Page 1 of 1
RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:37 pm
by normis
Since there have been many questions before, and our product names are getting longer and longer, we decided to make a document explaining all the numbers and letters in product names. They are
not random at all
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Product_Naming
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:50 pm
by Erastus
Nice thanks gathered that from some
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:10 am
by bysard
ty.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:29 pm
by honzam
Thanks
But, i think this is not enclosure:
Enclosure type:
EM - extended memory
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:58 pm
by macgaiver
I think you need to make it mandatory for the training materials. If you are certified you must know products!!
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:27 am
by StubArea51
Very nice...thanks for sharing
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:00 am
by normis
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 8:52 am
by StubArea51
Very cool...thanks y'all!
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 3:10 am
by sasskass
WRT54ac
Chronos 3x3
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:44 pm
by pukkita
I just bought some RBSXTG-5HPnD-HGr2, guess that r2 means v2.0 of the same board?
The reported board in routeros however is RB SXT G-5HPnD r2 the same as the -SAr2 (built-in 90 Sector antenna)
Guess this mean that both SXT use the same board, inside two different enclosures with different built-in antenna?
If so, will a future Mikrotik ROS update change the firmware board-name to correctly reflect this to be able to remotely distinguish between the unconfigured sectors/PTP when in neighbour view? This is a very typical new node situation, 4 sectors and a PTP)
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:11 pm
by Petzl
r2 is client of ptp only i think , so no AP mode
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:00 pm
by mrz
r2 is revision2 (version2)
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:35 pm
by mousa1983
Nice;Thanks much.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:59 am
by SystemErrorMessage
interesting. How would mikrotik name a CCR with 100 cores assuming mikrotik produces one in the future. TileGX have 100 core variants.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:18 am
by janisk
it would be something along these lines - CCR1100
the rest would be just how many interfaces it has. Here, the example with a lot of Gbit interfaces
CCR1100-9001G
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 11:11 am
by joegoldman
it would be something along these lines - CCR1100
the rest would be just how many interfaces it has. Here, the example with a lot of Gbit interfaces
CCR1100-9001G
OVER 9000??!?!?!
I'm excited just to see CCR1072 + ROS7 to begin with
I'd imagine next major CCR revision would be CCR2X., so a 36 core would be CCR2036-[int. details]
The naming scheme is actually quite easy to understand and very helpful once you spend some time understanding it
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:20 am
by honzam
What mean
RP in the name of product?
http://routerboard.com/RB953GS-5HnT-RP
edit: I found it. It is RPSMA
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 8:05 am
by alice
Isn't there any letter to distinguish between passive PoE and 802.3af, at ?
If I get it right, i, P refer to Mikrotik proprietary "controller" mechanism...?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 8:33 am
by normis
Isn't there any letter to distinguish between passive PoE and 802.3af, at ?
If I get it right, i, P refer to Mikrotik proprietary "controller" mechanism...?
no, "i" means injector (PoE out on one port), "P" means power (PoE out on more ports)
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:14 pm
by WirelessRudy
So, I log into my remote unit, a "RB911G-5HPnD" and am wondering what we ever placed there it is I am logging into? Was it a Sextant? Or was it a board in a box with one or two attached antennas? Never kept a record, I should.....
SXT has SXT in their name.
QRT has QRT in its name.
Groove is also clear about it.
OmniTik says it all.
But during implementing the SEXTANT line something is forgotten I presume? Can still still be corrected. Both at clients and some backhauls we used both SEXTANT or same boards in boxes with other make antennas.
To know now what exactly we'd used I have to drive over..... pffff.
Or is there any other way I can distinguish a SEXTANT from a similar board sold 'stand alone'?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:07 pm
by normis
SXT, QRT and Groove have specific PCB board. The SEXTANT has identical board with generic RB911. Software has no way to know if there is a box around or not.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 10:09 pm
by Zwodka
What to call this device?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:30 am
by macgaiver
What to call this device?
Product like this exist only in one ethernet row - RB3011.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:59 am
by Zwodka
What to call this device?
Product like this exist only in one ethernet row - RB3011.
RB3011 is:
- big
- robust
- metal case
- dual core
- with display
- expansion slot
- 10x 10/100/1000
- 1x SFP
- USB 3.0
- relatively expensive
I talk/write about a:
- small/compact size
- plastic case
- single core (same Hap Ac)
- no display
- no expansion slot
- 8-10x 10/100 or 4-5x 10/100 and 4-5x 10/100/1000
- 0x SFP
- USB 2.0
- cheap
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 11:01 am
by normis
so you mean like a RB2011L
?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 12:26 pm
by Zwodka
so you mean like a RB2011L
?
