Page 1 of 1
WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:40 am
by ddenia
WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Recently used the WDS, but noted that it is less fast, and then decided to try VPLS and noticed that it is faster ... Like it or not? and what do you recommend I use?
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:50 pm
by sup5
use station-bridge instead.
much easier to setup.
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:01 pm
by angboontiong
use station-bridge instead.
much easier to setup.
what's the different station-wds and station-bridge.
any much different on it?
thanks.
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:05 pm
by rodolfo
I think wds is an apple and vpls is a table.
completely different things to answer your question.
could you explain what do you want to achieve ?
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:23 am
by ddenia
I think wds is an apple and vpls is a table.
completely different things to answer your question.
could you explain what do you want to achieve ?
I need so that the base station connected to 10 clients, and so they each received a 20-50Mbit.
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:59 pm
by sup5
use 'ap-bridge' on your access-point
use 'station-bridge' on your clients
there is no need to mess around with WDS, EoIP or even VPLS.
They all add complicated configuration and in case of EoIP and VPLS unnecessary overhead.
Re: WDS or VPLS for Mikrotik?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 3:14 pm
by Hotz1
use 'ap-bridge' on your access-point
use 'station-bridge' on your clients
there is no need to mess around with WDS, EoIP or even VPLS.
They all add complicated configuration and in case of EoIP and VPLS unnecessary overhead.
What if you need both ends to be ap-bridge? (e.g., backhaul radios that connect to each other as well as to others.)