I thought that RB751U will be much better when I connect external antenna. So I did so today (using 5.9). I've made a lot of tests and find out that the best results I can get using:
- Channel Width: 20MHz - strange, but using 40MHz the speed is not much better and stability is worse (but in fact I can use 20MHz only because I will use multiple access points alternating channels 1, 6, 11, so it doesn't bother me)
- HT Chains: both (external antenna is greatly improving chain1)
- Antenna Mode: antenna b (obviously, b means external antenna for chain1)
Bad thing is that I can get higher transfer speed using "common" 802.11n Canyon home router (using 20MHz as well). I've tried transferring data from my NAS to one PC, the same file from NAS to 3 PCs at the same time, measuring speedtest from internet to PC and to multiple PCs - common router is faster in any situation
I need RB751U to act as hotspot stations (WiFi AP + hotspot) connecting to central User Manager on RB1200, but now I am thinking about combination of cheap RB750 and cheap "common" AP instead of RB751U. Two cases, two adapters, but better speed?
Bottomline: yes, using external antenna is better than internal, but not good enough comparing to other WiFi routers.