Amlost
But I think smaller and low weight one. Without display, maybe plastic case, under each other the 2x 4/5 ethernet ports.
Yes, I understand you, but ... It's a wish/desire
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 12:28 pm
by normis
so you mean like a RB2011L
?
Amlost
But I think smaller and low weight one. Without display, maybe plastic case, under each other the 2x 4/5 ethernet ports.
Yes, I understand you, but ... It's a wish/desire
2011L is without LCD and low cost
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:27 am
by Zwodka
If this is the case already. Do you plan to make a "bigger" RB2011/RB3011 series with three group of 5-port Ethernet switch. For SoHo environment would be great
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:39 pm
by Chupaka
Cosmetic suggestion about naming: on
https://mikrotik.com/download page, please replace "hEX" with "hEX (except RB750Gr3)" or kind of =)
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 4:45 am
by huyeav
hi support,
i using CCR1036 but one cpu core high load
any suggestion?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:44 pm
by Chupaka
Tools -> Profile. And this topic is about naming, not about CPU
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:11 am
by doneware
can we assume the combination XG will mean multi-gigabit?
like in CRS312-4C+8XG
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 10:20 am
by normis
can we assume the combination XG will mean multi-gigabit?
like in CRS312-4C+8XG
X = Roman 10
so 10G interfaces
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 12:17 pm
by doneware
so 10G interfaces
as i remember Janis' ending lines to the device itself, he was mentioning 2.5G/5G/10G there as the new way Mikrotik is following - maybe was just a freudian slip - this was the base of my speculation.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:56 pm
by lapsio
Why RB750G is not named RB750UG. The same about RB760iGS not being RB760UiGS? This naming scheme looks really inconsistent in practice :/ CRS and CCR naming schemes seem to be much more consistent. Also why those are not x2? They have 2 cores after all...
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:57 am
by normis
Why RB750G is not named RB750UG. The same about RB760iGS not being RB760UiGS? This naming scheme looks really inconsistent in practice :/ CRS and CCR naming schemes seem to be much more consistent. Also why those are not x2? They have 2 cores after all...
Read carefully. USB is only indicated on non Gigabit devices, because Gigabit devices automatically imply USB (if two models exist, where one is non-gigabit, one is gigabit).
G - Gigabit (may include "U")
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:42 pm
by normis
We have updated the manual with some more letters
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 5:25 pm
by doneware
We have updated the manual with some more letters
-<n>G+ number of 2.5G Ethernet ports
-<n>P+ number of 2.5G Ethernet ports with PoE-out
-<n>C+ number of combo 10G Ethernet/SFP+ ports
-<n>S+ number of 10G SFP+ ports
-<n>XG number of 5G/10G Ethernet ports
-<n>XP number of 5G/10G Ethernet ports with PoE-out
-<n>XC number of combo 10G/25G SFP+ ports
-<n>XS number of 25G SFP+ ports
-<n>Q+ number of 40G QSFP+ ports
-<n>XQ number of 100G QSFP+ ports
then it wasn't a tongue slip. XG has it.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 1:31 pm
by tuliss
cAP = ceiling Access Point
capsman = Controlled Access Point system Manager
hAP = home Access Point
hEX ?
mAP ? micro Access Point ?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:16 pm
by macgaiver
hEX ?
mAP ? micro Access Point ?
home Ethernet eXchange
micro Access Point
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:40 pm
by a575606
I had to comment on this, because I was just talking with my friends about your naming scheme. I just purchased the RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN. When I was shopping for a router and came across it for the first time, I remember having a chuckle thinking it seemed a good router, but you guys might want to have a chat with your marketing guy. I figured there was a reason behind it, but it is a mouthful.
Jokes aside, it's my first Mikrotik router and aside from a few quirks with wifi which I'm hopeful will get worked out eventually, it seems well built and I'm very happy with it so far. Thanks!
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:09 am
by Zwodka
There will be a non-TC (classic MikroTik style) version of hap ac2?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:20 am
by normis
no, why?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:58 am
by Zwodka
Hi Normis!
