+1... generally new releases have different version numbers. I have never seen anyone release a new version (different build times, etc) with the same version numbers.you guys should re-name it to RC2 if there's a revision. I just re-downloaded it as the same file, same size, just different dates on it. I can't even tell what was changed from the Jan 2nd and the one released back in December
+2. Make better naming. RC2, RC3 etc....+1... generally new releases have different version numbers.you guys should re-name it to RC2 if there's a revision. I just re-downloaded it as the same file, same size, just different dates on it. I can't even tell what was changed from the Jan 2nd and the one released back in December
+1+2. Make better naming. RC2, RC3 etc....+1... generally new releases have different version numbers.you guys should re-name it to RC2 if there's a revision. I just re-downloaded it as the same file, same size, just different dates on it. I can't even tell what was changed from the Jan 2nd and the one released back in December
+4+2. Make better naming. RC2, RC3 etc....+1... generally new releases have different version numbers.you guys should re-name it to RC2 if there's a revision. I just re-downloaded it as the same file, same size, just different dates on it. I can't even tell what was changed from the Jan 2nd and the one released back in December
absolutely horrible. I have a PtP I just tested this on. It would link up for about 10-20 seconds, then stay registered, but the rates would drop to 6/162 and not pass any traffic until "-" I minus it off the Master forcing it to re-register, and the process repeats.
if you have any wireless or point-to-points, don't use this firmware!
we fixed this problem, you can redownload the v6.8rc1.Hey Uldis,
Could you take a look at: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=80421
So far every 6.8rc1 build since this year (starting from the 2-1-2014 build), give kernel panics.
Cannot create supouts sadly, because of the reboots the kernel panic issues, it keeps rebooting in a loop.
we fixed this problem, you can redownload the v6.8rc1.Hey Uldis,
Could you take a look at: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=80421
So far every 6.8rc1 build since this year (starting from the 2-1-2014 build), give kernel panics.
Cannot create supouts sadly, because of the reboots the kernel panic issues, it keeps rebooting in a loop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continual_ ... nt_processIf you changed something to fix it, shouldn't you really call that v6.8rc2 ? Sort of confusing when you change things or fix something and call it the same release.
Will this update include a fix for Ticket#2011122766000641, concerning packet loss if PPP packets arrive out of order?What's new in 6.8rc1 (2014-Jan-02 09:46):
*) improved speed of PPP, PPPoE, PPTP & L2TP on multicore routers
What's new in 6.8rc1 (2014-Jan-15 12:45):
On what type routerboard?The 15-01-2014 build fixes the kernel panics!
How do I obtain this?You Need to have "Development version testing" Access on main mikrotik.com page.
write to support@mikrotik.comHow do I obtain this?You Need to have "Development version testing" Access on main mikrotik.com page.
CCR1016-12GOn what type routerboard?The 15-01-2014 build fixes the kernel panics!
See aboveNormis, why Mikrotik don´t hear these requests?+5 for correct naming of builds. RC2... RC3... RC444
Add some sort of sequence number to your internal build names. Timestamp of when the build begins or revision number should work.Our system is built in a way, that we can change these numbers if we release these versions. Currently we don't release them, they are internal "patches" of previous builds. We would have to do something differently then. But as you know, these are unofficial internal releases anyway.
You can test the latest build and see:I reported a problem with Quickset crashing the router in 6.7. This problem was acknowledged by support and I was told MikroTik would try to fix it in the next release. The ticket is #2013120766000022
Will this be fixed in 6.8?
Did you contact support? Please tell me the ticket number and I will check what is wrong thereYou can see that support in recent times does not give advice.
What's new edition of the old mistakes.
Even I do not know it seems that the problem only on RB951G 6.8rc1 on the second router CRS125 all ok
And it seems with nv2 ping isnt jumping like before, now stable 3ms under 40/40mbit btest.mietus, some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.
mietus, some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.
Realy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .acmietus, some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.
Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .acmietus, some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.
Which one would you prefer ?Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .ac
Normis !!! Fantastic news!*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.Normis !!! Fantastic news!*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
You are working/improving NV2 protocol and wireless section!!!!!!!!!
Can you give us some more details of this change?
Improve throughput / latency? It solves some stalemate?
Can we try it? If so, where is the download link?
