CCR1009 and Cisco 3750G
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 8:06 pm
So here's what i've got and I'm looking for advice.
I've got a CCR1009 currently running with a bridged link into the Cisco 7350G.
The 3750G only had SFP ports and copper so I created from Port 2 and SFP a LACP bridge to the cisco.
This works great sort of.
What I'm thinking I can do is the switch can handle OSPF and intervlan routing, it can't do NAT I don't think (not supported but some basic functionality is there).
I'd like to take advantage of the switch and its wire level asic switching while using the CCR1009 as a route processor.
I'm thinking I can drop my internet connection into the 3750G, it pulls a public IP over DHCP from the internet provider, put that on one VLAN.
Set my LAN on VLAN 20, 10.0.0.0/16 and use the CCR to act as a route processor.
I'm trying to figure out the config. The switch itself can recieve routes from the router over various protocols, OSPF, BGP. So effectually I want to use it as a route processor to tell the switch how to route packets. I'm not sure if this will be possible without using NAT. Any advice is welcome.
I've got a CCR1009 currently running with a bridged link into the Cisco 7350G.
The 3750G only had SFP ports and copper so I created from Port 2 and SFP a LACP bridge to the cisco.
This works great sort of.
What I'm thinking I can do is the switch can handle OSPF and intervlan routing, it can't do NAT I don't think (not supported but some basic functionality is there).
I'd like to take advantage of the switch and its wire level asic switching while using the CCR1009 as a route processor.
I'm thinking I can drop my internet connection into the 3750G, it pulls a public IP over DHCP from the internet provider, put that on one VLAN.
Set my LAN on VLAN 20, 10.0.0.0/16 and use the CCR to act as a route processor.
I'm trying to figure out the config. The switch itself can recieve routes from the router over various protocols, OSPF, BGP. So effectually I want to use it as a route processor to tell the switch how to route packets. I'm not sure if this will be possible without using NAT. Any advice is welcome.