Would be happy to get rid of additional VMs / Wine.
@phascogale is right: setting up a Linux VM is
far "…easier than the explained process for Windows."
Further defense and details.
None of that would change with a native macOS build. It would suck for all the same reasons, and I tell you this as a macOS fan.
VMTek
Without having tried it, I expect it to fail due to their touted "processor-native virtualization - not slow emulation." This means it will not emulate an Intel x86 CPU, which is what you need to run the current netinstall-cli binary.
What will work and is truly free and not a come-on for a $45 in-app fee licence charge is
UTM, since it is based on QEMU, thus does offer emulation in addition to virtualization. The only trick there is to select bridged networking, per my guide linked above.
All this having been said, we do still have cause to want ARM32 and ARM64 builds of netinstall-cli, but that's for installation into a container to run on MT routers using those CPUs, for turning the box into a netinstall appliance. The
current workaround requires installing QEMU into the container at a cost of ~4 megs, preventing use on the smallest of MT's ARM devices. A native static build would let you do this on a disused hAP ac² even with its paltry 16MB flash, for instance. Each port could be connected to a different container instance, serving different builds of RouterOS, making it a "crash cart" for broken routers.
Bweeeeeeeee! "Clear!"

Beep-beep-beep. "You saved him, doctor!" "Aw, shucks, I'm no doctor, just a humble network engineer."