Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
Ultanium
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Multiboard NStream2?

Wed May 17, 2006 2:47 am

I have 4 routerboards, 4 SR5 cards, and 4 dish antennas. Rather than putting two cards on one routerboard for NStream2 (taxing the CPU), can I do this full duplex setup?

rb532 #1 Tx >-------->-------> Rx rb532 #2

rb532 #3 Rx <--------<-------< Tx rb532 #4

Tom
 
durim
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:25 pm

Wed May 17, 2006 3:09 pm

I am not sure if this can be done perhaps bonding could help I am not sure so somebody can tell if this posible or not
 
ucheonyeaka
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Nigeria
Contact:

Wed May 17, 2006 5:39 pm

I have not tried this before but looks interesting.

We implimented Nstreme dual using 2 RB532, 4 SR5 cards and 4 19db Flat panel antennas. Works grate depending on the traffic you intend to push through!



Regards,
Uche
 
Gradius
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Wed May 17, 2006 7:26 pm

Using 1 set of equipment ( 2 RB532, 4 SR5, 2 Antennas ) will be fine unless you are wanting to use this for a high bandwidth backhaul. In my experience, with the CPUs on the RB532 you can only push 30Mbit max using Nstreme2.

I've often thought about doing what you suggested and using 2 set of equipment. Theoretically it should work perfect but the only negative thing about this would be the extra cost of equipment. If you do try it and get it working, please post your results. I'm sure there are lot of people eager to see them.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 26912
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: Multiboard NStream2?

Thu May 18, 2006 9:59 am

you need two more devices:
                        | rb532 #1 Tx ------ Rx rb532 #2 |
Router#0 -->>--|                                               |--->  Router#5
                        | rb532 #3 Rx ------ Tx rb532 #4 |
and then this would be Eugene's famous 400Mbit setup. See wiki (MUM Europe)
 
User avatar
kalviz
newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:02 pm

Thu May 18, 2006 10:42 am

Normis, can you give more details about Eugene's setup? Did he bond 2 ethernet interfaces (one to RB#1, second to RB#2)?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 26912
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Thu May 18, 2006 10:48 am

no, he used firewall to do per-packet load balancing. each packet was sent to another interface. eugene has been asked to post the details setup, but he always forgets to do this
 
andreacoppini
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Malta, Europe

Thu May 18, 2006 6:14 pm

no, he used firewall to do per-packet load balancing. each packet was sent to another interface. eugene has been asked to post the details setup, but he always forgets to do this
Bah... Latvian vodka, always has the same effect... 8)
 
User avatar
Ultanium
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Sun May 21, 2006 3:11 am

Thanks Normis, just read through the super wireless test. I hope we can pursuade Eugene to post more details on this setup, this is exactly what I want to do!

Tom
 
oriondotnet
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:27 pm

Sun May 21, 2006 6:15 am

YES...

We need sample configuration please....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jaclaz, vsvetinsky and 19 guests