What is RB52?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 1:15 am
Anyone mind to share info? There is a new wireless package to support the "new RB52" - is this a new Atheros based interfaces? Any information from MikroTik?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:41 pm
Yes it is a new wireless card Atheros AR5414 chipset that Mikrotik will sell soon.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:56 am
Will MT support the "Transmit Power Control" included in this chipset. And if so, how will it work?Yes it is a new wireless card Atheros AR5414 chipset that Mikrotik will sell soon.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:44 am
correctly it is called RouterBOARD R52 and is a wireless interface. more details later
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:17 pm
Is this based on the Ubiquiti SR5 mini-PCI card by any chance? MT is listed as a distributor/partner for this product.
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 1:19 pm
no it is a 65 mw card its not based on Ubiquiti
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:36 pm
It's not RB52 - it is RouterBOARD R52. Feel the difference 
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:53 pm
:)
manufactured by Mikrotik ?
manufactured by Mikrotik ?
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 12:44 pm
Yes, but you can know that all of our hardware is 'assembled' by contract manufacturers as we don't have board assembly plants. Same situatin for Cisco and most other companies and products now.
John
John
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 1:26 pm
I suposed soYes, but you can know that all of our hardware is 'assembled' by contract manufacturers as we don't have board assembly plants. Same situatin for Cisco and most other companies and products now.
John
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 1:59 am
So what's new and exciting in the Atheros AR5414 chips?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 2:34 pm
Single chip (MAC and radio) a/b/g card, should be cheaper to manufacture and lower power draw. External PA/LNA possible if you're designing your own card.So what's new and exciting in the Atheros AR5414 chips?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 4:00 pm
So with regards performance there is no real advantage?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 5:47 pm
Atheros don't claim performance improvements that I've seen just from their website, I guess a developer has great access.
However, one of the Atheros features that should improve performance is in all their recent radios, "XR" (= eXtended Range).
That works by improving receiver sensitivity beyond the normal threshold limit.
I did campaign to have an XR (on:off) switch in MT, but it's not there yet ...
Regards
However, one of the Atheros features that should improve performance is in all their recent radios, "XR" (= eXtended Range).
That works by improving receiver sensitivity beyond the normal threshold limit.
I did campaign to have an XR (on:off) switch in MT, but it's not there yet ...
Regards
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 1:25 am
XR has been available since AR5004 and works by reducing the throughput to give better receive sensitivity which doesn't help large backhauls 
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 10:15 am
Thanks for that tip -
But it would help a CPE a lot, right?
And possibly a base station in a low-throughput sector where coverage (range) is more important.
I know other users have requested this feature, I wonder how good it is in practice.
Regards
But it would help a CPE a lot, right?
And possibly a base station in a low-throughput sector where coverage (range) is more important.
I know other users have requested this feature, I wonder how good it is in practice.
Regards
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 5:06 pm
So there isn't really anything great about the new chipset then??
I agree that XR would be pretty handy for those customers who would like a low speed link but are just out of range. Does anyone know if there are plans to have it added in a future release?
I agree that XR would be pretty handy for those customers who would like a low speed link but are just out of range. Does anyone know if there are plans to have it added in a future release?
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 5:10 pm
[bump] Just everybody keep asking politely for it .... 
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 5:12 pm
Hi all,
Try to lower down the TX power on the Wlan settings :-) it works!
i have a 9 Km link and i get 8 dBi more signal when i put in 21 as a range on the Atheros 5212 card on one of the sides in the PtP link.
and the signals get equal. on the diffrent sides...
Try to lower down the TX power on the Wlan settings :-) it works!
i have a 9 Km link and i get 8 dBi more signal when i put in 21 as a range on the Atheros 5212 card on one of the sides in the PtP link.
and the signals get equal. on the diffrent sides...
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 9:35 pm
Anyone want to compare Mikrotik's Routerboard R52 with the Atheros ref design pictures :
Compare
http://www.atheros.com/pt/images/AR5006 ... iboard.gif
with
http://www.mikrotik.com/img/r52_l.jpg
and they look the same - except for the can lid being off - and as you'd expect, the MAC address on the MT one is their own OUI.
It's a lower chip-count radio so hopefully power/heat dissipation is lower than CM9 etc.
A bit more information on AR5006 is at
http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5006XS.htm
Will be very interesting testing out these new boards ....
Regards
Compare
http://www.atheros.com/pt/images/AR5006 ... iboard.gif
with
http://www.mikrotik.com/img/r52_l.jpg
and they look the same - except for the can lid being off - and as you'd expect, the MAC address on the MT one is their own OUI.
It's a lower chip-count radio so hopefully power/heat dissipation is lower than CM9 etc.
A bit more information on AR5006 is at
http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5006XS.htm
Will be very interesting testing out these new boards ....
Regards