Page 1 of 1
Feature request
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:09 pm
by ddlan
Netmask and Gateway Settings for Managementinterface.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:48 pm
by fewi
You're aware it is remotely reachable without those? Management traffic simply is sent back to the source, copying the destination MAC and IP into the relevant header source fields and putting the packet on the wire out the port it came in on. Weird method, but it seems to work.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:50 pm
by ddlan
push
Re: Feature request
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:52 pm
by normis
push
it's not a router. read Fewi's post
Re: Feature request
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:55 pm
by ddlan
And when the switch is in a other net behind a vpn. All Other managable switch have a changable gateway and netmask.
sry for my english
Thomas Böttcher
Re: Feature request
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:07 pm
by kirshteins
SwOS does not make any IP routing decisions as there is no need for it (as SwOS does not run programs like ping-to or ssh-client etc.). 250GS still should be accessible behind VPN.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:29 am
by mindaugasr
If You said Your swich is smarter than smart, we definitely need one feature: IGMP snooping!
If You add this, we can implement all network tasks.
Thanks.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:36 pm
by SethM
And when the switch is in a other net behind a vpn. All Other managable switch have a changable gateway and netmask.
I just installed a 250GS at a client location to utilize the traffic shaping properties; it can be accessed remotely just fine.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:08 pm
by Pilgrim
Please, could you point in the direction of how to use the SNMP remote access. Do I need a SNMP client, or is it possible to get remote access using just a web browser?
Thanks,
Pilgrim
Re: Feature request
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:44 pm
by fewi
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/SwOS#SNMP_Tab
And yes, of course you need an SNMP client. Anything that talks SNMP. Web browsers usually don't.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:39 am
by Rus123
As for me, I need CLI via SSH or Telnet. I think it will be usefull and helpfull.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:39 am
by craigmyster
I have several 250Gs behind a NAT. I can access them no problem using dstnat rules but SNMP keeps on randomly timing out for monitoring. This seems to be the case on all the devices. In the NAT rules I don't see the counters going up for my srcnat masquerade rules, For the Torch tool output on the router I see the 250G's address communicating with the external server address. I am still stumped though because even though http traffic to the 250G works fine behind the nat the srcnat counters on the 750G router counters are not going up.
Re: Feature request
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 4:27 pm
by craigmyster
I have several 250Gs behind a NAT. I can access them no problem using dstnat rules but SNMP keeps on randomly timing out for monitoring. This seems to be the case on all the devices. In the NAT rules I don't see the counters going up for my srcnat masquerade rules, For the Torch tool output on the router I see the 250G's address communicating with the external server address. I am still stumped though because even though http traffic to the 250G works fine behind the nat the srcnat counters on the 750G router counters are not going up.
Accessing the Web interface remotely when the 250GS is behind a NAT using dstnat rules works good. But SNMP traffic keeps on timing out. I can do an snmp walk and see the interfaces but it keeps on randomly timing out.