Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
thembo
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:04 am

MT AP vs UBNT

Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:48 am

i have a mikrotik AP/bh composed of an omni antenna 5.7ghz 12dbi ,333rb with 350mw card for the AP.
at client site about 1 km i have nanostation5 running and connecting with signal of -64.

the problem am facing is when i ping the AP from client side, the pings are so high as 1500ms.
opening a web browser takes very long time.can someone help here.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: bit.ly/the-qos
Contact:

Re: MT AP vs UBNT

Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:32 pm

As far as I can see, everyone switch from using omni antennas to several sector ones. Maybe your AP is overloaded, what about CCQ? You are not providing enough information currently...
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1465
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: MT AP vs UBNT

Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:10 pm

How many clients?

How much bandwidth is being used?

20MHz channel?

PTP file sharing?

Got QoS set up?
 
thembo
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:04 am

Re: MT AP vs UBNT

Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:55 am

this is one of the information from my AP.

signal strength -72
Tx signal strength -71
signal to noise -31dbi
tx/rx ccq 59/20%
p throughput 16953

my AP is running on frequency 5320
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: bit.ly/the-qos
Contact:

Re: MT AP vs UBNT

Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:22 am

RX CCQ is too low. Fresnel zone (radio line of sight) OK ? What about interference? This is why I like to use NSTREME !!!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests