxLAN is supported in v7, EVPN would be fantastic to have as well to use as a control plane for VxLAN and for multihoming.

Agreed. But only a limited number of CRS3xx series support VXLAN/MPLS in hardware, so in my opinion both eVPN and MC-LAG are needed.

eVPN for devices supporting MPLS/VXLAN in hardware e.g. CRS309, CRS317
MC-LAG for devices without it e.g. CRS326, CRS354