BGP full tables
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:24 pm
Hi,
I have been reading this forum as preparation for the purchase of a rb1000.
Currently we have a simple setup. Two BGP upstreams with full view (295k+ routes both), some ACL's for limiting inbound prefixes and blocking some ports, and internally just switching to a core switch, on which we route vlans. Traffic is low (max 200-300mbits, possibly increasing to 500-600 mbits).
It seems to me that rb1000 can take the traffic. The ACL's are done in the firewall I think, at least for the port filtering? Would the two full tables cause any problems? Would it be possible to expand that to four full views? Does anyone see any bottlenecks based on these specs?
Thanks for your time!
I have been reading this forum as preparation for the purchase of a rb1000.
Currently we have a simple setup. Two BGP upstreams with full view (295k+ routes both), some ACL's for limiting inbound prefixes and blocking some ports, and internally just switching to a core switch, on which we route vlans. Traffic is low (max 200-300mbits, possibly increasing to 500-600 mbits).
It seems to me that rb1000 can take the traffic. The ACL's are done in the firewall I think, at least for the port filtering? Would the two full tables cause any problems? Would it be possible to expand that to four full views? Does anyone see any bottlenecks based on these specs?
Thanks for your time!