Lets make a poll ... I vote for WLC ..Which one would you prefer ?Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .ac
It is fix for this problemNormis !!! Fantastic news!*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
You are working/improving NV2 protocol and wireless section!!!!!!!!!
Can you give us some more details of this change?
Improve throughput / latency? It solves some stalemate?
Can we try it? If so, where is the download link?
I vote WLCWhich one would you prefer ?Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .ac
Yes, that is fixed in this release.It is fix for this problemNormis !!! Fantastic news!*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
You are working/improving NV2 protocol and wireless section!!!!!!!!!
Can you give us some more details of this change?
Improve throughput / latency? It solves some stalemate?
Can we try it? If so, where is the download link?
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... nv2+lockup
I vote for WLC!Which one would you prefer ?Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .ac
eh.. look a bit above from your postsDid anyone noticed that latest mipsbe .npk file is bigger?
11.6MB instead of usual 9.8MB.
I'm very curious what made such difference.
Regards,
+1I vote WLCWhich one would you prefer ?Or finishing off Wireless ControllerRealy good news! You've to clean code while integrating .ac
Nice what script do you use? It seems that we can on MUM enjoy the new AC Goodiesjan/02/1970 01:00:12 system,info installed routeros-mipsbe-6.8rc1
jan/02/1970 01:00:15 script,warning defconf: penta chains are only for 'ac' boards
none, just upraded 911G boardNice what script do you use? It seems that we can on MUM enjoy the new AC Goodiesjan/02/1970 01:00:12 system,info installed routeros-mipsbe-6.8rc1
jan/02/1970 01:00:15 script,warning defconf: penta chains are only for 'ac' boards
Please tell us exactly what happens to the wireless interface - you couln't see it form the clients device, or no traffic was going? Disabling/enabling the wireless card didn't help?After one day of action rb951g hung wifi card.
routeros-mipsbe-6.8rc1 was updated at 2014-01-24 14:30
After restarting the communication device has been restored.
I want to know the same thing.Any news about IGMP proxy bugs?
MT, please do the same for bonding =)fixed bridge mac address changing when port (with lowest mac address) goes down
6.8rc1 is no release SW. Hope this is fixed for the release.Hello all,
despite that NV2 was fixed in 6.8rc1, i would not recommend to use this release with SXT 5nd r2, because ether1 port flapping issue.
Please clarify what port flapping issue you mean, include your ticket number so I can check status. ThanksHello all,
despite that NV2 was fixed in 6.8rc1, i would not recommend to use this release with SXT 5nd r2, because ether1 port flapping issue.
labdien braliukaiPlease clarify what port flapping issue you mean, include your ticket number so I can check status. ThanksHello all,
despite that NV2 was fixed in 6.8rc1, i would not recommend to use this release with SXT 5nd r2, because ether1 port flapping issue.
what does the wireless,debug log say on both CPE and AP side when not connecting?SXT Lite 5ND r2 does not connect to acces point
SXT stops scanning on channel access point and stop, but not connecting
Disable, enable wlan1 solves the problem but not always
I checked various channel symptom of the same.
what does the wireless,debug log say on both CPE and AP side when not connecting?SXT Lite 5ND r2 does not connect to acces point
SXT stops scanning on channel access point and stop, but not connecting
Disable, enable wlan1 solves the problem but not always
I checked various channel symptom of the same.
Symptom has already performed at several sxt connected to different acces pointThis is just Info log, please enable also Debug log (in system logging, add new topic with "wireless" and "debug")
Does this happen only one SXT lite, or also on other devices connected to the same AP?
In V6.8 works fine. I tried BW test (10/10) 1minute. No crashaffected CPE SXT (6. still crashing under load (10/10Mbit udp btest) after 10s
Seems hw fault, because other devices works as expected.In V6.8 works fine. I tried BW test (10/10) 1minute. No crashaffected CPE SXT (6. still crashing under load (10/10Mbit udp btest) after 10s
i confirm that dial on demand dose not workDial on demand does not work on the RC that was released briefly this morning. A L2TP (and sstp) client that worked in previous releases (6.6 and earlier including 5.x) would not start. The interface did work if dial on demand was deactivated and was started manually.
What type of device you have? what features do you use?is it just me or 6.8 x86 using more ram then 6.7?
it doubled the used ram
this is a user forum, please send the files to support@mikrotik.comfresh start sup attach
this is a user forum, please send the files to support@mikrotik.comfresh start sup attach