The recent floods and electrical storms have led us to accelerate the reorganization of our network (read: deployment of MT RouterOS devices vs. Cisco) and I'm encountering some ospf errors I haven't found via Google or via search of this forum (please excuse me if I'm wrong) at a time that is very time critical:

09:38:10 ospf,debug received packet from 209.151.120.81 on unconfigured
interface [eth0]
09:38:12 ospf,debug Hello sent to 224.0.0.5 via [eth0:209.151.120.102]
09:38:12 ospf,debug Hello received from 209.151.120.86 via
[eth0:209.151.120.102]
09:38:12 ospf,debug Hello from 209.151.120.86: options *|-|-|-|-|-|E|*

This machine:

[badminton@ec-gw] log> /ip address print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
# ADDRESS NETWORK BROADCAST INTERFACE
0 209.151.120.102/28 209.151.120.96 209.151.120.111 ether1
1 172.25.120.102/28 172.25.120.96 172.25.120.111 ether1

The next one upstream:

[vaden@bw-gw] > /ip address print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
# ADDRESS NETWORK BROADCAST INTERFACE
0 209.151.120.86/28 209.151.120.80 209.151.120.95 ether1
1 172.25.120.86/28 172.25.120.80 172.25.120.95 ether1
2 209.151.120.97/28 209.151.120.96 209.151.120.111 ether2
3 172.25.120.97/28 172.25.120.96 172.25.120.111 ether2

The next one upstream:

[vaden@ep-gw] routing ospf> /ip address print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
# ADDRESS NETWORK BROADCAST INTERFACE
0 172.25.120.70/28 172.25.120.64 172.25.120.79 ether1
1 172.25.120.81/28 172.25.120.80 172.25.120.95 ether2
2 209.151.121.109/30 209.151.121.108 209.151.121.111 ether9
3 209.151.120.81/28 209.151.120.80 209.151.120.95 ether2
4 209.151.120.70/28 209.151.120.64 209.151.120.79 ether1
5 209.151.120.22/26 209.151.120.0 209.151.120.63 ether1

The head of the chain is a Cisco 7206 at 209.151.120.65/28 and all are in the same ospf area (0.0.0.0).

Don't make too much fun of the the situation -- the hops mimic the stage coaches of the old days in rural north Texas.

Thanks for your help/remarks/comments/criticisms.

rgds/ldv