1. I prefer the classic or Hex-S (!) style
2. The LEDs. On the classic style the LEDs much more visible.
But it is my opinion
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:33 pm
by mkx
1. I prefer the classic or Hex-S (!) style
Say hello to Flintstones next time you meet them
Black is new white
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 3:11 pm
by lapsio
I'm afraid I must agree with LEDs argument. hAP acĀ² LEDs are barely visible under angle.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 3:15 pm
by freemannnn
yes hex s is so sexy. my favorite design. black grey and little orange. so beatuful. i wish it had wifi
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 7:30 pm
by nostromog
There will be a non-TC (classic MikroTik style) version of hap ac2?
Are you aware that the ac^2 can be installed "flat"? i.e. the base has two configurations, the tower one and a desktop one.
By the way, I agree that the leds are too difficult to read, in any condition of light. I can barely tell how many are on. I also miss the ability to reprogram the leds, something I loved in the MISPBE hAP ac series...
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 3:30 am
by vortex
I confused C and C+ a couple times.
Probably because I think "100".
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:38 pm
by anav
@MT Staff, are there any plans for an RB to get an SFP+ port or two (RG450Gx4+1) for example??
Speaking about LED and lights (260GSP) my P associated port alternates between amber, green and red............ )
Now all I need is about 200 of them for my xmas tree. ;-P
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:43 am
by weidmar
Hello,
thank you for documenting the naming of routerboards. I have here some boards labeled RB91XG on PCB. In routerOS it says, it is an RB911. Also i have some boards labeled RB912G on PCB and in routerOS it says, it is an RB911.
I am confused...
Have to admit, that i am new to Mikrotik an routerBoards.
Thank you.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2021 11:48 am
by mbovenka
RB911: Series 9 board, 1 10/100 Ethernet port, 1 wireless interface
RB912G: Series 9 board, 1 10/100/1000 Ethernet port, (potentially) 2 wireless interfaces
That's how the board naming comes out. How many wireless interfaces does the 912 actually have? If 1, that may be why it shows as a 911 in ROS.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2021 4:56 pm
by weidmar
@mbovenka thank you.
i will check it with my boards.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:19 am
by eworm
The new CCR is named CCR2116. Following the documentation the second digit number is "reserved".
Actually it's increased... What does that tell us?
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 3:16 pm
by kraal
Hi,
Are there any plans to:
- update the link to the wiki in the first post to make it point to the page of the new wiki ? (the link is obsolete)
- update the page of the new wiki to include the latest naming decisions made by Mikrotik ?
- simplify the naming once and for all ?
Some examples of what's missing / unclear:
- ax
- L not in board names (L009) (if it stands for "lite" it should be in the "features" group of digits)
- 009 stands for ? 9 ports ? My guess is that it doesn't mean "0st series with 0 wired and 9 wireless interfaces", nor "james bond 009 spectre" isn't it ?
- RB not in board names (but used as an example on the page)
Sorry to say that but the way Mikrotik devices are named is quite a mess, every time I think I understand something the next new product (range) shuffles the cards. So a clean and maintained naming page would be
really appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 3:46 pm
by normis
do not use the wiki, it is an archive (it says so on the page, btw). here is the new manual:
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... uct+Naming
also we made a video about naming:
https://youtu.be/AILuuE4mJKg
L stands for nothing, it is a "Series", just like RB and S, C, D, M etc.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 4:26 pm
by mkx
OK, so which naming convention do 5009 or L009 conform to?
Board Name
Currently, there can be three types of board names:
- 3-symbol name
1st symbol stands for series (this can either be a number or a letter)
2nd digit for indicating the number of potential wired interfaces (Ethernet, SFP, SFP+)
3rd digit for indicating the number of potential wireless interfaces (built-in and mPCI and mPCIe slots)
- Word - currently used names are: OmniTIK, Groove, SXT, SEXTANT, Metal, LHG, DynaDish, cAP, wAP, LDF, DISC, mANTBox, QRT, DynaDish, cAP, hAP, hEX. If the board has fundamental changes in hardware (such as completely different CPU) revision version will be added at the end
- Exceptional naming - 600, 800, 1000, 1100, 1200, 2011, 3011, 4011 boards are standalone representatives of the series or have more than 9 wired interfaces, so the name was simplified to full hundreds or development year.
These don't seem to conform to 3-symbol-name. Official name seems to be RB5009UG+S+IN ... meaning that 5 is series, left 0 is number of wired interfaces (we all know that RB5009 has more than 0 of them), right 0 is number of wireless interfaces (which is true for 5009 but not for L009) and 9 is some unlisted feature. And likewise for L009 (with official name L009UiGS-RM).
