If anyone is interested, I've successfully upgraded a hap lite remotely from 7.10.1 to 7.13.3 directly.
For the record: the only reason for the "recommended" / "required" upgrade path
<early v7> -> 7.12 ->
<7.13 or later> is when one uses ROS mechanism of upgrading packages (
/system/package/update/install). And the actual reason is two fold (one of them applies at upgrade time):
- split of wireless package from base package. Upgrader in ROS traditionally tries to upgrade installed packages, upgrader in 7.12 knows that it needs to install additional optional package wireless (if optional wifiwave2 was not installed prior to upgrade). Without his "additional knowledge", upgraded device would suddenly be left without wireless interfaces (which happens often when people upgrade device by hand and don't pay attention to details).
- renaming and split of wifiwave2 package - renamed to wifi and split into wifi-qcom and wifi-qcom-ac. Upgrader in 7.12 knows to select the correct wifi-qcom package if wifiwave2 was installed previously, it selects correct variety according to hardware type
If user does manual installation (either by uploading package files and rebooting or via netinstall), all this consideration doesn't apply. So yes, you can jump directly from 7.1 to 7.14beta if you want and handle the wireless/wifi package mess manually. You can even jump directly from v6 to latest v7 directly (risking that config won't get converted correctly but this was always true when going from v6 to v7).
But the point of this thread is not whether one can install v7.13 this way or another, the point is that devices with 16MB flash can be tight (depends on architecture as well) and that devices with small amount of RAM are likely to run into stability problems (MT might squash some bugs with this regard so things may improve). So running v7 on hAP lite is possible, but some issues are to be expected.