802.1q vlan Q in Q, MTU & Eoip
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:57 am
Dear all,
is anybody having success in using Q in Q (which means VLANS over VLANS) without getting stuck in MTU Problems?
Did anybody succeed in transfering Q in Q in any form over an 'Master' EOIP Tunnel ?
My Test with two directly connected RB1000 with ROS 3.16 devices failed with following Problems:
- All MTU Values kept default with 1500, a vlan created on both boxes, each with an ip adress as transfernet, below this vlan a secondary vlan again with an additional transfernet - ping works fine on both, but in the secondary vlan only with frames of maximum size 1496
- All MTU Parrent Mtus (Ethernet & VLAN) increased to 1504, a vlan created on both boxes, each with an ip adress as transfernet, below this vlan (MTU 1504) a secondary vlan (MTU 1500) again with an additional transfernet - ping works fine on both, but in the secondary vlan again only with frames of maximum size 1496
- Additional i tried to establish VLAN over VLAN over an EOIP Tunnel, to prevent the problem in creating hundreds of Tunnels for transfering VLAN Traffic from one remote to the other site and also to have better redundancy. But my test was absolutely without success. The secondary VLAN didn't reach the secondary VLAN on the remote side. With the primary VLAN everything was fine.
Please share your Q in Q experience with me...
Regards from Austria,
Wolfgang
is anybody having success in using Q in Q (which means VLANS over VLANS) without getting stuck in MTU Problems?
Did anybody succeed in transfering Q in Q in any form over an 'Master' EOIP Tunnel ?
My Test with two directly connected RB1000 with ROS 3.16 devices failed with following Problems:
- All MTU Values kept default with 1500, a vlan created on both boxes, each with an ip adress as transfernet, below this vlan a secondary vlan again with an additional transfernet - ping works fine on both, but in the secondary vlan only with frames of maximum size 1496
- All MTU Parrent Mtus (Ethernet & VLAN) increased to 1504, a vlan created on both boxes, each with an ip adress as transfernet, below this vlan (MTU 1504) a secondary vlan (MTU 1500) again with an additional transfernet - ping works fine on both, but in the secondary vlan again only with frames of maximum size 1496
- Additional i tried to establish VLAN over VLAN over an EOIP Tunnel, to prevent the problem in creating hundreds of Tunnels for transfering VLAN Traffic from one remote to the other site and also to have better redundancy. But my test was absolutely without success. The secondary VLAN didn't reach the secondary VLAN on the remote side. With the primary VLAN everything was fine.
Please share your Q in Q experience with me...
Regards from Austria,
Wolfgang