These seemingly conform to CCR naming convention, but 9 would then mean number of CPU cores (which is not true for 5009 and L009).
And these don't conform to CRS naming convention as well.
And neither is listed as "Exceptional naming".
So the only remaining option is "Word" naming convention ... but using "RB5009" or "L009" as "Word" is a joke to me.
So which is it? It seems to me that MT introduced the fourth naming convention and it's "whatever garbage we come up with"
.
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:05 pm
by kraal
I know that the wiki page has been archived... The link on the first page of this thread points to this archived page instead of the new wiki page you just posted. That's why I'm asking you to update this link... If you don't want to update the link, unpin this thread because "as is" it is completely useless for readers.
Further, the new wiki page you just mentioned is maybe replacing the old wiki page, but it's incomplete as well as is doesn't help in understanding most of the "recent" additions (Or maybe the latest additions do not seem to follow this naming documentation. Example: RB5009UPr+ I understand that "Pr" stands for "Power", but why "Pr" and not "P" as documented ? Why "Pr+" what's the meaning of this "+" ?)
You write that "L" is a series, but where is the list of series in the documentation ? Unless I'm wrong, none of "L, S, C, D, M" are mentioned on the wiki page you just provided. As such how is the reader supposed to understand ?
A 50+ minutes long "talk show" video (as stated in the video) without chapters is great for people willing to listen to chit-chats, but not for reference documentation... And as the wiki page, your video doesn't explain 009. I searched quickly and tried to listen to the last 15 minutes about the "modern era" so if it contains the explanation it's just buried under (I'm not inventing anything, just citing parts of the video) biblical references, whiskey glasses, french pronunciation discussions, references about alien technologies. Don't understand me wrong, some "fun" doesn't hurt and is welcome, but information must be provided first.
Regards,
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:19 pm
by kraal
Seriously all this remembers me last Saturday when I went to the shop buy some beers, they changed the whole layout of the store aisle where beers are sold. Price tags were mixed, some where missing, tags for cans where pasted on bottles, etc. Had to call the manager to understand the prices and she was furious that I was annoying, she started telling me that everything is on the price tags and if I have a doubt I can proceed to checkout to get the correct price. Then she started listening, looking at the shelves and realized that something was wrong, she counted more than 30 tags completely wrong and realized that the person in charge of organizing this part of the shop just messed it completely. At the end she calmed down, thanked me for reporting their mistake and called the person responsible for the tags and they started correcting the issue.
I don't need a "thank you", fixing the link on the first post of this thread and updating the wiki page is all I and many other people need...
(Yes I'm a bit sarcastic, but I hate when people tell me to "RTFM" while they don't "RTFM" themselves)
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:31 pm
by chechito
i think knowing any vendor product line is not always an easy task, most the time if you want to be proficient and sucesful on product selection you cannot rely only on product name, you must dive in datasheets brochures etc, i think its part of the job
having said that, I don't think product naming it's a topic to tear your clothes off
i dont have problem with MikroTik product naming
PD
i think youtube video about product names was interesting and funny
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:08 pm
by normis
All RBxxx devices are using the old convention, where the series is 5
L0009 is a newer model, like C52 etc. the series is L
Everything is covered in the document. RTFM more carefully
Re: RouterBOARD naming
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:49 pm
by kraal
All RBxxx devices are using the old convention, where the series is 5
L0009 is a newer model, like C52 etc. the series is L
Everything is covered in the document. RTFM more carefully
- 5009 is not in the list of "exceptional naming" and the only reference to 4-digit series on the wiki page relate to CCR and CRS devices. And as far as I know RB5009 is not a CCR nor a CRS.
- the page does not explain what L stands for, nor what C stands for these "new models". Maybe for other people it is clear why C52 and C53 (hAP ax2 and ax3) have a "C" and why L41 (hAP ax lite) have a "L" similarly to L009.
- It is not clear why do some "new models" like C52, C53, L41 have to digits after the "serie" letter, why other like L009 two models have three digits
- "Pr+" is not explained on the page
- The link in your first post of this thread still points to an obsolete page and is still pinned
- The video you refer to provides no means to understand current naming scheme
You can continue denying the evidence that this documentation is incomplete... but don't be surprised if one day you choke on your pride.