I would look at this the other way. If something dies because of simple interference, it's not a good sign.a groove in 2.4GHz kills all picostations M2 I use as street access point
Sorry, I misunderstood that statement
sorry!!
I mean: "a 2.4GHz Groove "commercially" kills picostations"
1.400mw 2.4 is no legal in EU max 100mw /Any way Groove or SXT 2.4Ghz ver. will be goodI see the omnitik is 400mw. Why not the groove? 400mw will work for 5ghz and 2.4ghz.
Thanks for the informations. 2.4ghz 400mw is legal right. That is 26dbm? Put a 10dbi antenna and you got 36dbm which is 4 watts of power. Let me know what you find. thanks again.1.400mw 2.4 is no legal in EU max 100mw /Any way Groove or SXT 2.4Ghz ver. will be goodI see the omnitik is 400mw. Why not the groove? 400mw will work for 5ghz and 2.4ghz.
2.400mw 5150-5350Ghz is also no legal in EU max is 200mw from 5490-5725 u can use up to 1W
3.Always try to use less mw (less noise) - instead use bigger antennas
so MT dudes pls dont make 2.4ghz 400mw Sxt or Groove it will kill the spectrum
What batter me a lot is why groove sxt or any MT N-standart wireless cart are not supporting 5ghz-A (only A) 40Mhz channel with?
The only problem with a 200mW/23dBm single chain N Groove is that at higher modulations MSC7 the output power is only going to be ~16dBm. I think you would be better off starting at 400mW/26dBm and ending up with ~19dBm @ MSC7. This is going to give you a better chance of maintaining higher data rates and would allow you to lock your data rates to higher rates if you wanted.
Thanks for the informations. 2.4ghz 400mw is legal right. That is 26dbm? Put a 10dbi antenna and you got 36dbm which is 4 watts of power. Let me know what you find. thanks again.
Overall I do agree that 200mw is a great groove 2.4ghz. So I am waiting for mikrotik to build it.