problems with a failover gateway configuration
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 2:50 pm
Hello
I'm having problems with a failover gateway configuration.
I'll descrive my topology, We have to sites, with their respective router, that are like
a two black boxes for me, they are form the internet provide, who had configured a VPN between
the sites. ( I couldn't touth this routers).
We have been instaled a RF link to each site, using routerOS , that works
correctly at the speed of 90 Mbps.
Our client would like to make a faillover link using the VPN of the provider and the RF link.
We had aplied correctly the comands that apears in the guide
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Two_gateways_failover that says:
/ip route add gateway=192.168.1.1 check-gateway=ping
/ip route add gateway=192.168.2.1 distance=2
The main route is the RF link, and the secondary is the VPN of the provider.
That works, and when the link fail ( disabling temporaly the WLAN) the trafic is sended to
secondary path, imediatly and when we enable the wlan interface their recuperation it's fast too.
The problem is in the recuperation of a fail, the active connecticions from a hosts, servers,...,
continue using the secondary path, and don't refresh the new actual route (the main one). The new connections use the main path, but the connections stablished when the link was down don't take the right path.
Best regards
Fátima
I'm having problems with a failover gateway configuration.
I'll descrive my topology, We have to sites, with their respective router, that are like
a two black boxes for me, they are form the internet provide, who had configured a VPN between
the sites. ( I couldn't touth this routers).
We have been instaled a RF link to each site, using routerOS , that works
correctly at the speed of 90 Mbps.
Our client would like to make a faillover link using the VPN of the provider and the RF link.
We had aplied correctly the comands that apears in the guide
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Two_gateways_failover that says:
/ip route add gateway=192.168.1.1 check-gateway=ping
/ip route add gateway=192.168.2.1 distance=2
The main route is the RF link, and the secondary is the VPN of the provider.
That works, and when the link fail ( disabling temporaly the WLAN) the trafic is sended to
secondary path, imediatly and when we enable the wlan interface their recuperation it's fast too.
The problem is in the recuperation of a fail, the active connecticions from a hosts, servers,...,
continue using the secondary path, and don't refresh the new actual route (the main one). The new connections use the main path, but the connections stablished when the link was down don't take the right path.
Best regards
Fátima