Page 1 of 1
Great signal, stays connected but pings time out
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:45 am
by jober
Things have been runnig great till this morning and now we're timeing out with ping in a bad way. The signal is -59 and it never loses connection. The network is routed not bridged or running WDS.
(finrouter MT2.8.28 with cm9 cards)
Any ideas!
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:36 am
by sten
Overload? Virii? Defective radio card? Beelzebub? Baal? Or worse, woman scorned?
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:44 pm
by lastguru
the plural virii is that of the nonexistent word virius
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:33 pm
by normis
so viruses
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:36 pm
by sten
the plural virii is that of the nonexistent word virius
LoL, no, i mean to type "viri" but of course the most proper is "viruses" that's something that has stuck with me since my asm coding days. Back then we also shortened it to "vx". Don't really know the current terminology.
But i'll try to remember "viruses" in the future
/* Winners don't code self replicating software that has a potentially damaging payload. */
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:16 pm
by lastguru
LoL, no, i mean to type "viri"
incorrect again. the most probable plural ir "vira". "virus" is a neuter gender, but -i plural is used for masculine nouns. "viri" is a singular genetive of "virus"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_of_virus
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:22 pm
by normis
offtopic!!!
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:25 pm
by cmit
...but funny to read along...
Christian
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
by jober
offtopic!!!
WOW! Off topic! you don't say!
Man, what great help this is.
People, can we focus on the problems solution? PLEASE!!!
But it is funny!
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:24 pm
by eflanery
Back then we also shortened it to "vx".
While "vx"* is indeed a major pain in the RTOS, I wouldn't quite label it a virus, it's really more of a trojan.
As to the topic at hand: Reboot?, Change channels?, Packet sniff?, Post more details?
--Eric
*(Works)
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:01 am
by jarosoup
Sounds like interference to me (so does the OT posts
)
Jober, I've seen this same thing before - great signal, but bad pings and very little throughput, if any.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:33 pm
by msolis
Jober, I have this same problem. The CM9 don´t work fine in solve version.
CM9 work fine in 2.9.8. I test this card with 2.9.11 and work fine, but the bandwith is superior in 2.9.8.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:33 pm
by tully
I would suggest using wireless-test, that definitely has improvements for performance over the standard v2.9 wireless driver. Of course, it needs to be tested some to make sure there are no problems.
John
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:18 am
by jober
We are running 2.8.28 on these boxs. Is there a test package for 2.8.28?
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:55 pm
by onowojemma
I had this problem with my router board230, for the first 1 mouth it work great and out clint were very happy but now,it geting wose so what is the problem and the solution?
Ones again i say thanks to all in this forum for thier genaruse contribution