Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
CyberT
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:39 pm
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Contact:

Just a thought Dedicated P2P Protocal

Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:42 pm

Here is a snapshot of a conversation, sorry i didn't reformat it, sorry abt the spelling

basically an idea about a dedicated p2p protocol, that can have a lot of advantages, but i guess there is a reason it hasn't been done.
was in a response to the hidden node concept that we experience on sectors and that nv2 addresses

[22:26:52] <%CyberT> the exposed node imho is just what we call interference
[22:27:24] <%CyberT> seems like some algorithms wasn't thought thru properly
[22:27:44] <%CyberT> think im going to forum the tiks a bit
[22:28:02] <%CyberT> they should make a prepriatary p2p protocal
[22:28:11] <%CyberT> that accepts that is has only one peer ever
[22:28:26] <%CyberT> and you can then do what they did with dual nstream on one card
[22:28:30] <%CyberT> where u mac pair the 2
[22:28:52] <%CyberT> then its much easier for them to look into statuses
[22:29:05] <%CyberT> and displaying amount of jitter/interference
[22:29:16] <%CyberT> could be much better than an ccq
[22:29:24] <%CyberT> maybe bring an allignment test back in
[22:29:31] <%CyberT> with steps
[22:29:43] <%CyberT> where it takes both boards, they pair
[22:29:49] <%CyberT> then both do spectral scans
[22:29:55] <%CyberT> they chat about best freqs
[22:30:00] <%CyberT> they then test those
[22:30:11] <%CyberT> then has an allignment part again, an bt test
[22:30:14] <%CyberT> and bam your done
[22:30:46] <%CyberT> also make an snapshot of the current ccq bt tests during the setup
[22:30:49] <%CyberT> and db ratings
[22:31:24] <%CyberT> that way if a year later you get to it you can compare the snapshot agains it, and off the bat check the db ratings
[22:31:55] <%CyberT> and then you know if its that your grids have sligtly moved or
[22:31:58] <%CyberT> cables have aged
[22:32:02] <%CyberT> or envirometn has changed
[22:32:08] <%CyberT> or whatever
[22:32:11] <%CyberT> pritty big dev
[22:32:23] <%CyberT> but functionality would be phenominal
[22:32:42] <%CyberT> imagine comparing current noise floors to what they were when the link was installed
[22:33:02] <%CyberT> would be to much to ask for the link to trouble shoot itself :-)
[22:33:08] <%CyberT> %interference
[22:33:15] <%CyberT> %crosstalk from other freq
[22:33:21] <%CyberT> lol
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 27063
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: Just a thought Dedicated P2P Protocal

Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:55 pm

if you are quoting yourself, it should not be too hard to formulate your thought in a more structured and easy to read sentence :)